Youtube comments of American Dissident (@americandissident9062).
-
2800
-
802
-
442
-
354
-
277
-
256
-
88
-
79
-
73
-
71
-
68
-
66
-
66
-
57
-
55
-
51
-
46
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
This. “Authority” is not power. You can have both, but they’re not the same. Authority is basically the ability to speak from a place of wisdom, to give accurate assessments of a situation, to correctly deduce or induce the course of action, the ability to teach, to improve and enhance the woman by collaborating and working together, and to protect her from her own bad choices, which can include going into debt, getting assaulted, becoming addicted, etc.
Men don’t have anyone to help us in this way. We have to learn it ourselves, and then we can give that to a woman. That’s authority. It’s not power. It’s authority.
41
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
33
-
30
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
I was USI for 8 years. My favorite thing he mentioned was the shoes and cash. With good shoes and cash, you can go SO FAR in almost place in the world.
I usually tried my best to carry at least a few hundred in local cash and a couple hundred in USD. I was often handling sources which meant I was able to usually have at least some money the USG let me have, so it wasn’t hard to pull a little of my money plus a little government money.
As far as shoes, I preferred the Merrill Moab hiking shoes. They’re all earth-tone colors and they don’t look out of place outdoors anywhere in the world. If I was exclusively in a city then I would sometimes have running shoes instead.
I have had some people ask me if Merrill hiking shoes looked out of place in third world countries. I’m a white guy so, no not really. Think of the movie Black Hawk Down, the scene where Eric Bana is sitting in a market/bazaar area on Mogadishu. Are his X-Metal Oakley Juliet shades out of place? A little, but not on a random white dude.
In a lot of countries, it’s not uncommon to see a random white dude chilling out among locals, but sometimes it’s weird if the white dude is dressed exactly like those locals. The rest of the world is pretty used to having white westerners around for various reasons. Missionaries, OGA, NGO, English teachers, businessmen, extreme tourists, journalists, etc. The list is long. No problem at all for USI if you’re not an idiot.
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
It’s not just that women want attached men. They’ll also go just as easily after a man who is single but has other pursuers and prospects. When I was totally single and had no women after me (age 15-20), it was very difficult for me to get dates, or find sexual partners. I had none. No girlfriends that lasted longer than three weeks, and zero sexual partners. At age 21 I made a few changes, got a new job, started college, and started hanging with a large group of people. Once I got ONE girl interested in me, and had sex with her, and once my friends, coworkers, and classmates found out, everything changed. I went from zero sex partners, to five in less than one year. I had a girlfriend, then broke up and got a second on, broke up later and got a third, and then I had two women try to poach me away from her… Had more sex than I could handle from age 21-24…
Women will go after attached men and will also go after single men who have prospects. It’s the single men without prospects they seem to ignore.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
It’s ok to have a type, but you also have to be flexible. You might figure out that you type wasn’t actually your type. I dated short girls with dark hair, tan skin, and strong personalities in my early twenties, and I kind of thought that was my type. Five girls in a row like that. Then I met a woman through a message board based around college programs and study, and discovered we were in the same program and the same school. I wasn’t trying to date but I did offer to give her a book I didn’t need anymore.
She’s tall, blonde, light skin, has a subtle personality, basically opposite of my “type” I thought I had. Married 13 years, together for 15. Those girls who I thought were my type are invisible to me now and even if something happened to my marriage, they always will be. I am in love with the tall blonde type, and I got myself one.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
A mid-life crisis is what they call it, but what it actually is is the man hitting his prime. A woman’s prime is during her 20’s, because her prime is based on health and beauty and how attractive and lively she is. A man’s prime is based on his amassed resources, wisdom, education, life experience, and also physical strength. Because of this, his prime years could hit anywhere from his early 30’s through his mid-50’s, depending on how well he takes care of his body. A man in his 40’s can easily have amassed a nice net worth, a full education, at least 15-20 years of work experience in an interesting field, some decent travels and life experiences, AND he probably still has 90% or more of his physical abilities left.
