Comments by "Jim Mcneal" (@jimmcneal5292) on "How to stop the Blitzkrieg" video.

 @kylehousel3020 in terms of scale allies did it more
6
@kylehousel3020 the problem is that you can't always know for sure if you can finish it
2
@kylehousel3020 They could win, their problem is that they have surrendered too early in ww1 plus make some mistakes(like committing to offensive operations on the western front, should have built trenches instead)
2
 @alexeyamosov664 danzig too
1
@TheArklyte If they took Moscow it would have created problems with connecting factories in Urals and ports by which lend lease came. Plus Germany would have won the Kursk battle and most likely stabilized the front at the east. And it's just the most direct consequences of mister H not intervening. Maybe Germany would have started mobilizing economy earlier than in 1942, and that would make it possible to break USSR. Then they would have status quo'd the allies
1
@pyotrbagration2438 wtf is "austrian interference"?
1
@pyotrbagration2438 ah, I see. Well, I disagree, I think victory in France was achieved due to bad state of french military and good field commanders of the germany
1
 @spinosaurusiii7027 germans ran into a wall in winter 1941, mostly because of lack of equipment compared to USSR and the extended supply lines. And defeat in Kursk was entirely Hitler's fault
1