Youtube comments of skyesfury (@skyesfury8511).

  1. 1300
  2. 374
  3. 374
  4. 367
  5. 338
  6. 316
  7. 304
  8. 262
  9. 257
  10. 255
  11. 246
  12. 203
  13. 195
  14. 189
  15. 184
  16. 151
  17. 145
  18. 144
  19. 139
  20. 136
  21. 133
  22. 125
  23. 123
  24. 118
  25. 115
  26. 115
  27. 109
  28. 107
  29. 104
  30. 101
  31. 101
  32. 99
  33. 95
  34. 90
  35. 88
  36. 85
  37. 82
  38. 81
  39. 80
  40. 79
  41. 78
  42. 77
  43. 76
  44. 73
  45. 73
  46. 68
  47. 65
  48. 64
  49. 63
  50. 62
  51. 57
  52. 53
  53. 53
  54. 49
  55. 47
  56. 45
  57. 43
  58. 43
  59. 43
  60. 42
  61. 41
  62. 37
  63. 37
  64. 36
  65. 36
  66. 36
  67. 34
  68. 34
  69. 34
  70. 33
  71. 32
  72. 31
  73. 30
  74. 30
  75. 29
  76. 28
  77. 28
  78. 28
  79. 27
  80. 26
  81. 26
  82. 26
  83. 25
  84. 25
  85. 25
  86. 25
  87. 25
  88. 24
  89. 24
  90. 23
  91. 22
  92. 22
  93. 21
  94. 20
  95. 20
  96. 20
  97. 20
  98. 20
  99. 19
  100. 19
  101. 19
  102. 18
  103. 18
  104. 18
  105. 18
  106. 17
  107. 17
  108. 17
  109. 17
  110. 17
  111. 16
  112. 16
  113. 16
  114. 16
  115. 16
  116. 15
  117. 15
  118. 15
  119. 15
  120. 15
  121. 15
  122. 15
  123. 15
  124. 15
  125. 15
  126. 15
  127. 15
  128. 15
  129. 13
  130. 13
  131. 13
  132. 13
  133. 13
  134. 13
  135. 13
  136. 13
  137. 12
  138. 12
  139. 12
  140. 12
  141. 12
  142. 12
  143. 12
  144. 12
  145. 12
  146. 12
  147. 11
  148. 11
  149. 11
  150. 11
  151. 11
  152. 11
  153. 11
  154. 11
  155. 11
  156. 11
  157. 11
  158. 11
  159. 10
  160. 10
  161. 10
  162. 10
  163. 10
  164. 10
  165. 10
  166. 10
  167. 10
  168. 10
  169. 10
  170. 9
  171. 9
  172. 9
  173. 9
  174. 9
  175. 9
  176. 9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 9
  180. 9
  181. 9
  182. 9
  183. 9
  184. 9
  185. 8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191. 8
  192. 8
  193. 8
  194. 8
  195. 8
  196. 8
  197. 8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. 8
  202. 8
  203. 8
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 8
  207. 8
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 6
  240. 6
  241. 6
  242. 6
  243. 6
  244. 6
  245. 6
  246. 6
  247. 6
  248. 6
  249. 6
  250. 6
  251. 6
  252. 6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. 4
  315. 4
  316. 4
  317. 4
  318. 4
  319. 4
  320. 4
  321. 4
  322. 4
  323. 4
  324. 4
  325. 4
  326. 4
  327. 4
  328. 4
  329. 4
  330. 4
  331. 4
  332. 4
  333. 4
  334. 4
  335. 4
  336. 4
  337. 4
  338. 4
  339. 4
  340. 4
  341. 4
  342. 4
  343. 4
  344. 4
  345. 4
  346. 4
  347. 4
  348. 4
  349. 4
  350. 4
  351. 4
  352. 4
  353. 4
  354. 4
  355. 4
  356. 4
  357. 4
  358. 4
  359. 4
  360. 4
  361. 4
  362.  @Tal__  "your clever remark about 'cancerphobia' shows just how removed conservatives are from logic and understanding of the issues they talk about" Says the guy who made a definition for a word, and by that very same definition you made up, literally no one is a transphobe. And you think you have any ground to accuse others of being removed from logic and understanding? You are the textbook definition of an idiot. "I never advocated for calling trans women penisphobes for removing their penises, did I." No, you just compared gender dysphoria to a medical illness that can result in permanent injury if not treated. What was that you said about being removed from logic and understanding? "I would say it is stupid if people accused recovered cancer patients of mutilating themselves and being delusional for thinking they are people who don't have cancer, when their chromosomes say they should have cancer." This doesn't follow the logic of anything anyone has said here, including yourself. You can't even follow your own logic. "I might call them cancer-patient-phobic if they tried to keep them away from children or out of the military." Which just shows that you didn't understand the point I made. Not surprising, though. You're detached from reality in pretty much every way. Even to the point of making up definitions. Definitions that apply to literally no one. "Tonsillitis is comparable to g-d, since they are both health problems that can be treated effectively with surgery" Meanwhile, in the real world, studies are showing more and more that even surgery is not helping people with gender dysphoria. It's almost like you don't even know about the topic you're virtue signaling over. "Like tonsillitis is a physical health problem that causes illness, g-d is a mental health problem that causes m-i such as depression and anxiety." Apparently you have spellingphobia since you clearly have an irrational fear of spelling out words like "gender dysphoria" and ..... whatever the hell "m-i" is supposed to be. Maybe it's meant to be "mental illness"? Not sure why you're scared of spelling words out. And if that sounds dumb, it's because it is. Because "spellingphobia" is as real as "transphobia", especially by the definition you've made up.