What you’re seeing is a man in his prime behaving like a man in his prime.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Now I’m convinced that Kamala NOT doing Rogan was the right move for her. People are saying that it was a mistake to ditch Rogan, but I have another point of view. Her team was actually smart this time, and made a good move. No matter what set they built, teleprompters, pre-screened questions, editing, time limits, location options, etc., Kamala would have been terrible. She could never have succeeded. It was an impossible task. She’s so awful that she can’t be allowed to do the JRE, even with HEAVY curating. Avoiding the JRE was the best option. That’s how bad her campaign was. Given two options, BOTH hurt her campaign. If she went on JRE, Trump could have had 400 electoral votes. 😂
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Millennial here. First of all, let’s all just understand that the vast majority of Gen Z do not look like that thumbnail.
Secondly, Gen Z has been watching millennials do EVERYTHING we were ever asked to do, and we still got jammed with the bill for a party we never got to attend. We grew up and 9/12 happened. We were told to go to war, so we went. And then another war. And then another war. And then another war. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria. We were told to get educated, so we became the most educated generation in history. And the economy collapsed while we were doing it. After we got educated, we were told that our degrees were useless, and that we should have gone into a trade.
Gen Z is seeing a few millennials turn 40. Did you know that 34% of millennial men aged 28-34 have not had a single sexual partner in the last year? Millennials are well into their 30’s and most don’t own a home, don’t have a car paid off, aren’t married, and aren’t really moving up in their career field. Gen Z doesn’t want any part of that.
Third, the term “giving up” usually just means “not doing what boomers tell you to do.”
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@claytonelofgren When you say you’re at least a 6/10 in facial attractiveness, you’re not using the normally distributed bell curve, right? Some things to know about how men are rated by women in surveys:
Surveys have been done on both men and women by showing them hundreds or even thousands of photos of random people of the opposite sex, and they’re asked to rate them as “average”, “below average”, or “above average”. It’s been consistent over the past ten years of surveys that the vast majority of women rate 80% of men as “below average”. Firstly, this demonstrates that women don’t know what the fuck “average” means. Secondly, if we assume that no one receives a 10/10, because that is flawless perfection, we now have a scale of 1-9, with 5 being the very center and average. 6/10 is actually a 6/9, and 6 is slightly above the average of 5. This means you’re only a 6/10 (6/9) IF most women would rate you as “above average”, which is a rating only about 20% of men receive. So based on that, are you actually a 6/10? I believe that in a normally distributed bell curve, I personally am a 6/10 (6/9). But in this current culture of dating (which I am happy to not be a part of), most women between the ages of 20-40 who are actively trying to date would probably call me “below average”, which to them means I’m around a 3 or 4 out of 10, but actually just means I’m outside of the top 20%.
Women don’t use a scale based in reality. I do firmly believe I’m not a top 20% guy when it comes to my face, but I know for sure I’m not a 3/10 (3/9).
So based on that, are women likely to call your face “above average”? This disconnect from reality that young women have in assessing the facial attractiveness of men might explain your difficulty.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I work in the medical field as a bachelor level RN.
"We work hard, we play hard" usually means the environment is extremely fast paced, corners sometimes have to be cut, we are taking risks we probably shouldn't be taking, and then most likely will have a clique of people who will go to bars and get drunk every weekend, sometimes might fuck each other, and you have to do that too if you want to fit in and get a little bit of help during your awful shifts.
"We are a family" is basically saying that our scheduling and shift hours are going to suck, or they're going to need scheduling holes filled and you're going to be expected to do that.
"We will promote you later" is not often stated. RNs don't have a lot of room for promotion.
"You are replaceable" isn't heard all the time in my field, at least not lately. There is a lack of nurses who want to do bedside care. Patients are awful and treat nurses poorly, and so we are always hearing about this nursing shortage in the US. Except there is not a nurse shortage. Just a nurse shortage at the patient bedside. Nurses are getting their bachelor and master degrees and moving into lobbying, research, management, quality, education, etc. They're leaving the patient bedside because patients are horrible. So nurses know damn well we are hard to replace at the bedside.
