Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "Media mocked for claiming Johnny Depp trial was ‘misogynistic’" video.

@KingDangAhLang Amber did not need to "create evidence" in 2016 AND 2018 for her to "be believed" ... but for this trial she "had to" to make her claims stick. She didnt have the opportunity to "go back and make better pictures" ... and thus had to lie and lie and lie. It worked in the UK trial (where Depp was NOT ALLOWED TO CROSS-EXAMINE HER), where the CORRUPT JUDGE (he personally knows the journalist who wrote the piece for the Sun, because their wives do charity work together) simply ACCEPTED HER TESTIMONY AS TRUE.
2
Dear Kosha Gada, which EVIDENCE did Amber Heard have for Johnny Depp EVER "touching her inappropriately"? THERE WAS NONE, because everything they produced was FAKE ... from the wine spills, to the bruises and the MANIPULATED PICTURES themselves! They even used ONE PHOTO FOR TWO INCIDENTS and submitted it TWICE under two different "evidence numbers"! Metoo also was NEVER EVER "good"!
2
Dear Evan Mulholland, please PROVE how "Johnny Depp was TOXIC towards Amber Heard"! Oh and please STOP USING THE WORD TOXIC, which is VAGUE and doesnt mean anything!
2
@YuleChannel WRONG ... the media is infiltrated by "activists for REBRANDED COMMUNIST IDEOLOGIES" (which is what feminism, BLM and "rainbows" are ... because instead of "workers vs. capitalists" you simply replace the words: "women vs. men", "black vs. white", "rainbows vs. straights")! These activists are pouring out of universities ... which are NOT controlled by Murdoch.
1
@lindalee-brown5539 WRONG ... the sentence called for $15 million to be paid by Heard, BUT the punitive part - $5 million - is CAPPED at $350.000 ... to get to $10.350.000 .... from which you subtract the $2 million Depp was sentenced to pay to Heard. That ends up with $8.350.000 for Depp ... no "fake ozzy dollaridoos" involved.
1
@briaharris183 Worst bit was the ONE picture of "wine on the wall in the hallway of the Columbia Building", which wasnt there yet when the four cops came around to look. That "spillage" - perfectly round drops with no streaking in any direction - was clearly created by someone dipping their finger into a glass of wine and then flicking it towards the wall; it did NOT come from "JD swinging a magnum sized bottle around". Amber and her co-conspirators havent watched enough CSI (blood-splatter analysis) to think about "figuring out how the drops were created" ... I bet she couldnt bear to sacrifice some of her $500/bottle wine to create believeable spots on the wall.
1
METOO is EVIL from the start, because it is about "taking TINY accusations from many accusers and adding them together to make it an actionable charge" ... which isnt a legitimate way to treat it LEGALLY, where only charges that are "actionable" by themselves can be brought in court.
1
"No one" is getting charged with perjury ... because it is a MINOR OFFENSE ... and THE COURTS ARE OVERLOADED!
1