Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. 64
  2. 33
  3. 31
  4. 31
  5. 30
  6. 29
  7. 27
  8. 27
  9. 27
  10. 27
  11. 24
  12. 22
  13. 19
  14. 18
  15. 17
  16. 15
  17. 14
  18. 13
  19. 13
  20. 13
  21. 12
  22. 12
  23. 11
  24. 11
  25. 11
  26. 11
  27. 11
  28. 10
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 8
  40. 8
  41. 8
  42. 8
  43. 8
  44. 8
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 7
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 7
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 6
  56. 6
  57. 6
  58. 6
  59. 6
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 5
  68. 5
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. Too bad he is as bad as you ... because you are still using the term "woke" ... instead of calling it what it is ... COMMUNISM/T. Communism is a RELIGION and you can not break someone out by bombarding them with facts (doesnt work on christians or muslims either), so the only way is to make them DO IT THEMSELVES ... by "asking a question" and then LEAVING without giving an answer. Examples (for the gender pay gap): - Why - if women are 23% cheaper to employ for THE SAME WORK - are there unemployed women? No company could pass up such a large advantage. - The claim of the gender PAY gap is made all over the western world, so it involves hundreds of thousands of companies and bureaucracies. Women also work in the wages departments and yet there is ZERO WHISTLEBLOWER holding up the paper which says "women only get 77% of the wage a man gets". Why? [You need to be able to make the distinction between the PAY gap (the hourly wage) and the EARNINGS gap (the monthly pay), which exists due to men usually working tougher shifts and overtime and so on ... AND the PARLOR TRICKS of bringing up the "average hourly pay" for "all women" vs. "all men" ... which makes a comparison between JOB CHOICES.] There are smart questions - LOGIC FLAWS - to be asked about everything ... like the amount of blacks killed by cops in a year being smaller than the amount of dead people as a consequence of the riots ... or just on a weekend in Chicago. The point is to GO AWAY after asking the question ... because "an idea is the most persistent virus" (Inception).
    3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. Stop being this politically NAIVE ... and start calling "the left" by their REAL NAME of ... (REBRANDED) COMMUNISTS. Just compare the STRUCTURE of their ideologies: - centered around an EMOTIONAL CLAIM of "group X is being treated unfairly" - heavy use of THOUGHT-TERMINATING CLICHÉs ... but NOT to "give accurate information"[1] but rather to ... a) INDOCTRINATE and CONDITION those who "listen and BELIEVE" and to ... b) "other/outcast" those targeted by the terms ... to - create the TWO COLLECTIVES which communism NEEDS - all these ideologies are also INTERNATIONALIST ... which "feminism in Afghanistan" showed nicely, but the BLM protests in Britain using the same argument as in the USA AND me finding ACAB and 1312 sprayed in my corner of Germany proves pretty much beyond all shadow of a doubt. You can also get from one ideology to the other by simply REPLACING THE KEY WORDS ... it really makes ZERO DIFFERENCE if its about "workers vs. capitalists", "women vs. men", "black vs. white" and "rainbows vs. straights"! The ACTIVISTS use the same rhetoric everywhere ... and no amount of black people coming out to state "I am not oppressed" will matter. So please ... STOP BEING THE NICE UNCLE DAVE ... because this is TOO SERIOUS to be nice! Oh and stop treating "them" as if they were HONEST ACTORS, they arent ... and need to be treated accordingly. [1] The "good" [sarcasm] anti-fascists in the GDR used to call EVERYONE IN THE WEST "fascist" all throughout the existence of their country. This proves that "truth" and "facts" do NOT MATTER ... and that "being an anti-fascist" is no fun with no fascists around, so they NEED TO BE CREATED by simply declaring people to be fascists! Their name for the [Berlin] Wall was the "anti-fascist protection wall" (der antifaschistische Schutzwall).
    2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. "How to get capitalism working really well?" Trivial question to answer by looking at two undeniable facts: 1. the global population is increasing more and more (and everyone has a right to a job) 2. the industrial revolution in its stages [INCLUDING globalization, because it is technology based] has increased productivity and made fewer people required for a certain task AND it has - through globalization - made "simple tasks" cheaper If you put these two facts together you get the reason behind the global migant crisis, BUT you also get the reason behind the growing wealth gap in our western societies. Large companies are getting bigger and bigger and even expand to other areas (Google and other such examples) while small family sized companies are faced by pressure from the giants like Bookshops are faced by pressure from Amazon. The main goal should be to create sufficient WORK for everyone and this requires for work to be "less efficient" ... like a local shoemaker who still makes shoes from leather compared to an asian factory where the workers are slaving for minimal pay day in-day out. So how does this make capitalism better? Just think about one of the core "rhetorics" which always promote capitalism: "cheaper goods are better for the consumer". Personally I think the opposite is true, because we all are consumers AND we are also workers! Thus if I save money on a purchase ... the person behind the counter has less money to operate with and has to make up the difference by either paying his employees less OR by pressuring his suppliers into accepting lower prices. This is bad because THEY (the employees of the shop or the suppliers) have less money to spend on stuff I am selling ... so in the spirit of competition I have to lower my prices and my own wages. Being a miser only feeds the downward spiral FOR THE POOR PEOPLE! This downward spiral does NOT affect the rich people and they keep on getting richer all the time. Is this good? NO, for the simple reason that they take money and "stockpile it". MONEY MUST FLOW, so it is far better to have loads of people earning a little bit more compared to one person earning a lot more ... because those loads of people WILL SPEND IT. Rich people only use the money for two things: - getting more "means of production" (i.e. buying another company, house, ...) - using it in the capitalist WAR (which is fought with money instead of guns) to eliminate competition ... by opening a store next to your competition and undercutting their prices to drive them out of the market.
    1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. The argument/explanation given for "why islamophobia was invented" is wrong. The term is a THOUGHT-TERMINATING CLICHÉ and as such is used to MANIPULATE PEOPLE into "shying away from people who are declared to be islamophobic and to NOT THINK about what these people say!" This tactic has been used by the left for DECADES and can most easily be seen in Britain, where the inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence declared ALL "the police" to be "institutionally racist", which made "avoiding being called racist" a top priority ... and which is the reason why all the Pakistani grooming gangs were allowed to do their dirty work, raping 11-year-old white british girls! Those who protest against these gangs are being called "far-right" and "islamophobe". When you want to know who rules over you, ask who you are not allowed to criticise! In the West "islam" is one of those things ... due to the word islamophobe (which doesnt actually exist, because the criticism of the religion is NOT IRRATIONAL). I am currently compiling a list of newspaper articles and general resources/reports on the grooming gangs of Britain - 700 and rising - and it isnt a nice read. It also shows that SOME MUSLIMS and SOME members of the "Pakistani community" are NOT taking up their responsibilities and simply declare these perpetrators as "not one of the group" ... instead of accepting the blame which the religion and culture HAVE ... in their texts and in their customs. This "not one of us" can be heard a lot on the left, every time when "it wasnt real communism" is uttered, people are UNWILLING to accept the blame their ideology / religion CLEARLY HAS! Communism has become a religion (just look at all the fanatic Bernie-bros.) and islam is an ideology too. @Dave Rubin Maybe challenging your guests in their stories might be a good idea, because "just letting them talk" is not a good thing, due to presenting their stories as "the truth". Precise knowledge of LANGUAGE and how it is USED TO MANIPULATE would be something to look into.
    1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1