    4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. 3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393. 3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. 3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. 3
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 3
  426. 3
  427.  @memb.  "Damn, you have a talent for not explaing things well, sometimes in a roundabout and/or condecending way. " I tend to become rather condescending toward people who show an intentional desire to remain stupid. As for not explaining things well, yea, lifelong problem. Made even more frustrating when trying to explain something that should be obvious to anyone who's brain is not in a vegetative state. Imagine trying to explain 2x2=4 to someone that's looking at four oranges on a table and they still aren't getting it. Eventually you get frustrated and start being snarky and condescending. Now imagine dealing with people like that for several years across multiple topics. It jades you after a while. The laws have been in place for so long that payment processors and financial institutions know what they can and cannot do. They know the loopholes, the tricks, the red flags, etc. They've got so many lines of fine print that it's next to impossible for them to ever end up in court. Unless it's something like what MC is currently in court for (basically scamming their customers, to put it very simply). Because I'm bored.... Take the fringe case numbnoodle gave earlier of the 18 content creator. If someone facilitated a transaction between her and someone in a country where 18 is too young, the payment processor would not be the one facing court time. They would assist the authorities in figuring out who in their company assisted with a transaction that would normally be automatically blocked in the system. That individual (or individuals) would be charged, not the company. Because the company is going to have redundant checks in place to prevent such illegal transactions, which means it had to be done manually. Anyway, bored of this topic. Have fun, peeps.
    3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. 3
  431. 3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435.  @Tal__  "I have made my arguments for the meaning of 'phobia' nobody has effectively countered them." Translation: I don't like the answers therefore I pretend they don't exist. Regardless of whether you like the answers or not, using your own definition means that literally no one is transphobic. "I don't think there is much point in this semantics debate anyway." So you make up definitions for make-believe words, and you also clearly make up definitions for real words. Because there haven't been any semantic arguments made thus far. "I doubt you would disagree there is widespread revulsion towards trans people." Why would I agree with a blatantly false statement? There is dislike, yes. Revulsion, no. There is disdain for the people shoving their beliefs in the world's face, but not revulsion of what they think of themselves. The basis for your entire argument is based on a strawman. "Several here have explicitly expressed disgust towards transgenderism." To someone who has based their entire flawed argument on a strawman, there's no chance of you understanding why you're wrong about the focus of their disgust. "The contention here is it's rationality and you are yet to present reason for feeling This way towards transgenderism." You don't know what I think of transgenders. Because I have neither said nor implied what my feelings about it are. I have focused 100% on what YOU have said and used your own words and strawman against you. But again, until you abandon the strawman your entire argument is based upon, there is no possibility of you understanding what everyone here has said to you. Bottom line: Neither by your definition, nor any definition, of "transphobia" does anyone exist who is "transphobic". No one is afraid of transgender people for them being transgender. No one finds them irrationally revolting. Until you understand this you cannot hope to understand the issue.
