Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism" video.

  1. Feminism.
    90
  2. ... which makes it clear it is RELIGIOUS for her. She BELIEVES in (but doesnt need to prove) ... - the existence of the patriarchy [No one ever proved the existence of this cabal.] - the existence of the pay gap [I can disprove its existence with the data Cathy brought up, but that is easy.] - the existence of the "pink tax" [Just check your local store for bicycle helmets, but make sure both are either WITH Disney branding or WITHOUT.]
    36
  3. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    32
  4. Chinchillupa Guy No ... there is no PAY gap ... which would be "women getting paid less PER HOUR for the same job". You need to learn to be precise with words. There IS an EARNINGS GAP ... meaning: women get less at the end of the month because they like to take time off work and dont do overtime and so on. PAY GAP = NO, earnings gap = yes Oh and women also CHOOOSE different jobs than men (which is a HUGE part of the 9% Cathy mentioned but didnt include in her thought process, because that fact is inconvenient).
    30
  5. This statement is ... a) common sense OR b) totally ridiculous and racist/transphobe/homophobe/sexist ?
    29
  6. ... while protesting his "vast generalizations" (based on statistical data).
    27
  7. Well it makes the "problems" of todays media clear by showcasing ... a) the DISHONEST journalism which has an agenda other than "truth" and "objective reporting" and b) the limitation of the media (which gets abused by the activists like Cathy Newman) by cramming too many topics into a 30 minute video ... and then cutting Peterson off before he can finish explaining. Old media NEEDS to adapt to this or die.
    25
  8. A LOT ... I am going through regularly and only find a handful of mine. Many of those which point out that this is Cathy Newman's dishonest interviewing technique are gone. Oh and so are those using a certain link to an article from 2013, where Cathy admitted to discrimination (for women = against men = illegal).
    25
  9. The problem isnt intelligence (she graduated from Oxford) but rather the software running the show, because feminism.exe is really really narrow-minded.
    24
  10. She is a feminist ... dont insult morons.
    23
  11. I asked him on Twitter several times ... but he ignores that. That kind of behaviour should be sued as fake news ... or maybe our hate-speech laws here in Europe could apply too, because he is insinuating that we are all hateposters threatening poor poor Cathy Newman.
    19
  12. Well said and totally obvious. Feminists are the true sexists and SJWs/BLM are the true racists. No one cared about people being "black" (or whatever) two decades ago ... Michael Jackson, Prince, Eddie Murphy, ...
    18
  13. Dont call this "unorthodox journalism" ... this is THE NORM because of the feminist lens AND the assassination attempt on Peterson's reputation!
    18
  14. Cathy Newman didnt do this interview "as a woman" but rather as a FEMINIST ... which is her RELIGION. So please be precise and make that distinction, because you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics otherwise. YOU WOMEN have to DISTANCE YOURSELF from these nasty feminists!
    18
  15. Why should you be afraid to say that? Are "girls" a COLLECTIVE? I hope they are not, because that would kinda make you communists. Oh and every revolution starts with one person saying "this is wrong" ... and sometimes they are sacrificed by the dumb majority, which still makes that individual right. Just think about Galileo.
    17
  16. They thought it went well ... Cathy even tweeted "Viva feminism" afterwards ... not realizing she had shot both feet of her ideology off with this debate.
    17
  17. Obviously not ... because she works for the "good" and "righteous" mainstream media.
    16
  18. Do you think she cares who she is interviewing? This is an obvious hit piece designed to smear Peterson and get a headline along the "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" lines. They are DISHONEST through and through.
    16
  19. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    15
  20. In the next edition of the dictionary the term strawman will be replaced by strawwoman ... because of sexism and to honor Cathy Newman.
    15
  21. That was entirely ON PURPOSE, which is the core mechanic of a very dishonest interviewing technique. Watch other interviews with "controversial" people and you will see the same happening.
    15
  22. Dont shame the lobsters ... they did nothing wrong (because they didnt create feminism).
    14
  23. Never stop reading and thinking ... and dont forget to clean your room! Do not fall in love with poetry too much, because the example of Cathy Newman shows clearly that an "interviewing technique" can be very very dishonest. Focus of VALUES too instead of "nice words" (this is the whole point of Jane Austen's novel Mansfield Park, where the people who simply have learned "a good outer shell" are the bad ones, while the girl with the "good inner values" is the heroine).
    14
  24. The question is: How long are they willing to pay for someone to delete them full time?
    13
  25. Please remember - nthmonkeyirishwifey - that you are playing THEIR GAME whenever you say "woman" instead of "feminist". Language and PRECISE meanings of words are important and that is why Peterson does it AND that is why the left tries to make definition of words (and laws) fuzzy by insisting that "words are violence" for instance.
    12
  26. This is probably counted as "abuse" ... because the left cant understand humor and they most certainly dont have the capacity for self-criticism.
    12
  27. Actually it is impossible to HAVE an argument with a stupid person ...
    12
  28. No ... you have to giver her some credit, because she is SKILLED at WARPING WORDS into something outrageous. That isnt "random" ... and totally deliberate.
    11
  29. That is why it is GOOD ... it showcases todays DISHONEST JOURNALISM! Tell everyone you know to watch it so they can see it and become innocculated.
    11
  30. There is NOTHING to "discuss" because FEMINISTS deny the FACTS and keep on yelling sexism over and over again. Let me debunk the wage gap for you with two simple questions: - If it is "standard" to pay wome significantly less ... why are there unemployed women? - Many companies all across the western world employ women in their finances/salary department ... and yet there are ZERO whistleblowers who hold up the piece of paper with the "women get paid less" rule? Feminism has become a RELIGION where the followers BELIEVE in the existence of the patriarchy, the pay gap and the pink tax. You cant "discuss" with religious zealots ... because they WILL NOT BELIEVE EVIDENCE. That last statement comes from a certain gentleman from the 80s ... have a look at the REAL purpose of feminism: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    11
  31. She still has a job ... cos feminism.
    11
  32. Ella Mapes Feminism and social "justice" are dividing the world into "oppressed" (women, minorities, gays, trans- ...) and "oppressors" (straight white men). This is a MARXIST dichotomy and basis for communism. The Labour Party recently displayed this by their OPENLY RACIST pricing policy[1] on the tickets for their own conference, they consider "white privilege" to be a reality ... which is one of the "arguments" of feminists/SJWs. - white privilege - the patriarchy - the gender pay gap - the pink tax All easily disproven or rather NEVER PROVEN TO EXIST. People just CLAIM they exist and then MISUSE statistics to "prove" them. An example was Cathy Newman and her attempt to prove the wage gap ... which I shall disprove for you with HER OWN FACTS: - 9% difference is CORRECT - it is the difference between the average wage for ALL MEN and ALL WOMEN - what Cathy IGNORED is the fact that it is also for ALL KINDS OF JOBS ... which makes her whining about "fairness" completely BULLSHIT, because she is comparing engineers to cleaning ladies! Oh and another way to disprove the existence of the wage gap is done by posing two LOGICAL questions. Answer them for yourself: - IF it was "normal" to pay women 23% less (I am using the figure Obama stated, but it works the same with the 9%) ... why are there UNEMPLOYED WOMEN? - All across the western world there are many many MANY companies who have women in their "payment/salary departments" ... and yet there are exactly ZERO whistleblowers who come and present their "women get 23% less rule"? Why? Maybe because people get paid THE SAME? or they DO work differently? I would really like to know which of Peterson's points you cant agree with (Cathy Newman made ZERO coherent argument herself and Peterson is completely logical) ... but answering me here is pointless because I post far too much to go through reply notices from YT. So ... Labour is going down the communist rabbit hole. Open your eyes before it is too late. [I am not saying the Tories are better ...] [1] https://youtu.be/sZL8YY-9WJw
    10
  33. No ... sadly you were not trolled ... this is "reality" now.
    10
  34. The mischaracterizations are ON PURPOSE to create a "gotcha moment" for the purpose of slapping an alt-right/misogynist/provocateur label on him (which she TRIED to bring up and failed). Just watch other "interviews" with "evil alt-righters" like Nigel Farage, Milo Yiannopulous ... you will see her doing exactly the same. Peterson is simply outrageously good at seeing through her and deflecting it.
    10
  35. She isnt interested in a conversation, just in smearing him.
    10
  36. JossWainwright An outright APOLOGY to Peterson and everyone criticising them would be required IMO. It has been weeks/months since they claimed the victim status ... and have provided no proof for it.
    10
  37. Feminists cant be fired ... oh and if you want to see something worse look into the BBC payment scandal where feminists complained about "unequal pay" and then 98 men and only 90 women got a pay rise after an independant inquiry. That got the feminists REALLY pissed.
    9
  38. This is a team effort ... and you would have to replace EVERYONE to change something for the better. So they do nothing ... and wait silently until all those nasty destroyers have stopped hunting the purple submarine called "feminist Channel 4".
    9
  39. She displayed DISHONESTY ... and that is bad ... everywhere! She is a bad feminist who thinks it is fine for her to discriminate (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html This dishonest interviewing style is entirely on purpose and used to try and achieve gotcha moments to pin alt-right/sexist/provocateur labels on interviewees. Do NOT give her any credit, because she deserves none.
    9
  40. 1. she is a feminist and not "a woman" here 2. she is also a DISHONEST journalist on a mission to slander Peterson -> Do NOT be embarrassed for her, because SHE CHOSE THIS PATH and should deal with the consequences.
    9
  41. How about "Watching a female presenter with noodles for hair ... talk about the failures of femininity" instead?
    9
  42. She is a follower of this RELIGION called FEMINISM. "Do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    9
  43. They are ideologues and WANT that kind of ideology for their echo chamber. The "misrepresentating interviewing style" is on purpose to smear interviewees. Just look at other interviews with her and here is Milo explaining the "tactic": https://youtu.be/AWlaIwci3PY
    9
  44. Actually she did ... to get the keywords to twist in her next dishonest "So you're saying ..." rephrasing. That is a skill she trained hard for, but it is entirely dishonest and has nothing to do with a search for truth (which people usually think an interview should be).
    9
  45. Feminism ...
    9
  46. Stop conflating "women" with "feminists"! Women are good, feminists are evil selfish bitches who lie for their own profit.
    8
  47. Tell him to "send the message" to his friends so they too can become innocculated against dishonest journalism and ideological BS. That is one of the most important things for parents to teach their children, because nowadays we do have the tools to "get the other viewpoint" ... if we want and if we allow it. I have recently been "reformed" on my opinion of Tommy Robinson after viewing his speech at Oxford and his interviews with Brittany Pettibone and Sargon of Akkad. Before that I somewhat trusted the general opinion of "he is an awful right winger" ... which he isnt. This was a clear reminder to TRUST NO ONE, least of all governments and mainstream media.
    8
  48. They left it up because they thought they had won ... and then it was too late, because "the internet doesnt forget". People will have downloaded it by then.
    8
  49. If you want to know how she thinks I would have sent you to her Wikipedia page yesterday, BUT they edited out the crucial sentence and citation ... so I had to go back a version to get it. This is pretty NASTY STUFF: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    8
  50. No ... they would claim "russian hackers took over our signal and sent a fake broadcast".
    8
  51. In the 4 weeks since the video was uploaded he apparently gained more than 170.000 new subscribers on Youtube. It was 15k over the last 3 days, but the scandal is calming down ... so I do believe that number to be correct.
    7
  52. Its out now and taking it down would be admitting their guilt. They are copyright flagging every video using clips though ... but even that attempt to silence people is failing.
    7
  53. No ... feminism as a whole is terrible from the start, because it isnt about equality. It has the syllable "fem-" in it and if you want to be balanced you need to be EGALITARIAN. Oh and feminism has been a MARXIST ideology from the start ... with "us poor oppressed" (workers/women) vs. "those evil oppressors" (capitalist-bourgeois/men).
    7
  54. She could have been aggressive AND honest. The giant wave of criticism comes from the fact that she WASNT honest ... which feminists usually arent. She wanted to WIN at all cost, because she doesnt care about truth ... and that is why she shot a lot of own goals for feminism that day. Lets hope Feminism gets relegated to the "toddler league" now where it belongs.
    7
  55. Actually ... they all still have jobs and if we dont keep this pressure up this will be forgotten (until the 2018 recaps).
    7
  56. No it will not ... because journalism classes are taught by commies now who will sweep this under the rug ... and who will compare Peterson to Hitler like Rambukkhana did in Canada. There is a jury of "speech scientists" here in Germany which name a "bad word of the year" at the end of each year and it has been anti-right for many years now. Stuff like "social justice warrior" would make that list of "words we arent supposed to use" because it would defend leftie ideology and journalists.
    7
  57. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now.
    7
  58. Feminism is all about control and not about empowerment or opening up opportunities. You just look at the now-extinct Grid Girls ... "Viva Feminism"!
    7
  59. woman feminist
    7
  60. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    6
  61. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now.
    6
  62. The whole point of the interview is to SMEAR HIM and to put stickers with alt-right/sexist/provocateur on him ... which she all tried to bring up but dropped immediately. The misrepresentation is a TACTIC to enable her to do that ... if he had replied in any other form than "No I did not say that at all". Watch through other interviews of her with "evil right men" like Milo or Nigel Farage. After this interview it is easy to see ...
    6
  63. Only 2 ? I had probably hundreds ... because I made a doc with "standard replies".
    6
  64. David Savage You are true to form in your SJW-ness ... SHE advocates for blaming and shaming the ACCUSED (but not proven). SHE is the evil one here and you are the troll trying to defend her because your ideology demands it and because you dont think women can be evil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_Newman#Jordan_Peterson_interview
    6
  65. Comparing feminists to very young children is actually very precise and Peterson said something similar in a talk after the VICE "hit piece" interview: https://youtu.be/LvCLNVZ-2sk Personally I have come to the same conclusion with the following image: Imagine you are a football coach and tell your best scorer "you get to play goalkeeper today ... for equality". You can do that with five-year-olds, but later on? You would be FIRED immediately if you did that in a professional club ... and thus the comparison to 13-year-old girls absolutely hits the mark! Humans only began to evolve technology and science and arts when we started to SPECIALISE ... and now feminists want to turn that around when it comes to child care ... and call it "equality". Feminists live in the delusion that "life can be made fair and happy" ... which is complete nonsense and can be explained in 26 seconds: https://youtu.be/03bOrvlAyeQ
    6
  66. woman feminist
    6
  67. jackie moon I am german and dont get me started about "new linguistic changes" ... they actually changed the word "stop" to "stopp" in german ... because they changed the "rule" which form it derives from. Now it is based on the verb "stoppen" and needs two p's. German has been under assault by feminism for decades now ... and even though these changes arent correct grammar everyone is using them. * sigh *
    6
  68. She does this all the time ... it is a tactic they use to create headlines from "controversial" interviewees who dont listen carefully to the stuff the "journalist" claims they have said.
    6
  69. They have exactly the people they want ... and it WORKS. None of them is fired or has quit their job and they will simply IGNORE CRITICISM because they arent interested in facts and truth and honesty ... IDEOLOGY rules their newsroom (like it does for 90% of the newsrooms in the west).
    6
  70. I am torn ... "upvoting for Peterson" or "downvoting for Cathy and her ABYSMAL ideology" ...
    6
  71. No ... I am saying that women should not be part of any TV station.
    6
  72. Dear "gender pay gap feminists" (i.e. Kathy & Channel 4 News) ... stop arguing that it exists. It doesnt. You ARE being paid the same ... and if you want to argue it you can not bring any such 9% figures but have to bring SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL CASES. There are far too many women working in the financial departments of companies to NOT have had any whistleblowers if this were a "widespread epidemic" that you were NOT paid the same as your male counterparts. So please stop arguing for "the collective called women" ... because those 9% or whatever percentage you bring, include DIFFERENT JOBS with DIFFERENT PAY SCALES. Stop comparing apples and oranges! Oh and if a salary is based on negotiations you can not compare them at all. Additionally you might want to think about collectivism (the argument Peterson made when talking about trans "rights"), because YOU ARE COLLECTIVISING AS "THE WOMEN" and you are also in the marxist class battle of "suppressed women" vs. "bourgeois/oppressing men". Life in society was NEVER about that and you are very dangerous marxists if you continue to argue that way! Life within a family was about a SYMBIOSIS BETWEEN MAN AND WOMAN and not a DICK SIZE COMPETITION AS TO WHO GETS THE BIGGER PAYCHECK. Money does not tell you the worth of a human being! Oh and ... IF the pay gap exists ... please explain UNEMPLOYED WOMEN! There should be none if you can pay them less for equal work. So your whole argument is bollocks as long as there are any unemployed women!
    6
  73. No ... we need to make them see sense ... and this video is a great help in getting into a discussion, because it makes it easy to dismantle the feminist talking points. - pink tax ... just look up prices for pink and blue bicycle helmets near you - pay gap ... mention the fact that the 9% Cathy quotes includes LOTS of different jobs and ask if comparing an engineer to a cleaning lady is "fair". Oh and ask if it is wrong to CHOOOSE a social job over a higher paying competitive/technical job ... - patriarchy ... the existence of "more men at the top" does NOT prove a "secret cabal who hold women down" ... because there ARE women at the top. Britains five top jobs (queen, PM, head of scotland yard, ...) are held by women atm, so is representation a consequence of CHOICE?
    6
  74. She isnt interested in logic, truth and facts ... just in smearing Peterson. This is an interviewing tactic she uses all the time.
    6
  75. That pretty much sums up the REALITY of feminism ... which is usually countered by the LIE of the "dictionary definition" which is about equality, but that is immediately proven as a lie by feminists like Jess Phillips (UK), who doesnt want the "Women and equality committee" renamed to "Equality committee" after they got one MP who actually cares about men.
    6
  76. The Queen isnt powerful ... she just has a minor role as a representative and tourist attraction.
    5
  77. Words are violence nowadays ... or havent you paid any attention to the new trends from US and Canadian Universities? The feminist/social justice snowflakes are actually declaring whole campuses as "safe spaces" and reserve tiny squares for "free speech" (which has to be announced days ahead of time). This is not a joke ...
    5
  78. The point was to "rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS" and if Peterson had not immediately denied it she would have had her gotcha moment, because quotemining (i.e. cutting off the denial) would have enabled them to smear his reputation later on. This was entirely ON PURPOSE (and looking a bit dumb yourself doesnt matter).
    5
  79. Dishonest journalism tactics are just a tool and nothing belonging to left or right, capitalist or communist. Just like the Chinese have tanks, the russians and the west.
    5
  80. This is todays "dishonest journalism 101": - listen for keywords - twist them into something OUTRAGEOUS - get rigtheous indignation if the interviewee does not deny the things she said he supposedly said Watch other interviews with "controversial people" ... it is obvious with this as comparison. So please spread the word and make EVERYONE watch this to innocculate them against media BS ...
    5
  81. @Channel 4 15:20 "You're just PROJECTING what you think." should be repeated ad nauseum in your offices until you all stop doing it! WORDs ... have specific and unmutable meanings, but lefties like you are redefining them all the time. Stop doing that! Stop putting meaning where there is none. Stop calling everything racist and sexist and homophobic, when it is simply a stating of facts.
    5
  82. Harry McGrath Feminism and social "justice" ARE marxist ideologies at their core, because both work with "oppressor vs. oppressed" dichotomy and marxism IS LEFT WING! They CLAIM to be "liberal" but that is only the ideology to defend their own right to spew their nonsense ... while advocating for bans (hate-speech laws) and this: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    5
  83. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    5
  84. Funny how there are comments 3 weeks old but none that are younger, eh? Hello censors! Every time you delete a comment you prove him right more.
    5
  85. I wonder if she didnt feel oppressed by all of them. Maybe they could make it into a Dr. Who special "Cathy Newman is oppressed by her own strawMEN".
    5
  86. Yep ... they tell women "behave like men and you are equal" ... which is rubbish. A good analogy of "men and women and equalty" are "round holes and square blocks". You can have two with EQUAL AREA but the square wont fit into the round hole because they are EQUAL BUT DIFFERENT. Very young children used to learn this ... but feminists apparently didnt bother trying to understand, so they have to turn the square into something round and then FORCE it through the hole.
    5
  87. I think they have given up on that idea ...
    5
  88. You had respect for Cathy Newman? Someone who discriminates against people (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    5
  89. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    5
  90. Sadly there is no "freedom of speech" in the UK ... there are hate-speech laws instead which actually give certain protected groups (mostly muslims) the right not to be offended ... which was the reason why there has been a grooming scandal for DECADES. The police is sweeping it under the rug for fear of being called racists. https://youtu.be/q4qm8zofJM4
    5
  91. She isnt trying to start an argument, she is trying to smear him by twisting his keywords into something outrageous ON PURPOSE ... so they could get a quotemine/headline of "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters". That was the TRUE intention of Channel 4 and Cathy Newman ... to SMEAR an "evil populist".
    5
  92. They never had to learn how to actually argue, because no one dared oppose them due to the magic words ... "you're a sexist". Oh and their parents NEVER told them to grow up (both of Cathy's parents are/were teachers, so there wasnt anyone home to educate her/tell her what not to do ... which wasnt done anymore since the 70s anyways).
    5
  93. That barrier of "having to compete" (like all the men do) ...
    5
  94. If this continues the book will have outsold the Bible by the end of the year.
    5
  95. Start reading ...
    5
  96. Justyn HaLI Nice try, but the left cant meme ... and your attempt at comparing Peterson to white nationalists is stupid. Why dont you PROVE IT through FACTS instead of simple claims?
    5
  97. She isnt the only "journalist" to do this. Piers Morgan is another prominent one.
    5
  98. No ... they are delusional about their own arguments which are based on lies and projection. Jordan Peterson simply has - a very eloquent version of - COMMON SENSE. ... as if "a right not to be offended" would be practical or make the world a better place. This is TRIVIAL and they dont see it.
    5
  99. Yes ... dont call her "woman", because that way you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics ... and make the feminists stronger!
    5
  100. Bad is not really a good descriptor: "dishonest" is better and it sadly succeeds far too often and it profitable.
    5
  101. Stop strawwomaning and wash your ears. His responses are clear and understandable and you are either projecting or lying ... your choice.
    4
  102. No ... not a toddler but rather an arrogant youth who thinks she has figured it all out. Toddlers are incoherent, but arrogant youths have their own ideology.
    4
  103. Cathy Newman isnt dumb, she was at Oxford. The limiting factor is her feminist ideology, which turns her into "a good modern PC running Windows 95".
    4
  104. Make your will first.
    4
  105. He has had 25.000 hours of "practice" as a clinical psychologist, which means he has "seen them all" ... all kinds of lying and scheming characters.
    4
  106. No one wants her there ...
    4
  107. Patriarchy DOES NOT EXIST ... or else there would be ZERO women at the head of companies and states. Oh and you say it yourself ... you BELIEVE in the existence of the patriarchy ... which is RELIGIOUS and NOT FACT BASED! Maybe rethink that stance. Let me help you with the wage gap myth: - If it was "standard" to pay women less than men ... why are there unemployed women? - MANY companies all across the western world employ women in their finances/salary departments ... and yet there are ZERO whistleblowers holding up that piece of paper which lists the "women get less" rule? The statistics are always misrepresented by feminists (as proven by Cathy Newman) ... because they BELIEVE in the cause! Since the pay gap is the biggest argument for feminism ... why does it still exist?
    4
  108. https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    4
  109. Several parody sites closed down ... because they simply gave up due to the actual stupidity of feminists. They simply acknowledged the fact that they cant parody them anymore because they were simply ridiculous to begin with ... and Cathy Newman fits the bill.
    4
  110. Milo Yiannopolous and many others have explained her interviewing "tactic": 1. listen for key words 2. twist those words into something OUTRAGEOUS 3. get righteous indignation and slap an alt-right/provocateur/fascist/Nazis/misogynist label on the interviewee whenever the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" 4. rinse and repeat with a new topic This was CLEARLY seen in this interview ... so if any of you are ever interviewed by a "so you're saying feminist" ... just start every answer with "No I did not say that at all" (like Peterson). It is a CHEAP tactic learned in debating circles ... and is used by an ideologue who doesnt care about truth or facts just to get ratings. They werent prepared for these ratings ...
