Comments by "Adi Adindas" (@adiadindas) on "Brexit: UK does not trust EU’s ‘good faith’. Britain breaks rules on Brexit talks" video.

  1. From the beginning the EU has been negotiating like Mafi@. They are not negotiating but making the demand. It is started by dictating negotiation order. So, What rule has been breached, mafi@ rule of negotiation ?? Glad the UK has done that.
    2
  2.  M. Olsen.  "They just try to save you from ruin" My dear the nicest wording I have ever heard in my ear the same thing with the way Barmier hypocrisy defining the EU flexibility. If a person keeps saying we do not want you we donot want an extension and you keep asking for it that is begging. All the EU want is to make sure is the UK will not prosper outside the EU to deter other EU countries from leaving. When that time has come and the UK prosper outside the EU that will be the end of the EU.
    2
  3. EU nightmare. UK prospers utside the EU, that will be the end of teh EU. Looking forward on that day.
    2
  4. It seems there are a lot of misleading information here thinking that they are smart that they could fool the British people. Mind you the British voters are not stupid as you could see the result of the recent GE. What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    2
  5.  M. Olsen.  Another stupid remark from the same person. Superpower ehh where they rely on NATO to protect them. Tell that to the former eastern block country choose either NATO or the EU ! The minute you tell them the minute they will tell you they will choose NATO. Meeting the standard does not mean following the whole rule. You will have to meet the standard of any country if you want to trade not just the EU but any single country even the least developing country. But it is entirely different with following the rule. If the EU say “Jump” in order to sell in the EU, did any other county would follow that.
    2
  6.  M. Olsen.  Dod not you know that the EU trade surplus with the UK is £80bil
    2
  7.  M. Olsen.  Likewise, the EU could walk away anytime either. Just remember up to two months ago the EU keep begging for an extention.
    1
  8.  M. Olsen.  After the recent GE (e.g where most of the traitors have been purged from the parliament, Boris never Johnson never ask for an extension. It is the EU who keep begging for an extention. Keep in midn the previous dela was Theresa May deal.
    1
  9.  M. Olsen.  If ALMOST EVERY important person in the Brexit Negotiation the EU leaders are asking for an extension what else could you say !!!
    1
  10.  @indogoUI  How could the UK trade with other nation without meeting the standard, following the rule of the destination country. The level playing field demand by the EU is enterily different. They make the rule and the want to impose that rule in the UK irrecpective whteher the product would not not be sold in the EU. Also the EU wanted the role of the EU mafioso court the ECJ in the UK judicial system.
    1
  11.  @stevenp6761  You either informed or think you are smart that you could fool the British people. Mind you the British voters are not stupid as you could see the result of the recent GE. What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (FULL STOP), no need for services, etc which has been promised before. Other deal good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the item. Not only to the EU but even for selling product to the least developed country relying heavily for foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without allowing the UK fishing water to be plundered without allowing the role of EU Mafioso court the ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCT OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty.
    1
  12.  @stevenp6761  Utter tosh what the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services, qualifications acknoeldgemtn in reciprocal ground is good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule, qualifications of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    1
  13. @Alfa&Omega 00000 So you acknowledge what people have been saying for a long time The EU is a mafioso arganisation. That is teh way MAFIA maintain power. Another good reason to leave ...
    1
  14.  @stevenp6761  What the UK wants is the Canadian style agreement (services not included) which has been promised before (FULL STOP). And keep in mind the UK will pay EUR39 bill for that privilege Canada do not pay a single penny to have that deal. EUR39bil could easily be denied as it is not in the treaty. Moreover the UK has a claim in the EU assets considerng the UK has been the second / third largest NET contributors for a few decades. The deal such as services good to have but not a must. Keep in mind you always need to meet the standard and rule of the country of the destination if you want to sell the products. Not only selling to the EU but even for selling products to the least developed country relying heavily on foreign aids. But now the EU even refuse to grant the Canadian style agreement without ALLOWING THE UK FISHING WATER TO BE PLUNDERED without allowing THE ROLE OF EU MAFIOSO COURT THE ECJ. The UK will need to meet the EU rule EVEN FOR SELLING THE PRODUCTs OUTSIDE THE EU”. This is entirely different with the trading rule as this is already trespassing a country sovereignty. If you go to someone house / party you will need to follow his standard, house rules. That is a general norm so acceptable to everyone. But if someone makes a rule for you even to go to OTHER PEOPLE HOUSE; you will need to depend on his judgment (not third party arbitration) follow his decision whether you have breached the rule or not, it is entirely a different things. This thing is already about sovereignty as an independent person/nation. In the past messing up with sovereignty would mean a declaration of war. If Canada, Japan, South Korea are not stupid to allow this to happen for obvious reason why would the UK??
    1
  15. ​@Alfa&Omega 00000 The NAZI was led by Hitler. Yep they were loser in the WW2. Never learn the lesson. The Eu is like leecher to the UK, no benefit at all.
    1
  16.  M. Olsen.  Really. This little Britain’s beat you all in the Olympic games. Financial services is much larger than all of the EU financial services COMBINED. It might beat all of you again in the race to find vaccine for COVID-19. The difference between the UK and the EU is that provide an environment for innovation to prosper, attract the most talented and richest people around the world. Not like EU ruled by a bureaucrat in Brussels with its draconian rule and regulation which only attract the poor and less talented people who cannot compete elsewhere.
    1