Comments by "Adi Adindas" (@adiadindas) on "Michel Barnier eudebates BREXIT with IIEA-Ireland’s leading EU u0026 International Affairs think tank" video.

  1. There are a lot of misleading information from the discussion on this channel thinking that they are smart that they could fool the British people. Mind you the British voters are not stupid as you could see the result of the recent GE. What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    1