    4
  111. They done goofed ...
    4
  112. Give her a few extra hugs from the rest of us because she EARNED them ...
    4
  113. I have gone through this for hours ... on several days ... and found maybe 1 in 1000 defending Cathy Newman.
    4
  114. She doesnt bother ... business as usual in the newsroom.
    4
  115. Just look at this article to see why she is an awful person. No one admits to discriminating! https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html For women = against men = illegal ... and she even complains about sexism at the same time. Hypocrisy much?
    4
  116. This wasnt intended as a debate or interview but rather as a hit piece where "star interviewer Cathy Newman" proves to the world that Jordan Peterson is a sexist alt-right provocateur who should be banned from everything. That was the intention ... but you dont use dishonest interviewing tactics against a clinical psychologist with 25.000 hours of consultations where he has seen all manners of people and learned to judge them and how to deal with them. Peterson said in an interview afterwards that he used "the least amount of force necessary" ... and that was the right choice, because anything other than that would have made him look like the bully.
    4
  117. Peterson said in another interview "That is the last question someone like her should ever ask." https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
    4
  118. Addison Bross Oh come on. Stop white knighting, because the misrepresentation and twisting of words was soooo extreme that it can not be explained in any other way as MALICE. Cathy Newman is smart (graduated from Oxford) and thus Hanlon's razor does not apply! This was a CLEAR attempt to smear him and Rea was only talking about this case of "severe so-you're-saying".
    4
  119. ... in 10 days. If they had ANY business sense they would throw out the feminists and get in the Peterson followers of TRUTH.
    4
  120. Not only "top" but generally those who disprove their claims.
    4
  121. Someone said he has gained 170.000 subscribers on YT since the interview (and I believe that).
    4
  122. David Savage 1) Show those death and rape threats 2) Count how many of them there are in comparison to the VALID CRITICISM ... this video is at 2.3 million views in just a few days ... and a handful of such threats means NOTHING but idiot feminists and SJWs are always completely focusing on them in the typical "criticism-terminating cliche"-manner of "all men are rapists and are part of the patriarchy which suppresses all women". Stop it. You Marxists are losing now! 3) Stop your stupid defense of this silly feminist ... because she DESERVES THE CRITICISM
    4
  123. You are wrong Brian. She is an ideologue and she was hired to CREATE scandal (where none existed), which will drive the ratings (viewership numbers = PROFIT) up!
    4
  124. She is a feminist and has the right politics. Journalistic ethics havent existed for decades (if ever).
    4
  125. The comparison is correct, because Cathy Newman BELIEVES in the tenants of feminism (she even asked questions like "do you BELIEVE in [feminist talking point]" ... and science has NOTHING to do with atheism but everything with FACTS. Cathy Newman TWISTED facts because of her faith ... just like Muslims are being allowed to lie to non-muslims to further the cause of islam.
    4
  126. NOT choosing an ideology is exactly the right choice to make ... because every ideology is toxic eventually. For example: Too much liberalism creates problems through too many migrants coming to your country AND creating self-centered people. Too much capitalism (=globalisation) creates poor people by moving the cheap & simple jobs to cheaper countries leaving the low paid people without a job in high salary countries. Both capitalism and liberalism are good things AT MODERATE LEVELS ...
    4
  127. This wasnt rape. It was a woman falling on her own sword in front of a man she could never have touched.
    3
  128. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    3
  129. Feminism is an extremist ideology and this extremism isnt capable of creating a "stable" society and thus it needs to prop itself up with lies and misrepresentations to appear stable.
    3
  130. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    3
  131. Women are in the clutches of feminism and which would you choose: - the ideology which simply promises you more OR - the person who says "clean your room" ? Only very unhappy people will see through the former and turn to the latter. Also: many women are STUPID and believe in "full flavor with zero calories" ads ... men KNOW there are always consequences or a price to pay.
    3
  132. She only has the ideological "participation belts" which are so popular today ... without ever actually THINKING (i.e. doing the legwork) through her ideology. She "listens and believes" because it offers her more.
    3
  133. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    3
  134. They dont want to comprehend ... they want to dominate and to smear.
    3
  135. She is a feminist, what do you expect? Objective journalism? Nah.
    3
  136. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    3
  137. LoreleiLee53 This is DELIBERATE and her interviewing tactic. Watch other interviews with her or listen to Milo explain the tactic: https://youtu.be/AWlaIwci3PY
    3
  138. Germany here ... and NO ONE knows about this here and no media will talk about it. When I went to buy my copy of the book it was in the biggest bookstore in the heart of Berlin and it was in the back in the "English Book Shop" section, while "Karl Marx: Das Kapital" was displayed prominently next to the stairs.
    3
  139. Woman Feminist
    3
  140. Sadly this "lying" has zero consequences ... and now they are in "silent mode" and try to ride it out. Only the british people have the power to change this by complaining to their "TV standards body" Ofcom: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    3
  141. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    3
  142. ... not until Cathy leaves journalism forever OR gets red pilled! They are doubling down now, so there is ZERO INTENTION TO ANSWER CRITICISM / IMPROVE!
    3
  143. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it). FEMINISM IS NOT THE SAME AS WOMEN!
    3
  144. People from the "evil alt-right" are willing to talk to critics ... but SJWs? Nah, they just call everyone a Nazi and feel smug and righteous.
    3
  145. Roughly 0% was accurate ...
    3
  146. He needs to progress from "Channel 4" to "Channel 1" ... everywhere in western civilization.
    3
  147. Using Peterson's "images" I have created the following theory: Thesis: Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Argument: Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out, blaming others and never looking at their own flaws/responsibilities) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are like toddlers ... who are children that havent learned responsibility and self-control yet!
    3
  148. Her following point of "that has never been tried" was WRONG, because it has been tried and FAILED (gloriously) because the women would not "work hard" OR were "bitching about handbags all the time".
    3
  149. Oh come on ... "her salary is HERS, his salary is THEIRS".
    3
  150. He has tens of thousands of hours as a clinical psychologist. He knew her game from the first second.
    3
  151. No he doesnt ...
    3
  152. Nah ... she had an agenda. This has NOTHING to do with research, because she doesnt care about facts and truth. Only ideology (of her cult) matters or did you miss the questions like "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    3
  153. Oh she graduated from Oxford and thus "has the brains" ... but she also is a feminist zealot and that gives her an agenda which kills any chance for objectivity.
    3
  154. Well she noticed that the world outside is dangerous to her ideas and not at all pink ... so she jumped back in and shut the door behind her sitting in a corner and repeating the mantra "the patriarchy exists ... the patriarchy exists ... the pay gap is real ... " over and over again.
    3
  155. They dont care about logic (which is "sexist" in their eyes) and only want to win. Any lie or mischaracterisation to achieve that goal is acceptable.
    3
  156. So whatever Peterson says ... only liberals are allowed to agree? Hahaha ... stop thinking in GROUPS ... you are part of the problem if you do that!
    3
  157. Mario Pansera How about you try to ARGUE instead of simply STATING that his ideas can be questioned "from many many sides"? Until you do you should maybe shut up? People criticising Cathy Newman and feminism do bring arguments ... and I can disprove the wage gap even with her own statistic, because Cathy Newman uses the usual tactic of NOT TELLING ALL THE FACTS and then applying to emotion with the "is that fair" card ... while not saying that the 9% statistics includes all manner of DIFFERENT JOBS, which would mean she is comparing cleaning ladies to engineers ... which is scientifically WRONG and her appeal to fairness is DISHONEST!
    3
  158. ... except it is 2018 now.
    3
  159. I would say they are, because "negotiations" are a form of contest ... and that is something men have done since the beginning of time to figure out leadership. You NEED a hierarchy to succeed on a hunt for food or in a war for survival/conquest. "Smart" isnt part of this, but it is mostly men who have "figured stuff out" while women were more interested in "shaping the environment".
    3
  160. Dont be! As soon as you are you are playing "their game" of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it). You are YOU and not "a member of the collective of all women"! So remember to make that distinction between "woman" and "feminist" ... and fight them with all your power (because facts are worth zilch when coming from a man).
    3
  161. You are missing the point here: they thought they had WON ... but you could only have seen that point if you looked at the "what she tweeted right after the show"-discussion.
    3
  162. Just do it ... it gets MUCH better! I promise!
    3
  163. woman replace with FEMINIST! You are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics! Dont give them YOUR power ...
    3
  164. ... and then she even topped that one off with the right not to be offended.
    3
  165. The key thing is that it sounds absolutely ridiculous, but if Jordan Peterson had NOT denied it they would have had him agreeing to such a ridiculous statement. That was the entire plan.
    3
  166. Feminism needs to die anyways because ... - there isnt anything left to fight for in the west (and all claims from feminists are based on lies) - it is a marxist ideology that creates a war between the oppressed women and their male oppressors which wasnt there before - it will lead to the destruction of western culture/values
    3
  167. Well if you are from Britain you can actually do something about it: - SOFT: write to their advertisers, the TV standards agency (Ofcom: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints ) - HARD: watch the following video to 6 mins 20 and listen/read and be "nitpicky" with details: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM 1. Is TV a "public communications network"? 2. Are feminist/leftist ideologues on TV "causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety"?
    3
  168. She only represents feminists ... and if you speak of women when you should speak of feminists you actually PLAY THEIR GAME of identity politics! Always remember this ... because only a small part of women are feminists and yet they make enough noise as if they speak for all.
    3
  169. She doesnt care ... because she has her ideology which is like a religion to her and her compatriots.
    3
  170. Yeah, but the holy scripture of feminism also tells us of that evil organization called "the patriarchy" which is oppressing all women everywhere ... even that homeless white guy on the street is oppressing poor poor Oprah Winfrey with her billions. So you cant seriously ask for any regard for men from feminists.
    3
  171. Please do not conflate "women" when you mean "feminist"! You are giving the feminists more power than they deserve by playing their game of identity politics!
    3
  172. Can you provide evidence where she isnt a trainwreck? (Other than simply reading the news ...)
    3
  173. ... but but but she is only throwing a hissy fit because HE PROVOKES HER ... (by not rolling over and dying like a good little beta).
    3
  174. .... eeeexcept she pulls her "feminist joker" of "women SHOULD go directly to GO AND collect 400$"!
    3
  175. Actually ... that is precisely what journalism IS ... these days. Just remember the "Trump & Russia" stories from CNN, which they made up ... for the ratings.
    3
  176. Let me be the "misogynist" and add "... as expected" for the end. Disclaimer: I dont hate women, just feminists and SJWs ... regardless of their gender.
    3
  177. She is part of an echo chamber that thinks exactly like her. They will ride it out ... unless british people stand up and complain ... to Ofcom and the police about them violating the standards of objectivity and causing annoyance and anxiety.
    3
  178. Actually you are wrong ... feminists like to tell everyone else they are wrong/evil without having to bother actually proving their point through logic. In other words: they want FREEBIES.
    3
  179. Real JOURNALISTS have become rare, most of those that claim to be one are actually ACTIVISTS with an agenda.
    3
  180. Yes she does ... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html Admitting to discrimination (for women = against men = illegal) while whining about sexism at the same time.
    3
  181. I never used my Twitter account (which I created six years ago) before this ... and I never made a word-document with "standard replys" before either.
    3
  182. strawwomen
    3
  183. a living meme.
    3
  184. No ... she is DISHONEST, because this interviewing TACTIC is used by her (and others) a lot. Just "misrepresent what the other is supposedly saying" and if they dont deny it they lose.
    3
  185. Just wait a year or maybe two ... feminists will bring up all the old and disproven arguments up over and over and over and over again ... https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM
    3
  186. Peterson is NOT white knighting. You are either trolling or stupid and dont understand what white knighting is. He was NON-AGGRESSIVE in this interview because it was the right way to go ... because if he had gotten angry and mopped the floor with Cathy he would have been a bully and lost the interview.
    3
  187. Why do you need logic when you have the club of thought-terminating cliches?
    3
  188. Thomas Hines a) Even if there are "moderate feminists" with reasonable ideas, those are NOT the ones who "do stuff". b) The ideology is based on a "female lens" and is thus never objective in the first place. If you want equality, call yourself egalitarian but not feminist. tl;dr Feminism MUST BE DESTROYED ... which doesnt mean I am against equality for women!
    3
  189. She is a feminist ... so far "stupid behaviour" has not hurt any of them ... because if you attack one the others will jump to her defense (as showcased by the articles in defense of "poor Cathy" the next day).
    3
  190. Dont credit them for anything ... they dont deserve it and thought they had won afterwards ... and when the shitstorm broke it was too late.
    3
  191. Just look at FEMINISM and SOCIAL JUSTICE. These two ideologies are organizing their way of thinking along the MARXIST line of "poor oppressed" (women, minorities, gays, trans, ...) against "evil oppressors" (the straight white man). Just as with marxism/communism this is a very very strict BLACK AND WHITE WORLD VIEW with no middle ground. That's why people are radicalized ... but the feminists started it and they are the most brutal ones. [Just have a look at the life of Erin Pizzey.]
    3
  192. Well put Robertt.
    3
  193. Feminism.
    3
  194. You need to look at this from a different point of view: this is a SHOWCASE of JOURNALISTIC ACTIVIST DISHONESTY! This is very obvious here and easy to see and thus everyone can LEARN to spot it. Tell everyone you know to watch it and learn ... i.e. become innoculated to the lies.
    3
  195. Do not be embarrassed for her ... she CHOSE her path! No one made her do it and so the blame is all hers. She graduated from Oxford, so she is clearly intelligent enough to "see things clearly" ... and yet she CHOOSES to do ideology.
    3
  196. Strawwoman ... you dont want to be sexist, do you?
    3
  197. Obviously fridges are sexist ...
    3
  198. She isnt going to be embarrassed because she did what she was planning to do and thought she had succeeded afterwards. Oh and she should have been embarrassed five years ago, when she admitted to discriminating (who does that in an interview? and: "for women" = "against men" = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    3
  199. She is ignorant ... and an ideologue of the rather RELIGIOUS ZEAL type ... except her religion is FEMINISM: two articles with her OPINIONS from 2013 and 2018 and the men-hating/-blaming is clear: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda That "religious zeal" was made clear in this interview when she asked "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]? as if it was a question of FAITH.
    3
  200. Most importantly it showcased DISHONEST JOURNALISM perfectly ... through Cathy Newman failing over and over and over again ... until it is obvious for everyone to see.
    3
  201. Feminism was never "fine and admirable" because that whole dictionary definition of "equality" is a LIE. The "female lens" makes it a NON-EQUALITY MOVEMENT!
    3
  202. Connor Richardson No its not ... I have gone through the threads and seen no evidence. What we have though is an analysis of key words that showed Peterson getting 30 times the abuse of Cathy Newman ... including a pretty nasty tweet from a FEMINIST with a verified (thus endorsed) checkmark. Twitter doesnt do anything against them ...
    3
  203. Do not confuse "feminist" with "women". She is a fully blown religious feminist as shown by "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" So please keep in mind to always make that distinction, because otherwise you are playing their game of identity politics and you give them more power (like the right to "speak in YOUR name"). This is very very important, because if it was clear that feminists only speak for 20% of all women they would not be able to do so much bad stuff.
    3
  204. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    3
  205. He isnt a feminist at all because he treats everyone equally. Feminism is CANCER and needs to be abolished because it is a Marxist ideology based on the "poor oppressed women" who fight against the "evil oppressing Bourgeoisie Patriarchy of men".
    3
  206. Keep up making a distinction between "women" and "feminists", because they get far too much power from speaking for "women" who they dont represent.
    3
  207. Well she is off working while her (most likely beta) husband works from home. So there might be hope for the kids.
    3
  208. Here is Ethan van Sciver (comic book artist for DC comics) talking about the drawings he made for the book: https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ Oh and yes, Ethan is one of those "evil people" who was chased off Twitter for "being a Nazi" (actually it was just a bunch of SJWs calling him a Nazi for 6 months without any proof ... well "drawing for the Nazi Peterson" is proof enough). This is part of "ComicsGate" which threatens to ruin the whole comics industry ... fascinating subject and it should be a big scandal, but nobody cares. In any case ... Ethan is one of the nicest guys ever!
    3
  209. If he had "smashed" her he would have been seen as a bully ... and SHE would have won through playing the victim afterwards (underlined by footage).
    2
  210. Well the "problem" is that "men dont have to battle" and simply get handed the top jobs ... at least according to feminist logic. Concerning "battling" I think you might find this analysis interesting: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    2
  211. Peterson is a top tier THINKER first and foremost. Cathy Newman ONLY has "debating tactics" and an ideology based on lies. Thinking? Not her can of beer, let alone having an individual thought ...
    2
  212. "If a man is standing in the woods and no woman is standing next to him, is he still wrong?" - age-old philosophical question.
    2
  213. She has a severe case of FEMINISM ... her ears are fine, but the "data interpretation and judgement unit" is put in the wrong way round.
    2
  214. Arthur Kaletzky ... as a Marxist you are a DANGER TO HUMANITY because you are dividing the world into two camps with ZERO middle ground. This means WAR and OPPRESSION and NO COMPROMISE. That is the core of YOUR ideology. Get rid of it! The whole "70 IQ argument" clearly shows that you can only insult and demean others while not bringing any FACTS [relevant to this interview].
    2
  215. How about you tweet him and ask about that? It really looks they were lying and SHOULD APOLOGISE TO PETERSON!
    2
  216. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    2
  217. Nah ... he is a frog with a sense of humor and razor sharp understanding of words ... which have become fuzzy for many lefties.
    2
  218. Peterson is the grand master of "keep cool" and "stay focused": https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    2
  219. No ... she likes to LIE and MISREPRESENT ... in the service of ideology.
    2
  220. rodrigo gonzalez ... and you arent even wrong.
    2
  221. So ... if women get paid less please answer these two simple questions: - why are there unemployed women when they can be paid less for the same work? - many women work in the "payment department" of companies and yet there is ZERO WHISTLEBLOWER to come out with facts and figures for this ILLEGAL discrimination? Stop ignoring facts ... while cooking up your "proof".
    2
  222. Sadly NO ONE here in Germany knows about this interview or even Jordan Peterson. When I went to buy it in the biggest book store here in central Berlin I had to go to the "English books store" ... while "Karl Marx: Das Kapital" is prominently displayed next to the stairs.
    2
  223. Actually it detailed quite well where the "crisis of masculinity" comes from: FEMINISM.
    2
  224. Not true ... because she twists them ON PURPOSE! Hanlon's razor is "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." BUT in this case (and in all the other cases of dishonest journalism) we cannot let this stand, because at least Cathy Newman graduated from Oxford and ISNT STUPID and this isnt the action of an individual ... so it must therefore be MALICE!
    2
  225. Well they ARE the same for a reason: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    2
  226. This is her usual DISHONEST interviewing style for smearing "controversial" people with false accusations. She tried to pin alt-right, sexist and provocateur labels on him ...
    2
  227. No she wont ... unless she takes a red pill and gets rid of her feminism. That one is unlikely.
    2
  228. Peterson explains it himself somewhat: "good people need the CAPACITY to become monsters but they need the CONTROL not to be one." If you think about feminists like Cathy Newman you will realize that they ARE MONSTERS ... but have ZERO CONTROL to hold themselves back.
    2
  229. Have some examples: catfights http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html unproductive in tech https://medium.com/the-mission/im-an-ex-google-woman-tech-leader-and-i-m-sick-of-our-approach-to-diversity-17008c5fe999
    2
  230. No ... she has been let in because her IDEOLOGY is the right one for the company. All this notion of "impartial journalists reporting facts" is wrong. Western media are just as biased and agenda-driven as state-run media in a dictatorship ... except they pretend they dont because there isnt an armed guard threatening to shoot any dissenter immediately. The enforcement happens through "enforced groupthink" among the journalist class and anyone who misbehaves gets ostracised.
    2
  231. An apology is not enough. She needs to RETIRE for the rest of her life ... after apologizing ... oh and her entire team needs to follow her.
    2
  232. Personally I would suggest strong dosis of testosterone on a regular basis ... to increase their HONESTY LEVEL: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121010172212.htm Only for the feminists though ... the "real women" who are ok with both genders being different dont need that.
    2
  233. SvenTviking There are two SIMPLE logical questions you can use to debunk the wage gap: - IF it is possible to pay women 23% less (as Obama claimed a few years back) and companies do it regularly why are there unemployed women? - All across the western world there are LOTS of women in all the financing/payment departments of companies ... and yet there are ZERO WHISTLEBLOWERS to leak those "sexist rules"?
    2
  234. This was intended as a "hit piece" where they can get quotemines for Peterson by having him NOT DENY any of the OUTRAGEOUS twisted rephrasings of Cathy Newman. This is a DELIBERATE style and used all the time to create headlines or misrepresent people for their own political agenda.
    2
  235. They thought they had won in the first few seconds afterwards ... which prompted that - now deleted but archived - tweet with Cathy Newman laughing at a tablet and a caption of "enjoying the Twitter while waiting for the police". It is too late to remove it now, that would be admission of guilt. They ARE copyright flagging every critic though who uses clips from the video ... which is failing too.
    2
  236. She isnt angry, she is a feminist. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    2
  237. Yes and no ... No ... because she graduated from Oxford and they do have requirements there. Yes ... because she is a feminist and that is a RELIGION to her which she BELIEVES in. Fanatic belief in a religion usually gives that person a narrow mindset and holy cows which must not be questioned.
    2
  238. Spread the word ... EVERYONE needs to see this masterclass of dishonest journalism (which is the standard today). This will innoculate them against falling for these manipulations.
    2
  239. I think there were some comments to your post the last time I was around ... HELLO CENSORS! /wave /finger
    2
  240. They are deleting comments left and right ... I have been through here REGULARLY and recognise comments I commented on ... and thus notice that they are missing. EDIT: I had made a comment on your comment before ... and then it was magically gone a day later. That is why I commented in that fashion.
    2
  241. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now.
    2
  242. This is a standard smear tactic for interviews. She does it all the time and if you dont deny the twisted claim of what you said she has got you. She isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another dirty one.
    2
  243. Of course she is ... because it is all in service of the feminist war against men. She - and the whole other bunch of leftie media - does it all the time, just watch other interviews of her with maybe Milo or Nigel Farage.
    2
  244. I hope you realize that the outrageous rephrasings were done on purpose. Dishonest journalism 101.
    2
  245. john smith Usually I would try to make the "feminists dont represent all women" argument, but sadly I think you are correct with that generalization. We have all seen the masses of teenie girls yelling their heart out at concerts of the current boy bands ... and these teenagers are NEVER taught to "control their emotions". Liberalism (in the 70s) is to blame for this ...
    2
  246. Dont vote for or against (because that will affect Channel 4's ratings in general) but rather keep the video trending by commenting here every few days. Oh and make everyone you know watch this, because it is a masterclass of dishonest journalism which lets anyone understand the concept of it ... and detect it in other interviews. This innocculates the people of the world (who watch it and arent ideologically blinded into "protecting the woman").
    2
  247. Her interview is shaped by her IDEOLOGY and to achieve victory she uses a smear tactic: - listen for keywords - rephrase into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" (dont forget quotemining later on with extracts/clips on the news) This is DELIBERATE! Stop explaining it as "stupidity" or "an accident" or even "devil's advocate". It's not. It is all about IDEOLOGY and the culture WAR ...
    2
  248. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    2
  249. The important question is: will this make them THINK AGAIN about their ideology? She is a radical feminist and should start feeling ashamed of her views by now, but sadly we all know "they always double down on the BS". Just read her Wikipedia page (just the bottom) ... if you want to read something scary.
