Comments by "Muck006" (@Muck006) on "David Starkey Talks" channel.

  1. In 2020 I spent eight months on researching (basically looking up newspaper articles) "a certain type of gang" which does "a certain type of adult activity" with "a certain type of minors who could not consent to it" ... and quite a lot of Police Officers have gotten "honours" and fallen up the stairs rather than "going straigth to jail without passing GO". The current "independent anti-slavery commissioner" is one such example, because she hindered the investigations in her district when they came up. There is also Jimmy Savile, which took Maggie Thatcher FIVE ATTEMPTS to get him knighted. She simply didnt get the message.
    21
  2. You mean the "Communist in Chief"?
    6
  3. Thatcher was EVIL: 1. she created the PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1986 ... because she didnt like being called "mean words" by striking miners and so on ... and this act is the basis for the Tony Blairs Communications Act 2003, which is the basis of CENSORSHIP. 2. she also gave Jimmy Savile is OBE ... in her FIFTH ATTEMPT, showing that "someone KNEW and TRIED TO STOP IT" ... but Thatcher persisted / "didnt get the message"
    2
  4. The Anglosphere? NOPE ... they are NOT "the West's last hope" for a simple reason: they have NO CLUE who they are fighting, because ... a) they have THE WRONG DEFINITIONS for left-/right-wing (because "the english" got it wrong 240 years ago AND they are too arrogant to change) and also for fascism, communism and socialims (because "the anglosphere" is focused on MONEY ... which is NOT the primary factor in these ideologies) b) they have been clearly warned by YURI BEZMENOV in the 80s ... and yet "everyone" is still talking about "woke" instead of REBRANDED COMMUNISM. Sorry ... "anglos" ... your ARROGANCE is the West's undoing and the last hope is rather countries like Hungary ... and RUSSIA!
    2
  5. DEFINITION: Religion = "An IDEOLOGY centered around an EMOTIONAL CLAIM (that can not be proven)." --->>> the French Revolution and Marxism/Communism and also their child-ideologies of feminism, BLM/CRT and "rainbows" are RELIGIONS ... because they are all centered around the EMOTIONAL CLAIM "group X has been/is being treated unfairly", which is never proven ... and you have to "listen and BELIEVE"! Drawing comparisons to the Reformation is WRONG ... because this is an evolution AND COUNTER-MOVEMENT TO THE ENLIGHTENMENT (because "logic" and "reasoning" are the OPPOSITE of "emotion") that began with the French Revolution. The enlightenment included the "realisation" of "dont do unto others what you dont want to have done unto you" ... which is THE INDIVIDUAL realising that it is a part of "a whole" and its own freedoms end where the freedoms of others begin. The French Revolution and moreso marxism and communism are about COLLECTIVISM ("egalité / fraternité) ... and "giving every individual the same". The BIGGEST FLAW in the comparison with the Reformation lies in "LEFT-WING" ... and I mean the CORRECT (continental european) DEFINITION of it, which came from the French Revolution and it is basically: right-wing = NATIONALISM and TRADITIONALISM left-wing = INTERNATIONALISM and "anti-traditionalism" / "change for change's sake" / PROGRESSIVISM "Anti-traditionalism" needs to be translated into the desire to DESTROY THE OLD ... which "the Reformation" DID NOT HAVE! This "destroy the old" can be found in many things ... like ART, where artists loudly proclaimed "we need NEW ART" ... and then started to reject traditional arts and skills. P.S.: "The Woke" NEVER CARE ABOUT ANYTHING THEY DEMAND ... because in five years that will be "tradition" ... and thus will need to be destroyed. Just look at feminism and the TERF-trans "war".
    2
  6. Sadly that is not very precise, because FOLLOWERS OF RELIGIONS are also "looking for truth" ... except that their truth is BELIEF / FEELINGS-based and not fact-based like history. Since the entire West is under attack by religions (communism is a religion too!) it is important to be precise with words.
    2
  7. The one thing "the english" NEED to accept and understand is the CORRECT DEFINITION for "left-/right-wing", which came from the French Revolution ... but basically everyone in the english-speaking world attaches "stuff that doesnt belong" to those sides, which is the reason why these terms HAVE NO FIXED MEANING for "you guys". Just look up the "left-right political spectrum" page in Wikipedia and LOOK AT THE CHANGE HISTORY! The correct (=continental european!!!!) definition is important, because this makes it EASY to understand the difference between communism and fascism ... because the former is left-wing extremist marxism and the latter is right-wing extremist marxism ... which you can easily SEE when you look at the seating arrangement in the german parliament of 1933. So anyone claiming "Nazis are left-wing" is DEAD WRONG (and uneducated) ... which is FRUSTRATING to argue against. You got those definitions wrong 240 years ago ... and are too arrogant to admit this mistake ... Conservatism is RELATED to right-wing, but it isnt the same.
