Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "AH Fans Attack Credibility of Dr Curry Over THIS Photograph! Barrister wades in." video.

  1. Looks like it is FAKE ... because the SKIN TONE of "Dr. Curry face" is different from "Dr. Curry body" ... look for the "reddish- and whiteness" and it feels off. I could be wrong and it could be a case of the LIGHTING, BUT the woman on the right has a "curious head shape" too AND the right border (in the picture/her left side) of her entire body also has a "curious shadow line" in relation to the car. In fact the LIGHTING SEEMS TO BE ARTIFICIAL ... and yet there are NO SHADOWS (from arms) falling on the body behind the arm? There should be some, because the stronger the lighting, the stronger the shadow!
    1
  2. Dear BBB, the SOCIALISING in the british "law circles" IS BAD, because it FEEDS the "like/dislike of the potential opponents / people arguing a case in front of you"! Lawyers NEED TO be advocates of their clients and MOST IMPORTANTLY: JUDGES NEED TO BE IMPARTIAL, which doesnt happen when they like one lawyer more than the other DUE TO SOCIALISING! The british justice SYSTEM ... IS BROKEN ... through this kind of NETWORKING! "Lady Justice" wears a blindfold as a SYMBOL OF WILLFUL BLINDNESS ... to signal impartial treatment of those in front of her ... but the statue of Lady Justice atop of Old Bailey HAS NO BLINDFOLD and this "networking" is a clear bit of evidence that "justice ISNT blind!" There are many cases where this is shown ... and they - CURIOUSLY - involve "the government" and "things they dont like", because networking in british society INVOLVES NON-LAWYERS TOO! Your ASSUMPTIONS of "neither of them would skew their evidence" ... dont mean anything ... as the Depp vs. Sun/Wooton case has shown.
    1