Youtube comments of Marvin Martian (@m4rvinmartian).
-
756
-
556
-
419
-
361
-
268
-
228
-
205
-
167
-
155
-
154
-
143
-
116
-
112
-
98
-
95
-
79
-
77
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
66
-
66
-
63
-
59
-
58
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
48
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
33
-
30
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
Quite possible they did NOT think of this.
Pay close attention. Women cannot predict the future.
I am dead serious.
Start looking for it. A woman cannot see more than a couple weeks if that much, into the future.
That means, women, NEVER understand the consequences of their actions today.
I finally got my girlfriend to understand why I really don't care about her opinion on big things by making her play out a scenario a couple years into the future. Just picturing the effects, half a year in, she was all over the place.
They generally make decisions based on emotion.
When we make a decision, it's based on facts, and so, 2 years into the future, a fact will remain a fact.
A woman has no idea how she will FEEL a few weeks from now, and thus, has no idea what the world "will look like" a few weeks into the future, because she doesn't know how she will FEEL about the world a few weeks from now. And as a result, the world might as well not even exist next month.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
How we survived without it??
You must be young. First... we didn't have complicated cars with 20 computers per car.
THEN, we had these things called, 'old white men', in these locations called, 'garages'.
And they had EARS, EYES, and a stunning lack of greed.
You'd go there with whatever was ailing, and they'd say... see that, you need to fix it. Go get this part, see if you can put it on, if not, swing by here, and I'll slap it on for $25.
I'll let you figure out how we got from there to here.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@NennieC123 we found the NPC, she's only got Orange Man Bad programming though.
Hey Nennie sweetie, you need a man in your life, thinking isn't your strong suit.
See, you are what intelligent people call, a headline reader.
In other words, about 5 minutes of conversation could exhaust everything you know about politics.
Have you EVER even looked at a budget? Do you know the "wall" is less than 0.1% of the budget. Let that sink in.
THE DEMOCRATS are allowing the longest shutdown in history for an item that is less than 0.1% of the budget!
THE DEMOCRATS SWEETIE!
I'm sure you believe in anthropogenic climate change, even though it's been proven a thousand times that the sun's sunspot variability is actually what is tied to the Earth's climate, and NOT CO². Do you know plants need CO² to grow? Do you know we are extremely close to TOO LITTLE CO²? Yeah, there's a lower limit on crop production before it collapses from too low CO². Doesn't it make you concerned that for an overpopulated world, the UN... wants the world food production to collapse? Wouldn't you say next... Does the U.N., want food production to collapse? Do they want to concentrate food production, only in 1st world countries that can afford fertilizers, so they can sell to 3rd world countries, instead of letting them be self sufficient and grow their own?
Please start dating a conservative man in 2019, so he can make you a useful part of this country and not just a spender and headline reader-repeater.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Focus, be on your game. I represented MYSELF against a 22 yr divorce attorney and DESTROYED THEM! She paid ME, 1.5yrs alimony for a 3 yr marriage. I kept ALL of my race cars, engine building company, real estate company, my watch collection, my knife collection, EVERYTHING I ENJOYED... she kept all the debt, the house that I really didn't care about that had no equity, and all the furniture SHE WANTED, EVERYTHING SHE ENJOYED.
LOL.
I took my quarter mil and started a non-profit. That was a decade and a half ago. Single and SO HAPPY.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Gary... You're not going to listen, but you'll hopefully remember, as you're reflecting on your mistakes, don't simp for women.
Family (the one that brought you into the world), you, your career. ONLY invest and focus on those.
That means meeting Trump will do more for you, than just about anyone else, esp loose women.
Even if you have money, you're not a Billionaire. And if you do have money, that is even more of a reason to meet with him.
My words are sage, live them, or regret them.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Life of Amoree uh huh... Maybe you don't know what it means to have an IQ under 100. A LOT OF bad decision making goes with that. And because calling cops and telling them you got wronged while committing a crime, literally makes up compilation videos. Further, a good lawyer could get their client off in this case, because there is a thing called "attractive nuisance". Lastly, a first time offense for petty theft is a slap on the wrist, while you're buying this douchebag a new $1000+ interior to their car, or replacing furniture and carpet in their house. Lastly lastly, one is tortious, one is petty criminal. Innocent until proven guilty is only a benefit of criminal due process. In civil litigation, YOU ARE GUILTY until you can prove you are NOT. So the guy that made the packages has 0% chance of proving not guilt since he proudly had made this video, he would have with the ink/paint as well, and it's all the evidence the plaintiff attorney would need.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
4:45 Close. Men and women both have a point system in their heads. The difference being. Men, start women at zero when they meet. Then points start adding up. Attractive, add points, friendly, add points, tradcon, add points. If she f's up, some points are taken away... BUT! Points can always be added back.