    1
  8. Sadly ... the historian GETS IT WRONG ... because "woke" is nothing but a CONTINUATION OF COMMUNISM ... which came from MARXISM ... which came from THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. They are all EMOTION-CENTERED IDEOLOGIES that are based upon an emotional claim of "group X has been treated unfairly" and the solutions are NEVER based upon LOGIC and REASONING (which would make them "fair") but rather upon EMOTION (which makes it "SOCIAL justice").
    1
  9. The Enlightenment introduced LOGIC and REASONING as guidelines to shape our societies, BUT every historic trend has its counter-trend and this began with the French Revolution, because their arguments are based upon EMOTION-BASED GRIEVANCES ... and emotions are the opposite of logic. The French may have THOUGHT they are "logical", but their arguments started with emotion and ended up with "cheering for the guilloutine" and finally "the guard (of Napoleon) doesnt surrender!" Burke seems to "dance" between these two, with his opposition to "the individual monarch" (which is a personal reaction) and founding conservatism, which is the acceptance that radical change is based upon emotions and this will not create a good society. Most humans want a STABLE SOCIETY ... not one where the rules change on a weekly basis!
    1
  10. Sorry to disagree, but your OPINIONS on the metric / imperial system is just that ... an OPINION. The british system is "a bit s.h.i.t.e." for one simple reason: You divide / multiply everything by NOT 10 ... which makes math and thus SCIENCE much easier! If the person who invented the foot had divided it into 10 inches ... and declared 10 feet to be a yard it would have worked better, but "you" didnt. And dont get me started on your old currency! The point I have to agree with is the calendar ... but the clock (especially the "60 minutes = 1 hour is requiring recalculations in science all the time. [One of the things the french tried was to create a "church of the supreme being" ... and the architect who was drawing plans for a temple (Étienne-Louis Boullée) could even give Adolf Hitler & Albert Speer a run for their money on the GIGANTISM of the designs.]
    1
  11. Natural sciences lives by PRECISE DEFINITIONS ... and also by LOGIC and REASONING. Words NEED precise definitions ... but that is one of the things which are under attack these days, when the meaning of a word is being reformed to fit people's ideology. If you can't say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying. The details are everything.
    1
  12. Easy answer: NO Explanation: To INNOVATE you need to be able to THINK CRITICALLY and FREELY ... which is "discouraged" in China. Thus they can only "adapt" and "make minor changes" but will NEVER EVER "invent a new wheel/way to slice bread".
    1
  13. History is an EVOLUTIONARY process ... but the problem with "anti-traditionalist" thinking is that they have this idea of STARTING AGAIN WITH A BLANK SHEET OF PAPER ... which will not work, because it always ignores the one unchangeable thing: HUMAN NATURE! The difference between an animal and a human is that humans CAN "decide against their instincts" by using logic and reasoning, but far too many "homo sapiens" ONLY decide by their feelings and instincts. There is a rather brilliant quote from one of the Harry Potter movies which makes this clear: "We will have to decide between what is RIGHT and what is EASY. ... and instincts are the easy way. It takes EFFORT to overcome your instincts, but that effort isnt made these days anymore.
    1
  14. In these days you NEED to add another word to "truth" ... because the communists currently reshaping the West have added classifiers which make the term meaningless: "my truth". So it is necessary to make it clear that you are talking about the one and only truth that matters: OBJECTIVE and FACT-BASED truth! The quest for objective truth could only begin thanks to the ENLIGHTENMENT, when the "ruling DOGMA of the church and monarchs ruling by the grace of god" became criticiseable and religion lost its political power. The enlightenment introduced LOGIC and REASONING to shape our societies ... but sadly history is made up of "trend" and "counter-trend" ... and so we are facing lots of (basically identical) ideologies BASED UPON EMOTIONAL CLAIMS ... which is the polar opposite of logic and reasoning; hence the destruction of scientific knowledge in universities ... and its replacement with BELIEF-BASED "knowledge".
    1
  15. I have only read "Thoughts on present discontent" of his speeches about 10 years ago ... and back then it felt as if "50% of the trouble he describes is EXACTLY AS TODAY ... and the other 50% is about the royal family and its corruption of sorts".
    1