    2
  250. The critical difference is that Cathy Newman has an AUTHORITARIAN IDEOLOGY which limits her intellectual capacity through ideological blinkers and forbidden thoughts. Peterson is all for freedom of thought ... and he still has a sense of humor as displayed by this bit about him: There is Soviet propaganda everywhere, including on the ceiling. He has more than 200 such paintings: Lenin addressing a crowd, a portrait of a Soviet agronomist, Russian soldiers during World War II. In the early 2000s, Peterson began buying these paintings on eBay because the irony of bidding for communist agitprop on the most capitalist marketplace ever devised was too delicious to resist. But he also bought them to remind himself of how glorious utopian visions often descend into unspeakable horror. https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256 and he has also "accepted" / "adopted" part of the memes about him: https://youtu.be/Ixc9i1G7eew
    2
  251. jorafaustino BS ... Peterson simply states that the blank slate theory is wrong (with the lobsters) but he doesnt deny that people are "formed by culture". That is PROJECTION of your prejudices ... [Not stating something isnt the same as denying it ... but then "lefties" do like to change language to suit their purpose and dont like being precise with words!] Did YOU protest the idiotic trans Professor he had a discussion with on "The Agenda with Steve Paikin" ... who claimed that there are no biological differences between men and women OR does your ideology not allow that? https://youtu.be/kasiov0ytEc Where is the "outrage" over that comment? It doesnt exist because no one wants to be bullied as a transphobe.
    2
  252. She does this ON PURPOSE ... and the criticism has NOTHING to do with her being a woman. So go away with that "you sexists" defense of Cathy Newman. She is indefensible and totally complicit in this, because she does it all the time and EVEN WOMEN CAN SAY NO to "being forced [she isnt] to conduct such a horrid and dishonest interview".
    2
  253. Well this was much better ... because it was a shotgun into both feet of feminism.
    2
  254. Get in line ... a very VERY looooooonnnnnngggg line.
    2
  255. https://youtu.be/8kpHK4YIwY4?t=52s
    2
  256. This is a perfect demonstration why feminism and social "justice" are FAILURES.
    2
  257. Sable Newman wasnt "disrespectful" but rather completely dishonest ... on purpose. That is the way "modern" media work these days and yet no one gets outraged over it? This interview needs to be used to do exactly that, because it is a masterclass of showcasing that dishonesty, which can be clearly seen in other "interviews" after this.
    2
  258. This is her USUAL style of interviewing "controversial" people. Watch other interviews with maybe Milo Yiannopulous or Nigel Farage. This is VERY professional but also VERY VERY DISHONEST!
    2
  259. Try this one: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4 to add criticism AND a laugh ... by solely focusing on Cathy Newman.
    2
  260. You missed a few ... I think it was 36 times.
    2
  261. Sir, sir ... I know who he is: Keith Bingham, telephone sanitizer from Solihull ... https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    2
  262. Nah ... the feminism is strong with her. She is a RELIGIOUS ZEALOT of the cult of feminism.
    2
  263. Just to put it in perspective: this video has gotten more views in 4 weeks than "Rhiannon" by Fleetwood Mac in 10 years! https://youtu.be/py3w5fttedA
    2
  264. She does ... she was at Oxford ... this is all on purpose and that "not understanding" was a ploy to paint it as "unnecessary" for the dumb people watching this. They see her every day and "trust" her ... and if she brushes something away it "isnt important". Do not see anything coming from her as being based on "being dumb" or "accidental", it isnt.
    2
  265. Ideology ... she is RELIGIOUS BELIEVER in the cult of feminism. Just listen to her asking "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]" and if that wasnt enough look for the discrimination here: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    2
  266. Really? Usually it reminds people of noodles ...
    2
  267. Sadly the book has nothing to do with "the issue" ... of "feminism is evil and destructive and based on LIES".
    2
  268. ... entirely on purpose. That is todays dishonest journalism.
    2
  269. Das hat inzwischen jeder halbwegs klar denkende Mensch erkannt ... und dafür sollten wir ihr dankbar sein. Eine Einladung annehmen ist doch inzwischen nicht mehr so gefährlich, einfach die Antworten mit "No, I did not say that at all" beginnen und man hat nichts mehr zu befürchten. Eine präzise Wortwahl ist natürlich wichtig ... aber die Feministin Cathy Newman hatte KEINE Argumente die nicht erstunken und erlogen waren. Leider wird aber auf diese Argumente reagiert, denn die BBC-Angestellten (dabei ging es um Moderatoren die ihr Gehalt VERHANDELN und die nach ihrer POPULARITÄT bezahlt werden sollten) haben inzwischen ihr Gehalt "freiwillig" gesenkt: https://youtu.be/ObOUYc5BGnQ (Vorsicht: sehr deprimierend, aber eben eine Warnung vor "einer Menge STUPID" aus letzter Woche)
    2
  270. The dragon is actually still alive and we need to be the swarm of "troopers" who cut it up into pieces and roasts it over a fire tonight. It is hurt but on the way to recovery. If you are british ... complain to Ofcom! https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    2
  271. Trudeau HATES him.
    2
  272. You expect a feminist to have a sense of style/elegance? Your comment will be listed as sexist because it reduces her to her outside features (no matter that feminists do it themselves by reducing everything to a male/female thing).
    2
  273. Being interviewed by her is easy after this. Just start every reply with "no I did not say that at all" ... until she and Channel 4 and all the other dishonest journalists around the globe get it.
    2
  274. Maybe start "standing on one leg with one hand in front of you while humming 'Ommmmmm' ... to remind you"? The truth is that he had A LOT of practice (he said something like 20.000 hours of interviews as a clinical psychiatrist with his patients ... and then there is also this: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U ). The usual rule of thumb is that you become "a master" after doing it for 10.000 hours.
    2
  275. He isnt Yoda, he is KERMIT! https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA
    2
  276. April Brobston I think you have it the wrong way round with that last word ... which should be a "GOOD!" instead. She deserves zero compassion for this obviously dishonest attempt to smear Peterson.
    2
  277. He even has a sense of humor ... he started buying communist propaganda posters on ebay ... because that is the most capitalist marketplace ever ... and he liked the irony of that. The posters also remind him of the possible consequences of failure of free speech. https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256
    2
  278. Everything Cathy said was based on lies ... everything Jordan said was based on his own thinking and if you said he was wrong he would gladly debate you 2 hours on it every time. That is the difference ... oh and Cathy will NOT agree to a second talk ... so it is clear that only one is wrong.
    2
  279. Keep fighting feminism ... because they still control the media and universities ... PROPAGANDA WORKS!
    2
  280. It IS her fault, because she and her ilk are running the show ... and never bother to "look outside the box of feminism feelings-based-logic". Self-criticism is seriously lacking everywhere among the media and politicians nowadays and if they get valid criticism thrown their way they pull the good old "harrassment" or "racists" cards.
    2
  281. LiftedX So what? Are the ideas RESERVED FOR LIBERALS? It doesnt matter who has a good idea! Even a raving loonie racist COULD have a good and valid idea. What then? Ignore it? That would be a form of ad hominem. STOP THINKING IN "PEOPLE CATEGORIES" when talking about ideas. That is IDENTITY POLITICS (which is complete garbage!)!
    2
  282. Cathy Newman graduated from Oxford and they do have standards there. The problem isnt "intelligence" but rather IDEOLOGY! Feminism does narrow your field of view to the point of not being able to think clearly anymore ... and for her that ideology is a RELIGION. She did ask "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" Top notch PC with Windows 95 ...
    2
  283. No ... she isnt dumb (graduated from Oxford), she is dishonest! This time it IS malice and not stupidity!
    2
  284. Feminism? The answer is obvious/trivial.
    2
  285. It is not up to her ... Channel 4 has an agenda and admitting it will basically kill everything they are trying to achieve AND it would kill the whole leftist media who leapt to her defense. So no, it will not be happening (and here I am a pessimist who still HOPES it will happen).
    2
  286. She isnt a lemming and this dishonest technique succeeds often enough. So please make everyone watch this with the advanced information of .. - she ISNT DUMB (graduated from Oxford) - this is ON PURPOSE and a dishonest interviewing technique (that is used on purpose to create gotchas)
    2
  287. "All female companies" (or even "majority female") have been tried already ... and didnt work. Obviously #notall but these examples are an indicator of stuff that feminists sweep under the rug and dont want to talk about (which is why Cathy Newman claims "it hasnt been tried yet" [just like Communism ...]): catfights http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html unproductive in tech https://medium.com/the-mission/im-an-ex-google-woman-tech-leader-and-i-m-sick-of-our-approach-to-diversity-17008c5fe999 awful for the stock price (that might have had other reasons though, so dont trust it without a huge pinch of salt) http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.de/2006/10/feminists-lying-about-female-ceos-in.html
    2
  288. Sadly she still IS everything that is wrong with the media ... and she is young enough to stay for at least 20 more years.
    2
  289. Here is an article about "daddy" Peterson (a really good and long one with a laugh or two included): https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256
    2
  290. Actually he is more like Chiun ... "better than that": https://youtu.be/Mmek0f1Illo
    2
  291. She is DISHONEST ... ON PURPOSE ... to try and smear/frame Peterson.
    2
  292. There is no pay gap ... not the way she claims/insinuates.
    2
  293. It will probably be #1 for 2018 sales.
    2
  294. She does this ON PURPOSE ... to get him to agree to the OUTRAGEOUS twisted phrases ... by not denying them. He is far too experienced to fall for that, but she tried HARD to gotcha him into giving them a "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" headline.
    2
  295. That is all on purpose and a smear tactic of an interview. Watch other interviews with her ... like Milo Yiannopulous or Nigel Farage. It is obvious ... NOW.
    2
  296. The 9% is correct, BUT Cathy Newman misrepresented the statistic by PURPOSEFULLY IGNORING the fact that it is across all manner of different jobs, so Cathy cries about fairness while comparing engineers (mostly male) to cleaning ladies (mostly women). And that basically disproves the pay gap ...
    2
  297. No ... this is DISHONEST journalism for the purpose of ideology AND to create a scandal headline ... "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters." You should tell EVERYONE to watch it, because it is a masterclass of dishonest journalism and teaches you to recognize it the next time you see it.
    2
  298. Dont do either ... but return to comment to keep the video trending.
    2
  299. Please refrain from using girl/woman when you talk about this FEMINIST!
    2
  300. She is a feminist ... what did you expect? She even admits to discriminating (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    2
  301. There are only two genders ... male (->he), female (->she) ... and everyone else is "not a gender" and "it". The point of a gender is that there are two which are needed for reproduction. Everything else DOES NOT MATTER.
    2
  302. The secret is out now and the internet doesnt forget ... so they can simply leave it up and get all the (negative) publicity.
    2
  303. Adversity / challenges are what make us GROW, because we have to THINK and WORK to get past them.
    2
  304. That SHOULD be the goal of a society ... but sadly it isnt for western society anymore and that started with a lot of dumb students in the 60s who were tearing down everything from the past.
    2
  305. The "beauty" of it all is that Cathy Newman has the "Shield of Invulnerability" called FEMINISM and her newsroom/organization is fully feminist/SJW as well. So nothing will happen to her ... unless enough Brits stand up to complain about it!
    2
  306. Irene MW You are going to kick yourself BIG TIME when you accidentally use it the first time ... so dont even play around with "newspeak".
    2
  307. That is precisely what it is. Peterson talks about "good people being able to become a monster BUT having the control not to do it". What Cathy Newman and her fellow feminists/SJWs are is monsters ... but without the control not to be one. Thus they are actually toddlers who havent learnt self-control and responsibility yet.
    2
  308. I agree on the "failed" bit, but that "backfired" isnt decided yet. Sure there are many more people who have bought/read his book, but those are still a drop in the ocean compared to the DUMB MASSES who are led by the nose by propagandistic media like channel 4 and CNN and so on ... in the service of the ideologies of feminism and social "justice". Yuri Bezmenov predicted this to happen in the 80s, but he also said that reversing the process would equally take decades: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    2
  309. The pay gap is actually an earnings gap and exists because WOMEN CHOOSE SO.
    2
  310. Maybe you would like an example of "SJW indoctrination" in psychological studies? https://youtu.be/8teybz6Gtdk It cant be more blatant than that ... and it probably is for anything "gender studies related".
    2
  311. Maks Try this article to "get her character": https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    2
  312. She isnt even a child (because you can actually argue with them and make them understand) but rather a toddler ... which are constantly lashing out and demanding that others cater to their whims. For toddlers that is a natural state and fully acceptable, but at her age ... well you are 100% correct with the "SHE should grow up" comment.
    2
  313. Fred Perry You are obviously willfully ignorant, because Peterson COULDNT explain anything due to the fact that Cathy Newman constantly changed topic when she was losing. And alluding to other people really proves NOTHING because you dont prove anything. Go and clean your room!
    2
  314. Feminism
    2
  315. Do it ... or you will miss the best part.
    2
  316. No ... she is doing a public service by showing this MASTERCLASS of (failed) dishonest journalism ... to make everyone able to see how it is done. She only uses her "so you're saying" tactic and that excessive use makes it clear to everyone with a somewhat open mind. So please tell everyone to "take this bitter pill" to become innocculated against dishonest journalism some more.
    2
  317. That isnt a pay gap ... because every salary is NEGOTIATED ... it is an EARNINGS GAP.
    2
  318. Although you are correct Gillian ... it is SADLY true that there IS something like a "right not to be offended" (in Britain, the EU, ...) ... where the "victim" decides if something was MEANT offensive. Watch the following video to 6 mins 20 and read the "definitions" from the police: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM "Right not to be offended" is the basis of any hate-speech laws ...
    2
  319. I am interested in the PROOF they gave for "Peterson attracting followers of the alt-right" ... which is complete nonsense btw, because Peterson is AGAINST IDENTITY POLITICS (from the left AND right).
    2
  320. ... entirely on purpose. They learn this "technique" in university. I have an article from a german "professor of media studies" who is talking about "tactics" to use in discussions with "the evil right-wingers" in our country to "win". Truth and honesty and facts? Nah ... WINNING is the only thing that counts for them!
    2
  321. Start reading NOW.
    2
  322. Dont call her "lady" or "woman" ... call her FEMINIST!
    2
  323. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    2
  324. ... and play victim after the dishonest narrative blows up in your face.
    2
  325. You might be interested in this analysis, where "Mao" gets used in a surprising "strawman": https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    2
  326. The sad part is that criticising her for this stupidity is "harrassment" and "hate speech" nowadays.
    2
  327. That is entirely on purpose ... to smear any opponent of her religion of feminism and social justice.
    2
  328. emma dan She also admitted to discrimination (for women = against men = illegal) ... five years ago ... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    2
  329. Sadly such a thing exists ... and is pushed by feminists/SJWs: HATE-SPEECH LAWS!
    2
  330. Channel 4 is a feminist echo chamber and she did exactly what they expected from her ... AND there isnt enough protest from the british public! They simply ride out the outrage of a few people commenting on this video ... who no one will hear.
    2
  331. Talking and looking at other people is banned too?
    2
  332. Sadly ... in our scientific world we have made a mastery of "misrepresenting facts" by tweaking statistics. Things like "300% economic growth" of a country is NOTHING if you started from nothing for example ... but it still is factually true.
    2
  333. Involved? Nah ... that is simply her dishonest journalism at work. Remember this style, because she isnt the only one to use it.
    2
  334. Wont happen ... she is part of an ideological echo chamber and firing her would mean they are ALL wrong.
    2
  335. Reason and science are sexist anyways ... BAN THEM!
    2
  336. In honor of Cathy Newman and to reduce sexism a jury of linguists has decided to change the term to "strawwoman".
    2
  337. It is about 1 in 1000 ... I have looked for hours on several days.
    2
  338. Sadly it isnt ... hate-speech laws are based on this principle. Only the USA has a "right to free speech".
    2
  339. Are you even aware that she is completely DISHONEST and misquotes him ON PURPOSE? You apparently like a LIAR and an IDEOLOGUE ...
    2
  340. Have some more reasons to hate Cathy: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html - admits to discrimination while crying about sexism - wants "public lynching on the internet" for ACCUSED
    2
  341. Please change "woman" into "feminist", because not all women are feminists and generalizing like that IS PLAYING THEIR GAME of identity politics.
    2
  342. Just listen to it elsewhere ... like: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ (sit down ... this one is full of really good revelations that left me shaken) https://youtu.be/iRPDGEgaATU (Peterson + Shapiro + Rubin ...) or obviously his channel.
    2
  343. This video is more important, because it pulls the pants down from todays DISHONEST journalism. THIS is truly teaching us a useful skill: how to recognise BS. So make everyone you know watch this and tell them that it is dishonesty and NOT STUPIDITY that shaped Cathy Newman's words!
    2
  344. He needs to do that, because "not denying" the so-you're-saying-summaries would mean he agrees with them, which would have resulted in a gotcha for her and quotemining headlines ... "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters".
    2
  345. @Julie Bargiglione An insult is only an insult if it ISNT DESERVED!
    2
  346. That isnt delusional ... that is dishonesty. Entirely on purpose as a provocation.
    2
  347. 7 million after 4 weeks. This is getting many more views than really good music videos ...
    2
  348. Watch Peterson at McMaster ... https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    2
  349. Rewind even more to other "interviews" by her to find that this tactic of misrepresenting someone is done on purpose. Milo can explain how she does it and it surves only one purpose: to label someone alt-right/sexist/provocateur ... either in https://youtu.be/AWlaIwci3PY The secret is out and the only thing you need to remember when faced with her or others of her kind: start your sentences with "No I did not say that at all" (I suggest doing it preemptively sometimes ... just like https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI to tell "them" that you are sick and tired of their filthy tactics and that they have no arguments).
    2
  350. Big question: has she worked it out yet or not?
    2
  351. Anyone can do that ... just repeat "No, I did not say that at all" over and over again.
    2
  352. If they acknowledge the reasons for the wage gap - which have NOTHING to do with any sexism and everything with FEMALE CHOICES - they cant use that to enforce changes. IMO they cant admit those reasons ... because that would endanger the myth of the patriarchy and if that one falls feminism falls (as it should!).
    2
  353. Oh come on ... it was OBVIOUS she was LYING and MISREPRESENTING what he said ... I mean the lobsters should have made that absolutely clear! She isnt stupid and graduated from Oxford, so it has to be ON PURPOSE ... because of her IDEOLOGY! This is FAR beyond "tough questions". Just read these articles to get an idea of how she actually is: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda Oh and stop believing women automatically!
    2
  354. Humanity would be nowhere ... if we hadnt had to STRUGGLE. If we were living in a garden of eden without any "desire to go somewhere" we would still live in caves and without clothes. Here is a quote to explain this: https://youtu.be/I8RW3K3hhWU
    2
  355. She isnt there "as a woman", she is there to represent feminism. That is her MISSION IN LIFE!
    2
  356. Siko Shakur Please stop using the term "women" when you need to say "feminists", because by conflating "every woman" with "feminist" you are PLAYING THEIR GAME of identity politics and give them more power!
    2
  357. They are about SUPREMACY now ... https://youtu.be/P0hRuJ16O_w
    2
  358. Please stop the newspeak ... Trudeau is an idiot.
    2
  359. She even explains that those 9% are "over all jobs" and then complains about "fairness". There are only two choices: - she (and other feminists like her) is actually too dumb to interpret a study OR - she (and other feminists like her) MISREPRESENT ON PURPOSE! No third option exists.
    2
  360. Hey ... its not about the quality of your work and your experience ... but rather the work hourse you have on the clock AND about how good you FEEL your work is. Well at least in feminists minds it is.
    2
  361. I think this one would be appropriate for the next interviewee to have as a reply to her: https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI
    2
  362. We need to crowdfund a "Golden Strawwoman" award for Cathy Newman instead and make it into a big event with lots of categories for all the media. Oh and "Strawwoman" because we dont want to be sexists ...
    2
  363. You assume it is only one dishonest person? Birds of a feather flock together!
    2
  364. Make your will first ...
    2
  365. Well she has two daughters who are raised by her husband (who works from home) ... and she probably would run them down if they were standing in the way of the top job. IMO feminists like her HATE their own children ...
    2
  366. MrKosobi Do you have any EVIDENCE for your claim of "his followers are not that bright"? Do you have any evidence that YOU are smarter than them? No? Maybe you should think about your citations or else tl;dr needs to "come and get them from you" ... https://youtu.be/U6d_LAShcEQ PROVE YOUR CLAIMS OR SHUT UP. You could alternatively try to make an argument where Peterson is wrong ... ARGUMENT ... NOT CLAIM!
    2
  367. Actually ... you are a tad wrong, because this is Britain and the police actually are arresting people for "being annoying" on the internet. https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM Obviously that right "not to be annoyed" only applies to lefties and not to people who are annoyed by leftie media ...
    2
  368. She is doing EXACTLY what she is supposed to do (and has done lots of times before). She isnt dumb but rather dishonest ... as is the whole echo chamber of Channel 4.
    2
  369. No ... she IS a professional. This DISHONEST TECHNIQUE can be seen in other interviews too, but Jordan Peterson is far too experienced to fall for this cheap trick. - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the interviewee doesnt deny having said that sh&%
    2
  370. She was prepared and she has the experience, but her AGENDA made her "arguments" ridiculous AND this kind of dishonest interviewing technique is done entirely on purpose to smear people (when they fail to deny the OUTRAGEOUS rephrasings of their own words). THIS WAS ON PURPOSE ... but since Peterson is "max. level in discussion" she didnt stand a chance of getting him with that trick ... and now everyone can see it!
    2
  371. Intelligence isnt the problem (she graduated from Oxford), programming is: FEMINISM! Add to that "dishonest journalism" on a mission to "smear an evil right-winger" ... and you get these 30 minutes.
    2
  372. Milo Yiannopolous and many others have explained her interviewing "tactic": 1. listen for key words 2. twist those words into something OUTRAGEOUS 3. get righteous indignation and slap an alt-right/provocateur/fascist/Nazis/misogynist label on the interviewee whenever the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" 4. rinse and repeat with a new topic This was CLEARLY seen in this interview ... so if any of you are ever interviewed by a "so you're saying feminist" ... just start every answer with "No I did not say that at all" (like Peterson).
    2
  373. Just take the lesson from this interview and always be prepared to answer "no I did not say that at all". It was also his calm which let him win this "debate".
    2
  374. I'd say 0:00 - end is a prime example for that.
    2
  375. She is doing EXACTLY what they ask of her ... and most of the time it works. Oh and she isnt dumb or incompetent ... she and Channel 4 are plainly and simply DISHONEST! This style of "warping the words of the interviewee" is a technique used by many "tough journalists".
    2
  376. They are entrenched deeply within our education system ... all through the western world: https://youtu.be/8teybz6Gtdk
    2
  377. It is a natural reaction to want to help a woman who is crying ... we cant help it!
    2
  378. She has ... and two girls.
    2
  379. Pineapplaplatypotamus You forgot the "even" in that sentence ...
    2
  380. He has experience with this and worse: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    2
  381. Hmmm ... is he truly a genius OR is he simply willing to DO THE WORK OF THINKING on his own? A lot of the stuff seems like common sense and the "genius part" is explaining it in a way that "the masses" can understand it. "Doiong the work" is a "Herculean task" because you have to read and remember A LOT ... so "genius" / "hero" are all words that can be used to describe Peterson but they could be achieved by lots of people.
    2
  382. You forgot "million" ...
    2
  383. You have greater odds at winning the jackpot in a lottery ... twice in a row ... than them changing their ways.
    2
  384. We need to keep this trending until they realize that "truth & honest facts" has more market value than "ideology and lies".
    2
  385. Feminism
    2
  386. They dont care about common sense or "the truth", all they care is THE RATINGS and thus PROFIT ... and after that comes FEMINISM. This interviewing technique is dishonest and was used on purpose!
    2
  387. HDC .... because lefties arent even smart enough to understand him and thus have to denegrade and insult and smear him ... because they cant win with arguments.
    2
  388. We have to take this as what it is: a MASTERCLASS in dishonest journalism ... which is made easy to see through a failed attempt.
    2
  389. get an adblocker? just turn it off afterwards ...
    2
  390. Well complain to the british police, because they should be able to ban her from her job (if you are convincing enough). There actually IS such a "right" ... it is called "hate-speech laws" and only applies to women, minorities, gays, trans ... no straight white men. Just watch ... at 6 mins 20 there is a VERY VAGUE definition: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM
    2
  391. They are thinking of THE COLLECTIVE OF WOMEN ... which is a) Marxism and b) grade A stupid.
    2
  392. We need to keep pushing and remind them of their own ideological stupidity ... because they will try to turn it into "she gets rape and death threats from the alt-right followers of Peterson"-narrative. This is what happened during #GamerGate too years ago ... but GamerGate won through persistence.
