Comments by "American Dissident" (@americandissident9062) on "GriffinMind"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:02 I get what you’re saying here bro, but women can’t really get much more selective. It’s already gotten to the point that literally only a 7/10 looking Chad is even allowed to speak to a 5/10 looking woman or higher. If a man isn’t at least a 7 in looks and 32 years old or younger, he has no shot. Then once he gets past that, he’s got to have a bunch of money, a high level vehicle, a high end place to live in a cool locale, his body has to have an athletic build, he’s got to have an undergrad degree already, and he’s got to have some super interesting career (not job, career), and a cool hobby or two that he’s already good at. And even with all that, he’s got to have the personality to keep the girl entertained all the time, and be good at sex.
Almost none of us have every one of those things. I just named 11 things. I personally have 6 of those things myself with 1 more soon, and I would have no chance in today’s dating market.
1
-
1:59 This is why the 1-10 scale is actually a 1-9 scale, which fits perfectly because that means that the mean, median, and most likely the mode will all be 5. That also allows us to eliminate decimals. When asked for ratings, a lot of people with give a number and then focus on trying to place a decimal, like they’re giving a little bit more to the person as charity or something. There is no 6.7 or 8.5 or 4.3. It’s just a 1-10 whole number scale where no one is perfect, and the average is a 5, and normies exist in the 4-6 range, uglies exist in 1-3, and the beautiful people live in the 7-9 range. It also lines up well with the normally distributed bell curve, which says that approximately 68% of people will fall somewhere between 4-6.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1