"We wear many hats" means that when housekeeping isn't there, the nurse will clean it. If phlebotomy isn't there, the nurse will draw the blood. If a tech isn't there, the nurse will do the tech's job. If registration isn't there, the nurse will sign the patient in. Etc. The nurse will always be expected to pick up the slack and this will not be considered when doing raises.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I’ve been a fan of Rogan since his early UFC days (not really for his comedy), but I’ll say he’s got some stupid ass, obnoxious, pretentious friends. Who is that idiot in the sunglasses? And am I the only one who think Ari is a douche? I get the vibe that a lot of his low level comic friends are just fooling themselves into thinking that they’re big time because they’re on the JRE. This is why I skip all of the JRE podcasts with comedians who aren’t named Dave Chappell or Bill Burr. The people who are athletes, scientists, military, or experts in something are the best guests. Pat McNamara, Jordan Peterson, Michio Kaku, Bas Rutten, etc. Comedians like Bert Kreischer and Ari Shaffir and whoever that guy is wearing sunglasses in a podcast studio, I’m out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VincentAgueda-f3s 12 hour shifts are difficult, but being in that environment 5 days a week is equally as difficult mentally. The solution is to keep the 12 hour shift, but cut the nurse/patient ratio down by a lot. Six patients is too much. Five is manageable sometimes. Four is much more ideal. When I had six, I’m basically just treading water. Trying to make sure the meds go out on time, I don’t miss orders, and otherwise, everyone is still alive. You don’t want a nurse saying “everyone is still alive, so it was good.” You want them saying “my patients have gotten to heal up for the last 12 hours.” Not “they’re alive.”
With five patients, it was work, but everything got done. I didn’t get to do anything extra, but everything was done.
With four, I knew everything about my patients in and out. Every med was on time and explained in detail with each patient why they were being given that medication. I was able to provide education on how to do their dressing changes when they got discharged. I could SIT DOWN IN A CHAIR in the patient room and talk to them. To the family. With four patients, your snack and drink requests make it onto my priority list. When I have four patients, you will not wait for me to arrive in your room when you call. If I have four patients, I will pick up an extra shift when we are short handed on staff, because it’s not a problem. When I have four patients, I will fully explain care plans and direction of care to patients. I’ll explain the short term and long term goals. When I have four patients, I’ll even talk about patients’ hobbies with them and tell them about myself. I’ll ask the older people about their lives. I’ll ask the younger ones about their plans.
That’s the difference. It’s not just the length of time. It’s the workload while I’m there. I was once given seven patients on a shift.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andymanaus1077 So if you’re saying that ER staff aren’t able to discern what is a vax injury and what isn’t, then how is anyone else? I’m being told that young men are dropping like flies from cardiac issues due to the vax. So then should I not have a steady stream of young men in my ER with that?
I don’t trust that vax one bit. But I find it amazing that all of these claims are being made and I’m seeing no evidence, no systematic reviews of literature, no RCTs, no meta-analysis, not even a single quasi-experimental study. If I’m going to sit here and demand evidence from the “vaxxed and boosted” lunatic crowd who says the vaccines cured COVID (it did not), then I must demand the same evidence from the crowd who claims that thousands of Americans around the country are dropping dead and having heart attacks all over the place and all the other claims that are being made.
If people are dying, and there is actual evidence, it can be written about. I just co-wrote and published last year a systematic review of the effectiveness of Montelukast on Covid infections. I can and will write one on vaccine injuries if I can find some evidence beyond the claims of prepper websites telling me that every vaxxed male is dying in the next year from heart attack.