    2
  393. I would suggest she accompanies Cindy the next time on this adventure: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2div2j [next time it is probably the moon]
    2
  394. No ... she is good at what she is doing but Peterson is better and doesnt fall for it. The bad part to criticise about her is the DISHONESTY.
    2
  395. Phily Crypto You seem to live in an "ideal world" where people think the dictionary definition is what journalists and feminists intend to achieve. IN THEORY this is what SHOULD happen, but IN REALITY people/the lefties have given up on objectivity and the search for truth and replaced it with ideology and propaganda. From that standpoint she wasnt incompetent (because that tactic works often enough), Peterson is simply far too experienced to fall for such a simple trick.
    2
  396. Strawwoman ...
    2
  397. Actually the correct hashtags should be #FeminismIsCancer or #DishonestJournalism
    2
  398. Lunch Box Have you made your wife actually watch and THINK about what was said yet ... or are you not willing to risk the marriage? ;)
    2
  399. Actually she is a "crazy harpy sister" ... one of the flock of RELIGIOUS believers in feminism.
    2
  400. That was entirely intentional ... watch other interviews of her with "controversial figures" like Milo or Nigel Farage ...
    2
  401. She isnt interested in facts or truth. All she is interested in is smearing OPPONENTS in her interviews through the use of lies and misrepresentation ... for the cause of FEMINISM (which is her RELIGION ... as proven by her BELIEF in "patriarchy" and "the wage gap").
    2
  402. He would be wasted in any political office. At most he should be an advisor AND LISTENED TO!
    2
  403. The whole newsroom is like this.
    2
  404. That is called "modern" journalism ... CREATING the scandal where none exists ... for the ratings and profit OR for the own ideology.
    2
  405. Actually no ... Jordan Peterson is Luke Skywalker and Cathy Newman the Emperor.
    2
  406. Just forget this obviously biased feminist ... who doesnt bother PROVING any claim she makes ... like "Jordan Peterson is alt-right" ... which he isnt. Rule #1 when dealing with a troll: DO NOT FEED!
    1
  407. woman feminist
    1
  408. Oh and they have to pay someone to do this ... let's see who can keep it up longer ... them or "more than 9000 shitposters from Canada" ... https://youtu.be/m7ZuffBrloo?t=21m24s
    1
  409. Sadly they dont care or have forgotten why it can lead to bad consequences. Oh and here is a good movie (apparently based on a real experiment) which should be shown to SJWs: https://youtu.be/ICng-KRxXJ8
    1
  410. No ... and understanding is not a requirement for a feminist ... BELIEVING is, because it is a RELIGION nowadays!
    1
  411. No ... she is a feminist and has the right ideology to be in media.
    1
  412. This is a masterclass of dishonest journalism. You can clearly see how she does it and arm yourself against it with the sentence "No I did not say that at all" (and some clean ears for listening).
    1
  413. She uses "so you're saying" AND THEN MISREPRESENTS/LIES ... to SMEAR HIM.
    1
  414. If you are british ... write a "sternly worded letter" ...
    1
  415. 12 k new subs on his channel over the last ~2 days alone ... and someone said it was 170 k since the interview. I do believe it.
    1
  416. She has a top notch PC (graduated from Oxford) but sadly runs Windows 95 (feminism) on it.
    1
  417. Do you like it for Jordan Peterson winning OR dislike it for Cathy Newman being a hag?
    1
  418. No it isnt. This is a masterclass showcasing dishonest journalism and everyone needs to see it to learn how they do it to become innoculated against the intended manipulation!
    1
  419. She isnt low IQ ... because she graduated from Oxford. The problem is IDEOLOGY (which is her religion of feminism) which gives her a narrow-minded view.
    1
  420. They thought they had won. Cathy even tweeted "Viva Feminism" right afterwards ... and once the catastrophe became clear it was too late to take it down (people had already downloaded it and started making comment / analysis videos).
    1
  421. woman feminist
    1
  422. Entirely on purpose ... in an attempt to smear him by making him "not deny" [=agree] an outrageous statement.
    1
  423. She is neither a journalist nor a reporter ... she is an activist with an agenda!
    1
  424. No ... that has NOTHING to do with it. The entire point of feminist logic is that men and women are IDENTICAL and thus interchangeable ... which they arent and shouldnt be. The fact that women NEED to bear children and are "more communicatively focused" should be enough to prove the difference, but feminists ignore that or explain it away. There are "outside requirements on women" which make it NECESSARY for them to work less.
    1
  425. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  426. Vanessa Cid Cathy Newman DISPROVED the gender pay gap herself in this interview. - the 9% figure is correct - the figure was calculated from the AVERAGE wages of ALL men compared to ALL women -> the fact Cathy glossed over is that it is also for ALL JOBS which are PAID DIFFERENTLY and women CHOOOOOOOOOSE different jobs from men. That is NOT SEXISM ... that is INDIVIDUAL CHOICE and if you dont see that you are just another disciple of the RELIGION of feminism! The FACTS disprove you, but you choose to ignore them because you BELIEVE in the preachings of your religion.
    1
  427. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  428. If you are british you should complain to Ofcom! https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  429. If I was on a deserted island thousands of miles from civilisation ... I would invent a teleporter to swap places with Cathy Newman.
    1
  430. The way this FEMINIST acts hurts women in the long run! [Feminists do NOT speak for all women but they claim they do ... which is why they forced Formula 1 and Darts and other sports to abolish the Grid Girls for example (because it is demeaning for "all women") ... who rather liked HAVING A JOB.]
    1
  431. Why use headphones? Share that ridiculousness of Cathy Newman ...
    1
  432. ... entirely on purpose. File it under "dishonest journalism".
    1
  433. She is unable to comprehend anything because she doesnt want to. This is all ON PURPOSE. It is her (and others) interviewing technique ... and it is very very dishonest.
    1
  434. Complain to Ofcom ... that's what they are for: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  435. She is a FEMINIST ... I think that is all you need to know: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  436. Well if you are from Britain you can actually do something about it: - SOFT: write to their advertisers, the TV standards agency (Ofcom: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints ) - HARD: watch the following video to 6 mins 20 and listen/read and be "nitpicky" with details: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM 1. Is TV a "public communications network"? 2. Are feminist/leftist ideologues on TV "causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety"?
    1
  437. Janice Marie NOTHING can unnerve him: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  438. Cathy Newman is a FEMINIST to the core and in 2013 she even admitted to "positively discriminating for women" (which is discriminating against men and thus bad) while complaining about sexism at the same time. That article is in the independent ... look it up. After this interview she again had an anti-male article written ... about men dominating the internet.
    1
  439. I have a strong hunch which one of the two she is: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html She is a faithful believer in the church of feminism and their claims about the patriarchy, wage gap, pink tax and rape culture.
    1
  440. Several parody sites have closed down because they couldnt keep up with the actual stupidity of feminists. That show of Cathy Newman would be really funny ... while being filled with feminists "facts".
    1
  441. Well she was trying to use facts too (the 9%) ... but is too blinded by ideology to see that these facts DONT say what she wants them to say ... which makes her EITHER stupid OR an evil ideologue who lies on purpose.
    1
  442. Millions have died from this already ... and the joke isnt funny anymore after about a few thousands have done it before.
    1
  443. They dont care ... just look at how Cathy Newman "doubles down" on her "men are evil and suppress women everywhere" narrative a few weeks ago: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  444. Good! Keep on making the distinction between "women" and "feminists". Oh and Alison Tieman (HoneyBadger commander in chief) has made the best analysis of this interview I have seen so far. It is two episodes: https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao
    1
  445. Good comment! Making the distinction between "women" and "feminists" is very VERY important, because as soon as you are fuzzy and talk about women when you are actually talking about feminists, you play their game of identity politics ...
    1
  446. IF she was actually (consciously) trying to help JBP she would not interrupt him and ask questions that help his narrative. Instead she does the stupid "so we should organise like lobsters" stuff which is really cringeworthy.
    1
  447. She is a RELIGIOUS BELIEVER in the cult of feminism. Just listen to her ask "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    1
  448. That is balanced with an absolutely HIDEOUS hairstyle and a not-so-nice voice though ...
    1
  449. Cathy Strawwoman
    1
  450. This "twisting of words" is done entirely on purpose. It is a very dishonest TECHNIQUE to interview "controversial figures".
    1
  451. If you want a good laugh here is an excerpt from an article about Peterson: There is Soviet propaganda everywhere, including on the ceiling. He has more than 200 such paintings: Lenin addressing a crowd, a portrait of a Soviet agronomist, Russian soldiers during World War II. In the early 2000s, Peterson began buying these paintings on eBay because the irony of bidding for communist agitprop on the most capitalist marketplace ever devised was too delicious to resist. But he also bought them to remind himself of how glorious utopian visions often descend into unspeakable horror. https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256
    1
  452. She is worse than that ... she is an angry feminist people actually listen to and quote in the media ... i.e. the PROPAGANDA INSTITUTIONS.
    1
  453. Why do you become insecure? Do you not agree with him? Most of his arguments are trivial ... if you accept the basic facts he presents as true.
    1
  454. - a few days later in the Netherlands: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ - Rubin Report together with Ben Shapiro: https://youtu.be/iRPDGEgaATU - Joe Rogan: https://youtu.be/6T7pUEZfgdI - h3h3: https://youtu.be/YFANYt52m1g
    1
  455. You missed it completely. She graduated from Oxford and isnt stupid, BUT ... she is running "feminism.exe" and this makes her narrow-minded AND she is a journalist, which makes her dishonest.
    1
  456. Ahh yes ... the typical leftist CLAIMS WITHOUT PROOF ... followed by some "judging by his looks".
    1
  457. She IS intelligent (Oxford university), but she is hampered by being a RELIGIOUS feminist who BELIEVES in the existence of the patriarchy and wage gap and so on ... and ignores evidence to the contrary.
    1
  458. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  459. She is a feminist. Being a fool is kinda a requirement to join that religion.
    1
  460. Arthur Kaletzky Bullshit! There is no "patriarchy"! The point of capitalism is COMPETITION ... which is FIGHTING and thus A MALE DOMAIN. You can not abolish that. Competing against each other is a NATURAL THING and what you are arguing for is PLANNED ECONOMY ... which HAS BEEN TRIED AND FAILED!
    1
  461. Yes ... almost reminds me of Jeanne D'Arc and her inquisition after winning a few battles.
    1
  462. You dont seem to have gotten the memo where "science" has "proven" that "there is no biological difference between men and women". https://youtu.be/kasiov0ytEc NO ONE ... got outraged over "his" ridiculous claims ... because he is a trans-activist-PROFESSOR (and he still has a job).
    1
  463. She is perfectly qualified, because this is a DISHONEST INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUE to create scandals and quotemines. Entirely on purpose!
    1
  464. This is her TACTIC. Watch other interviews with her ... it is DELIBERATE to enable her to slap alt-right/sexist/provocateur labels on the interviewee (most likely afterwards through quote mining).
    1
  465. women feminists
    1
  466. Yep ... divide et impera ... 2000 years old and still works.
    1
  467. No ... she is saying that you have the right "not to be offended" ... by boy bands ( https://youtu.be/ceS_jkKjIgo ) or maybe even feminists? Go and phone the police and have them make arrests of anyone who offends you!
    1
  468. That is the main reason why feminism needs to be abolished.
    1
  469. Her interview is shaped by her IDEOLOGY and to achieve victory she uses a smear tactic: - listen for keywords - rephrase into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" (dont forget quotemining later on with extracts/clips on the news) This is DELIBERATE! Stop explaining it as "stupidity" or "an accident" or even "devil's advocate". It's not. It is all about IDEOLOGY and the culture WAR ...
    1
  470. woman feminist It is important to make this distinction, because if you dont you give her more power than she deserves! Oh and if you dont do it you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics!
    1
  471. If you like watching this for entertainment you might be interested in this "parody": https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  472. Only the feminists ...
    1
  473. A GIANT middle finger to Channel 4 and Cathy Newman ... and yet they will not change because they are religious zealots.
    1
  474. No ... it is far FAR worse, because this is the consequence of a devious plot hatched in the 60s/70s to destroy the west. Back in the 80s there was a KGB defector called Yuri Bezmenov and he explained it ... and when you look at the last 40 years it does fit. He talks about "equity" (=feminism), "social justice" (BLM, gay and trans activism and all the minority/refugee rights groups) AND he mentions the COGNITIVE DISSONANCE of the "infected" by saying "they will not believe your evidence": https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA The fact that the KGB doesnt exist anymore is irrelevant, because the movements have taken on a life of their own AND there are just a few people needed to give these movements a nudge in the "right" direction: https://youtu.be/qNcmSFz_Cng https://youtu.be/zPQNcjN1UAk
    1
  475. That is a good point to notice ... because it "changed the game" from defense to attack: https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik
    1
  476. Actually ... he is better than that ... https://youtu.be/Mmek0f1Illo
    1
  477. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  478. Somewhere there is a person/clique at the helm driving it ... they cant all be Mao.
    1
  479. She CHOSE her path and is intelligent enough to know better. So no feeling sad for her ... she deserves all the shame in the world for being an evil narrow-minded ideologue.
    1
  480. - give a man 50 women and you will have lots of fun and offspring - give a woman 50 men ... and that wont do anything for her except a wide variety of choice for the offspring Conclusion: men will COMPETE for women, women only need to CHOOSE Men and women ARE different in their outlook in life and yet SJWs and feminists claim they arent.
    1
  481. Vorile DeWise The only real way to make them stop equating "feminism = all women" is to create a second movement for women ... because then the media need to be precise with their words and people notice that there are far fewer feminists than they thought. Well either that or making feminism illegal.
    1
  482. Thesis: Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Argument: Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out, blaming others and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are like toddlers ... who are children that havent learned responsibility and self-control yet!
    1
  483. Oh come on ... I can disprove the existence of the pay gap in several ways ... one of it is the data Cathy provided: 1. Cathy Newman's 9% - the figure is CORRECT (for Britain) - it represents the average wage of ALL MEN compared to ALL WOMEN ... these two things were mentioned by Cathy Newman, but what she didnt mentioned was the TRIVIAL FACT: - that the 9% is ACROSS ALL JOBS which are paid differently and because women CHOOOOOOSEE different jobs they dont get the same amount ... and comparing engineers (mostly men) to cleaning ladies (mostly women) is STUPID (or dishonest) 2. LOGIC ... just two simple questions you should answer: - IF it was "the norm" for businesses to pay women 23% less (as Obama claimed for example) ... WHY ARE THERE UNEMPLOYED WOMEN? - All across the western world there are lots of companies who employ women in the payment/financing department ... and yet there are ZERO WHISTLEBLOWERS who release their "rulebook" which states "women get paid less"? There is no pay gap! Women get the same salary as men! The claims of discrimination are NEVER EVER PROVEN BY THE FEMINISTS and they always ignore other factors ... it HAS TO BE the gender and cant be "women taking more time off work than men" ... This is all easy to understand ... but feminists have the monopoly in media and thus in indoctrination!
    1
  484. Never ever be embarrassed for a FEMINIST. They deserve no pity ...
    1
  485. No ... she is a feminist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  486. Nah ... she wont be fired and the feminist echo chamber will stand by her.
    1
  487. It isnt a problem of intelligence but rather of objectivity/narrow-mindedness ... which is a problem with feminism or any other RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGY. She even asked "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" as if it was a question of FAITH.
    1
  488. joke meme
    1
  489. Her attempts with Milo Yiannopulous and Nigel Farage failed too, but more often than not they succeed. This interview should help innocculate people against it and if you ever get interviewed have the sentence "no I did not say that at all" ready.
    1
  490. Socialism doesnt work. Ask anyone from the GDR about it ...
    1
  491. I wouldnt limit dishonest tactics to the left only but rather attribute it to extremists on any side. Extremism isnt a "stable" position in itself and thus it has to stabilize itself through "disqualifying criticisms" through dishonest tactics. The Nazis used that a lot and they "disproved" science discovered by jews through some warped ideas they cooked up. That was the same kind of dishonesty ...
    1
  492. Yes she will ... she is disagreeable and the whole newsroom is ideologically on that line.
    1
  493. Badger Services Do yout think they WANT him to become more popular? After this CLEAR attempt at smearing him and the whole victim narrative afterwards? You are giving them FAR too much credit! Peterson is a THREAT to feminism which Cathy Newman and Channel 4 represent!
    1
  494. woman feminist As soon as you say woman when you should say feminist, you are playing their game of identity politics and give the feminists more power than they deserve.
    1
  495. Nope ... they are all betas subservient to the feminist cause. Practically all media newsrooms are ECHO CHAMBERS today.
    1
  496. ... and how awful she is.
    1
  497. They thought they would win this easily ... because they BELIEVE IN THE RELIGION OF FEMINISM (and all the lies/propagandic half-truths). Anyone who doesnt believe is a heretic ... i.e. alt-right.
    1
  498. Sarp Rofl ... his citations are numbered in the THOUSANDS while citations of Prof. "Jordan Peterson is the same as Hitler" Rambukkhana has citations in the tens ... for one article. Oh and if you cant read a lengthy article you ARE dimwitted.
    1
  499. bigrigbob2010 The correct term is "Ctrl-left" ... because they literally want to control everything ... in everyone's life.
    1
  500. Wont help ... because she is still running feminism.exe which narrows her viewpoints considerably.
    1
  501. I have to disagree with you there, because "hate speech laws" ARE exactly that: a right not to be offended. The problem is that they are VAGUE in their definitions ... AND they are doing the opposite of "offense is taken, not given" in putting the definition of a crime in the hands of the "victim" while ignoring the INTENT of the "perpetrator". You can read a defintion of laws at 6 mins 20 here: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM
    1
  502. Rumor has it the ending was "edited" for the aired version.
    1
  503. That is dishonest journalism and quite on purpose.
    1
  504. I feel we all come here to make the same comments over and over again until one of two things happens: - Channel 4 gives up deleting comments OR - Channel 4 goes bankrupt after spending too much on people hired to delete comments.
    1
  505. She probably does know, but she also knows that she will lose her argument if they go down that road, so "quick ... switch topic"-mode is engaged. She was at Oxford University and has the intelligence, that is limited by her feminist RELIGION.
    1
  506. No ... that was all ON PURPOSE ... and if he hadnt started every reply with "no I did not say that at all" they could have gotten a nice scandalous headline out of it: "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters". That was the ENTIRE purpose behind this style of interview ... it is DISHONEST ... and ON PURPOSE. So maybe you should rewatch it with that in mind, because she isnt "dumb" ... she graduated from Oxford!
    1
  507. Bullshit ... lobsters have them beaten by a few hundred million years ... and that is the entire "lobster point".
    1
  508. He isnt Dracula, he is Kermit: https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA
    1
  509. Please STOP merging feminists with women. That is PLAYING THEIR GAME of identity politics and that is giving THEM power!
    1
  510. There are loads of videos analyzing this one from different perspectives: - communicative "levels": https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik - camerawork: https://youtu.be/-zVbJ46zQpA - the "greater picture": https://youtu.be/4NEvuQWR3oo and a bit of parody entertainment: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  511. Scandal increases the ratings ... and truth doesnt matter to these activists.
    1
  512. Cathy Newman is a FEMINIST. That makes her absolutely illiberal because she wants to control everything. She also admitted to discrimination (for women = against men) five years ago ... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  513. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example. It isnt "unqualified" but rather "dishonest".
    1
  514. You dont have to have a super high IQ ... because this was just a simple interview where Peterson talks simple stuff. Oh and Cathy Newman graduated from Oxford so she isnt dumb, but she has her ideology of feminism narrowing her field of view AND the "dishonest journalist desire" to create a scandal-headline.
    1
  515. She has been trained to use this dishonest interviewing technique and she does get her gotcha moments often enough. It is simply a masterclass showcasing "how to do dishonest journalism" ... with an interview where it didnt work.
    1
  516. Intellect is missing, but WISDOM (i.e. NOT doing something even though it promises profit) is lacking even more. There is a nice quote from one of the Harry Potter movies which states that "we must decide between what is right and what is easy" and far too many people choose the easy path and demonise those choosing the right path.
    1
  517. The important part is his COURAGE, because there are probably a lot more professors in universities in north america who see the problem of social "justice" but who are too scared to speak.
    1
  518. Maybe this could become a "teaching aid": https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI
    1
  519. She has a beta and two children ... she doesnt need to get laid, she needs a nice long holiday on a remote island with nothing on it but herself, her family and a few trees and nature. Maybe she will learn to appreciate "gendered work distribution" after trying to fell a tree and carrying it back for firewood.
    1
  520. You might become even more enlightened by several analysises of this interview: 1. by Alison Tieman (2 parts): https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik 2. Jordan Greenhall (wider implications of the general situation): https://youtu.be/4NEvuQWR3oo 3. and a bit of a parody for entertainment purposes: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  521. So you like DISHONESTY? Every "so you're saying" was a gross misrepresentation and LIE ... Hint: you CAN ask tough questions without lying ... you need an actual ARGUMENT and FACTS to do that though and Cathy Newman only has LIES. Case in point was her whining about the gender pay gap and then using a figure where LOTS OF DIFFERENT JOBS are summed up ... and which can not be used to state any "fairness argument".
    1
  522. Listen to Jordan Peterson interviews where he talks about this one, she wasnt ok for one second during this interview and was aggressive from the start. https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ Oh and "biased listening" has nothing to do with it. This is DISHONEST JOURNALISM.
    1
  523. Masochist ...
    1
  524. You dont need "data" to deconstruct her argument and the easiest example is the 9% "pay" gap. The figure is correct, BUT it is the AVERAGE from ALL men and ALL women and thus from ALL JOBS. Thus Cathy Newman whines about "fairness" while comparing CEOs to cleaning ladies. This is TRIVIAL and either she DELIBERATELY misrepresents it due to ideology OR she is absolutely stupid. The same is happening for other arguments, where she either "uses generalization and condemns examples with SOME women/men" OR she "admonishes Peterson for using generalizations while using individual examples herself". Cathy Newman basically leads the interview in a way where yes AND no are the wrong choice in a yes/no question. Feminism is a marxist ideology which is always about "an evil oppressor" (men/patriarchy) and their "poor oppressed victims" (women) ... WITH NO MIDDLE GROUND. That is why they are awful ... but the "truth" is on this middle ground.
    1
  525. She doesnt care ...
    1
  526. woman feminist She isnt incompetent but Peterson is too smart for silly dishonest debating tactics.
    1
  527. A favorite saying of mine is "If you can't say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying. The details are everything."[1] because it makes it clear that people should be PRECISE WITH WORDS. Being blunt is fine when it isnt about something serious, but the fight against feminism and social "justice" is simply too important to allow any vector of attack on counter-arguments. It is a bit nitpicking, but the standard defense of feminists is the victim narrative and "being incompetent" will be seen as an insult by them AND might eventually be enough to get you jail time if you were to say this on social media in Britain ... https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM [1] Babylon 5, Centauri Minister of Intelligence
    1
  528. That comes with the ideology of feminism.
    1
  529. AceArion As usual he has been painted as a "horrible alt-right Nazi" when he protested against enforced speech laws in Canada (which had been introduced for the benefits of those poor poor trans people). This is horseshit and happens every time when someone "right of Mao" criticises feminism and social "justice". People should THINK about the meaning of the word/phrase "THOUGH-TERMINATING cliché" ...
    1
  530. He has had practice ... https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  531. Cathy Newman is a RELIGIOUS feminist ... and religious fanatics are not the type to "listen to others". Just listen to her questions ... "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" which makes it clear that she doesnt care about FACTS or EVIDENCE.
    1
  532. DRY sand ... because you can actually build some nice sand castles out of moist sand.
    1
  533. Have you complained to Ofcom yet? That's what they are there for (I think) ... TV "standards". Oh and while you are at it you might mention a word or two about the feminist takeover of the BBC. It is getting ridiculous ... and that is coming from a German who has his entire country run by feminism and political correctness.
