Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1. Feminism.
    90
  2. ... which makes it clear it is RELIGIOUS for her. She BELIEVES in (but doesnt need to prove) ... - the existence of the patriarchy [No one ever proved the existence of this cabal.] - the existence of the pay gap [I can disprove its existence with the data Cathy brought up, but that is easy.] - the existence of the "pink tax" [Just check your local store for bicycle helmets, but make sure both are either WITH Disney branding or WITHOUT.]
    36
  3. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    32
  4. Chinchillupa Guy No ... there is no PAY gap ... which would be "women getting paid less PER HOUR for the same job". You need to learn to be precise with words. There IS an EARNINGS GAP ... meaning: women get less at the end of the month because they like to take time off work and dont do overtime and so on. PAY GAP = NO, earnings gap = yes Oh and women also CHOOOSE different jobs than men (which is a HUGE part of the 9% Cathy mentioned but didnt include in her thought process, because that fact is inconvenient).
    30
  5. This statement is ... a) common sense OR b) totally ridiculous and racist/transphobe/homophobe/sexist ?
    29
  6. ... while protesting his "vast generalizations" (based on statistical data).
    27
  7. Well it makes the "problems" of todays media clear by showcasing ... a) the DISHONEST journalism which has an agenda other than "truth" and "objective reporting" and b) the limitation of the media (which gets abused by the activists like Cathy Newman) by cramming too many topics into a 30 minute video ... and then cutting Peterson off before he can finish explaining. Old media NEEDS to adapt to this or die.
    25
  8. A LOT ... I am going through regularly and only find a handful of mine. Many of those which point out that this is Cathy Newman's dishonest interviewing technique are gone. Oh and so are those using a certain link to an article from 2013, where Cathy admitted to discrimination (for women = against men = illegal).
    25
  9. The problem isnt intelligence (she graduated from Oxford) but rather the software running the show, because feminism.exe is really really narrow-minded.
    24
  10. She is a feminist ... dont insult morons.
    23
  11. I asked him on Twitter several times ... but he ignores that. That kind of behaviour should be sued as fake news ... or maybe our hate-speech laws here in Europe could apply too, because he is insinuating that we are all hateposters threatening poor poor Cathy Newman.
    19
  12. Well said and totally obvious. Feminists are the true sexists and SJWs/BLM are the true racists. No one cared about people being "black" (or whatever) two decades ago ... Michael Jackson, Prince, Eddie Murphy, ...
    18
  13. Dont call this "unorthodox journalism" ... this is THE NORM because of the feminist lens AND the assassination attempt on Peterson's reputation!
    18
  14. Cathy Newman didnt do this interview "as a woman" but rather as a FEMINIST ... which is her RELIGION. So please be precise and make that distinction, because you are playing THEIR GAME of identity politics otherwise. YOU WOMEN have to DISTANCE YOURSELF from these nasty feminists!
    18
  15. Why should you be afraid to say that? Are "girls" a COLLECTIVE? I hope they are not, because that would kinda make you communists. Oh and every revolution starts with one person saying "this is wrong" ... and sometimes they are sacrificed by the dumb majority, which still makes that individual right. Just think about Galileo.
    17
  16. They thought it went well ... Cathy even tweeted "Viva feminism" afterwards ... not realizing she had shot both feet of her ideology off with this debate.
    17
  17. Obviously not ... because she works for the "good" and "righteous" mainstream media.
    16
  18. Do you think she cares who she is interviewing? This is an obvious hit piece designed to smear Peterson and get a headline along the "Canadian professor says we should live like lobsters" lines. They are DISHONEST through and through.
    16
  19. A jury of linguists has decided to change the term strawman into strawwomen, because a) it is obviously sexist and b) to honor Cathy Newman.
    15
  20. In the next edition of the dictionary the term strawman will be replaced by strawwoman ... because of sexism and to honor Cathy Newman.
