Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist @APsychForSoreMinds Talks about Dr Curry and Dr Spiegel" video.

  1. Everyone but Elaine and "Amber SIMPS" knows that ...
    5
  2. She used a STANDARDISED TEST as the basis for her assessment ... and for Amber's experts it was more "expert OPINION" without any evidence.
    3
  3. Amber Heard's team went by "expertise on paper" (Dr. Hughes's is long as is that of Dr. Spiegel) and Johnny Depp's team looked for "skill / quality of work".
    2
  4. He was basically "the host at his own home" ... but I dont think he did a lot of talking. "Having him on hand" would be a good idea if Dr. Currie had any immediate questions for clarification ... and in any case ... Dr. Currie was WELL-CHAPERONED, so no improprieties happened! [/sarcasm off]
    2
  5. Sadly ... you will have no idea "before trying it" how the psychiatrist/psychologist actually is, when you need to consult one. a) you wont have "an interview" to find out how they think AND b) you will have "mental problems" and thus your reasoning will probably be impaired. The APA has been including anti-male rhetoric in the textbooks that are used to teach new psychiatrists (like "perpetrator = male form of a word", "victim = female form" and also the reasoning behind it). "The Prim Reaper" has made a series of videos about "the hijacking of modern education" a few years back, going through her textbooks ...
    2
  6. Sorry ... but "expert witnesses" and "neutrality" DO NOT MIX ... which is made clear when you see two experts stating the complete opposite AND when you see "experts" - like Dr. Hughes and Dr. Spiegel - make ARMCHAIR QUARTERBACK DIAGNOSIS' of someone they HAVE NEVER TALKED TO! One did it by "believing what Amber told her" and the other by "watching Johnny Depp in movies and interviews", which are both COMPLETELY ILLEGITIMATE! Another example is claiming that #JusticeForJohnnyDepp is an ANTI-AMBER HASHTAG. That is ridiculous ... because it does NOT share the meaning of #burnTheWitch ... The opinions expressed here in the video show the DEFERENTIAL UK ATTITUDE ... which is WRONG! No "expert" should be above criticism, because experts are ALSO HUMANS ... same as judges, barristers, lawyers, ... police, bureaucrats, professors, politicians, ... HUMANS MAKE MISTAKES!
    1
  7.  @Kymberlee_W  Elaine decides upon her witnesses by their usefulness, which is why she chose the MAN-HATING Dr. Hughes ... and also the "#JusticeForJohnnyDepp is ANTI-AMBER" social media expert. This is the reason why PEOPLE NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO WORDS and look for double-meanings and "traps" ... like "making it an offense to call someone by the wrong pronoun" gives MORE RIGHTS to SOME people ... but LESSENS THE RIGHTS OF EVERYONE ELSE. A "special shoutout" needs to be made to whoever names some "packages of law" in the USA, because the "Patriot Act" is not really patriotic and rather reduces the rights and freedoms of every american for example.
    1