WOMEN OTOH, start guys at (arbitrary number) 2000 points. And every single tiny thing you do... takes points away. Notice... I did NOT say, every BAD thing you do, takes points away... I said, EVERYTHING. Confused yet? Don't be. Made her a perfect dinner? It wasn't, trust me. 2 points taken away. Bought dinner? 5 points taken away. Low effort, you don't care about her enough. Wasn't the right place. Even if it was the right place, you forgot SOMETHING. Want her to make dinner? 20 points, you damn miso.
Get it now? Understand why ALL relationships end nowadays? You WILL run out of points. When, is up to you.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@bittersweet2166 Based on FACTS PLUS VIDEO, she had to have walked up to and invaded that man's space. It is silly to think that with all of them apparently there, that she was there first, since he had just rented the bike. He was "hovering" over it, waiting for however long it takes for it to reset so he can get another 45 minutes.
Regardless if she's allowed to rent it, we are addressing the silly ass contention that those men invaded HER SPACE.
Just by her actions in the video, it's quite obvious she strutted up there, with an entitled attitude to take that bike, completely expecting to do that weak ass yelling when she didn't get her way.
A scream of fear, it'll carry a solid half block. Her weak ass protestations couldn't make it 2 car lengths. She was yelling just loud enough so some white-knight beta simp doctor would step in.
The only thing she was in fear of, was not getting a bike, right there and then.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@daryl4841 You've obviously never been retired. You'll GLADLY welcome MORE than 40 hours of work, if you spend just 1 year retired. Now, what you call work, and what I call work are two different things. For me, work = hours spent doing things that generate income. Not "doing things that suck". And I monetize my hobbies. So, unless you are going to catch up on 40 years viewing time of TV, and unless you enjoy staring at flowers grow or paint peel... you will seek a hobby to monetize too, and thus, will spend more than 40 hours a week, WORKING. Heck, I think I spent 40 hours on EACH of my hobbies this week.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There is no such phrase as "must of" in the English language. The "education/indoctrination" system has failed you.
Just do the simple test...
'of been cloudy'
'have been cloudy'
It's "must have". What happened was, your teachers were lazy and never connected for you, must've spelled out, with it sounded out, so you hear "must of".
But must've is what is called a "contraction", it is a shortening of must have, must've.
There also is no should of, would of, could of. It's all should have, would have, and could have.
Should've, would've, could've learned, if you had a real teacher.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1:55 I have a meteorology degree, from a preeminent college that teaches it. Global Climate Warming Change is a hoax.
How exactly big is that motorcycle???
Funny thing is, he hasn't talked to ANY of those "10,000" scientists, nor the ones on the motorcycle.
So, he's just repeating what he heard.
And THAT is what MOST people do nowadays.
I, on the other hand, am a classical scientist...
Ponder, Generate Hypothesis, Test to Conclusion, Formulate Theory.
No TV or propaganda involved.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Sammyk94950 Oh I totally agree. But I unfortunately know people intimately, with a Masters in Psych, and just like simps giving 304's money, there are financial simps that will give him money, even with a Chinese parade of red flags.
The theoretical statement I made, "humbles him" to other people that do not consider themselves that smart.
Those are really the only ones he can scam at this point, so he needs to make himself look like one of them.
Which is basically what you said.
But you're probably competent and intelligent, so that 'statement' looks bad to you.
And I agree. To us it looks like, damn he's an incompetent idiot.
But unfortunately, many of his fans know he's an idiot and don't care, because they too are idiots.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@4shitsandgiggles122 Here's an analysis of a passage from Genesis:
The key is Paul’s reference to angels. Some scholars think that Paul is referring to a different story in Genesis, the events that precipitated the Flood.
In Genesis 6:1-4 a group known as “the sons of God” see the daughters of men and notice how attractive they are. They decide to “take wives for themselves” and these women gave birth to the Nephilim. And this is where tall people came from.
Later traditions refer to the “sons of God” as the “Watchers” and ascribes to them as a kind of angel that, having disobeyed God, has been chained up for all eternity at the edge of the world.
What has this to do with veiling?
Well when the sons of God were in heaven eyeing up the good-looking human women, they were looking at the tops of their heads.
It only makes sense, therefore that angels are attracted to pretty hair (which is, incidentally, one explanation for why Paul thinks that women don’t have to veil themselves if they cut their hair).
So if you’re female and doing something that might get the attention of beings in heaven, like, say, praying, Paul thinks you should veil yourself to prevent yourself from attracting the wrong kind of supernatural attention.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dps615 Interest fact... the YouTube API allows you to collect all comments from ONE USER... globally on the system.
Ohh, lookie here. DPS has an e-rektion for his EV car.
