Comments by "John Walsh" (@johnwalsh4857) on "Who Has The Advantage In Ukraine?" video.
-
Manpower... true the Russians have the advantage in manpower 10-1 if you draw on the entire Russian popualtion as compared to the Ukrs. however the Ukrs have the home field advantage, shorter supply lines , a lot better management of logsitics, and the Ukrs mobilized at the start of hte war while teh Russians well took them 8 months into the war to mobilize. Also look at logistics, Russian logistics as it is in Ukraine cannot really handle hundreds of thousands of Russian troops, whenenver they throw in masses of troops, these units fall apart in the face of Ukrs offensives. why?, yah you thrown in thousands of men vehicles into the fight, however if your logistical system cannot support it, the army will suffer from bad supply issues and shortagees, in essentials like ammo and fuel, and when that happens and your enemy goes ont he offensive you get things like the Russian disasters at Kiev and Kharkov. where you get lots of abandoned Russian vehicles and Russian troops running away even leaving their weapons, also this leads in to soldier morale training quality. Ukrainians, well motivated high morale, Russians, apatheitc, poorly motivated, poor morale. Training: Similiar with the Ukrs having better overall. Leadership, Ukrs have a better overall leadership overall. Equipment. Ukrs troops are generally better equippped than their Russian counterparts due to massive aid from NATO countries and and their allies, esp. the USA. also look at night vision gear, personal drones, outiside Russian elite units(Spetsnaz, core wagner, VDV) Russian troops hafe a severe shortage of these. Also tactics used. these days Russians like to do WW1 style human wave attacks. supported by massed area blanket artillery fire and air support who mostly does pray and spray attacks from a distance since they are terrified of Ukrs SAMs. Ukrs like to do maneuver warfre, hit and run attacks, ambushes. and not do heady on costly ww1 style attacks. Ukrs like to target Russian logistics with missles and artillery as well as command centers cut off the head first before attracks.
1
-
1
-
my view stalemate in a convnetional war sense, however the Russians could win this war anytime, but have to use large amounts of WMDs to do so. and in doing so will risk war with NATO, and destruction of the Russian economy. So Putin is in a dillemma here, if he leaves Ukraine back to pre war borders,Putin will be overthrown and probably get killed. the only way he can get the Ukrs to qui is to probably use WMDs large scale. since the Ukrs will not surrender and back down. if the Russians do that, the Russians might lose , since NATO will military intervene and the risk of war with NATO will be big. and Russia has no chance to win a conventional war with NATO unless of course NATO is stupid enough to invade Russian proper itself or a nuclear exchange ensues where no one wins. I personally think Putin knows this but is hedging things as the use of WMDs will be his last card to play. the Russian economy is slowly dying from sanctions. its dependent on high oil prices which wlll come down when there is a worldwide recession which is being forecast for 2023. the Russians cannot mobilize their population forever, eventually the population support for Putin will crack and you will have a general revolt. Also the longer theh war goes the more strain on the Russian economy as the war is getting more expensive to prosecute. The Russian army is also getting more dillapidated its getting to be more of a shadow of what it was at the start of hte war. Russians are using WW1 style human wave assaults in the Donbass against the Ukrs, the Russian are buying large amounts of iranian missles and drones, as well as artillery ammo from the Iranians and North Koreans(probably the Chinese too under the table probably thru North Korea). since Russian stocks of missle and artillery that were stored for decades do not work due to corruption and poor management.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1