    3
  436. 3
  437. 3
  438. 3
  439. 3
  440. 3
  441. 3
  442. 3
  443. 3
  444. 3
  445. 3
  446. 3
  447. 3
  448. 3
  449. 3
  450. 3
  451. 3
  452. 3
  453. 3
  454. 3
  455. 3
  456. 3
  457. 3
  458. 3
  459. 3
  460. 3
  461. 3
  462. 3
  463. 3
  464. 3
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 20 years ago, I would have been good at souls-like games. And at that time I would have been in the "git gud" camp, telling people who can't beat souls-like games that they suck. But this isn't 20 years ago. My reflexes, reaction times, and pattern recognition for attacks are not as good as they once were. Which means I'm excluded from being able to enjoy souls-like games for no other reason than "time and age suck". That's not cool. I don't want the core of souls-like games to go away. But I do want to enjoy them. Which means I support having an Easy setting for the games. I'm currently working my way through EDF5 on Hard. Some missions are difficult even on that setting. And after I complete the missions on Hard, I'll be working on Hardest and Inferno. So it's not a case of me not wanting to play games on the higher difficulties. I despise game "journalists". They aren't gamers. And the fact they're asking for an easy mode/setting really irritates the crap out of me. They're asking for that because they're not gamers, because they suck at gaming in general. They have no interest in the game beyond writing that hit piece article about how -ist/phobic the game is, but they have to play some of it so they can claim "see! i r plaeyd da gaem!" I'm asking for an Easy setting so I can actually enjoy the game and turn the difficulty up when I feel ready for it. I don't want to resort to WeMod to play a game. And if I feel like that's the only way I'll be able to play it (as is the case with souls-like games), I just won't spend my money on them. Despite wanting to.
    2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674.  @joshfrench5858  "it’s spreading false information which is causing the spread of the virus because some people only care about them selves." Incorrect. 1 - It's not false info. They have evidence, data, and statistics to back up what they say. If you look into what you're calling "false information" you'll see this. 2 - Pushing the narrative that masks are preventing the spread is blatantly false and can be seen easily. All the areas where the protests were happening have seen a massive spike in new cases. The majority of people in those protests were wearing masks. The proof is in broad daylight, their own stories, that the narrative is false. "besides I thought this virus was a hoax just do some research" Where did I say the virus is a hoax? Are you so far gone into your brainwashing that you're incapable of not thinking that about someone who doesn't march in lockstep to the narrative? I don't believe the virus is a hoax. I'm questioning the narrative being pushed around the virus. "Oh it will disappear in the April sun just do some research." 1 - It's been proven by multiple doctors that sunlight does shorten the virus's life. 2 - Take your own advice and do some research. "Or are you making more wild baseless claims?" You mean like accusing others of thinking it's a hoax? Or dismissing multiple doctors confirming that sunlight does shorten the life span of the virus? You also implied that anyone said the April sun will make the virus disappear. No one has ever said that or anything like that. Well, people making baseless accusations have said it, but no one has made that claim legitimately. But really, Josh, take your own advice. Do some research. Though I expect you to make more baseless accusations instead.