There has to be something. I know Pubmed, Cochran Library, and other systems like the back of my hand and I can’t find anything beyond the initial stats on cardiomyopathy among newly vaxxed young men, and the Bell’s Palsy people were getting from the J&J vax. And it’s not being censored from those sites because sensorship on those sites means they IMMEDIATELY lose all legitimacy. Those sites are the basis of evidence-based medicine in my field. There is no censorship because if you want something censored, you have to WRITE A FULL REVIEW, and it has to be supported by multiple other reviews, and even then what you’re disputing never gets removed. Ever. Once something has worked its way even partly up the evidence hierarchy, it’s set in stone for review in perpetuity. Even if it’s disproven, leaving it in the public domain serves a purpose.
Sorry for the rant, but if these claims are true, I, a part-time researcher, should be able to find actual research on it. I’m connected to four hospital systems and my wife is connected to a fifth, I work with the quality departments to research and implement evidence-based practice. I receive stats on all sorts of data points in these hospitals, and there is no trend of any kind that looks even remotely related to an uptick in any sort of injuries or diseases claimed by anti-vaxxers (I am an anti-vaxxer as it relates to the Covid vax). I’m seeing literally three upticks, which are predictable every year during winter. Strep throat in adolescents, RSV in toddlers, and flu in adults. That’s all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I’m a nurse, a man working in a female dominated field. I’m married to a nurse, but we got together before she was a nurse. Good thing.
I’ve seen first hand why women think they cheat less, and it really is because they can rationalize every tiny incident that they do or another woman does.
If a man cheats, then it’s on all men, and men are scum, and they all cheat, and they all do it all the time, and it’s just because they’re horrible.
If a woman cheats, the entire incident is broken down minute by minute and each move is rationalized for justification. It always comes down to her attempt to ensure that what she did is not wrong, even if he’s devastated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Aron-ru5zk I don't know if you've got the frame of reference to make that statement. I was with Army intelligence for 8 years, including in Korea, Germany and Afghanistan. Men with rifles are still the only pieces in the "order of battle" that can consistently hold terrain. Drones can't hold territory. Tanks can't even hold territory. Hell, this latest war is showing us that men carrying small arms are a major threat to tanks on the battlespace. Especially as kinetic warfare moves more and more into heavy urban terrain, men with small arms are going to be increasingly needed to hold terrain. Every part of the order of battle, from artillery to armor, drones, warships, and most definitely air power, has it's place in battle. But these are always changing. One thing that still has not changed is that if you want to hold territory, you've got to have men with rifles on the ground in the area. No question.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:09 The summers here are brutal. From May through September we have brutal heat and suffocating humidity, which also means gnats and mosquitos are horrible. Our winters are also wet, which means we don't get to enjoy to cold temps we get, which usually only last for December and January. The temps might seem ok most of the year, but the humidity ruins it. Also, June and July have thunderstorms almost every single day. "As long as you don't mind the humidity", that's like saying Somalia is nice as long as you don't mind the constant rebel uprisings.
3:41 New Orleans was much larger in population prior to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
4:08 After slavery ended, it only ended for black slaves. The Irish slaves in the north were still being locked inside the textile buildings and other industrial buildings and being forced to work 7 days a week. People don't like hearing about Irish slaves in the north.
9:00 The cost of living in the Pensacola metro-statistical area is going up quickly, but wages are not. Also, home owner insurance in Florida is a nightmare. Within the next few years I may be priced out of the state. I make $80,000 per year before taxes. If I can't push that over $90,000 within the next couple of years, I'm probably going to have to move.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It’s actually down to just the two reasons, where people don’t believe in fighting for causes our government pretends are important, and the woke culture. I know people say that our people are out of shape, but the obesity rate in the US is slowly decreasing, and the younger generations have a lower rate than the older generations. There are people who can make the cut, but the military is targeting trannies, gays, and high school girls with two moms.