    1
  534. No ... they arent failing you dumbwit ... they are WINNING because SHE has a job in MEDIA ... which are the organisations DISPENSING PROPAGANDA!
    1
  535. Not only them ... https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  536. I really dislike people who say "the world has moved on" without proving that it has "moved to a BETTER place". "More" is NOT the same as "better" and maybe the ways of the past - which have been discarded/rejected completely by the student protesters in the 60s - are a better solution than todays self-centered garbage behaviours where feminists turn it into a (marxist) war between the sexes (instead of a SYMBIOSIS of the two) and SJWs turn it into yet another marxist racial war between "white males" and "everyone else". Radical changes like those in the 60s and 70s can only destroy ... AND this was done ON PURPOSE ... for the benefit of the commies: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    1
  537. ... and that is why it is AWESOME. It is OBVIOUS and should be a "masterclass lesson" for any teenager (and any human) to show them how dishonest journalism works.
    1
  538. Sexism AND racism have picked up ... BECAUSE OF FEMINIST CLAIMS of sexism (that is a thought-terminatinc cliché and the use of them has dominated public discourse over the last 10 years but they were hardly ever used before that)! Using that word INSTILLS FEAR AND DOUBT into the mindset of women ... which is what feminists need to get support for their agendas. The same is true for racism and transphobia and so on ... all THOUGHT-TERMINATING clichés! Just look at the 80s and 90s: Michael Jackson was the KING OF POP, Eddie Murphy had loads of hits and there were lots of others like them who were successful. Would that have happened if "all white people were racists"? No. But now there are claims of "white privilege" ... usually uttered by black STUDENTS who are themselves privileged or white activists who like to virtue signal. Oh and feminism started the use of thought-terminating cliches ... so it is "the original sin" and needs to be destroyed because you cant trust them with any judgement anymore. Start thinking in terms of "egalitarianism" ... because all those barriers which Cathy mentioned are also in the way of men!
    1
  539. No ... she graduated from Oxford and is "smart". The problem is that she is also a feminist AND a dishonest journalist. Twisting his words and turning them into something outrageous within seconds is a skill and took lot of practice and she needs to understand what he said.
    1
  540. https://youtu.be/8kpHK4YIwY4?t=50s
    1
  541. It may be painful, BUT treat this as MEDICINE to counteract yourself being cheated by dishonest journalism ... which you will probably recognize more easily after this one. So go out and make everyone else you know take this medicine!
    1
  542. The effect would be much greater if people finally made the connection between feminism/social "justice" and the effing KGB ... which Yuri Bezmenov told us 30+ years ago ... https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    1
  543. Strawwomen ... we dont want to be sexist!
    1
  544. And a few days ago she keeps her story of being a victim alive by MORE LIES: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  545. That is done on purpose ... to try and trick him into NOT DENYING any of the outrageous claims ... which would have gotten them a headline to discredit him: "canadian professor thinks we should live like lobsters". I am sure you can see them doing that ...
    1
  546. After 25.000 hours of consultations as a psychologist he has seen it all.
    1
  547. This was a team effort ... have a look at how the camerawork and studio design is intended to "help": https://youtu.be/-zVbJ46zQpA
    1
  548. She is a feminist ... try to work it out from there.
    1
  549. They arent ... because their echo chamber would crumble.
    1
  550. Do NOT be embarrassed for her! She deserves any punishment for her own misbehaviour ... because SHE CHOSE THIS PATH!
    1
  551. Either 22 or 36 ... those are the two numbers I have read here.
    1
  552. ... which is "behaving like selfish toddlers" AND which will destroy the foundation of society through the "everone for herself" attitude.
    1
  553. She has a severe case of FEMINISM (which probably explains the hair too).
    1
  554. Well if you are from Britain Bartholomew ... complain to Ofcom about it. That is what they are supposedly for ... "standards" and Cathy Newman kinda proved the dishonesty with this and Channel 4 added more dishonesty with the victim narrative afterwards.
    1
  555. Danny JC She isnt a woman ... she is a fully fledged disciple of the church of feminism! She even asked "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" At most she gets "female" from me ... but woman? Nope!
    1
  556. Dont say that aloud ... or you will be called a misogynist.
    1
  557. Some people might even leave a dislike for Peterson or a like for Cathy ...
    1
  558. Her USUAL tactic for interviews with controversial figures. Watch her talk to Milo Yiannopulous or Nigel Farage and you will see the similarities.
    1
  559. If you think about it objectively and with a lot more information it is DEPRESSING, because she still has a job in MEDIA (i.e. in PROPAGANDA). She admitted to discriminating (for women = against men) FIVE YEARS AGO and hasnt been called out over it. She also complained about sexism in the same interview AND argued for "mob justice" on the internet ... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  560. I dont think you are good at that game luuke ... because that is exactly what Nico is saying.
    1
  561. She graduated from Oxford ... and I'd say she doesnt care about that, because the only "valid" reason is sexism. Feminism is her RELIGION!
    1
  562. Just for women though ...
    1
  563. A team of linguists have decided that the term strawman is sexist and needs to be replaced with strawwoman ...
    1
  564. Cognitive dissonance is strong in her ...
    1
  565. There are always several factors ... and being female and pretty can help your career immensely. That isnt part of the feminist agenda though and gets brushed under the carpet.
    1
  566. Be fair ... leave the choice between Scylla and Charybdis to Cathy. In either case she should NOT have her job!
    1
  567. Well put Alex! Stop defining yourself by outside characteristics! That path leads to identity politics and racism. If you want to know more about Peterson here is an article / bio of him: https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256 ... and here is the REAL interview which he made a day later in the Netherlands. Make sure you are sitting down, because it left me shaken from the insight of the man: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
    1
  568. She isnt stupid (graduated from Oxford) and this interviewing technique is totally dishonest and used on purpose. It succeeds often enough ... but that doesnt mean it is good journalism.
    1
  569. Your argument about "the pay gap" and Peterson not answering well is stupid ... BECAUSE CATHY CONSTANTLY CHANGED TOPICS. He wasnt given the time to talk about anything in-depth. The wage gap DOES NOT EXIST ... or else there should be ZERO unemployed women because they are cheaper (and supposedly do the same work as men) and would be hired preferentially. So please STOP trying to argue that way. The only thing that exists is an EARNINGS GAP ... which exists due to CHOICES women make compared to men. There was a recent study for UBER drivers and even with a gender-neutral software assigning fares women were earning less ... because they CHOOSE TO WORK DIFFERENTLY.
    1
  570. She didnt think at all about him, only about her RELIGION of feminism and what she BELIEVES in: - the existence of the patriarchy - the existence of the wage gap - the existence of the pink tax
    1
  571. The problem isnt IQ because she graduated from Oxford, the problem is her ideology of feminism which she RELIGIOUSLY believes in. She even asked Peterson "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" Zealots are NEVER the ones you can convince through arguments.
    1
  572. SADLY ... british justice is a step further, because "the right not to be offended" actually exists there: HATE-SPEECH-LAWS! Someone just got sentenced for making a (bad / tasteless) joke which NO ONE COMPLAINED TO THE POLICE ABOUT (so there was NO VICTIM): https://youtu.be/vqf1pr36OCg They basically said: "your intent is irrelevant and we determine what you intended to do" ... which basically kills all humor that doesnt conform to "the narrative".
    1
  573. The point is that there IS a gap ... but it isnt because of the gender. Even UBER has a gap between men and women (software assigns the passengers neutrally), but that is because the women CHOOSE to work differently from the men.
    1
  574. 1 + 1 = 2 is WRONG: https://youtu.be/iKcWu0tsiZM
    1
  575. Good ... remember to make the distinction between "woman" and "feminist" ... because far too many people dont and a) play the feminist game of identity politics because of that AND b) give them more power than they deserve.
    1
  576. Maybe spice it up with some common sense from Steve Hughes in the meantime? https://youtu.be/ceS_jkKjIgo [concerning the "right not to be offended"]
    1
  577. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  578. Ideology ... she is a feminist who even admits to discriminating (and nobody cares because she is a feminist): https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  579. Do not pity her ... she deserves none: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  580. No it doesnt!
    1
  581. She isnt an SJW, she is a feminist ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_Newman#Jordan_Peterson_interview citation 40.
    1
  582. DO IT ... it will be worth it. Oh and he has got a prize: the book sales increased and he has gained more than 150k new subscribers.
    1
  583. She IS qualified for the purpose of DISHONEST JOURNALISM! Peterson is simply more experienced than her though and doesnt fall for it. Cathy Newman IS intelligent enough (graduated from Oxford) but she is narrow-minded due to being a believer in feminism.
    1
  584. He is too far away ... no ... there are enough good people in Britain who could do it, like Sargon of Akkad: https://youtu.be/4Cv6rhmiOeg This was the "live" version of his regular "this week in stupid" ... and feminists/SJWs produce enough stupid to make it a regular thing.
    1
  585. Have some more comedy-ception ... while critiquing the "interview": https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  586. No ... she actually twists words on purpose ... to get gotcha moments when the interviewee does NOT disavow what she says he said. It works far too often and is a rather dishonest tactic of todays journalists.
    1
  587. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    1
  588. All you need in a discussion with her is ... "No I did not say that at all" AND https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI
    1
  589. She isnt stupid. She is a feminist. Using dishonest interviewing techniquest is STANDARD these days. Look for it in other interviews with "controversial" people.
    1
  590. Tim W H That is the difference between "equality of opportunity" and "equality of outcome".
    1
  591. Women earn less as UBER drivers ... because they work differently ... and now they think about changing the - so far non-gendered and impartial - software to "fix" this.
    1
  592. ... just like it was in the country of her "masters": https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    1
  593. He has a lot of practice. https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  594. Peterson explained later on that he used "the minimum force necessary" because if he had used anything more he would have become a bully and Cathy would have won. You have to let the idiots show their idiocy to red pill people and win a debate.
    1
  595. https://youtu.be/1M-hw1xVGcs
    1
  596. Oh Bunny ... stop sniffing the propaganda ... she is a FEMINIST ... and since you ask for proof: 1. look at her Twitter, she tweeted "Viva Feminism" afterwards 2. look at this article, where she admits to discrimination (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html Hypocrisy much? This "interviewing style" is also a common practice, but you can not deny that it was DISHONEST, because she twisted Petersons words FOR EVERY QUESTION! That is proof enough. Now let's talk about "data", because even Cathy Newman's own data (with a tiny pinch of common sense) disproves the existence of a pay gap: - the 9% figure is CORRECT - it is the difference between the average of ALL MEN and ALL WOMEN ... Cathy gave these two "facts" - what she did NOT SAY was that it is also for ALL MANNER OF DIFFERENT JOBS ... and that is the reason for the difference, because women CHOOOOOOOOSE different jobs from men! That is NOT SEXISM OR DISCRIMINATION! It is FREEDOM OF CHOICE! Oh and here are two questions you should answer for yourself if you believe in the pay gap: - If it was "standard" to pay women less for EQUAL work, why are there unemployed women? - All across the western world there are countless women in the salary departments of companies and yet there are ZERO WHISTLEBLOWERS holding up the form which states the "women get 9-23% less" rule. Why?
    1
  597. Nope ... if it was the video was on Stevie's own channel.
    1
  598. This is her (and other journalists') dishonest interviewing style. They practiced this long and hard ... to achieve the "disconnect" between logic/the answers of the interviewee and their own goal.
    1
  599. This is simply a masterclass of dishonest journalism. It showcases how feminists havent got ANY arguments based on honest facts and have to cheat to argue.
    1
  600. They thought they had won ... and once they realized their mistake it was too late to take it down or stop the comments (which would simply have been elsewhere).
    1
  601. You are Keith Bingham, telephone sanitizer from Solihull ... https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  602. Lots of people have brains ... but they arent allowed to be heard, because they arent politically correct or are saying wrongthink. The widespread use of thought-terminating cliches by the left and its media has denied any chance for real talk and resulted in fake outrage.
    1
  603. ... because he is right?
    1
  604. Just remember this interview and the eternal words: "No I did not say that at all ..."
    1
  605. That interviewing style is ON PURPOSE to get a scandalous headline and increase the ratings, something like "canadian professor says we should live like lobsters".
    1
  606. Here you can find the rules in Britain: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM at 6 mins 20 secs.
    1
  607. woman feminist
    1
  608. If you are a Brit ... complain to Ofcom about this blatant show of ideology and because it caused you needless anxiety: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  609. Actually ... that right ... sort of ... exists ... in Britain. It is called "hate speech law" and Count Dankula just got found guilty for "being grossly offensive" (even though NO ONE complained to the police about his video)!
    1
  610. lemmysfibroma The "liberals" who started changing our western culture after the student revolts in the 60s did it. They introduced "free development of children", "not saying no to kids" and other such nonsensical stuff ... in addition to the "free love" which started increasing the single-parent family numbers AND the "no housewife at home because she wants her career" families ... where NO ONE IS LEFT TO EDUCATE KIDS AND THEY DO IT THEMSELVES. Responsibility is NEVER taught ... and especially not to women! That kind of "liberals".
    1
  611. That's because she is one ... a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)!
    1
  612. He simply applied an old rule: "use the MINIMUM force NECESSARY".
    1
  613. No ... she has set FEMINISM back ... which is not the same as "women". As soon as you conflate the two you are playing their game of identity politics ...
    1
  614. That is her "journalistic training" ... because all this misrepresentation of the other person's point of view is DELIBERATE! Watch other interviews of her with "controversial" figures and you see the pattern.
    1
  615. This was NOT the work of her producer ... because she has to TWIST his words within seconds ... and her opinion is anti-male-feminist to the core anyways: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  616. She isnt a lawyer but an activist for the ideology of feminism. Read on if you want to know more [WARNING: depressing hypocrisy] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  617. Feminists have that magic word which can ruin many businesses ... it is called "SEXISM" ... and whenever it is uttered they get their way because far too many men have been brainwashed into believing them automatically.
    1
  618. woman feminist
    1
  619. Actually she has NOT "sold out to the entertainment industry" but rather is a BELIEVER IN FEMINISM. Listen to it again and wait for the question "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" That should make the "religious belief" clear. The "feminist to the core" part is made abundantly clear in this newspaper article http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html where she admits to discriminating (for women = against men = ILLEGAL) while complaining about sexism at the same time ... detect_hypocrisy.exe isnt running inside of Cathy Newman. Concerning her intelligence: she graduated from Oxford and they do have requirements to get in, so she cant be stupid/lazy.[1] Concerning that psychologist: she is AWFUL IMO, because she uses the same wrong "identity politics" (one of the first sentences was "womanhood") and "feelings" argumentation as FEMINISTS (like Cathy). There are loads of MUCH better videos analyzing this one from different perspectives: - communicative "levels": https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik - camerawork: https://youtu.be/-zVbJ46zQpA - the “female picture”: https://youtu.be/_UwK-my_Kmw - the "greater picture": https://youtu.be/4NEvuQWR3oo and a bit of parody entertainment with some serious questions: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4 [1] I do have my own theory/image concerning feminists and their behaviour: Cathy Newman and all the feminists are still toddlers. Explanation: Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)! Human babies are little tyrants (constantly demanding food, sleep and clean diapers) and feminists are never told to control themselves (for the sake of society/the community) ... and so they are still the same little tyrants blaming others and demanding stuff from others ... like they did as toddlers.
    1
  620. David Savage YOU are the "woke bro" SJW here. Oh and this isnt viral enough until Channel 4 or the BBC and all the other leftist media acknowledge the stupidity of feminism and its lies.
    1
  621. Feminism doesnt start "in her career", it is indoctrinated in university and even schools.
    1
  622. There has been a recent study at UBER ... which found a pay gap, but because the software is gender neutral all the consequences of lower income was due to the CHOICES the women make and NOT BECAUSE OF ANY SEXISM/DISCRIMINATION! https://youtu.be/cDpsJay7lNQ Additionally you might want to answer the following two questions if you BELIEVE in the pay gap: - If companies regularly pay women 9-23% less for the same work as men ... why are there unemployed women? - Women work in many many MANY salary departments all over the western world and yet there are exactly ZERO whistleblowers holding up a piece of paper where the "women get 9-23% less" rule is written down. Why? 9% - Cathy's stupid figure 23% - which Obama claimed a few years back
    1
  623. Actually ... he is a frog: https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA
    1
  624. They dont care about journalism, they care about activism. They have exactly who they wanted ... for their echo chamber.
    1
  625. Peterson has shown the way ... just be persistent and keep repeating "No I did not say that at all".
    1
  626. Counter point: british and EU hate-speech laws ... which kinda act as "a right not to be offended" by being extremely "muddy" in their definition and defining the way in which a comment was taken as the measuring stick (as opposed to "offense is taken not given").
    1
  627. You are absolutely wrong ... if you think that it is a choice between "being for women" and "misogyny". YOU are part of the problem, because the VAST majority of people are merely criticising her for what she has DONE, not because she is a woman. Oh and I always point out that she is a FEMINIST and not a woman. Conflating "woman" with "feminist" is PLAYING THEIR GAME of identity politics and gives her more power. What she has ACTUALLY done is make ANTI-FEMINISM stronger!
    1
  628. Not really ... it was a few minutes earlier as explained in these two videos: https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik
    1
  629. Exactly Tom ... the cat is already out of the bag ...
    1
  630. Cathy doesnt want offense in the world ... and thus doesnt want to think ... and thus has no need for listening.
    1
  631. She doesnt need to have a clue of anything, because all she wants is to twist his words and then for him to "forget denying" the rephrased statements. That would have given her a scandalous headline along the "canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" line. Do NOT be embarrassed for her, because it is HER CHOICE to do this!
    1
  632. woman feminist
    1
  633. If you are a Brit ... complain to Ofcom! Isnt their job to uphold "standard" in television?
    1
  634. 16:00 "The patriarchal system is just fine" 1. PROVE the existence of the patriarchy 2. STOP PROJECTING [The patriarchy is just another example of how feminism is a MARXIST ideology, because it divides society in oppressor and oppressed! Stop being Marxists!]
    1
  635. She tweeted "viva feminism" afterwards ...
    1
  636. @Jineapple I dont know which interview you watched, but "in technical terms" she is absolutely DREADFUL with constant strawmanning and getting her "so you're saying X" WRONG. She also had severe brainfarts with the lobsters, the wage gap and the "right not to be offended". Those are trivial things to figure out.
    1
  637. Before she can listen she needs to get rid of her RELIGION of feminism! "Do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    1
  638. I think you got this the wrong way round, because this interview is BRILLIANT in that it showcases DISHONEST JOURNALISM so that everyone can see it and learn. Thus people can become innocculated against that tactic in the future.
    1
  639. Are interviews "typically constructive" though? The competition among privately owned media channels basically REQUIRES them to create a scandal and thus they are going to be tempted to use such dishonest tactics to do it. Newspapers/magazines have been rather dishonest for decades for exactly this purpose ... especially the "tough investigative ones" I know. Honesty and the search for truth SHOULD BE at the heart of media, but it isnt ... not even for our publicly funded media here in Germany, who have a requirement to report from all sides. They simply ignore that rule.
    1
  640. No ... Peterson didnt do anything ... she fell on her own sword (because no one told her which side is the sharp bit).
    1
  641. The problem isnt IQ - she graduated from Oxford and they still have standards there - but rather one of IDEOLOGY. Her ideology of feminism gives her a narrow-minded point of view and she follows that ideology RELIGIOUSLY ... which can be seen by her asking "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    1
  642. It has been "prophesized" 30+ years ago by Yuri Bezmenov: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA He talks about "equality" (feminism) and "social justice" (BLM, trans issues, ...) AND he even predicts the cognitive dissonance / religious belief in the lies of feministic "facts" with his sentence "they will not believe your evidence."
    1
  643. An insult is only an insult if it isnt true.
    1
  644. No ... she is a feminist. She "has a good top notch PC" (educated at Oxford) but "is running Windows 95" (= BELIEVES in feminism). That gives her a narrow mindset AND several tenant she BELIEVES in ... and where she automatically disregards any evidence to the contrary.
    1
  645. Frog ... https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA
    1
  646. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    1
  647. Feminism is a RELIGION ... or did you miss Cathy Newman asking "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" and thus reasoning is not part of their way of thinking.
    1
  648. woman feminist
    1
  649. No .. a "great debater" does not NEED LIES! A great debater has FACTS and TRUTH.
    1
  650. P Lewin ... which proves that these labels are POINTLESS!
    1
  651. Semantics? Nope ... "If you can't say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying." You seem like the typical leftie who doesnt care about PRECISION WITH WORDS ... maybe it is time to educate yourself as to the differences between "pay" (i.e. the hourly wage) and "earning" (the total sum at the end of the month including hazard pay, night shift pay, ... which are NOT part of the hourly wage). There was a study at UBER and it resulted in "women earning less" ... BECAUSE THEY WORK DIFFERENTLY. The software is completely gender neutral (so far) and unbiased (subject to change due to affirmative action?). Also: https://youtu.be/QcDrE5YvqTs
    1
  652. Everyone who has a shred of objectivity left has seen this obvious "interviewing technique" and will be prepared for it in the future. Cathy is not a journalist but rather a feminist activist on a mission.
    1
  653. 1. Stop calling everyone who criticises Cathy a troll. You seem to have zero clue what the true meaning of that word is. 2. Peterson won this hands down ... because Cathy did not have a single FACT to argue against him. Even her 9% pay statistic was STUPID because it compares ALL MEN to ALL WOMEN for ALL MANNER OF DIFFERENT JOBS. Using that in an "equal pay" and "fairness" arguement shows how dishonest Cathy is.
    1
  654. Nah ... she tries so hard to get him NOT to say "I did not say that at all" ... so they can have a "canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" headline for the news ...
    1
  655. Preparation would not have changed anything, because her "feminist facts" ARE WRONG ... like calling the 9% a "wage gap" when it is an "earnings gap" and whining about "fairness" when you have a statistic which puts CEOs together with cleaning ladies is seriously stupid. The only preparation that could have saved her would be "getting rid of feminism in her head" ... but they (Cathy & Channel 4) are not going to do that one. They are in "deflection mode", "victim narrative" and doubling down.
    1
  656. No ... dont punch her ... use the million dollars to pay people to complain to the british TV standards agency Ofcom: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints ... to get her FIRED and unemployable. There is another (harder) way which involves the police AND the "annoyance laws" they have for "public electronic communications networks". People "causing annoyance, inconvenience and needless anxiety" can be sent to prison for up to six months ... and Cathy Newman fits that bill. You find that here at around 6 mins 20 ... https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM Dont go the DUMB criminal way, use the smart tactics which THEY advocated for!
    1
  657. Also: believing that men and women are different is equally controversial ... when it is sooooo easy to explain: - give a man 50 wives and he will have some fund and lots of offspring - give a woman 50 men and it wont do anything Conclusion: men WILL compete for women, women WILL pick and choose ONE
    1
  658. Do it on the bus/underground ... and make people interested, because they NEED to see this! This is educational ...
    1
  659. You chose wisely.
    1
  660. And we have to guess what is WRONG now ...
    1
  661. No ... Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who havent grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we dont teach kids anymore!
    1
  662. "Lemming" kinda suggests "dumb" (even though that whole Lemming-myth was created by Walt Disney and is #fakeNews). She misrepresented him ON PURPOSE and with great skill (it takes skill to twist words into such outrageous statements within seconds), so there was malice behind it ... and explaining it along the lines of "accident" or "stupidity" is wrong. She and others like her do it all the time ...
    1
  663. She isnt a liberal, she is a fully blown leftist ... because feminism is marxism and thus extreme leftist.
    1
  664. That is a rather dishonest but mostly successful interviewing technique used to create scandals. It is entirely on purpose.
    1
  665. I like Thinking Just look at the first example of a "female company" I gave above and you have to agree that Jordan Peterson's statement about women being more agreeable has to be limited to male-female interaction. Amongst themselves (and especially behind each others backs) they are gossipping nasty little vipers.
    1
  666. People would be less likely to be controlled if they read his book, because they would be more capable of taking care of themselves instead of relying on the helping hand of feminism ...
