Comments by "John Walsh" (@johnwalsh4857) on "BAKHMUT HAS FALLEN" video.

for the 2nd supposedly strongest army in the world to take a town in 9th months and 100K casualties vs. a supposed weak Ukrainian force ...hahahaha, very funny, I thought the Russians said the Ukrainians are weak and we could defeat them in what two weeks hahahah, now the Russians are bragging they took a town in exchange for 100K casualties and 9 months of combat hahahahahah. so what now Ukrainain army are peers to the Russian army now hahahha. HOW EMBARASSING RUSSIA
2
yah Russians are the ones who usually underestimate the Ukrs, Ukrs never underestimate the Rusians, Bakhmut was a trap, a meatgrinder for the Russians and it served it purpose and yah in order to get to Kramatork and Sloviansk the Russians have to slog thru a lot of fortifications and trenches, and the Ukrs will oblige the Russians with more dead Russians soldiers, no problem bring it on hahah
1
@paulzoom489 the Russian army is a joke
1
yah who cares, so what, Ukrainian morale not affected since the ukrs know that it is a meatgrinder a speed bump to delay and bloody the Russians before they get to Kramatorks and Sloviansk. Yep and let see it took 9 months and 100K casualties for the Russians to capture Bakhmut, the Ukrs lost what 10K to 25K casualties mainly injured and still the Russians have to break thru many miles of trenches and fortifications to get to the rest of the Donbass. haha. and there are Ukrainian offensives on the Russian flanks at Bakhmut developing yah it will be funny that the Russians take Bakhmut then later forced to abandon it or worse a lot of troops esp. Wagner gets trapped at Bakhmut haha, and mass surrenders hahaha. that would be so embarrassing that the it will really affect Russian morale. and this victory at Bakhmut so called has not really raised Russian morale either, you dont see the Russians clamoring to volunteer to the front hahaah. heck I think looking at the situaton where the RUssians lost like 100K casualties at Bakhmut (25k to 50K dead), most Russians would not want to volunteer to Ukraine. Temporary phyrric victory for the Russians.
1
@gerfand yah very much for the supposed 2nd strongest army in the world to take 100K casusalties and take 9 months to conquer a town is really very amusing. Russians are very amusing. and pathetic.
1
and you know what compare this to the battle of Sieverdonetsk in May to June 2022, simliar siege battle , Ukrs army not really prepared a one month battle which cost the Russians about 10K casualties also destroyed the city. However Bakhmut Aug 2022 to May 2023 9 month battle cost the Russians 100K casualties also destroyed the city, hmmm. and the longer it goes the Ukrs get stronger and stronger. and the more Russians lose troops, the more they have to mobilize the more they mobilize the more weaker Putin hold on the country is esp. when you have very costly victories which really dont mean much, Russians trying to desperately ballyhoo this battle as a victory and its pathetic just shows weakmess. yep . and just like the battle of Sieverdonetsk, the Russians just got ruins not much else, Russian fanboys are pathetic and hilarious and desperate too. After this war is over the Russian fan boys will blame everything on Putin and claim they are the victims hahahah. when Ukraine gets everything back including the Crimea, the Russians go into civil war and millions of Russian refugees flee to Europe, EU needs cheapo labour like dig ditches , or cheap hookers just like the 90s, Russians as usual will fill that those jobs.
1
@tujup10 really??? combined Russian army and PMCs, and the Russians having been recruiting a lot of convicts lately , yah 30K supposedly Russian as usual giving the wrong figures, Russian accounting must really suck no wonder why most of Russia is a thrid world country, heck after this war is over soon to be simliar t Syria and Somalia.
1