    2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. janissaryfilms *Even the first chapter of my freshman year entry-level English class covered logical fallacies. Any undergrad can tell you that.* Freshman orientation is not English.  Logical fallacies are not taught in English classes.  Anyone who's actually been to college or university knows this. *You equate the possibility of Bernie's relatively good press being attributed to his success to the possibility of a 20km meteor hitting earth.* You're not helping your case with comments like this.  I used an extreme example of something that's in the realm of possibility to point out that anything is possible, but that it's not probable.  It's a very simple concept to understand... *Obviously, that was a joke* ...and you failed to understand it. *but you didn't provide any real grounds for that argument and it just sounded like you were just spewing hate.* REALLY failed to understand it. *It just makes your argument less effective than pointing out the actual flaws with Bernie Sanders as a candidate.* Since I wasn't talking about Bernie, but rather how the media has been handling him, I can't possibly imagine why I wouldn't be talking about Bernie's flaws. This is some hardcore fail on your part, sir.  You think a subject that as nothing to do with English is taught in English classes, don't understand basic concept of using the absurd to point out the absurd, and failed to notice I was specifically talking about the media's treatment of Bernie, not Bernie or his flaws. If you can give a good answer to this next question, I'll be happy to continue this discussion with you.  Yes, I'm the one who will decide if it's good or not. Why should I keep having a conversation with someone who can't get three extremely simple things right?
    1
  753. 1
  754. janissaryfilms *This site is used by thousands of English students and professors including my own.* Used by a professor and taught in a class are not the same thing.  You're actually using a fallacy to argue that logical fallacy is being taught in English class.  Conflation.  The treatment of two different concepts as one.  English professors use a lot of resources, but not everything they use is taught in their English classes.  The fact you're unable to see this just further illustrates the already obvious ignorance you have about this. *You say I'm displaying ignorance when all of my comments have been backed with facts or evidence.* You haven't backed anything with facts.  You've made wild assertions and used fallacies to make those assertions.  It's actually rather hilarious that you're making this claim of using facts while blatantly using fallacies, that you claim to have learned about in your English class.  In fact, your use of fallacies to claim these assertions are correct in itself proves you have not been taught what fallacies are, thus proving you were not taught them in English class. *I can see you're just like most YouTube commenters and will stand by your opinion even if it's wrong.* Says the guy who has been proven wrong repeatedly and keeps doubling down on bullshit assertions while using fallacies to back up his assertions.  Dance, puppet! *I'm showing you proof right now. If you fail to see that you're only proving your own ignorance* You've shown you don't know what you're talking about.  Repeatedly.  And you've shown you use fallacies to claim your assertions are correct, without even knowing you're using a fallacy. I'm not being paid to teach children about logical fallacies and how the world works.  That's what people like your English professors are supposed to do.  Either you slept through their classes or you have not actually been in any of those classes.  I don't need to throw my university education around to prove my point, which is what you have done.  I can simply rely on reality to prove it.  Hop along down to your local college and talk to any English professor there, ask them if they teach logical fallacies in English classes.  We both know you won't do this, but I can tell you their answer - No, we do not.  Because topics that are not related to the English curriculum are not taught in English classes. Now you have successfully derailed this comment thread with laughable assertions about English classes while using logical fallacies that you claim you were taught, but clearly were not, in those English classes.  So congrats, sir.  Have a nice life.