    1
  667. She wasnt playing the devils advocate ... she was playing the devil ... because she misrepresented him on purpose.
    1
  668. That doesnt prevent feminists from asking for more ... even if it isnt the same job they compare themselves with: https://youtu.be/DV30WXOgTZs
    1
  669. "King of keeping cool" is Peterson's middle name ... https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  670. That one will have to become a well used quote ... but then again a scottish judge has found a comedian to be guilty of being "grossly offensive". The sentence will be declared on the 23rd ... Count Dankula. [That one is SADLY proof that "the right not to be offended" exists in Britain ... in the form of hate speech laws.]
    1
  671. You might want to have a look at this 2-part analysis ... https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik which also has some "Cathy Newman sad" moments in the debate and "compared" it with this: https://youtu.be/hNRWIh_ZWwI
    1
  672. She thought she WON ... for about an hour afterwards. Then it was too late to take down the video and they switched to "victim narrative" (which failed) and have now adopted "silent mode" / "business as usual" to simply outride the public interest and survive.
    1
  673. She doesnt need a psychologist, she needs to gather a dozen or so other female feminist allies (Jess Phillips would be a good choice and Theresa May) and then be sent on a lonely island in the Pacific Ocean to survive on her own ... like Bear Grylls did.
    1
  674. "Taking on the masses" is part of his job as a professor and he is cool with ANYONE asking questions and willing to talk, even when they misrepresent him: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  675. There arent enough bridges for them to live under ...
    1
  676. Actually ... bulls in a china shop arent going to smash much (unless the bull is too large for the shop to begin with). The Mythbusters did an episode on that one.
    1
  677. Someone said that Peterson got 170.000 new subscribers over the last three weeks ...
    1
  678. Why is it sad she failed? She is dishonest and none of her arguments are sound in any way.
    1
  679. Have a look: https://youtu.be/DV30WXOgTZs
    1
  680. Good comparison on the word toddler, because ... Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this image about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)! They arent even small children, because you can REASON with a four-year-old ...
    1
  681. She is intelligent enough to have graduated from Oxford ... so the problem isnt a lack in brainpower but rather that the "feminism.exe" software limits her ability. Just think of it this way: - PC: top notch gamer stuff - operating system: MS-DOS
    1
  682. She is one of their top dogs and this is her "interviewing technique". It is entirely done on purpose but it didnt work with Peterson. She does it all the time and many times it works ... https://youtu.be/AWlaIwci3PY
    1
  683. You got it wrong. She IS intelligent (graduated from Oxford) ... but she totally LACKS INTEGRITY, but that is a requirement nowadays for "star journalists". Just remember that journalists used to massively hack phones a few years back which shows a total lack of ethical standards among british journalists.
    1
  684. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  685. She didnt do this interview "as a woman", she made it "as a feminist". That is the driving force for her, because she BELIEVES in it (religiously). She even asked "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" which is not a question about FACTS.
    1
  686. The point is to FORCE people to make the distinction between "woman" and "feminist" ... because only a fraction of women are feminists and yet they magically speak for all of them. That is why we NEED to be more precise with our words. Every time you say "this woman" when it should have been "this feminist" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics!
    1
  687. She is a feminist ... and journalistic integrity doesnt exist; in THEORY it should exist - at least in publicly funded media which SHOULD BE objective - but it doesnt for privately owned media companies which ALWAYS been about profit and that includes spreading a narrative.
    1
  688. Correct answer would have been: "I am a human being" ... or "what gives you the right to deny me the right to say things?"
    1
  689. Cathy Newman is an ACTIVIST for her RELIGION of FEMINISM. Just listen to her asking "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" ... as if it was a question of FAITH and thus RELIGION.
    1
  690. Here is an analysis just from her words: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  691. She still has a job ...
    1
  692. Someone should talk to her mom and make her tell Cathy to "WASH YOUR EARS"
    1
  693. DoctorRandomercam ... err "the Codger" ... does the same with her words at the end of this analysis (which ONLY looks at what Cathy Newman said): https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  694. She needs to learn to THINK without her ideology first ... and that wont happen unless she gets de-programmed on a lonely island.
    1
  695. No ... 5k downvotes for the Harpy.
    1
  696. Blue helmets MIGHT be cheaper because blue is a "decent colour" and is used for more helmet ... which makes them cheaper. Pink helmets MIGHT be more expensive due to the stupid DISNEY BRANDING on them ...
    1
  697. Shock therapy might be the answer ... on a remote island. Maybe put together a group of male and female feminists to live there on their own ... and see how they will organize "society" along male/female lines instead of equal representation.
    1
  698. Are you sure its not "burned"?
    1
  699. You have a weird taste ... but then you probably like noodles and an irritating voice.
    1
  700. They simply dont want to see that MEN HAVE TO FIGHT TOO ...
    1
  701. Dont buy the audiobook or you miss the drawings by Ethan van Sciver (who usually draws The Green Lantern for DC comics). He "explains" them here: https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ I think my advertisement is better!
    1
  702. She doesnt have autism, she has feminism.
    1
  703. Nah ... get some popcorn and enjoy the cringe. This is HISTORY ...
    1
  704. Gold digging isnt a "profession" ... because they usually get the stuff for free without actually doing something. Oh and she isnt a gold digger, because those usually are rather agreeable ...
    1
  705. She is only emotionally involved in trying to SMEAR PETERSON and to WIN FOR FEMINISM. Truth is not something she cares about, because her own 9% fact statistic PROVES the non-existence of the gender pay gap, because those 9% come from lots of DIFFERENT JOBS, which makes any cries of "fairness" complete hypocrisy!
    1
  706. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_Newman#Jordan_Peterson_interview She seems to be worse than "activist" because she advocates for "witchhunts on innocents" [blaming and shaming accused]. She is an agitator!
    1
  707. The whole point of "freedom of speech" is that you NEED to be able to offend people to think ... and this requires you NOT TO BE AFRAID to do it. Feminists and SJWs are cuddled idiots who think they can improve the world by making it "safe" ... but they are not understanding the fact that it will stop progressing if you do that.
    1
  708. ... because he can explain stuff so even scrubs can understand it.
    1
  709. He is used to this from his practice as a psychiatrist.
    1
  710. 1. He has had 20.000 hours of practice as a clinical psychiatrist ... so he is experienced with different personalities and dishonesty. 2. He has thought about what he says and writes in his book for YEARS, so it is very very well thought through. 3. His experiences in Canada with student protests has helped a lot: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  711. Well this "interview" is mostly useful as a showcase of dishonest journalism. Jordan Peterson had many more and FAR FAR FAR better opportunities to talk about his book and his ideas afterwards. - a few days later in the Netherlands: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ - Rubin Report together with Ben Shapiro: https://youtu.be/iRPDGEgaATU - Joe Rogan: https://youtu.be/6T7pUEZfgdI - h3h3: https://youtu.be/YFANYt52m1g
    1
  712. I'd vote for crowdfunding an award for Cathy Newman instead: "Golden Strawwoman of 2018" ... kinda like the Razzies. There are many categories of "feminist BS" that could be pointed out in an award ceremony. Example: https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM
    1
  713. Nonsense ... all the arguments of feminists are based on LIES ... and this is the reason why people are frustrated. Like the gender pay gap ... which is actually an earnings gap. The pay gap DOES NOT EXIST, because ... - if it was possible to pay a woman 10% (or more) less than a man, why are there unemployed women? - there are countless women working in the "payment departments" of companies and if there was a "women get paid less policy" SOME WOULD HAVE COME OUT AS WHISTLEBLOWERS. The whole thing is A MYTH. It doesnt exist and feminists/journalists create its existence through OMMITTING FACTS ... like WOMEN CHOOSE different career paths. "Forcing a ratio of representation is undesirable" has NOTHING to do with "statistics" and everything with COMMON SENSE, because you want THE MOST QUALIFIED for a job and taking anyone else will lower the quality of the results you get. This is TRIVIAL ... but radical ideologies like feminism do not think that way.
    1
  714. @Voice of Reason Oh come on ... "intelligent people" are ALWAYS drowned out by the masses of "lesser beings" ... which is why TV is catering to those masses instead of actually trying to be objective. There are lots of good arguments/debates in comments sections and this comments section is an example of it.
    1
  715. She IS bad ... even to the degree of admitting discrimination (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  716. No ... this is exactly what she was supposed to do, because "honesty" and "truth" are NOT HER OBJECTIVE! She want to SMEAR the evil alt-right/sexist/provocateurs when they answer in any form other than "No I did not say that at all". If you start any other way you are trapped because you "agree". Its like afterwards when Peterson tweeted to "stop the abuse" ... which was taken as proof for the existence of abuse ... which doesnt exist. It is rather the other way round ... Peterson got 30 times more abuse than Newman ... including from a Twitter-verified feminist. This is Jordan Peterson though ... and such cheap tricks dont work on him.
    1
  717. Actually ... it is a masterclass for teaching the people of the world how DISHONEST JOURNALISM works these days. So tell your friends to watch it and become innocculated.
    1
  718. Here is an analysis completely ignoring what Peterson says ... purely focusing on Newman: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  719. Do they still have jobs?
    1
  720. Look into the "Bully Hunters" debacle ... which should - so far - be a contender for second place in entertainment value. 1. short summary and criticism: https://youtu.be/th5G0bUNh14 2. booohooo ... evil right wingers harrass us: https://youtu.be/p8Ktbrmp0Ag 3. looks like Steel Series might have been behind it: https://youtu.be/1wXrTLWEOv4 4. actual statistics on harrassment and so on (from a real scientist): https://youtu.be/Hv533psEk_M
    1
  721. Do you have her job description? Probably not, because it might contain "feminism" and "equality" and other key words and miss "objective" and "respectful" and most importantly "journalism" and "thinking".
    1
  722. Meep meep.
    1
  723. Oh come on ... her "real motivation" is OBVIOUS: a victory for her RELIGION of FEMINISM ... which she tried to achieve by MISREPRESENTING what Peterson says. In case you need proof for her RADICAL FEMINISM: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  724. This can not be overstated ... AND this must be asked of Ofcom, which is the "TV standards agency" in Britain. So if you are a Brit ... START COMPLAINING! https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  725. ... entirely on purpose to try and smear him.
    1
  726. woman FEMINIST ... and there you have the answer why. Oh and refrain from saying "woman" when you mean "feminist" in the future, because that would be playing THEIR GAME of identity politics and it gives them more power than they deserve. Only about 20% of women are actually feminists ... but they make ALL the political decisions concerning women!
    1
  727. She isnt a journalist, she is an ACTIVIST for her feminist RELIGION! She BELIEVES in the patriarchy. She BELIEVES in the wage gap ... and she ignores evidence to the contrary.
    1
  728. No ... that says everything about todays DISHONEST JOURNALISM ... the same will be true if the pendulum swings the other way!
    1
  729. You should be overjoyed by having experienced this masterclass of dishonest journalism, because it will innocculate you in the future from being manipulated by them.
    1
  730. No ... this should be watched by EVERYBODY, because it clearly showcases dishonest journalism ... and many people could be innocculated against it that way.
    1
  731. Count Dankula recently got found guilty for being "grossly offensive" ... and there are several people EVERY DAY that are "taken in for questioning" by the police.
    1
  732. Feminism
    1
  733. Dont be ... he chose her and he is a beta.
    1
  734. Here is the video of Ethan van Sciver talking about the drawings within it: https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ
    1
  735. Name them and then compare their "rank in the hierarchy" to her. She is dishonest on purpose, because they can create a scandal and increase their ratings that way. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely!
    1
  736. If you want an analysis just looking at what Cathy Newman said: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  737. Peterson has 25.000 hours as a clinical psychologist under his belt ... and he has seen every type of human already. The usual amount to reach "mastery" of a skill is 10.000 hours ...
    1
  738. David M That train left the station half an hour after they posted this video. They didnt realize the mess they were in until it was far too late. Sadly I think they will succeed with their "silent mode" ... unless british people start complaining to Ofcom about the total lack of standards in journalism AND the indoctrination that is happening there. If you want a MUCH WORSE example watch this video from today: https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM
    1
  739. Actually ... a jury of language experts has decided to change the term into "strawwoman" ... in honor of Cathy Newman and because strawman is sexist.
    1
  740. They should make a separate series/season set in Britain. There is enough BS to go around for that: Feminists at the BBC: https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM Feminists at Tesco: https://youtu.be/DV30WXOgTZs
    1
  741. Actually he became famous in 2016 ... you probably didnt notice though. Here is another one: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  742. They thought they had won this ... Cathy even tweeted "Viva Feminism" afterwards.
    1
  743. It is on purpose. This is a very disingenuous interviewing tactic and she does it all the time. There are others like her too.
    1
  744. George Detective It is liberalism which enabled lefties to take over, so all lefties are liberals ... until they are in power when they turn authoritarian. So liberalism IS to blame for dismantling the defenses of western societies (traditions and the ability to say NO). Oh and yes she is an absolute leftist ... a neo-marxist feminist who lives in identity politics.
    1
  745. Men do not count for feminists ... #killallmen and recently #metoo (and the false accusations ever since Obama's "title IX - dear colleague letter") show that clearly.
    1
  746. Well he didnt say that ... but we do ... and she calls it misogyny in return.
    1
  747. ... which is a label they put on Milo Yiannopulous because they didnt really have an ideological drawer to put him in but simply wanted to smear him as a bad person. Its the same for "populist" here in Germany, which is at its core a neutral term, BUT it has been modified in the press with the prefix "right-" and become a thought-terminating cliche.
    1
  748. That is entirely on purpose ... to create a gotcha/quotemine moment when the interviewee does not deny the "so you're saying" statements. Next day's headline: "Canadian Professor says we should live like lobsters".
    1
  749. No. They still control all the media.
    1
  750. There are enough good and REAL interviews out there to learn what he is saying ... Cathy Newman did us a service of demonstrating "dishonesty and feminist bias in todays media". Here are some interviews you might want to watch/listen to: - a few days later in the Netherlands: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ - Rubin Report together with Ben Shapiro: https://youtu.be/iRPDGEgaATU - Joe Rogan: https://youtu.be/6T7pUEZfgdI - h3h3: https://youtu.be/YFANYt52m1g
    1
  751. Yes.
    1
  752. She and her newsroom didnt know it for about a day. They thought they had won!
    1
  753. feminism
    1
  754. She has always been like this and he accepted her. No need to feel any pity for him.
    1
  755. She wont ... she is far too invested in the church of feminism.
    1
  756. Jordan Peterson basically explains this himself, when he talks about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are todllers who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)!
    1
  757. Aqua ... and you need to remember the standard reply in an argument: "No I am not saying that at all" ... as a kinda ... https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI -moment of "we know you are full of lies".
    1
  758. There is no "moderate feminism"! Both genders are equal in the eyes of the law (even though women are "more equal" in some areas) and any "barriers" - as Cathy called it - have been removed. There is ZERO reason for the existence of FEMinism! If you want to be for equality become egalitarian (which isnt gendered to begin with) ... because there are MANY problems for men ... but feminists have always blocked changes to these issues.
    1
  759. Have you complained to Ofcom yet about this blatantly biased and obvious hit-piece journalism? They are supposedly there to keep up "standards" in media ... https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints Just make sure to get as many people complaining to them as possible ...
    1
  760. Diana Ekman Only for an instant (2 parts): https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik
    1
  761. Actually it was 36 ... no need to exaggerate. That is still more than 1 per minute.
    1
  762. Do you REALLY know what 1+1 is? https://youtu.be/iKcWu0tsiZM
    1
  763. Good! Here might be another reason: Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)!
    1
  764. She doesnt care ... that is the reason for EVERY RELIGIOUS ZEALOT who believes in a cause. "What is the slaughter and suffering of a few thousand men/jews/arabs/christians/whites/gays against the advancement of feminists/naziism/christianity [crusades]/islam/BLM/... ?"
    1
  765. woman feminist
    1
  766. That was the entire point of these 30 minutes from the point of view of Channel 4 ... dishonest journalism to get one quotemined citation so they could have a headline like "Canadian Professor says we should live like lobsters".
    1
  767. Please give your CITATION for the "so wrong" CLAIM ... oh and make sure it isnt a feminist-biased one.
    1
  768. Like it for Jordan Peterson or dislike it for Cathy Newman ... both work (i.e. these votes are useless).
    1
  769. I think the consensus is that 36 is the correct number for that.
    1
  770. That is an "interviewing tactic" and quite deliberate ... in an attempt to smear Peterson.
    1
  771. DISHONESTY - and all her easily visible TOTAL MISREPRESENTATIONS make this fact clear - is NEVER a good way to go about in a discussion. FABRICATING FACTS is all she does and there is nothing to "uncover" ... no dirty secret. LOTS of people have tried and did not manage it, so please stop your defense of the indefensible DISHONEST journalism. You can have a real interview without that.
    1
  772. Isnt it obvious? "Women [as a collective] earn less money than men" ... which "proves" her point. They completely omit the fact that (usually) "the money HE makes is 'ours' and the money SHE makes is 'hers' " ...
    1
  773. Exactly ... feminism has become a RELIGION! Dont tell them that or they will start claiming religious freedoms/protections next.
    1
  774. That isnt domination ... that is defense against domination, i.e. hitting back after being berated for 20 minutes.
    1
  775. Stupid citations with a bias. Everyone with an open mind can see that feminism is marxism, because it is about "the poor oppressed workers women/trans/gay/minorities" against "the evil Bourgeoisie Patriarchy of the straight white man". Your blogger denies this FACT and thus the bias is clear and the conclusions can only be wrong. This ideological mindset is BLACK AND WHITE and allows for ZERO MIDDLE GROUND, which is the reason for the current radicalization ... which comes from feminists/trans activists (not trans people!)/gay activists (not gay people) ... Oh and in case you missed it: feminists and SJWs are (unpaid) agents of the KGB ... https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    1
  776. topkek rekt Portugal is a part of the EU ... are you "fluent" on those laws? Sadly my country of Germany is pushing far too much in that regard ... and I apologize for the inconvenience ... I only have one vote and our media is ENTIRELY SJW/feminist and completely uncritical of Merkel.
    1
  777. The worst part IMO is that nobody argues "for society", i.e. the happy and symbiotic family, because everyone is only focused on him-/herself ... which started after the cultural revolution in the 1960s. Before that we were rebuilding after the war ... but as soon as the resources werent scarce anymore teamwork and "responsibility for the nation"[1] went overboard. Oh and another point on the whole feminist ideology of "competing with the men for better paid jobs" and how this destroys the family: Imagine a coach for a football team. Does he tell the forward to "go goalkeeping because everyone should be allowed to shoot goals"? No. You do that with your five-year-olds, but if you want a functioning TEAM (i.e. "the sum is greater than the sum of the individuals") you SPECIALISE. Specialisation was the reason for civilizations to evolve ... and feminists want us to return to everyone being "jack of all trades, master of none" state of primitive cultures. This is especially bad due to the things which Yuri Bezmenov said in the 80s ... which explains the increased extremism/radicalisation of feminism and the existence of social justice movements. https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA The KGB supported the start of these movements ... but they have taken on a life of their own AND "they will not believe your evidence" is the reason why they wont stop. [1] as in JFK's "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" ...
    1
  778. @Jonathan Bowen Sure they put this online, BUT in the aired version they EDITED OUT THE GOTCHA if I can believe what I heard. That is the part which make them truly evil and manipulative.
    1
  779. No ... worse ... she is MAKING /SPREADING the koolaid (because she is in media).
    1
  780. Oh she did listen ... or else she couldnt have used keywords from his answers to rephrase them into an OUTRAGEOUS statement that he supposedly said. And if he hadnt denied that statement instantly they could have quotemined it for a headline ... "Canadian Professor says we should live like lobsters" ... READ ALL ABOUT IT ... BREAKING NEWS ... its all 100% grade A DISHONEST!
    1
  781. ... to everyone except herself.
    1
  782. No he couldnt. There are hate speech laws in Britain and "feminists" are one of the protected groups ... while "men" arent.
    1
  783. Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who havent grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we dont teach kids anymore!
    1
  784. Strawwoman.
    1
  785. No fatality anywhere ... because Channel 4 still hasnt apologised AND Cathy Newman still has a job.
    1
  786. This is a masterclass of (failed) dishonest journalism ...
    1
  787. Some men even like these kinds of jobs ... because they can joke around "with the boys" all day while working out a bit in the sun.
    1
  788. The dishonest tactic was entirely on purpose. She graduated from Oxford, so she isnt dumb, she does have her ideology of feminism though (which gives her a narrow-minded view) AND the requirement of the company to create a headline through scandal.
    1
  789. Please do not combine "her" and "logic" in a sentence. That does not compute. Oh and she operates ENTIRELY on the emotional level: https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik
    1
  790. No news of Cathy Newman and Ben de Par being fired ... hope in humanity crushed.
    1
  791. REEEE ... you are denying the existence of lobsters!
    1
  792. We need to convince the neutral people first and foremost ... and after that we need to MOBILIZE THEM!
    1
  793. Lots of practice ... 25.000 hours of clinical practice and this: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  794. She didnt ... at least not yet. They are totally silent on Twitter and not even a tiny bit of remorse or apology left in them.
    1
  795. It does serve a purpose as analyzed here: https://youtu.be/-zVbJ46zQpA
    1
  796. The problem is one of RESPONSIBILITY ... which men are taught but women arent. So women never really need to face the consequences of their choices, because all of society is jumping to their aid the instant any of them has done something bad. Women are quite immature in that regard ...
    1
  797. Then you are as narrow-minded as Cathy Newman, because that part is TRIVIAL. The whole point is to counter the "blank slate theory" / the "everything is cultural" ideology with some biological fact. Lobsters have no cultures but they do have hierarchies ... which PROVES that "developing hierarchies" is NOT "a consequence of an evil oppressive patriarchical culture" but rather BIOLOGICAL ... it is WITHIN US. Oh and how would you explain the existence of IDENTICAL gender roles in cultures that developed independently? Natives in africa have that just like the natives in south america or asia. So ... please activate your brain and THINK ... for yourself for once.
    1
  798. It isnt a problem of language but rather of ideology. Feminism does make you close-minded ...
    1
  799. Stop giving them kudos for screwing up! They BELIEVED they had won and screwed up ... by uploading and allowing comments. They cant revoke that now ... because that would be a second wave of outrage.
    1
  800. @Sleazebag If you want to have a critique without anything from Peterson in it: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  801. She is TRYING ... but failing.
    1
  802. Good.
    1
  803. ... if you have a hate-speech law.
    1
  804. That is about as likely as winning the lottery jackpot.
    1
  805. He has a LOT of practice: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  806. ... on purpose.
    1
  807. Actually ... she is saying that she is an ACTIVIST for the CHURCH OF FEMINISM!
    1
  808. She is DISHONEST in her "digging for answers" and that makes her BAD and not a person to admire.
    1
  809. woman feminist It is important to make this distinction, because if you dont you give her more power than she deserves!
    1
  810. He said later that he used the least amount of force necessary.
    1
  811. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    1
  812. kierkegaardrulez He has 25.000 hours of interaction with patients as a clinical psychiatrist ... so he definetly qualifies as "master".
    1
  813. Consistency or even truth are not her focus; smearing him is ...
    1
  814. He used an old principle to "use the least force necessary" ... and that was wise, because if he had "smashed" her he would have looked like a bully and Cathy Newman could have played the victim.
    1
  815. Her interviewing tactic is DISHONEST ... ON PURPOSE, because if he hadnt denied any of the OUTRAGEOUS rephrasings of what he allegedly said ... he would have "agreed" with those wild statements. This is todays style of "critical" journalism ... for the sake of scandals and good ratings and PROFIT!
    1
  816. That is a stupid solution ... I mean you are correct in that "they" are hypocrites, but they are still wrong on both accounts: - there are only two genders (man/he, woman/she ... and everyone else is "it") - there is no gender pay gap and any differences are based on CHOICES
    1
  817. Having several different people analyse/criticise different aspects of it helps too ... and there are many different ways this has been analysed: - communicative "levels": https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik - camerawork: https://youtu.be/-zVbJ46zQpA - the “female picture”: https://youtu.be/_UwK-my_Kmw - the "greater picture": https://youtu.be/4NEvuQWR3oo and a bit of parody entertainment with some serious questions: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  818. Better a fool than a stupid SJW/white knight/feminist ... who thinks that there can ever be a right "not to be offended". Have some Steve Hughes explain the ridiculousness of that idea: https://youtu.be/ceS_jkKjIgo P.S.: I am offended by boy bands, feminists and SJWs and will call the cops tomorrow to have you arrested for offending me David. [And since you wont get it: Google the word sarcasm ...]
