Comments by "Okunniger Volker" (@Okunniger_Volker) on "PsycHacks"
channel.
-
29
-
This is why I say MGTOW is just feminism for men; because at the end of the day it is compensating for what we were not taught when we were younger, things we should've known before we got burnt and became reactionary.
It's important to put them out of your mind and work on yourself. The spectrum of confidence is not reality but a lense by which we see the world, nor necessarily is your history a accurate representation of what you can accomplish since it was painted with that lense that you had at that time.
How do we know what we are capable of then?
Well, I'd say generally speaking were capable of more than we often think, though this coming from one who had tended towards the low self esteem end of that spectrum. If you're average IQ, you're a pretty capable person, you've just gotta look at things maybe a bit like a fitness coach would, what are you likely to achive and how do you shape and structure your life in a way to accomplish the most?
Take exercise as a example, if you're having a hard time sticking with it, is it because you're trying to make it work instead of fun?
What about finances? How can you make yourself more likely to be successful and how could you make it enjoyable and or a game?
If you can do this, you'll accomplish a lot more than you think you can, and realize that you're able to.
Another way I view it is when your young your parents guide you telling you what you should and shouldn't do, telling you what's going to help you most and get the results you seek. Much of the time we make our decisions a bit more short sighted than that, so the question here is; how do you make discipline a fun and rewarding game?
This will vary from person to person, but ultimately is boiled down to lessons we were not taught when we needed them.
13
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@macadamia668 I will measure any species by the same metrics. If a human fails to mate as biology dictates, then there is some issue. To determine that issue is quite easy, humans are not the complex creatures they like to believe they are (in order to justify their lack of understanding and or shortcomings, real or perceived).
In "perfect" conditions, all humans would happily mate. In perfect conditions, all humans would care for their offspring and in perfect conditions all humans would maintain a mate. To deny this is to deny basic biology usually justified by psychological and or social conditions that are not perfect or ideal.
These things are obvious to anyone not wearing baggage with an ounce of objectivity, so "know it all"? Absolutely not, but do I understand the basics better than most?
Without a doubt.
Call it arrogance all you like, but that is a mute claim unless you can prove the above wrong.
And you said it yourself, "its the lack of mind games..." this is a social issue which in its absence leaves younger women far more attractive, but what role does hypergamy play in womens vetting process for security which they are biologically wired to attain? Is that inherently bad? Or is it infidelity that is the issue?
There are those who react, and those who understand, the difference between the two is vage to those who react, and stark to those who understand.
1
-
1