Comments by "Jim Mcneal" (@jimmcneal5292) on "The MORBID Truth About The EVIL Economics Of OnlyFans" video.

  1. I disagree. 80%(or more) of men can't become attractive enough to make women really like them, and no amount of masculinity or achievements will create enough halo effect to make them appealing. Those 80% will NEVER get a genuine sexual interest from an opposite sex, and it always was a thing. Let's talk about "traditional"(it's not traditional AT ALL actually) society structure of 50's in america. Most guys work and end up married. Families seem relatively stable with strong bond in couples. But wait a minute, if 80%(or more) of guys are unattractive(and don't make women go "wow"), how families are stable, why don't women just leave? Because of respect. The thing holding most husband and wives together was not passion, but societal norms and respect. Now answer the question, do you, the reader of this comment, want to have relationship a girl who is not aroused by you, and only is with you because she respects you and doesn't want to be alone? When you're in bed she either fakes orgasms or imagines the Chad in your place. I don't. I would rather be alone than date a girl who is not aroused by me. And let girls all date those 20%. Onlyfans is actually amazing, because it lets women make some additional money. The only thing left is to normalize dating OF models and one guy dating several girl, and we've got polygynyous families!(which actually are traditional) "But how can OF be normalized, it's s*x work?" First thing to remember is that OF doesn't inherently mean having sexual contacts with men. But let's accept such classification, and consider it a s*x work. So what? Ask yourself, who would you prefer to date, 1)"traditional" girl without onlyfans, but who previously had s*xual contact with man, or 2)OF model who never have been with a man? Does those pics matter that much? Or may be it's number of men she's been with before you that does?
    3
  2. +
    1