    1
  819. You are missing out on the drawings by Ethan van Sciver, who makes a living by drawing Green Lantern for SC comics. https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ
    1
  820. You might find this analysis interesting: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4 ... but SADLY ... british justice is a step further, because "the right not to be offended" actually exists there: HATE-SPEECH-LAWS! Someone just got sentenced for making a (bad / tasteless) joke which NO ONE COMPLAINED TO THE POLICE ABOUT (so there was NO VICTIM): https://youtu.be/vqf1pr36OCg They basically said: "your intent is irrelevant and we determine what you intended to do" ... which basically kills all humor that doesnt conform to "the narrative".
    1
  821. SADLY ... british justice is a step further, because "the right not to be offended" actually exists there: HATE-SPEECH-LAWS! Someone just got sentenced for making a (bad / tasteless) joke which NO ONE COMPLAINED TO THE POLICE ABOUT: https://youtu.be/vqf1pr36OCg They basically said: "your intent is irrelevant and we determine what you intended to do" ... which basically kills all humor that doesnt conform to "the narrative".
    1
  822. Her interview is shaped by her IDEOLOGY and to achieve victory she uses a smear tactic: - listen for keywords - rephrase into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" (dont forget quotemining later on with extracts/clips on the news) This is DELIBERATE! Stop explaining it as "stupidity" or "an accident" or even "devil's advocate". It's not. It is all about IDEOLOGY and the culture WAR ...
    1
  823. Neo is nothing against him ...
    1
  824. Oh she IS listening ... but then misrepresents him on purpose to try and get him to agree to that bullshit ... so they can quotemine in a 15 second clip.
    1
  825. Keep sticking them in their face, because they (Channel 4) wants to ride it out through silence. Keep asking for PROOF of the abuse once per day on Twitter ... (I do) ... until they bow down. Keep thumbing down any of their content ... and most importantly - if you are a Brit - COMPLAIN TO OFCOM: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  826. Ummm ... Justin Trudeau? So please ... #notall
    1
  827. Actually ... Peterson's ideas are quite simple, but she would have to argue on the level of FACTS ... and she can not win there.
    1
  828. Wamen? We dont want no apology from wamen! We want you to become women again and renounce feminism and social justice!
    1
  829. "All female companies" (or even "majority female") have been tried already ... and didn’t work. Obviously #notall but these examples are an indicator of stuff that feminists sweep under the rug and don’t want to talk about (which is why Cathy Newman claims "it hasn’t been tried yet" [just like Communism ...]): catfights http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html unproductive in tech https://medium.com/the-mission/im-an-ex-google-woman-tech-leader-and-i-m-sick-of-our-approach-to-diversity-17008c5fe999
    1
  830. Donald L. Sorry, but Germany is lost. We need saving from the outside (again) because ALL the media are leftie-feminist here. There is no resistance!
    1
  831. That is entirely on purpose to achieve a "gotcha moment" for Cathy where she can slap an "alt-right/sexist/provocateur" label on her interviewee. It is entirely DELIBERATE and an "interviewing tactic" (which is used by others too ... Piers Morgan). All in the service of IDEOLOGY.
    1
  832. This feminist should not be near any media outlet anywhere on the planet.
    1
  833. This is a trained skill she learned and entirely on purpose. If the interviewee does NOT deny the purposefully misconstrued claims by Cathy ... he is agreeing with those OUTRAGEOUS sentences and she has got him. She would immediately switch the topic and leave no chance to clarify anything.
    1
  834. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  835. She is intelligent enough (graduated from Oxford), BUT she is also a feminist ... which makes her narrow-minded.
    1
  836. She is a feminist ... the prototype of SJW. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  837. She came across as DISHONEST because she misrepresented Peterson with every single "So you're saying" ... and there were a lot of them.
    1
  838. That is the concept behind hate speech laws ... which are actually a thing here in Europe. Sadly. They are very vague in their definitions and you can see one in this video around 6 mins 20: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM
    1
  839. Dont be ... take a sarcastic look at it and say "thank you Cathy Newman for proving to the world that feminism has no arguments and that Channel 4 does dishonest journalism". This is a MASTERCLASS for dishonest journalism ... showcased in the biggest failure. You can learn how they do it and become innoculated to their tactics!
    1
  840. Feminism.
    1
  841. Silver is a bad material to use for weapons ... unless you dont intend to use them.
    1
  842. How many of those likes are book sales?
    1
  843. She fails to mention the facts though ... https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM
    1
  844. The problem is the format of "old media" ... ad breaks every 15 minutes ruin the flow and even TV shows/movies are constructed along these lines (which are easily noticed on a DVD version). Now they could CHANGE their format (and many publicly funded media dont have that), but they are trapped inside the SJW/feminist echo chamber.
    1
  845. Her interview is shaped by her IDEOLOGY and to achieve victory she uses a smear tactic: - listen for keywords - rephrase into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" (dont forget quotemining later on with extracts/clips on the news) This is DELIBERATE! Stop explaining it as "stupidity" or "an accident" or even "devil's advocate". It's not. It is all about IDEOLOGY and the culture WAR ...
    1
  846. No idea who Uncle Dane is, but this is higly educational ... because it showcases DISHONEST JOURNALISM.
    1
  847. Her point is that she doesnt want to fix the problem through dialogue and compromise ... just by dictatorial (feminist) decree. That's why she and every other feminist is this crazy ... they (religiously) BELIEVE to be right and you can not argue with a fanatic.
    1
  848. He does have lots of experience: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  849. Interesting statistics ... but it sadly misses the important categories: POLITICS and SOCIAL ISSUES.
    1
  850. Round 2 wont happen, because Cathy Newman could never achieve a victory in "an honest talk". All she has is her religion and dishonest interviewing techniques.
    1
  851. She is a feminist ... do you really expect her to actually LISTEN and THINK?
    1
  852. This is old news ... from more than a week ago ... and there has been ZERO PROOF (tweets, emails, ...) shown as evidence (and they would really like to have done that) AND the police is NOT involved. So threats do not exist.
    1
  853. You missed the point ... because it is "So you're saying PLUS a misrepresentation/lie" that has happened here.
    1
  854. You completely forgot that "scientist" ... who claimed that there is no biological difference between men and women on TV. He still has his job as a PROFESSOR and NO ONE COMPLAINED about his claim that "science has proven this long ago". https://youtu.be/kasiov0ytEc "Science" has proved it, so you better give up trying to prove anything ... This was the show which was the reason for the Lindsay Shepherd scandal for Wilfrid Laurier University ... where she showed five minutes and Prof. Rambukkana and two others lambasted her for 45 minutes, drove her to tears AND compared Jordan Peterson with Hitler.
    1
  855. No ... she wasnt "guiding" his words, she was trying to SMEAR HIM by rephrasing his keywords in an OUTRAGEOUS manner ... and if he had not denied that again and again he would have agreed to it and she would have had her gotcha moment! This was ENTIRELY ON PURPOSE ... and very very DISHONEST!
    1
  856. They were ALWAYS this bad. Just watch the speech from Tommy Robinson in Oxford to see them misrepresenting him in clips. https://youtu.be/_YQ94jFg_4A
    1
  857. She is part of a feminist/SJW echo chamber in her newsroom. That is a requirement these days ... or havent you noticed?
    1
  858. She isnt a newbie ... she is one of their best ... the dishonest tactic doesnt work on every interviewee ...
    1
  859. The whole newsroom is a feminist / dishonest journalist echo chamber.
    1
  860. 25.000 hours as a clinical psychiatrist tend to give you some experience in talking with people who are liars, psychopaths, nasty people, ... The usual threshold for "mastery" in a subject is 10.000 hours.
    1
  861. No ... she needs a nice loooooonnng vacation on a remote island (together with her husband and children) to find out how she likes to go hunting while her hubby keeps the house (which they had to build) clean.
    1
  862. Nah ... this was suicide.
    1
  863. https://youtu.be/m7ZuffBrloo?t=10m30s and the answer is YES for Jordan B. Peterson!
    1
  864. Decades ago ...
    1
  865. She is a high-paid ideologue.
    1
  866. feminism ...
    1
  867. No she didnt ... she laughed and waited for the "hate"-tweets, so she could take control back again with the victim narrative.
    1
  868. Just like a spoiled five-year-old.
    1
  869. Archon Katiara Blackdawn ... and you spout anti-religious nonsens (without actually having watched his videos ... I would most likely win a bet on that, right?). Are you feeling good in your moral superiority? If you have an ARGUMENT (you know ... facts that prove his points to be wrong) ... BRING THEM!
    1
  870. I still identify as an attack helicopter with the pronoun REEEEEE (which they get wrong all the time ... either too few or too many EEEs).
    1
  871. Should be a bit more ... because stuff seemed to "magically disappear" for a while. I think they have given up now.
    1
  872. Do you have any ARGUMENTS as to why he is wrong ... or do you only have INSULTS and CLAIMS like a typical SJW?
    1
  873. Toxic FEMINISM ???
    1
  874. Good rebuttal Ink, I would also like to add that these people arent journalists but rater ACTIVISTS, because they look at everything "through a feminist/SJW lens" ... as many professors in the USA would phrase it.
    1
  875. Nah ... that isnt possible ... not since 2013: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html She ACTUALLY admitted to discriminating (for women = against men = ILLEGAL) while complaining about sexism ...
    1
  876. Delusions of grandeur caused by ideology?
    1
  877. Ted Bell Oh come on ... Nazis were NOT LEFTIST! Nazis - NATIONALISTS first and foremost (and germanic superiority) Commies - INTERnationalists The "socialist" part was just a TOOL, a "means to an end" (=controlling the workers), but not a core part of their ideology.
    1
  878. No ... she isnt a puppet but rather a zealot in her own right: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html Feminism is her RELIGION!
    1
  879. It also isnt a PAY gap ... it is an EARNINGS gap which puts CEOs and cleaning ladies into the same statistic ... and thus it is no basis to cry about "fairness" like she did.
    1
  880. She is a dishonest journalist using a smear-technique to interview a "controversial" person (in the pursuit of gotcha-moments). She is also a feminist which makes her narrow-minded.
    1
  881. The unsettling realization starts when you realize that people like her ARE IN POWER!
    1
  882. Two examples of female run/female focused companies that "didnt go well": catfights http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html unproductive in tech https://medium.com/the-mission/im-an-ex-google-woman-tech-leader-and-i-m-sick-of-our-approach-to-diversity-17008c5fe999
    1
  883. The problem is that this would result in muslims flooding western countries (look at Sweden) and taking over.
    1
  884. Strawwoman
    1
  885. No one has control over who follows him. He cant turn them away and what he says will obviously resonate with radicals ... but does that invalidate his opinion? No, so why do people bring up these extremists? To do exactly that ... invalidate his opinion. It is just another THOUGHT-TERMINATING cliché ... so just ignore them and anyone who brings up such "facts". They usually have something to hide. Just look at this video and focus on the "evidence" for "special abuse" of Diane Abbott (you have to watch it all, because he lists the claims first and then debunks them): https://youtu.be/cqhLUIYQaKk This is a STANDARD tactic of "half-truths" ... just leave out the stuff countering your narrative (like abuse of men) and you can inflate the problem. There is a brilliant analysis of this video by Alison Tieman from HoneyBadgerRadio explaining threat narratives and inflating them: pt.1 https://youtu.be/cC3ORQvgtao pt.2 https://youtu.be/akpHo67e-ik
    1
  886. The only preparation that could have saved her would be leaving the cult of feminism ...
    1
  887. No ... she isnt a liberal, she is a true BELIEVER of feminism! Feminists are marxists/commies at heart and just used the stupid liberals to dismantle the defenses of society against marxism ... the family and cultural values and so on.
    1
  888. SADLY ... british justice is a step further, because "the right not to be offended" actually exists there: HATE-SPEECH-LAWS! Someone just got sentenced for making a (bad / tasteless) joke which NO ONE COMPLAINED TO THE POLICE ABOUT (so there was NO VICTIM): https://youtu.be/vqf1pr36OCg They basically said: "your intent is irrelevant and we determine what you intended to do" ... which basically kills all humor that doesnt conform to "the narrative".
    1
  889. Another "Doc" owned this thing afterwards: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  890. Obviously ... its the leftie media in their bubble.
    1
  891. Dont convince the men ... you need to convince the women (and children ... to innoculate them against dishonest journalism).
    1
  892. It has been INDIVIDUALISM which allowed the "me me me" culture we have today AND which allowed the "what about my salary" attitude of feminism. The true evil is EXTREMISM and no "purely individual" (=self-centered/greedy) or "purely collective" (=oppressive) society can work ... ever! You NEED a balanced approach of BOTH.
    1
  893. Theobaldus "Just give idiots enough rope to hang themselves with ..."
    1
  894. "If you can't say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying. The details are everything!" - Babylon 5, Centauri Minister of Intelligence ... and a great way to say "be precise and know the meaning of words".
    1
  895. Anything can be learned/taught ... through PRACTICE. Jordan Peterson has 25.000 hours of clinical practice with patients and has seen it all, so surprising him with a kind of behaviour is impossible. https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U A usual rule is "it takes 10.000 hours to achieve mastery of something".
    1
  896. ... because the left is all about THE COLLECTIVE ... and GROUPTHINK. Criticism of its ideology is HERESY!
    1
  897. Feminism has exactly ZERO arguments to raise ... the wage gap is a myth, the patriarchy does not exist and all the rest are stupid and petty arguments too without any proof whatsoever. Just look into the "rape culture" and how the figures are extrapolated and cheated ... the recent shitshow about "BullyHunters" is another good example of how feminism raises a threat narrative (for online gaming in that case): 1. short version: https://youtu.be/th5G0bUNh14 2. the usual blame: eeevil right wingers: https://youtu.be/p8Ktbrmp0Ag 3. if you care about REAL statistics/science from a statistician: https://youtu.be/Hv533psEk_M That is why they HAVE TO resort to lies and misrepresentations to keep the movement of feminism alive.
    1
  898. David Savage I have read a lot of your stupid comments here, but this one takes the cake (so far) by its TYPICAL SJW PROJECTION of "all threatening to rape and kill her" ... PROVE IT ... and a handful of such (probably not credible) threats are no proof that the criticism IS NOT VALID ... which is the thing you want. Sorry ... not today. She lost that debate solidly on all points and she showed the stupidity of her own ideology.
    1
  899. BS ... "doing the same job" is not always "the same" AND you have to take experience into account too, because a rookie should not get the same pay as a "veteran of 30 years" ... even if they hold the same position. An example of deluded feminists asking for equal pay and then getting their panties in a twist when an INDEPENDENT inquiry finds that MORE MEN are underpaid: https://youtu.be/CiZ6uRlm6sM
    1
  900. It is a smear campaign ...
    1
  901. No ... he would be a good ADVISOR, but as PM he would have to stop doing what he is good at and would be dragged down by the menial day-to-day tasks. Just get him to endorse someone already established as a politician WHO WILL THEN LISTEN TO PETERSON ... once he is in office.
    1
  902. No charges, no proof for any abuse, no police contacted. The only thing is TONS more analysis and the knowledge about her dishonest tactic spreads.
    1
  903. Sadly ... yes.
    1
  904. Sadly ... SADLY ... that is the ONLY "point" where Cathy is - SADLY - correct, because in Britain there IS such a thing as "the right not to be offended" ... and it is called HATE-SPEECH-LAW. A guy just got found guilty for teaching his girlfriend's pug to do a Nazi-salute (after a trial that lasted TWO YEARS) ... because the judge said that "intent does not matter" AND there wasnt even any single complaint about the video he made. https://youtu.be/vqf1pr36OCg Personally I dont think the "joke" wasnt in very good taste ... but then - as Steve Hughes pointed out years ago - NOTHING HAPPENS WHEN YOU ARE OFFENDED! https://youtu.be/ceS_jkKjIgo Oh and I am just as offended by boy bands as Steve is ...
    1
  905. No, it should be MANDATORY for everyone watching TV!
    1
  906. It is ... sadly no one in my country of Germany has ever heard of Peterson, this debate or even his book. What can I say ... we are completely overrun by feminism with zero pockets of resistance.
    1
  907. She'd probably get it ... just remember the old saying "any publicity is good publicity" ... and there is NO ONE who is forcing any negative consequences on them.
    1
  908. woman feminist
    1
  909. No ... she graduated from Oxford. Do not try to explain this with stupidity, because you would be wrong. This is DISHONESTY ... ON PURPOSE ... because of her ideology/religion of feminism.
    1
  910. If you are thirsty for "more info" on that unknown value: two articles from 2013 and 2018 ... which both show similar attitude: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  911. No ... do not underestimate her! This was entirely ON PURPOSE and a standard DISHONEST INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUE! Rewatch it and take that into account ... and then watch other interviews with her and "controversial" people. LEARN FROM THIS ... and most importantly: do NOT excuse her from any responsibility because she is female ... she isnt a woman, she is a FEMINIST (who graduated from Oxford)!
    1
  912. This was done entirely on purpose ... and if he hadnt started every reply with "No I did not say that at all" she would have gotten a nice "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" headline out of it.
    1
  913. He has had practice ... https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  914. She IS intelligent (graduated from Oxford), BUT she uses a dishonest interviewing technique ON PURPOSE ... and she is also a narrow-minded feminist. This was exactly what "they" planned to do ... well minus the fact that Peterson didnt fall into any of the traps laid out for him. Take it as a MASTERCLASS of DISHONEST JOURNALISM ... show everyone you know, to innoculate them against these dirty tricks!
    1
  915. Vic J "If you can't say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying. The details are everything." - Babylon 5, Centauri Minister of Intelligence. Being PRECISE with words is important ... but lefties like to redefine the meanings of words because they cant win an argument otherwise. They redefine violence to include words for example ... and to pass hate-speech laws. This muddiness needs to STOP and Peterson is the epitome of being very deliberate and precise with words.
    1
  916. That was entirely on purpose ... to try and trick him into "not denying = agreeing with" her outrageous warped statements.
    1
  917. Nevertheless we NEED to push the lefties out of media because a majority still watches TV.
    1
  918. Actually its over 9000 ... http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/its-over-9000 ... just as his patience level.
    1
  919. The therapy she and all the feminists need is a lonely island where they can try to live in their "ideal equal society" ... which will fail because it is the men who need to chop down the trees for firewood.
    1
  920. Many people have died to that already.
    1
  921. Actually ... she sorta has ... because she lives in Europe and we do have stupid hate-speech laws which enable the victim to define something as a crime. Usually "offense is taken not given" is a valid saying, but these laws have negated that.
    1
  922. She does have two girls ... but they are raised by her husband who is at home, so they might be less damaged than it could be.
    1
  923. Actually I would say it is the other way round with Cathy Newman running around him trying to unnerve him or get anything she could have slapped an "alt-right label" on ... pretty transparent but wont ever work ... EVER. Not on Peterson: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  924. She is ... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda Being a RELIGIOUS FEMINIST does narrow your mind.
    1
  925. In SJW-world feelings trump facts ... which is why there are hate-speech laws in Britain which actually create the "right not to be offended". Obviously that right only exists for some - more equal - animals.
    1
  926. She has her RELIGIOUS dogma from her religion of feminism. She BELIEVES in the existence of the patriarchy, the wage gap and the pink tax.
    1
  927. Anyone with an open mind is a friend of Peterson ... any dictatorial anti-free-though ideologue is his enemy.
    1
  928. He didnt have the time to explain ... because the words "equal work" were never used ... and that is the ONLY way to complain about inequal pay. They were only talking about "the collectives" of men and women ... where an analysis is STUPID.
    1
  929. She doesnt WANT to understand because she religiously BELIEVES in feminism. I hope you noticed her asking "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist dogma]" ...
    1
  930. Her interview is shaped by her IDEOLOGY and to achieve victory she uses a smear tactic: - listen for keywords - rephrase into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation if the answer doesnt start with "No I did not say that at all" (dont forget quotemining later on with extracts/clips on the news) This is DELIBERATE! Stop explaining it as "stupidity" or "an accident" or even "devil's advocate". It's not. It is all about IDEOLOGY and the culture WAR ...
    1
  931. Jonathan Warner You should wash your ears, because you DID NOT LISTEN. He said their IDEOLOGY was the same ... not "the activists" (he even specified this exact point) ... and his argument is TRUE, because feminism and social "justice" are based upon MARXISM (oppressor vs. oppressed) ... which is also the foundation of COMMUNISM.
    1
  932. Logically you are correct, BUT Britain (and all other countries with hate-speech laws) are on their way to introduce exactly such a right: https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM at 6 mins 20 secs you can read the VAGUE definitions.
    1
  933. "Keeping cool" is his middle name: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U (all he needs are dark sunglasses and a leather jacket)
    1
  934. ... not fast enough. It will take decades to get them out of academia again! Yuri Bezmenov predicted this in the 80s ... https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    1
  935. In honor of Cathy Newman and to stop the sexism the term has been changed to "strawwoman". Personally I would advocate for a crowdfunding campaign to create a "golden strawwoman of the year" award for her.
    1
  936. It is deliberate ... and very dishonest. All she wants is HER gotcha moment to smear the interviewee with alt-right/sexist/provocateur labels ... all you need to counter her now is a whole big bag of ... https://youtu.be/FRG-RBZBTZI / "no I did not say that at all".
    1
  937. Do not be embarrassed for her! She deserves no pity at all for being a misandrist: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  938. No she hasnt ... the left ALWAYS doubles down: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  939. http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Emperor_of_Mankind
    1
  940. Decades ago ... when leftie professors started churning out leftie journalists and they took over and created ideological echo chambers in service of the "end goal" ... which was revealed to us in 1984 (the year): https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA He even included "they will not believe your evidence" to predict cognitive dissonance / religious belief in feminisms claims of "the patriarchy" and "the wage gap". They are just as real as any god you may believe in.
    1
  941. Positive inspiration isnt enough, because the narrow-minded idiots are still in control of the media and will ruin future generations with their feminist/social justice "lens" (blinkers).
    1
  942. Caleb Morgan ... and here is your EVIDENCE: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA Just listen to Yuri Bezmenov talk about "equality" (feminism) and "social justice" (BLM, gay-/trans-activists, ...) in the 80s AND listen to him talk about "they will not believe your evidence to the contrary" (cognitive dissonance / RELIGIOUS belief in feminism).
    1
  943. Why not compare her to J.K. Rowling, who attacked Trump for not shaking the hand of a small boy in a wheelchair, but when it turned out that he HAD done that FIRST (and the footage was cut by a Democrat to push this narrative), Rowling only apologised to the boy and his family but not to Trump. https://youtu.be/76eGLHYOKBQ?t=7m
    1
  944. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  945. That one is an attempt to "control the narrative" and it was completely transparent ... as her lies and misrepresentations were.
    1
  946. He seemed bored/amused by her attempts ... because he has seen it all already.
    1
  947. No ... she wants to SMEAR Peterson as alt-right/sexist/provocateur. That has nothing to do with arguing, because an argument needs facts and she only has fake facts.
    1
  948. Look up Piers Morgan ...
    1
  949. Alexander Arico The religious fanatic always ignores facts, because she BELIEVES in the existence of the patriarchy, wage gap, pink tax and rape culture. They will not change their way unless they are forced to. [I just complained to the governing board of our publicly funded media channels here in Germany today to protest the general one-sidedness. It was eight pages of arguments and links to evidence ... but I dont hold my hopes high to get them to change, because the governing board is part of the channel ... and thus part of the echo chamber.]
    1
  950. Actually he is a frog ... https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA
    1
  951. She is married and has her beta and two girls.
    1
  952. She isnt confused but rather misguided/deluded by her RELIGION of feminism!
    1
  953. Just forget this obviously biased feminist ... who doesnt bother PROVING any claim she makes ... like "Jordan Peterson is alt-right" ... which he isnt. Rule #1 when dealing with a troll: DO NOT FEED!