I did 8 years on active duty and the woke, PC, risk averse culture of the Army (the entire military) is why I’ve refused to talk when recruiters have called me to ask if I’m interested in joining again. I had considered it at one point, and had a choice this time of going officer, or back to enlisted. But I’m not doing either. If they want trannies and gays, then I’ve got plenty of other shit I’m busy with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Recycling is a huge scam. It was sold to us as kids in schools about how we should reuse and recycle. Reusing is basically the only thing you can do to help. Recycling is a massive scam. I’ve lived in northwest Florida, central Texas, south Florida, west Indiana, west Tennessee, southern Arizona, central South Carolina, and south Alabama. All of those places had “recycling” available, but none of them sent the recycling to actually be recycled. I even went to a recycling plant in central Texas and saw myself that barely 5% of what came in actually got recycled at all. When you buy a product that claims to be made from recycled material, it’s almost always some form of corrugated paper, but usually the statement “recycled material” is a half truth. It’s usually mostly new material or only a small bit of recycled material.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KingDeadMan 1. If you're still calling "science" a subject, then you're a kid. 2. You're talking about bias, but you've presented absolutely nothing here. No demonstrated knowledge of anything. I literally just finished writing a meta-analysis of over a dozen RCTs on the use of medications to treat Covid. I understand bias and how studies can be flawed to various degrees. What would you suggest we rely on, if not science, which is essentially just the scientific method of making observations, formulating questions, running studies and experiments, and developing theories? Are you suggesting we ignore that for your randomly concocted anecdotal experiences?
What we are discussing here is measurable now since more than half of new relationships in the Western world begin with an initial online interaction. With the advent of massive dating apps and websites, these things can now be intricately studied and tracked, and patterns have emerged that demonstrate the points I made. It's been made very clear that in the Western world, polyamory is much easier for females to achieve than males. It's also been demonstrated that around 70% of women are only targeting the "top" 20% of men. This leaves a large percentage of men who are in the "bottom" half of the hierarchy receiving little to no female interaction at all. This phenomenon, whether you like it or not, has been observed and recorded using scaled metrics, surveys, etc. The explosion of online dating apps and websites has allowed us to study and measure what was once unmeasurable and difficult to study. What it definitively shows is that dating is a nightmare for men outside of the top 10-20 percent, and that the majority of women who are not obese and disgusting will have a much easier time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree, but it won’t become that big because our minds are already inundated with nearly constant “devastating” information.
We are literally involved with a peer to peer shooting war in Ukraine between NATO and Russia (European front), while simultaneously jockeying for strategic advantages in the Pacific in anticipation of war with China. In Europe, the lynchpin is oil and gas pipelines, and demographic collapse of Russia. In the Pacific, it’s Taiwanese semiconductor production and rare earth minerals in the Pacific. And amidst it all, another powder keg between Israel and Iran, with anti-Israeli countries using oil as leverage against Israel’s supporters.
And all of that is only a blink of time after a major global pandemic that was literally widely believed to have been man-made.
I could go on and on, but my point is that no one would have cared about Watergate or a Tuskegee or a PG&E if a Watergate, Tuskegee, or PG&E happened every week. It seems like that’s what we get now. Another war, another scandal, another company killing people for money, another future pandemic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just do our solar system, 8 planets, plus Pluto, plus some of the larger or closer moons like our moon, Phobos, Deimos, Europa, Ganymede, Io, Callisto, Titan, and maybe a few asteroids. If each of those locations was explorable and the size of the Fallout maps or Skyrim, or even 2/3 the size of those, then we’d be set. Obviously certain locations would be bigger than others. And then also create several interesting and useful spaceports on earth. The ISS could be in it. Some other satellites. You could be tasked to repair commo satellites. Or fight battles. Or whatever. So many things could be done if they just stopped trying to render the entire known universe. I’d rather have an Olympic sized swimming pool than a big lake that’s only a foot deep.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Gen Z didn’t create it. Millennials called it “acting your wage” and now Gen Z and millennials both call it quiet quitting. But we are definitely the first two generations that started doing it as a social movement. The generations before us could work long and hard and stick with a company and make a lot of money, raises, promotions, benefits, pensions, and good retirements. Millennials and Gen Z aren’t afforded that anymore. Management puts it forth like working for them is a privilege, like an unpaid internship is a big favor to the unpaid intern, like overtime and unpaid hours are implicitly owed to the company, and asking for compensation for that work is an insult. So millennials started acting our wage, and then Gen Z quiet quit, and the old boomers got all butthurt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:02 I get what you’re saying here bro, but women can’t really get much more selective. It’s already gotten to the point that literally only a 7/10 looking Chad is even allowed to speak to a 5/10 looking woman or higher. If a man isn’t at least a 7 in looks and 32 years old or younger, he has no shot. Then once he gets past that, he’s got to have a bunch of money, a high level vehicle, a high end place to live in a cool locale, his body has to have an athletic build, he’s got to have an undergrad degree already, and he’s got to have some super interesting career (not job, career), and a cool hobby or two that he’s already good at. And even with all that, he’s got to have the personality to keep the girl entertained all the time, and be good at sex.
