Comments by "dbergerac" (@dbergerac9632) on "Man shot by Kyle Rittenhouse testifies" video.

  1. After his testimony, the defense doesn't need witnesses.
    4
  2.  @cerebrophage7709  Incorrectly identifying a victim as an assailant is one way to catch a homicide charge. You aren't supposed to "take out" anyone who is not posing an "immediate" threat. If Kyle were an "active shooter" he had a target rich environment but oddly, only shot people who were in the act of attacking him as he made his way to the police lines.
    3
  3. The assailants intention is irrelevant. True or not, it could not be known by the accused. His ACTIONS gave Kyle reasonable fear for his life.
    2
  4. Wait for it about 2 minutes after the prosecution rests.
    2
  5.  @victormelendez2124  The evidence is that he never crossed the state line with the gun. Perhaps you did not watch the trial.
    2
  6.  @99onone50  Wasn't Rosenbaum in violation by being that close to a minor?
    2
  7. Working in concert with other rioters to kill Kyle, causing the death of one assailant, is enough to convict the surviving attacker of Felony Murder. It's too bad that justice takes a back seat to politics.
    2
  8.  @chieftahchawwickah7341  Perhaps the state should have charged him with curfew violation instead of murder. This case is a loser.
    2
  9. He was indeed rushing to the cries of "medic" until he decided to turn around (abandoning the medic role) and chase Kyle with a drawn Glock.
    2
  10. Had the police not abandoned part of the city to its fate, none of these events would have happened. (orders from the top, however political, are still orders though.) If anyone is responsible, it is the Mayor.
    2
  11.  @davidtallent4230  It's looking like a win so far.
    2
  12. Democrat immunity.
    1
  13.  @cerebrophage7709  It's illegal to shoot someone running away as they do not pose a threat. No double standard. When surrounded by assailants, running may save your life and is preferred to "going Rambo" no double standard. Running toward the authorities through a threatening mob is not an act of aggression. No double standard. Kid? Do YOU remember where you were when JFK was shot? I saw Sputnik with my own eyes.
    1
  14.  @cerebrophage7709  I would prefer that they did not. Who in this specific event were police? The assailants, or the victim of assault? I would NEVER want the police to shoot someone who is running TO the police with his hands up. I'd also be unhappy if he were beaten with a skateboard by an uninvolved stranger while running TO the police. Save your silly false equivalencies for your comrades.
    1
  15. His intent would be unknown to Kyle, and thus irrelevant. Don't point unless you want to play "one of us is getting shot".
    1
  16. His attacker had a semi automatic pistol, Glocks are more often found illegally modified for full auto than AR's.
    1
  17. He was a full time revolutionary "protester". Some have medical skills and use them along with other tasks.
    1
  18. Kyle did not belong there at all. His youth made him a target for predators and he did not understand that. Kyle was looking to be "part of the event". Now he always will be. He is guilty of being a fool, but not of murder. Like so many adrenalin junkies and cop wannabes, he'll never be employed by any city. He doesn't deserve a murder charge for putting himself foolishly in danger.
    1
  19. Yeppers. It is better to be hanged for a sheep as for a lamb.
    1
  20. Least competent prosecution since OJ.
    1
  21.  @Skinski7  It was a loser case from the start. The highest incompetence was seeking the indictment to begin with.
    1
  22. Active shooters are actively shooting. A mugging victim who shot his attacker is not an active shooter. "See that dead guy over there? Don't be like him. Let the kid get to the police."
    1
  23. I'd be funny if they did not do this on every story.
    1
  24. The judge might still just call and end to this sham with a directed verdict of Not Guilty.
    1
  25. If it can be shown that the surviving attacker was acting in concert with the others attempting to murder Kyle, he should be tried for the felony murder of the other two assailants.
    1
  26.  @toast1012  If he weren't suing the city for millions, I'd disagree, believing that his lefty bona fides would shield him, but money talks.
    1
  27. If someone tries to mug you and you shoot him and then try to contact the police, it does not make you an "active shooter". The only people shot were "active assailants". Every-single-one-of-them would have been unharmed if they had just left well enough alone.
    1
  28. When your idiot boss assigns you an impossible job.
    1
  29.  @andre1987eph  Not worried about THAT.
    1
  30.  @LandSharkEatsU  There were no murders in this case.
    1
  31.  @LandSharkEatsU  Yes. And if he is found guilty there was a "murder." If the jury determines it was self defense then It's "justifiable homicide". Because the jury has not yet decided, it is a homicide trial. The Judge rightly struck the word "murdered' from testimony already as incorrect and prejudicial. As of this moment, there has not been a "murder" only homicide ( justifiable or not) involved in the case. Although I expect the term to be used in closing arguments.
    1
  32.  @victormelendez2124  In the 9th inning, the wife arrived asking: "what's the score?" Him: "0-0" "Good I didn't miss anything.
    1
  33.  @LandSharkEatsU  He shot first, he didn't attack first, but he did shoot first. It's the only reason that he wasn't murdered.
    1
  34.  @LandSharkEatsU  So the guy throwing things at him and chasing him with threats is not a bother. Got it. He just ran away using his tractor beam to pull a bystander into chasing him at speed until Kyle got him where he wanted him, a place where Kyle was cornered and could retreat no farther. That's one really sophisticated and complicated to shoot someone when it'd be easier to just point and shoot; and there was no evidence of a tractor beam being used.
    1
  35.  @LandSharkEatsU  If someone is painting a house, you can call him a painter. Until it becomes a mural, he's not an artist.
    1
  36.  @Everynamestaken69  I knew a guy who was 5'4" and in Special Forces who was no "manlet". A slightly taller fat child is no comparison. Rosenbaum sought a victim who he correctly thought weak. He certainly had no chance against one of the armed adults.
    1
  37. The only actual "Perry Mason" trial moment in history.
    1
  38.  @FreedomofSpeech865  So far, no one has been proven to have been "murdered" at all. That child had been busying himself offering first aid to protesters until he was jumped.
    1
  39. Leftist city politics. The mob was supposed to burn part of the city unimpeded, but some citizens interfered. They want an example of the vengeance of The Party and Kyle is it.
    1
  40. I was, until his testimony worked so well for the defense. Now his stupid, commie life has some meaning.
    1
  41. Usually I watch the entire trial before I decide, but this time the prosecution convinced me of his innocence.
    1
  42.  @RealYRM  They couldn't find anything damning in hours of testimony.
    1
  43. There was a LOT of video. If Kyle had not wounded him, he'd be the one on trial for murder. Kyle did him a HUGE favor.
    1
  44. His "intent" could not be known to Kyle, only his actions, so his intent is irrelevant. Only did he give Kyle reason to fear bodily harm.
    1