    15
  21. That was entirely ON PURPOSE, which is the core mechanic of a very dishonest interviewing technique. Watch other interviews with "controversial" people and you will see the same happening.
    15
  22. Dont shame the lobsters ... they did nothing wrong (because they didnt create feminism).
    14
  23. Never stop reading and thinking ... and dont forget to clean your room! Do not fall in love with poetry too much, because the example of Cathy Newman shows clearly that an "interviewing technique" can be very very dishonest. Focus of VALUES too instead of "nice words" (this is the whole point of Jane Austen's novel Mansfield Park, where the people who simply have learned "a good outer shell" are the bad ones, while the girl with the "good inner values" is the heroine).
    14
  24. The question is: How long are they willing to pay for someone to delete them full time?
    13
  25. Please remember - nthmonkeyirishwifey - that you are playing THEIR GAME whenever you say "woman" instead of "feminist". Language and PRECISE meanings of words are important and that is why Peterson does it AND that is why the left tries to make definition of words (and laws) fuzzy by insisting that "words are violence" for instance.
    12
  26. This is probably counted as "abuse" ... because the left cant understand humor and they most certainly dont have the capacity for self-criticism.
    12
  27. Actually it is impossible to HAVE an argument with a stupid person ...
    12
  28. No ... you have to giver her some credit, because she is SKILLED at WARPING WORDS into something outrageous. That isnt "random" ... and totally deliberate.
    11
  29. That is why it is GOOD ... it showcases todays DISHONEST JOURNALISM! Tell everyone you know to watch it so they can see it and become innocculated.
    11
  30. There is NOTHING to "discuss" because FEMINISTS deny the FACTS and keep on yelling sexism over and over again. Let me debunk the wage gap for you with two simple questions: - If it is "standard" to pay wome significantly less ... why are there unemployed women? - Many companies all across the western world employ women in their finances/salary department ... and yet there are ZERO whistleblowers who hold up the piece of paper with the "women get paid less" rule? Feminism has become a RELIGION where the followers BELIEVE in the existence of the patriarchy, the pay gap and the pink tax. You cant "discuss" with religious zealots ... because they WILL NOT BELIEVE EVIDENCE. That last statement comes from a certain gentleman from the 80s ... have a look at the REAL purpose of feminism: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA
    11
  31. She still has a job ... cos feminism.
    11
  32. Ella Mapes Feminism and social "justice" are dividing the world into "oppressed" (women, minorities, gays, trans- ...) and "oppressors" (straight white men). This is a MARXIST dichotomy and basis for communism. The Labour Party recently displayed this by their OPENLY RACIST pricing policy[1] on the tickets for their own conference, they consider "white privilege" to be a reality ... which is one of the "arguments" of feminists/SJWs. - white privilege - the patriarchy - the gender pay gap - the pink tax All easily disproven or rather NEVER PROVEN TO EXIST. People just CLAIM they exist and then MISUSE statistics to "prove" them. An example was Cathy Newman and her attempt to prove the wage gap ... which I shall disprove for you with HER OWN FACTS: - 9% difference is CORRECT - it is the difference between the average wage for ALL MEN and ALL WOMEN - what Cathy IGNORED is the fact that it is also for ALL KINDS OF JOBS ... which makes her whining about "fairness" completely BULLSHIT, because she is comparing engineers to cleaning ladies! Oh and another way to disprove the existence of the wage gap is done by posing two LOGICAL questions. Answer them for yourself: - IF it was "normal" to pay women 23% less (I am using the figure Obama stated, but it works the same with the 9%) ... why are there UNEMPLOYED WOMEN? - All across the western world there are many many MANY companies who have women in their "payment/salary departments" ... and yet there are exactly ZERO whistleblowers who come and present their "women get 23% less rule"? Why? Maybe because people get paid THE SAME? or they DO work differently? I would really like to know which of Peterson's points you cant agree with (Cathy Newman made ZERO coherent argument herself and Peterson is completely logical) ... but answering me here is pointless because I post far too much to go through reply notices from YT. So ... Labour is going down the communist rabbit hole. Open your eyes before it is too late. [I am not saying the Tories are better ...] [1] https://youtu.be/sZL8YY-9WJw