    1
  954. She is a feminist, so "being an embarrassment" comes with that territory. Please be precise to make a distinction between "women" and "feminists" though, because every time you talk about "women" when you should talk about "feminists" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics and give them more power than they deserve to have! https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html P.S.: Did you notice how she asked "do you BELIEVE in [feminist talking point]?" For her feminism is her RELIGION!
    1
  955. All the illustrations in his book are about children ... https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ
    1
  956. You can find those under "hate speech laws" ...
    1
  957. Vorile DeWise I know your name! It is Keith Bingham from Solihull: https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  958. Please remind yourself forever to make the distinction between "woman" and "feminist", because conflating the two is playing their game of identity politics AND gives them more power than they deserve.
    1
  959. Good to see someone with the sense to see the difference. The ONLY way to solve the issue of the media saying "women" when they should say "feminists" ... would be to create a second women's movement that is opposed to feminism.
    1
  960. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    1
  961. WitheredScythe You are terrible at that game ... because that is exactly what I was saying (and it is the truth). Maybe you should watch this one ... but even "the codger" gets it wrong (but he notices it): https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  962. Here is the proof for that ... if you ever doubt: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  963. Have a great analysis of this ... KEITH! https://youtu.be/CaaSCU7d7U4
    1
  964. Sadly ... SHE is part of the media who are the ones able to define what fake news is.
    1
  965. Michael Challinoir Dont white knight Cathy Newman, she is just as guilty / bad as everyone else in that newsroom: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    1
  966. She is a feminist on a feminist TV channel ... and no preparation would have saved her, because feminist arguments are based on lies ... like OMMITTING the facts of "women CHOOSE not to go for high paid jobs" or "men HAVE TO STRUGGLE TOO to get a top job".
    1
  967. Even if they talked honestly ... she would have been outclassed. And she was educated at Oxford, so she IS intelligent. https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
    1
  968. Time to join the fight against feminism ... because she isnt "a woman", she acted as "a feminist" (which her newsroom is an echo chamber for). Just listen to her ask "do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" ... which makes it clear it is RELIGIOUS for her.
    1
  969. The comparison with GamerGate is appropriate, because this is also about ETHICS AND STANDARDS IN JOURNALISM! Needless reminder for Fred ... all the gaming journals have ethics policies now ... which is all GamerGate wanted.
    1
  970. That is actually a good analogy, because a circle and a square can be EQUAL in surface area ... but neither will fit through the hole of the other's size. This is a PERFECT description of the equality of men and women.
    1
  971. Another lesson on ethics should be on your "colleague" Eric Clanton ... https://youtu.be/muoR8Td44UE https://youtu.be/HEuJ0hvepLg Oh and ... 4chan had hacked his Amazon account and ordered dozens of Bikelocks on that ... which made me laugh A LOT.
    1
  972. No ... she is dead serious! She admitted to "discriminating positively for women" (=against men = WRONG) five years ago in a newspaper article and after this she again blamed the internet for being "male dominated" or so. I wish I could still copy links into YT comments, but ...
    1
  973. That was entirely done on purpose and what her team asked her to do.
    1
  974. She isnt a liberal, she is a FEMINIST ... and those are marxist AUTHORITARIANS (even though the current bunch came from the "liberation of women" in the 70s).
    1
  975. She is fine ... she is a lobster.
    1
  976. David Savage Stop denying the FULL STUPIDITY because "there is no right not to be offended" is also an undeniable truth .... just as well as "there are fewer women at the top BECAUSE THEY CHOSE NOT TO" [because you have to struggle hard to get there] and the "wage gap" exists because WOMEN MAKE DIFFERENT CHOICES. Stop your useless defense of that woman and take a red pill ... feminism and social justice are EVIL and here is why: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA They are doing what the KGB wanted them to do ...
    1
  977. Height is a social construct!
    1
  978. Nah ... not using the misrepresentations would mean they would have "an honest interview" ... which the channel doesnt want. They WANT their "pound of flesh" for the headlines ... along the lines of "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" (if he had failed to correct any of her gross misrepresentations of things which he supposedly said).
    1
  979. Nope ... I saw it ... he din do nuttin ... she fell on her own sword!
    1
  980. I am still amazed that the "transgender professor" who claimed "there are no biological differences between the sexes" on canadian TV did not create an uproar when he stated that in the debate about the pronouns.
    1
  981. Can I interest you in this box of matches?
    1
  982. ... because she is driven by ideology.
    1
  983. It takes me less than a millisecond to realize that "business is COMPETITION" and that you need "competitiveness and elbows" to succeed. Feminists actually believe that a "cuddly soft world where no one gets ever harmed" is possible AND desirable. To this I can only add ... https://youtu.be/03bOrvlAyeQ and https://youtu.be/I8RW3K3hhWU
    1
  984. Exactly ... they dont even need to get the goal in the interview but could have gotten it from quotemining through clips ... IF he had left them any chance for it. It usually works, but not this time.
    1
  985. She is a feminist ... so what else isnt new?
    1
  986. She didnt research his book ... or else she would NEVER have made that "live like lobsters" statement. That is the first chapter and he never talks about "living like lobsters" ... he only describes how lobster society works as proof that hierarchies develop without a society/culture ... which goes against the leftist claims that it is all a social construct.
    1
  987. She isnt dumb - graduated from Oxford - but rather running "feminism.exe" which reduces the efficiency of her PC. "Do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?" kinda proves it is RELIGIOUS for her and arguing/facts wont work. She also is DISHONEST because that is modern journalism!
    1
  988. That dishonest style is entirely on purpose and exactly what they asked from her. Repeat: IT IS ON PURPOSE ...
    1
  989. You know that SJWs have abolished clapping in universities (because clapping is triggering) and replaced it with finger snipping? That seems more in line with "clacking claws" ... coincidence or are SJWs actually lobsters?
    1
  990. This is a dishonest interviewing technique which she uses entirely on purpose in an attempt to smear her interviewee.
    1
  991. You could just as well have disliked it for Cathy Newman and Channel 4 ... but you are correct in that any vote is "ambiguous".
    1
  992. Entirely on purpose ... which is todays standard of DISHONEST journalism.
    1
  993. No one inside of an EXTREMIST RELIGIOUS SECT does. "Do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    1
  994. It is only a suicide ... the evidence is pretty clear.
    1
  995. Any examples of where he is wrong ... or are you taking the usual path of CLAIMING something and never bothering to prove it?
    1
  996. ... entirely ON PURPOSE. That is why this is so awesome ... a MASTERCLASS for dishonest journalism, where it is easy to see due to its failure. The method becomes clear ... so spread the word and let the whole world know.
    1
  997. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it).
    1
  998. Bullshit ... NAME THE OBSTACLES ... there are none! Your demonization of "role patterns" shows a lack of freedom of thought, because you need to explain why it is NECESSARY for women to "become CEOs" ... when they are NEEDED ELSEWHERE (children). The whole "50/50 split" idea is stupid, because men and women are DIFFERENT ... kinda like a square and a circle are different BUT both square and circle can have the same area and be EQUAL. You couldnt put a square through a round hole of equal size ... and to accomplish that you need to "make it round" ... and that DOESNT MAKE SENSE! Oh and concerning the gender pay gap you should answer the following two questions: 1. IF it is "standard" to pay women 9-23% less than men ... why are there unemployed women? 2. MANY companies all across the western world employ women in their salary department ... why are there ZERO whistleblowers holding up the piece of paper that says "women get less than men"? NONE of the "facts" Cathy Newman brought up are based on reality!
    1
  999. SADLY there is such a right "not to be offended" here in Europe. It is called "hate-speech law" and at 6 mins 20 in the following video you can see the purposefully vague definition of one of them ... which also put the decision if it is offensive on the side of the "victim": https://youtu.be/DF_rvhsGjBM
    1
  1000. Do you want something from 1984? I mean the year, not the novel ... it is the reason why feminism and social justice got so far AND the point why that was done: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA Oh and it is working. He even mentions "they will not believe your evidence" ... or in other words: the COGNITIVE DISSONANCE and/or RELIGIOUS BELIEF in the tenants of the church of feminism (patriarchy, wage gap).
    1
  1001. No ... I am saying you deserve a bigger gap ... something like 100%.
    1
  1002. Sadly she still has a platform and gets asked for her opinion ... as if she mattered: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/19/cathy-newman-the-internet-is-being-written-by-men-with-an-agenda
    1
  1003. Sadly it will be buried and not mentioned by the MSM ...
    1
  1004. Anthony Whyte Exactly ... but stating that "on average women are more likely/suitable for the JOB of raising the kids" would have been a "vast generalization" which need to be rejected. The undeniable fact that women carry kids around for 9 months, give birth in a really painful procedure (if done naturally ...) and then get to feed the little demanding brats every few hours gives them a MUCH closer and more intimate connection with the kids. But hey, that isnt scientific enough.
    1
  1005. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    1
  1006. @Ben Wiegand Just look at this FACT: It is funny to see a comment with 435 upvotes and the only reply is a defense of Cathy Newman ... HELLO THERE CENSORS! 1984 already? Yes yes ... all those nasty wrongthinkers who politely disagree and explain why you are wrong. Evil bigoted trolls living in their parents basement and jerking off to anime, eh?
    1
  1007. He chose her ... or at least didnt reject her ... so it is his own fault!
    1
  1008. No ... feminists. There ARE enough good women left in the world who see this BS and criticise it. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVRQqUgDRBevsDGOeE1DL3A https://www.youtube.com/user/Cassiejaye https://youtu.be/IT9jeK30yH8 https://youtu.be/0KBzawNam14 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC595wqznMGuY2mi6DKx-qnQ Please stop the generalization, because every time you do it you play THEIR GAME of identity politics! Feminists must realize that they STAND ALONE and DONT speak for all women!
    1
  1009. 25.000 hours as a clinical psychiatrist will give you enough practice to be prepared for a lying and deceiving journalist.
    1
  1010. This is not a joke ... and this is a masterclass of dishonest journalism! Spread the word so the world will see it, because after this you will become innoculated against the "dishonest representation" method of todays journalists.
    1
  1011. Wont matter to him ... https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U he would still be calm and winning the "arguments".
    1
  1012. Sadly that kind of indoctrination is happening in schools and universities nowadays. One example of course grades being judged by ideology: https://youtu.be/8teybz6Gtdk ... and this is from psychology (or something like that) where you deal with vulnerable people and should treat them in the best possible way!
    1
  1013. She only speaks for feminists! As soon as you talk about "women" you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics fusing "all women" with "feminism" and giving feminism more respectability and power(!) than it should have (because only a minority of women actually believe in it). STOP IT!
    1
  1014. Watch the Munk debate on "political correctness" with Peterson and Stephen Fry on one side and the preacher Dyson and an awful feminist on the other side. HEALTH WARNING: watch it while you are out of reach of any sharp objects, brick walls, high cliffs and so on ...
    1
  1015. Only if you can feel emarassment ... and she cant, because that amount of dishonesty requires a lack of moral values, which is a requirement for embarassment.
    1
  1016. She is simply a feminist and that limits her objectivity. I hope you noticed her asking "do you BELIEVE in [feminist agenda]" ... Feminism is a RELIGION for her.
    1
  1017. I would disagree ... she DOES listen carefully, because she needs the keywords to twist for the next "so you're saying"-misrepresentation.
    1
  1018. That "lack of objectivity" was entirely on purpose ... because she used a rather dishonest style of interviewing, where she DELIBERATELY misrepresents what the other person said. She did it in an outrageous manner this time and that makes it easy to spot as dishonesty ... and she does this all the time with people she wants to smear.
    1
  1019. Nah ... she just tries to work out a way AROUND IT ... she never would admit being wrong.
    1
  1020. Bah ... the left-leaning "scientist" would have come spouting all the NEWSPEAK nonsense like that "trans activist professor" did on canadian TV who claimed that "there is no biological difference between the sexes and that has been fact for decades": https://youtu.be/kasiov0ytEc Just watch a few videos by Gad Saad ... he regularly quotes "scientific" papers of today from gender studies and such: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLH7qUqM0PLieCVaHA7RegA Oh and there is also "tl;dr" (teal deer) who disects "scientific" papers like for example "feminist dog training": https://youtu.be/XwFK9rTdvQ0
    1
  1021. Nah ... he is just a frog: https://youtu.be/h4ftiL4c_CA https://youtu.be/Ixc9i1G7eew
    1
  1022. ... entirely on purpose.
    1
  1023. EgoShredder Complain to Ofcom about "honesty" and "quality" in media ... that's what they are there for after all and if enough people complain it might have to be talked about in parliament so the whole nation / world takes notice! https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  1024. That will become law next month.
    1
  1025. Dont group yourself with her ... unless you are also a feminist! If you do you are giving her your power and she doesnt deserve it. That is the reason why feminism could get to where it is: women have been complacent enough by being seen as "a collective". Please ... always make the distinctions between feminists and women, because if you dont you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics!
    1
  1026. Being interviewed by her should be easy now. All you need to do is start a reply with "no I did not say that at all", so I would say she should do lots more interviews but people should prepare anyone getting interviewed by her with this clip.
    1
  1027. He already has a job, BUT they could/should turn this into a series of SERIOUS discussions on the topic of the current changes in western culture. IF they get the right guests AND allow for more time to really discuss the problems it would be "unique on TV" and thus great for ratings. Obviously they need to unlearn their feminist talking points first to ask more intelligent questions ...
    1
  1028. SilvaDreams I wouldnt go so far as to claim that feminsts cant use their brains ... but rather that they have blinkers on ... like all the horses drawing carriages ... because they dont want to be spooked by the world left and right. This gives them an EXTREMELY narrow world view.
    1
  1029. Peterson has had 25.000 hours as a clinical psychologist ... so he has seen every type of human character enough times and wont be surprised or even annoyed by anything. There is his LEGENDARY bit at McMaster univeristy too: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  1030. No ... she actually BELIEVES in her own lies. Just listen to her asking "do you BELIEVE in ...". Feminism is her RELIGION!
    1
  1031. Zero feeling of shame? RELGIOUS belief in the tenants of feminism?
    1
  1032. Actually she was ... because she needed to know which keywords she would have to twist for the next "so you're saying"-misrepresentation. She is really good at this "journalistic" parlor game ...
    1
  1033. Cathy Newman and feminists like her are still toddlers. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)! You can argue and reason with small children though, so feminists are younger than that ... toddlers!
    1
  1034. She ISNT stupid ... because she graduated from Oxford. The problem with her is that she has a "top notch PC" but is running Windows 95 (feminism.exe) on it and this gives her a zealous narrow-minded view of the world.
    1
  1035. The "chief diversity officer" of Apple (a black woman) "quit" her job after making a remark that "12 blonde, blue eyed white men can be diverse too" ... she wasnt fired, but I guess she didnt feel welcome anymore after that.
    1
  1036. Do you have an insurance policy covering your computer monitor? Just in case you "accidentally" punch it.
    1
  1037. Nothing she could have done would have unnerved him ... after this: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  1038. ... and for exactly this reason it is an AWESOME interview ... showcasing DISHONEST JOURNALISM of today. Everyone needs to see this to learn how it is done (by Cathy failing).
    1
  1039. Dont ... you might get fired because of associating yourself with an evil alt-right, Nazi, racist, bigoted, transphobe, homophobe, sexist, populist white guy ... (did I forget any thought-terminating cliché or did I get them all?) Greetings from an attack helicopter and my preferred pronoun is REEEEEEE (which they always get wrong).
    1
  1040. The usual comparison is more like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fresh_ramen_noodle_001.jpg (and a few people probably developed an antipathy towards said piece of food) but yours probably is #2 on the list.
    1
  1041. Feminism ...
    1
  1042. I suggest you sue Cathy Newman for getting more money than you ... after all you breathe 24 hours every day just like she does.
    1
  1043. Peterson doesnt lie ... and the youtube demographic you cite is stupid, because the majority of female viewers spend their time on CAT AND BEAUTY CHANNELS ... which leaves a CLEAR MAJORITY of men for political channels. Owning an analytics company you know how to fake and misrepresent the facts to "prove" YOUR point, maybe you should stop generalising from a point you disagree with to "he lies", because these quotes DEPEND upon the SOURCE of the data and since you dont know his you cant make any assumption on him lying.
    1
  1044. Nah ... just talk to him and be prepared to have your opinion changed. Now if you dont want to do the latter that is your problem ...
    1
  1045. Cathy Newman is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)!
    1
  1046. a. Yes ... lobsters do have a hierarchy ... they FIGHT ... and the winner gets the girls. This has been scientifically proven! The point of this is to prove that the "hierarchies are a social construct" argument of SJWs is BULLSHIT! b. Anti-depressants designed for humans WORK ON LOBSTERS! Again ... scientifically proven. The whole point is to discredit the "XXXX is a social construct" bullshit ... but you might also look at this experiment with monkeys to see that "gender specific preferences" are NOT a social construct either and that they exist in monkeys too: http://youtu.be/Bm9xXyw2f7g (This one was just for TV, but it has been done under real scientific conditions.) Another experiment along the same lines has been made with newborn human babies less than 24 hours old. They were shown pictures of "faces" and "objects" and the girls looked longer at the faces while the boys were more interested in the objects. How do you differentiate between hierarchies that are biological and those that are sociological in nature? That is STUPID and impossible. The point of "having a hierarchy" as a necessary thing is sooo trivial that it boggles the mind you question it. How else do you want to organize humanity? Come on! People are DIFFERENT and NOT A COLLECTIVE, some are leaders, some are followers and some are workers. If you dont believe his claims ... get his book and look up the CITATIONS HE PROVIDES ... and if you dont believe his PROOF you will need to provide YOUR SCIENTIFIC PROOF to counter his claims. The "lobster chapter" is the first one in the book ...
    1
  1047. David M That is exactly what they wanted ... they knew Peterson as "controversial" and thought they could smear him (they tried alt-right, sexist and provocateur in this interview and failed).
    1
  1048. timnray99 And by people who like noodles.
    1
  1049. No ... IQ doesnt figure into it, because she bases her "facts" on LIES. Frank Herbert wrote the novel DUNE decades ago and included a sentence that "the way to control a mentat [human computer] is through his information" ... and feminism is willfully lying to its members about the pay gap (by omitting the "women CHOOSE their jobs" part) or by creating "the patriarchy" (by omitting the fact that most men have to struggle too) AND by turning society into a WAR between men and women instead of a symbiotic relationship. The point is: her IQ is "purposefully lowered" through the ideological blinkers.
    1
  1050. Oh he is MUCH better than that!
    1
  1051. Just scroll through them ... there are quite a few of those comments.
    1
  1052. MS-DOS ... ssspp scratch bleeep
    1
  1053. I am torn ... on the one hand I would like to give this a thumbs up for the length of the interview and having JBP on, BUT on the other hand I really want to thumb it down for Kathy and her projections and the whole ideological state of "Channel 4".
    1
  1054. Just read her Wikipedia to find the proof for your claims (last sentence to this interview and citation 40): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_Newman#Jordan_Peterson_interview
    1
  1055. Nah ... that is "just another day at the office" for any feminist these days.
    1
  1056. How do you call a dishonest journalist "good"? At the lobsters it should be OBVIOUS that she is misrepresenting what he said on purpose. She isnt dumb (graduated from Oxford), so it must be on purpose!
    1
  1057. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    1
  1058. Badger Services ... and luckily they dont have Obi-Wan's Jedi powers ...
    1
  1059. What else did you expect from a feminist?
    1
  1060. She is a feminist, what did you expect? And in a way she is still a toddler. Jordan Peterson has this part about "good people being CAPABLE of becoming a monster BUT KEEPING IT UNDER CONTROL." Cathy Newman and other feminists like her ARE MONSTERS (constantly lashing out and never looking at themselves) without the ability to control it, they are monsters all the time! Thus feminists are children who haven’t grown up and learned SELF-CONTROL and RESPONSIBILITY ... which are two traits we don’t teach kids anymore (ever since the 70s and the sexual and social revolution)!
    1
  1061. woman feminist
    1
  1062. Feminists have "form" of not accepting facts.
    1
  1063. BR00 D You are dead wrong and white knighting for Cathy Newman. This is "dishonest journalism 101" and entirely on purpose, because she misrepresented what Peterson said sooooo utterly RIDICULOUSLY and FOR EVERY QUESTION that the "oh she was just asking tough questions" defense doesnt have a millimeter of water under its keel to float on. Just watch other interviews with "controversial" people with her ... you will see a PATTERN of MISREPRESENTATION.
    1
  1064. Anthony Whyte Are you Cathy Newman's husband? You did state above that you are the one who is tending the house and the kids ... and this baseless accusation seems to support it. The number of subscribers he gained is probably even higher than 150k, because the video came out over a month ago and the number of views per day has decreased and yet he gained about ~30k new subscribers in the last 5 days. So the claim is NOT a projection! If you have an ARGUMENT and FACTS that disprove Peterson's views ... bring them.
    1
  1065. She hears what she wants to hear ... cognitive dissonance ... https://youtu.be/igqRWx0asTA
    1
  1066. She isnt simple-minded but rather dishonest ... because she wants to smear this "evil alt-right Nazi who is against women".
    1
  1067. Here is Ethan van Sciver talking about the drawings (and revealing his secret identity as Green Lantern): https://youtu.be/1AVVLfbVXEQ
    1
  1068. Hear some more (in a REAL interview), but sit down while listening: https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
    1
  1069. She is a feminist ... and they are religious zealots who lie a lot, because women ARE equal and have every right that men have now ... so they must invent a boogie man (called the patriarchy) to scare other women into following the religion. Christians had the devil, feminists have the patriarchy.
    1
  1070. viciousspew Allow me to quote C.K. Chesterton for you: "when we stopped believing in god we didnt start believing in nothing but rather in anything." We ALL believe in something ... we just have to put our finger on it. For Cathy Newman it is clearly feminism and for others it will be capitalism, vegetarianism, veganism, Yoga, TCM, aliens (i.e. Scientology), new technology (hello there Apple zombies and hello there helicopter-moms who buy their eight-year-olds the newest PC "because he will need it later"), ... just name your poison. Humans NEED to believe in something ... even the atheists do it (which is the funny part about it). Peterson isnt "religious", he simply thinks that there are lessons to be learned from the bible.
    1
  1071. That is all part of the agenda she was trying to achieve: smearing him with a label of alt-right/sexist/provocateur ... and she tried all three.
    1
  1072. This is all a scam from manufacturers of computer displays who hope people will react like that ...
    1
  1073. Check out the edits on her Wikipedia page ... that should be somewhat telling, because they took out something "nasty" (and the citation) already, which clearly stated that she discriminates against men ...
    1
  1074. If you are british: complain to Ofcom: https://ofcomforms.secure.force.com/formentry/SitesFormCSLEStandardsComplaints
    1
  1075. Peterson explained that he used "the minimum force necessary" AND he explained in the REAL interview he made a few days later in the Netherlands that one big advancement of western culture is that we even treat criminals with dignity (although the USA seems not really interested at that ... with Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and the mass incarceration of people there "as a privately run business"). https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
    1
  1076. If you are interested in numbers: Peterson seems to have gained 170.000 subscribers in the last three weeks.
    1
  1077. Millions have already died.
    1
  1078. That is her interviewing style when she tries to smear someone not agreeing with her feminist ideology: - listen for keywords - rephrase keywords into something OUTRAGEOUS - get righteous indignation when the answer isn’t "No I am not saying that at all" ... you have to DENY whatever she said you supposedly said ... or you "agree" with it and she got you Watch other interviews with her ... it’s obvious now ... and she isnt the only one ... Piers Morgan is another example.
    1
  1079. He has A LOT of practice and the patience of a saint: https://youtu.be/vMSmUzDt-7U
    1
  1080. "Growing up" is "taking up the responsibilities of life" ... and you see what happens when people dont do that ... in FEMINISTS. They do NOT take up their own responsibilities and keep demanding that OTHERS DO MORE FOR THEM ... like the stupid little toddlers they mentally still are! So ... I disagree with you disagreeing with Peterson on that argument.
    1