    1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. I looked through the list of mods on that google doc and, there's really no way to say this without sounding harsh and mean... None of those mods or authors will be missed. I'm not seeing big names on there and I'm not seeing big mods (and that includes dependency considerations). Some of the authors are just outright deleting their Nexus account. I'm a huge fan of mods and I have a lot of respect for mod authors. Right up until they start behaving like children. Look, Bethesda and other dev studios have been stealing ideas from the modding community for years (and when called on it they say "we toss around ideas but don't implement everything we talk about" to justify their stealing). THAT I can understand being upset over. But if you think Bethesda net isn't archiving your mod(s) when you upload it, I've got some beachfront property in North Dakota you're gonna love. The way Nexus handled this was bad. No other way to say it. Apparently they have plans for a more robust functionality to replace what they're currently using. Assuming this is true, they should have waited until it was ready to push before saying anything or doing anything with the live site. They didn't. And it's caused unnecessary drama that wouldn't have happened otherwise. Add to that the poorly thought out action they went with. They should have posted an announcement with what they want to do and gotten feedback to help refine it, WITHOUT changing any policy until the new system is ready. I've been a big fan of Nexus for almost a decade now. But they bungled this horribly. There's so many fragile egos in the mod author ranks. It doesn't take much to make some of them overreact. Which is what we're seeing with some of them outright deleting their accounts. Imagine if Chesko (Frostfall mod) had straight up deleted his account during the Paid Mod DLC drama. The work mod authors do is theirs (short of stealing from others). If a mod author deletes their work that breaks hundreds of other mods, then that mod author is a piece of sh!t. They lose the privilege (it's not a right) to complain about someone posting modified code to un-break the mods. Bottom line, though... Nexus screwed up. Some mod authors need to grow up and/or lose their ego (your mods aren't that great anyway). To the authors that have expressed rightful concern while still caring for your creations, thank you and know that you're not alone in your concerns.
    1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. ​ @Jupa  "I think you're the one embarrasing yourself, dude." You're certainly free to be wrong. "What I see is someone explaining a case" Really? Who would that be? It can't be the person that keeps saying payment processors and financial institutions are scared of legal consequences. Because everything about that claim is based on knowing nothing about the topic. "and you're seemingly latching onto the same point in different words." Then you're not paying attention. I have said from the start that payment processors and financial institutions are not scared or worried about legal issues in regards to OF because the laws have been in effect for many, many years. If that isn't what you read, then you're not reading what I wrote. The other guy is saying "nu uh! they scared of legal action!" And again, if that's not what you read, then you're not reading what he wrote. It was not until near the end that he said that they're worried about financial repercussions. And then he turned around and made one of the dumbest comments I've seen on YouTube in my almost 15 years being on this platform: That there cannot be financial loss if not caused by legal consequences. Again, if that that's not what you read, then you are not reading what he wrote. "And the fact that you're insisting 'dude just stop you dont know what you're talking about'/'in one sentence you've proved me right now stfu' it looks like you're the one being intellectually dishonest im afraid." Then you don't know what intellectual dishonesty is. No reason to even address anything past your first paragraph. You're clearly not reading what either of us have written so anything you have to contribute will be based on lack of understanding of the conversation. Or, if you prefer, "intellectual dishonesty".
    1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. @Red Blue "Feminism is about gender equality not empowering women" There's actually people that still believe this hogshet? This has been debunked so many times and so many ways that even the hardcore feminists stopped saying it. "it’s something my generation often forgets" Once a lie is proven is to be a lie, it is generally "forgotten" by the people pushing said lie. Or more accurately, they move on to another lie. "feminists have achieved human rights not just for women but also men" The list of things feminists claim credit for is extensive, and thoroughly debunked. But we could all use a good laugh. What has feminism achieved for men? Other than shutting down events that are trying to bring awareness to men's issues and belittling men, I mean. "so many feminists on tiktok think feminism is all about women and I hate that because that shows they never educated themselves on the history of feminism" It's literally in the name. Nothing wrong with a movement being for and about women. Again, it is LITERALLY in the NAME. But the part where you claim they aren't educated about feminism... They are more educated about it than you. You don't even know what the White Feather Movement was. That happened during the era where women (more accurately, feminist women) were demanding the right to vote (something they already had as much as men did, meaning not every citizen was allowed to vote, regardless of male or female). Additionally, not every woman wanted that, but feminists won't mention that part because any woman who doesn't frogmarch along with the feminist ideology was considered persona non grata (a practice that continues even today). You are not educated on feminism. You are brainwashed by it. You regurgitated the most debunked aspect of it right out of the gate. I would encourage you to actually educate yourself about it, but I highly doubt you would, especially if I gave you places to start (you would start using the typical feminism damning-words of "misogynist" and "sexist" and the like). I've been learning about it for over ten years. Learning things about it that isn't taught in feminist circles, learning things about it that feminists want to distance themselves from (although not actually denounce, meaning they are fine with it, but know it exposes what they are). You have a long way to go before you can claim to be educated about feminism. Everyone who has educated themselves about feminism has subsequently rejected feminism. Brainwashed is not educated.