    10
  33. No ... sadly you were not trolled ... this is "reality" now.
    10
  34. The mischaracterizations are ON PURPOSE to create a "gotcha moment" for the purpose of slapping an alt-right/misogynist/provocateur label on him (which she TRIED to bring up and failed). Just watch other "interviews" with "evil alt-righters" like Nigel Farage, Milo Yiannopulous ... you will see her doing exactly the same. Peterson is simply outrageously good at seeing through her and deflecting it.
    10
  35. She isnt interested in a conversation, just in smearing him.
    10
  36. JossWainwright An outright APOLOGY to Peterson and everyone criticising them would be required IMO. It has been weeks/months since they claimed the victim status ... and have provided no proof for it.
    10
  37. Feminists cant be fired ... oh and if you want to see something worse look into the BBC payment scandal where feminists complained about "unequal pay" and then 98 men and only 90 women got a pay rise after an independant inquiry. That got the feminists REALLY pissed.
    9
  38. This is a team effort ... and you would have to replace EVERYONE to change something for the better. So they do nothing ... and wait silently until all those nasty destroyers have stopped hunting the purple submarine called "feminist Channel 4".
    9
  39. She displayed DISHONESTY ... and that is bad ... everywhere! She is a bad feminist who thinks it is fine for her to discriminate (for women = against men = illegal) while complaining about sexism at the same time. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html This dishonest interviewing style is entirely on purpose and used to try and achieve gotcha moments to pin alt-right/sexist/provocateur labels on interviewees. Do NOT give her any credit, because she deserves none.
    9
  40. 1. she is a feminist and not "a woman" here 2. she is also a DISHONEST journalist on a mission to slander Peterson -> Do NOT be embarrassed for her, because SHE CHOSE THIS PATH and should deal with the consequences.
    9
  41. How about "Watching a female presenter with noodles for hair ... talk about the failures of femininity" instead?
    9
  42. She is a follower of this RELIGION called FEMINISM. "Do you BELIEVE in [insert feminist talking point]?"
    9
  43. They are ideologues and WANT that kind of ideology for their echo chamber. The "misrepresentating interviewing style" is on purpose to smear interviewees. Just look at other interviews with her and here is Milo explaining the "tactic": https://youtu.be/AWlaIwci3PY
    9
  44. Actually she did ... to get the keywords to twist in her next dishonest "So you're saying ..." rephrasing. That is a skill she trained hard for, but it is entirely dishonest and has nothing to do with a search for truth (which people usually think an interview should be).
    9
  45. Feminism ...
    9
  46. Stop conflating "women" with "feminists"! Women are good, feminists are evil selfish bitches who lie for their own profit.
    8
  47. Tell him to "send the message" to his friends so they too can become innocculated against dishonest journalism and ideological BS. That is one of the most important things for parents to teach their children, because nowadays we do have the tools to "get the other viewpoint" ... if we want and if we allow it. I have recently been "reformed" on my opinion of Tommy Robinson after viewing his speech at Oxford and his interviews with Brittany Pettibone and Sargon of Akkad. Before that I somewhat trusted the general opinion of "he is an awful right winger" ... which he isnt. This was a clear reminder to TRUST NO ONE, least of all governments and mainstream media.
    8
  48. They left it up because they thought they had won ... and then it was too late, because "the internet doesnt forget". People will have downloaded it by then.
    8
  49. If you want to know how she thinks I would have sent you to her Wikipedia page yesterday, BUT they edited out the crucial sentence and citation ... so I had to go back a version to get it. This is pretty NASTY STUFF: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/channel-4-newsreader-cathy-newman-says-public-humiliation-is-the-answer-for-sexist-remarks-8721200.html
    8
  50. No ... they would claim "russian hackers took over our signal and sent a fake broadcast".
    8