Comments by "John Walsh" (@johnwalsh4857) on "How Bakhmut Became Europe's Deadliest Post-WWII Battle: A Warographics Analysis" video.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. well to the Ukrs Bakhmut was an important site to attrit the Russians, do as much damage to the Russians as possible. and expensive in terms of resources spent. also to make as expensive as possible noting the Ukrs fortified the crap out of Bakhmut. and for the Russians a victory at Bakhmut is one less obstacle towards controlling all of the Donbass plus in the face of their defeats at Kherson and Kharkov the Russians needed a win. so hence the offensive, plus it was given to Prigozhin to do it since the Russians military did not want to do the Bakhmut offensive since they knew it would be super costly, Prigozhin on the other hand reasoned that convicts can be used to take bakhmut since they were super expendable. the Russian public wont care if criminals were exterminated in Bakhmut. however now nearly 9 months into the battle, the battle of Bakhmut is not over, sure the Russians took 90 percent of Bakhmut but the Ukrainains are still fighitng at the edges of the city and holding the heights and the Russians have not done offensives after wagner left. and Russian regular army replaced wagner group at Bakhmut. In short, Bakhmut was a trap for the Russians to waste as much manpower and resources as possible. which the Russians took. Now if the Ukrs retake bakhmut this would be a unmitigated disaster for Putin and the Russian army politically, Prigozhin can use this to try to oust Shoigu and Garasimov. a Russian defeat at Bakhmut would be seen as an untter embarassment for Putin.
    2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1