Comments by "Adi Adindas" (@adiadindas) on "EU Debates | eudebates.tv" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. Yep time is running out for ROI and the EU. For the UK, it is a very simple decision. No deal is by far much better rather than to sign the level playing field with ECJ role in it, to allow the EU vessels to plunder the UK water, to allow some part of the country to be controlled by the EU. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to sign such agreement why would the UK? Good to see ROI is getting scared now. That is the price to pay for ROI (Under Varadkar and Coveney) to stab the UK from back . Irish hard border. In No deal Brexit let the order ROI to put a hard border or exit the EU. The UK has mentioned from the beginning it will not put a hard border but if the EU wanted to put a hard border let them do that. All the UK needs is to sit down nicely and see ROI and the EU to tear apart each other or ROI to exit the EU. The EU has thrown Ireland under the bus blame that to Varadkar and Coveney who stab the UK from the back when the negotiationw as under TM. ROI near the top two contributors with EUR 16 bil net equate to Eur3200 PER CAPITA. Twice the amount the German would pay. Now all EU countries betray Ireland again by refusing to approve a much-needed funding to mitigate the impact on no deal brexit. https://financial-press.uk/2020/10/08/brexit-news-ireland-has-more-to-lose-than-any-other-country-taoiseach-martin-warned-politics-news/ In addtion the UK might block their access to use UK ports. 85% of their import export depend on the UK port. Reality Check: The Brexit challenge for Irish trade https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44657460
    2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. It seems there are a lot of misleading information here thinking that they are smart that they could fool the British people. Mind you the British voters are not stupid as you could see the result of the recent GE. What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35.  @Innoruuk  About the Irish border in no deal brexit, the UK card is simple, let the EU to ORDER ROI to put a hard border or to exit the EU. The UK has mentioned from the beginning it will not put a hard border but if the EU wanted to put a hard border let them do that. All the UK needs is to sit down nicely and see ROI and the EU to tear apart each other or ROI to exit the EU. Is it what the EU wants then go ahead. It will be the show of the century to watch. https://financial-press.uk/2020/10/08/brexit-news-ireland-has-more-to-lose-than-any-other-country-taoiseach-martin-warned-politics-news/ What Ireland will be doing if UK block their access to use UK ports for the price to pay for Ireland (Under Varadkar and Coveney) stabbing the UK from the back, considering 85% of their import export depend on the UK port. Reality Check: The Brexit challenge for Irish trade https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44657460 Ray Bassett Ireland’s former ambassador to Canada, Jamaica and the Bahamas has described the attitude of Foreign Minister Simon Coveney (and Varadakr) towards brexit is “a good example of Stockholm syndrome”. They are sympathising their abuser, their captors. The EU has thrown Ireland under the bus. ROI near the top two contributors with EUR 16 bil net equate to Eur3200 per capita. Twice the amount the German would pay. Now all EU countries betray Ireland again by refusing to approve and allocate a much-needed funding to mitigate the impact on no deal brexit to Ireland.
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45.  @stevenp6761  Utter tosh what the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services, qualifications acknoeldgemtn in reciprocal ground is good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule, qualifications of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    1
  46. 1
  47.  @stevenp6761  What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1