    1
  1738. @Red Blue YouTube likes to shadowban comments with certain words. It's aggravating AF cuz it kills any attempt at actual conversation. In regards to redefining "forced sex", everything I could find is littered with the typical buzzwords of patriarchy, white supremacy, misogyny, etc. In other words, across four pages of google search results, not a single trustworthy article. One name kept showing up, though. Estelle Freedman. A rabid first wave feminist whose papers held the bulk of the buzzwords. She had zero interest in equal rights, she was one of the original icons of the typical feminist misandry. The lack of trustworthy information is something you become accustomed to when searching for the history of stuff like this. Google heavily pushes the feminist agenda so finding any factual info that isn't heavily biased to paint misandrists as pillars of virtue is like finding a needle in a planet-sized haystack. It would probably take me days to find who was actually behind getting the legal definition changed. I'm really not feeling that devoted to it. So for this one I'll say "You might be right, but I doubt it was feminists based primarily on their history". In regards to which parts of feminism have been debunked, I'd refer you to Prof Christina Hoff Sommers, Sargon of Akkad, Computing Forever/Dave Cullen (if you can find any of his older videos after YouTube purged him cuz he dared to call feminists, and others) out on their BS). Though come to think of it, most of the older vids might not even be accessible anymore. Furher Susan has purged YouTube of a lot of the content debunking her precious religion of feminism (which is how they treat it, not that it's an actual religion). Like yourself, I appreciate the improvements to our world that women have brought us. The problem is a lot of improvements are falsely attributed to women to push a narrative. Giving women credit for inventing something when what they actually did was improve an already existing design. This dishonesty is something common in the feminist agenda. Instead of celebrating what these women actually did, they try to steal credit for what the men before them did. Which diminishes the actual importance of what the women did, implying that their improvements are not worthy of mention or respect. And oddly, Marie Curie is almost never mentioned among the list of lauded female pioneers of science, even though she made probably the biggest contributions to science out of all the women on the list. Guess radiation research isn't important when you have an agenda to push. I want to finish this comment with saying I appreciate your civility. It's certainly not something seen very often. From either side. Many of us that have been in this debate for years have become jaded and bitter cuz we're tired of the same debunked nonsense being regurgitated and hearing that men aren't allowed to have an opinion on topics about women while those same women won't STFU about topics about men. So if I sound bitter, there's a reason why.
    1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. With the number of accusations coming out, I'm finding it harder and harder to believe any of them. With the number of agencies, organizations, lawyers, and laws in place that handle and deal with harassment of all kinds (most of them let you report without giving any personal or identifying info about yourself to prevent possible employment issues), it beggars belief that there could such a monumental, out of control, epidemic of harassment at any company/corporation on American soil. Add to the above the type of people that Blizz has been hiring and staffing their company with for the past decade. SJWs, Wokists, the perpetually and permanently offended. People who believe, wholeheartedly, that words are literal violence. People who believe that not using proper pronowns* is literally assault. People who think that America is literally a rassisist nation. People who literally believe that wite privluj* is real. People who believe that a man sitting with his legs not pressed together is literally seksual harasmunt*. And so many other insane beliefs. They report people on social media for harasmunt* and bigutree* for simply not agreeing with them. You'll have to understand that it's hard to take this deluge of accusations seriously when you consider the source of the accusations. Which is extremely unfortunate since I believe there are legitimate accusations somewhere in this sea of victim olympics. The real victims are not going to see justice because of all the fake victims. *misspellings intentional because YT likes to shadoeban comments with certain words
    1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1