Comments by "Klara Chiamarsi" (@klarachiamarsi5935) on "BBC News"
channel.
-
7
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lavrov did answer straight. It's not his fault that you haven't understood the answer.
Steven asked if Putin asked for Lavrov's advice. Lavrov answered, in essence, that the decision-making mechanism in Russia is much more comprehensive then "asking for Lavrov's advice", he is not going to give all the details of how it organized, but can assure that the decision-making mechanism was implemented IN FULL.
That was a comprehensive answer. Steven undersood it, but acted like he didn't -- and that's a very typical behavior from a BBC journo, or any Western journo too.
See, how that works. A journo asks a question he knows beforehand the interviewee can't answer straight (national security reasons, commersial info, or simply inappropriate question). The interviewee answers the best he can (and the journo knows that). Then the journo says something to create and impression for the audience, that the answer wasn't given for some sinister reason. And gullible public ran away with that.
It's like, Journo: "how many times a week do you f*ck your wife?" Interviewee: "That's inaproppriate!" Journo: "He couldn't answer hard question!" The gullible public: "Oooh! He couldn't answer hard questions! He is definitely hiding something sinister!"
That's one of the ways of how media propaganda works.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1