I'm sorry you were a sucker, and failed at math and science in school, and you ended up being a good wage slave, that just reads headlines and does what you're told... but we are here now... and from this point forward, is the amount of time, it takes for stupid, ego, and narcissism to clear your system, before you can enter back into a society that thinks for themselves.
Quit being a cvnt, you were wrong, you screwed up... own it, and quit putting others down, because you're weak.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nucleargrizzly1776 1997. I got it a couple decades ago, took it apart, balanced, blueprinted, custom cam I ran the numbers on. Cam guy said it wouldn't work, afterwards he asked if he could make some sticks with the same numbers. lol.
Knife edge crank, billet everything. Deep dish pistons, H-beam rods. AFR Heads that had another few hours CNC done to it, and then I had them ExtrudeHoned to clean up the CNC.
Worked with Vortech directly to get it to 2 Bar.
Used to be in a Impala SS, had the SCTA fastest 4 door in Cali for a few years until STi came out.
It was an amazing car with that engine. And in Cali, I got to race it against every exotic.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@fairlind Ok, but you should know this is confirmation bias. And also hidden population bias (this is a cognitive bias coined by me). Where the person that selects the group, for whatever reason, introduces a pattern that creates an exclusion that then sets up a hidden population. I've had to untangle a LOT of clinical trials that had no idea such a thing exists.
See, my group sample is MUCH larger than yours by several magnitudes. I eliminate a lot of error that way. I'm not exempt from HPB, just have reduced the effect on the sample.
Your population is self-chosen. My population, had no choice in being chosen.
i.e., Your population includes dysphoria, malaise, other indications that autonomously self-assembled it.
But I get to LOCATE everything in my population, without inducing a feedback or introducing a bias. That means that I can locate signals that are below your threshold, and thus, don't include all of what you consider common artifacts.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@namelessnobody7611 EXACTLY! See.. all your side has, is personal attacks, and when pushed, you leave.
Look bro, most of the world is lying to you. Do your own independent research. Start with climate change if you like. Then look at all the propoganda the globalists show you.
Here is the trick. I won't provide sources, because you'll call them tainted. That is fine. But do this...
Look at the X axis. No, I'm REALLY serious. Look at the X axis on the "Climate doom" propaganda. I won't tell you what to look for. But if you are astute and learned, you'll see a pattern. Very distinct the second you notice. And then you'll notice it EVERYWHERE.
I enjoy discourse on this, and helping people learn. My name is on a plaque at Mt. Wilson, as part of the team that made one of the first adaptive optics in the world.
Guess what you have to know more than anyone else in the world about... when you are making adaptive optics? You cannot, at all, make adaptive optics work, be the first in the world to create it, if you don't know those disciplines implicitly.
And that's why I was sought out. Not just hired. Sought.
Believe what you want, but this planet has been around for over 4 billion years, and people that got less than 3.0 GPA in REGULAR SCHOOL... are trying to sell you a bill of goods, based on 200 years.
Cmon man. Do... independent... research.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'll tell you why the dislike. I disagree with foster before adoption. I think it's a racket and it hurts the dog more than it helps. Everyone still is treating dogs like animals, even though every video fawns over them like they are humans... but they disregard the dogs feelings when they boot them from YET ANOTHER family or home. What's worse, the foster is supposed to be the best thing they have had in their life in a while, and there is no reason for that dog to suspect the foster will disappear, and suddenly they are gone, and they are with yet another home, so now this dog will spend a VERY long time, wondering when THIS foster will disappear ALSO. Because dogs can't grasp THAT concept, they just know they had a bad life, suddenly it was good, and now it changes again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right of Publicity: an overview
The right of publicity prevents the unauthorized commercial use of an individual's name, likeness, or other recognizable aspects of one's persona. It gives an individual the exclusive right to license the use of their identity for commercial promotion.
In the United States, the right of publicity is largely protected by state common or statutory law. Only about half the states have distinctly recognized a right of publicity. Of these, many do not recognize a right by that name but protect it as part of the Right of Privacy. The Restatement Second of Torts recognizes four types of invasions of privacy: intrusion, appropriation of name or likeness, unreasonable publicity, and false light. See Restatement ( Under the Restatement's formulation, the invasion of the right of publicity is most similar to the unauthorized appropriation of one's name or likeness.
In other states, the right of publicity is protected through the law of unfair competition. Actions for the tort of misappropriation or for a wrongful attempt to "pass off" the product as endorsed or produced by the individual help to protect the right of publicity. See Unfair competition.
If a person can establish an aspect of his or her identity as a trademark, protection may be provided by Federal law. See Trademark.
The Federal Lanham Act can also provide protection where a person's identity is used to falsely advertise a product or designate its origin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1