Almost none of us have every one of those things. I just named 11 things. I personally have 6 of those things myself with 1 more soon, and I would have no chance in today’s dating market.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:59 This is why the 1-10 scale is actually a 1-9 scale, which fits perfectly because that means that the mean, median, and most likely the mode will all be 5. That also allows us to eliminate decimals. When asked for ratings, a lot of people with give a number and then focus on trying to place a decimal, like they’re giving a little bit more to the person as charity or something. There is no 6.7 or 8.5 or 4.3. It’s just a 1-10 whole number scale where no one is perfect, and the average is a 5, and normies exist in the 4-6 range, uglies exist in 1-3, and the beautiful people live in the 7-9 range. It also lines up well with the normally distributed bell curve, which says that approximately 68% of people will fall somewhere between 4-6.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ Imagine complaining about the way Trump speaks when the other candidates he put away were Joe Biden and Kamala, two of the absolute WORST speakers, even with teleprompters.
The left can’t get it through their brains that we are sick of politicians acting like politicians.
The most powerful and influential figures on the new right wing today are Joe Rogan, Dana White, Vivek, Elon, Tulsi, and of course, Trump. The only actual politician is Tulsi, and the democrats kicked her out because she wasn’t insane.
We are sick of politicians, and sick of the left.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That’s because the vast majority of women think 80% of men are “below average” in attractiveness. When you say somewhat decent looking, you’ve probably already eliminated 80% of men. Then when you ask for a guy making $100k, you’ve wiped out almost all of the rest of them. Lastly, marriage is a contract that, for the man, says “this is a lifelong contract that if you break it, your partner gets half of your stuff, but it doesn’t work the other way around, so your partner is incentivized to break it”.
Just those three things alone make it very unlikely. Women need to start looking at male attractiveness on a normally distributed bell curve instead of a curve that is skewed heavily right. The skewed right curve shows that only 20% of men even meet the minimum standard for looks. When the sexes are reversed, men rate women on a normally distributed bell curve where 70% of women are rated as “average”, and around 15% are above average. But women simply don’t know what they’re talking about anymore. They’re not connected to reality of the market, while men are becoming increasingly tuned into the reality of how bad of a contract marriage is for them.
Women looked at boomer marriages and saw what they should do. Men looked at boomers marriages and said “fuck that”.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I make somewhere between $85,000 and $90,000 per year gross. I’m taking home around $70,000 or so. I live in NW Florida, which is supposedly fairly low cost of living. I have no debt besides a mortgage, which runs around $1,200 per month.
Due to food costs, gas, inflation of pretty much everything, utilities, insurances, and the criminally high rates of home owner insurance in Florida, I currently live paycheck to paycheck. I work about 42 hours per week as a bachelor level charge nurse in an emergency room.
The only thing that keeps me from drowning if we have a disaster (car accident, burst water pipe, etc.) is our savings of $8,000. But that’s just a rainy day fund. $8,000 can go up in smoke with one little incident, like an HVAC unit being struck by lightening or a leaking bathtub that does water damage. Home insurance in Florida barely covers anything. One little incident and that $8,000 is burnt up in an instant. Even with that savings, we are always in a precarious spot. I don’t know how the people can live paycheck to paycheck without any savings.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1