Comments by "American Dissident" (@americandissident9062) on "Girls 'High Standards' vs Who They Actually Date" video.

  1.  @NJGuy1973  Did you think I was being serious?
    36
  2. Did he have any of their money? 😂
    33
  3. No it doesn’t. Why do you think women are different off the apps? They’re not.
    9
  4.  @Swenthorian  The only thing you mentioned that matters is that you make $100,000 per year. You didn’t mention your facial attractiveness, height, physical build type, IQ, or penis length. Being marriage minded and single doesn’t mean shit to women. In fact, being attached to another woman makes you a possibly MORE attractive option, not less.
    9
  5. Imagine a broad repeating two words that essentially mean the same thing and thinking she’s saying something.
    3
  6.  @jurassicthunder  You’re not going to be able to equate female behavior during first wave feminism and third wave feminism. First wave feminists wanted to vote, third wave feminists want us essentially dead.
    2
  7.  @claytonelofgren  When you say you’re at least a 6/10 in facial attractiveness, you’re not using the normally distributed bell curve, right? Some things to know about how men are rated by women in surveys: Surveys have been done on both men and women by showing them hundreds or even thousands of photos of random people of the opposite sex, and they’re asked to rate them as “average”, “below average”, or “above average”. It’s been consistent over the past ten years of surveys that the vast majority of women rate 80% of men as “below average”. Firstly, this demonstrates that women don’t know what the fuck “average” means. Secondly, if we assume that no one receives a 10/10, because that is flawless perfection, we now have a scale of 1-9, with 5 being the very center and average. 6/10 is actually a 6/9, and 6 is slightly above the average of 5. This means you’re only a 6/10 (6/9) IF most women would rate you as “above average”, which is a rating only about 20% of men receive. So based on that, are you actually a 6/10? I believe that in a normally distributed bell curve, I personally am a 6/10 (6/9). But in this current culture of dating (which I am happy to not be a part of), most women between the ages of 20-40 who are actively trying to date would probably call me “below average”, which to them means I’m around a 3 or 4 out of 10, but actually just means I’m outside of the top 20%. Women don’t use a scale based in reality. I do firmly believe I’m not a top 20% guy when it comes to my face, but I know for sure I’m not a 3/10 (3/9). So based on that, are women likely to call your face “above average”? This disconnect from reality that young women have in assessing the facial attractiveness of men might explain your difficulty.
    2
  8.  @claytonelofgren  6’5” with an income over $500k is already >0.1% of the population. Not just small, but statistically insignificant.
    2
  9.  @ephraimwinslow Gove the mic back to your publicist. 😂
    2
  10. Women absolutely want to be controlled, for sure. But they will Buck against it because if they push back and get out of the control, then it’s not control at all. Women want containment and to be controlled.
    1
  11.  @lauraviseniya5930  The majority of women crave a degree of control and containment. You’ve been trained that any “control” is abuse. This isn’t true. The control I exert over my wife extends to not allowing her to disrespect me, not allowing her to do things that are immature and destructive to our home or family, not allowing her to make stupid choices, and especially not allowing her to rationalize bad decisions. Women are full blown experts at rationalizing their bad behavior and decisions.
    1
  12.  @raymondcerv1370  You lost the point when you said “would of”. It’s not “would of”, it’s “would have”. Fix yourself.
    1
  13. Strange that you think the problem is dating apps, and not third wave feminism.
    1
  14. We don’t see that happen often. People don’t understand proportion. If you go to a city and you see twenty hot women with twenty fat idiots, you think “that’s a lot of good women with suck ass dudes.” No it isn’t. It’s twenty. There are 8 billion people in the world. We don’t look at individual cases one at a time. We generalize, because generalizations apply.
    1
  15. She has high standards but will wear a bullshit ass Mickey Mouse outfit like that. 😂
    1
  16. That’s because the vast majority of women think 80% of men are “below average” in attractiveness. When you say somewhat decent looking, you’ve probably already eliminated 80% of men. Then when you ask for a guy making $100k, you’ve wiped out almost all of the rest of them. Lastly, marriage is a contract that, for the man, says “this is a lifelong contract that if you break it, your partner gets half of your stuff, but it doesn’t work the other way around, so your partner is incentivized to break it”. Just those three things alone make it very unlikely. Women need to start looking at male attractiveness on a normally distributed bell curve instead of a curve that is skewed heavily right. The skewed right curve shows that only 20% of men even meet the minimum standard for looks. When the sexes are reversed, men rate women on a normally distributed bell curve where 70% of women are rated as “average”, and around 15% are above average. But women simply don’t know what they’re talking about anymore. They’re not connected to reality of the market, while men are becoming increasingly tuned into the reality of how bad of a contract marriage is for them. Women looked at boomer marriages and saw what they should do. Men looked at boomers marriages and said “fuck that”.
    1
  17.  @LaciRae  Thanks for that self own. 😂
    1