Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "Tucker accuses government of hiding 'compelling' UFO evidence" video.

  1.  ScantsRants 1  Of course people WITH BRAINS will complain, because "pulling out the majority of US troops - INCLUDING THE AIR FORCE STUFF" is a DUMB MOVE. You get the CIVILIANS out FIRST and THEN the troops. That is the way to do it, but the idiots in the White House couldnt figure it out ... and you couldnt either.
    8
  2.  ScantsRants 1  Oh and the election WAS stolen ... or how do you explain "hiding in the basement Biden" got more votes WITHOUT campaigning than charismatic Obama did? How do you explain the problems with the results shown in the Arizona audit? (Ballots NOT matching up security markings on the back and front side, several "votes" having the same number in the files and other such things.) Oh and let us not forget the TIMES article ... talking about the "fortification" of the election ... and the clear bias in Silicon Valley (which started with the Google election party in 2016, where the bosses - while suppressing tears - promised that "this will not happen again"). You should STOP using Gavin Newsom's "crime reduction technique", which made stealing less than $950 not a crime anymore ... thus reducing the numbers IN THE STATISTICS ONLY. Try to look at THE REAL WORLD and try to PROVE the stuff people you are disagreeing with wrong. Just remember: a CLAIM is NOT the same as PROOF / EVIDENCE.
    8
  3.  @DavidJohnson-hg1mz  Do you know the difference between "you can" and "I do"? One of them is ABSTRACT ... and that is what the Trump comment is all about ... because you always forget to mention THE SECOND PART ... the "AND THEY LET YOU DO IT" bit. Women used to SLAP men who got a bit too close ... but todays women dont seem to want to do that anymore.
    7
  4.  @ChrisWolf75  Nah ... he needs to be sent to Afghanistan ... to protect all the women and "rainbows". Just give him a sword (which has the word RIGHTEOUSNESS etched into it) to fight with.
    3
  5. Dont worry ... he will blow up the planet to power their journey.
    2
  6. This stuff started coming up under Trump. The "documentary" coming out NOW is a coincidence, because nobody who wanted to feed Tucker with false info could have timed it that well ... unless its a producer working for him.
    1
  7. ... and who is going to prosecute that? You'd have to do a FULL INVENTORY to find out which documents are present and which ones are unaccounted for. There are also loads of people CONSTANTLY CHANGING JOBS ... which means that "everyone has been part of it at one point" and thus none of them want it to come out.
    1
  8. Not these ones. They belong to your imagination.
    1
  9. Doesnt work ... you can only time travel into the future. At least with current knowledge of physics. Why would "we from the future" want to though ... because changing history doesnt work. Ever.
    1
  10. @Janus Zeal It isnt a narrative ... when there is evidence for it. Stop pretending that it is just a figment of imagination and start addressing the claims AND THE EVIDENCE. There was a video a month before the election from an "election helper training session", where the official basically GAVE TIPS TO THWART ELECTION OBSERVERS ON PURPOSE. This clearly shows THE WILL TO CHEAT and the "you need to stay on the far end of this big room" - evidenced through pictures - commands from election officials again PROVES THE WILL TO CHEAT. Look into the Arizona Audit - Razörfist / the Rageaholic has a video about it if you cant find it elsewhere - and the things they found there (security markings on front/back side of ballots NOT MATCHING, but they were counted ... and "vote numbers" [which should be unique] having several ballots connected to them). Oh and IF IT WASNT STOLEN ... why are the BUREAUCRATS resisting an order FROM A JUDGE to hand over ballots and equipment?
    1
  11. They get a CRAPTON of (D) trolls, (religious) trolls and even (conspiracy idiot) trolls on the serious stuff now, so they simply skip it for "Afghanistan" for the time.
    1
  12.  @dougreed736  Sure they can ... if it is a phenomenon which many observe but we dont have an explanation for. There were some unexplained plane crashes ... until people figured out that they had flown into a region of really still air or something, where the wing aerodynamics didnt work anymore and pilots reacted in the wrong way to them.
    1
  13.  @georgehenderson7783  That is the WRONG APPROACH. The correct one was demonstrated in 1989 by many Warsaw Pact countries who got rid of their commie regimes through PERSISTENT MASS PROTEST. If you try the civil war approach YOU LOSE for two reasons: a) you have rifles, but the US Army has tanks, missiles AND DRONES ... and they have the INFORMATION SUPERIORITY b) you STARTING it will give them the excuse needed to PASS EMERGENCY LAWS and take away ALL RIGHTS ... FOREVER (look into the "Reichstagsbrand") Dont be STUPID and do it the right way ... the TOTALLY PEACEFUL WAY. Times change and these times are all about PROPAGANDA and INFORMATION ... and about CONVINCING THE UNDECIDED that your side is the right side.
    1
  14. I havent been.
    1
  15. "Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life down here."
    1
  16. ... and do what? You cant FORCE people to "be nice" or "truthful" ... and if you could it wouldnt be a world worth living in. We need CONFLICT, which starts with DIFFERENT OPINIONS and ARGUING (peacefully) with each other. That is what REAL SCIENCE REQUIRES (like "defending your masters thesis").
    1
  17. The ones that want to eat you OR the ones that will blow up this planet to make way for a hyperspace bypass?
    1