Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Lavrov: Russia Seeks Victory Ukraine, No Minsk 3.0; EU Energy Crisis Deepens; Huge Russian Offensive" video.

signing of nuclear policies mean nothing. the US withdrew from the ABN treaty & installed nuclear capable missiles in Poland & Romania aimed at Moscow. 2019 the US withdrew from the INF treaty and said they will install nukes in Germany (& UA, Blinken said they would install nukes inside UA, only the qty would be open to discussion with RU)
20
the EU following the USA's policy of "either you are with us, or you are against us" mantra. Meanwhile RU, China etc will talk and trade with anyone regardless of who is in power, their LGBTQAI+++++ policies, where they see no need to lecture other countries
8
Neutrality - It is a historical fact that Ukraine did not have the right to apply for NATO membership, this is spelled out in the declaration of independence of Ukraine, paragraph IX. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL SECURITY The Ukrainian SSR solemnly proclaims its intention to become in the future a permanently neutral state, which does not take part in military blocs and adheres to three non-nuclear principles: not to accept, produce or acquire nuclear weapons. It will be interesting to see how RU can be guaranteed of UA NEVER joining NATO as this was the agreement when they became an independant country
6
US & EU having to follow the law & sanction UA if they aquire nukes? yeah right, since when does the US / EU follow the law or international law whenever it is detrimental to them
3
USA hasn't won a war since WW2 so i would hardly follow their tactics for military success. Even then, the Soviets were the first into Berlin ending the war in Europe & Japan had 70% of its troops fighting in China making the US' Pacific war easier
3
a German steel country that has been in business since the 1300's and survived two World Wars, has closed - that'll show them Ruskies!
2
@victorswiercz8203 oh you mean where they pushed Iraq back to their border - the Iraqi military 2/3rds destroyed from their 10 year Iraq-Iran war?
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n ABN treaty withdrawal was by W Bush, Trump withdrew from INF treaty & if you bother to read the news Germany are going to install US nukes. Why shouldn't RU review its nuclear policy considering how dangerous the US / NATO was become with their continual expansion & escalation including western soldiers invading RU soil in Kursk.
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n you have no problem with Zelensky demanding NATO does a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Moscow as he has demanded along with his repeated statement how UA is prepared to make nuclear bombs if they are refused immediate NATO membership - and the US / NATO does nothing to tell him to stop such talks. See you like to read the Kyiv Independant where they say RU MIGHT have nukes in Kaliningrad. The usual unconfirmed BS that Kiev reports that the US takes as gospel. Just as the US reported RU was using pre WW2 shovels and NKoreans are fighting in Kursk (once again zero evidence shown to confirm their statements)
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n you know NATO - the military organisation that had no reason to exist with the collapse of the USSR so they came up with a new plan - expansion up to RUs border to create the threat to justify their existence. NATO that illegally bombed Yugoslavia. In its 75 year existence is responsible for instigating over 100 military actions or wars around the globe - yeah that defensive alliance called NATO
1
yep, seeing as the media is saying it was the weapons delays to UA that is the real reason for UA losing, they will try to make sure that won't be the excuse in Israel
1
@harrymills2770 US does not care for Israel. "if there were not an israel we would have to create an Israel" - Joe Biden 1986. All the US cares about is a friendly country in the Middle East that allows them to park their military there. 2009 Brookings Institute oped on how to provoke & go to war with Iran that devotes an entire chapter in using Israel as their proxy (Ch5 Leave it to Bibi) where it lists an advantage of Israel attacking Iran - Israel will be blamed for it n the global stage & not the US
1
any document signed by the US (& west) isn't worth the paper it is printed on. It started with the American Indians in the 1800's and continues to this day
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n but a violent and illegal coup is legal in your opinion. You know the one - where Victoria Nuland admitted they spent $6 billion to overthrow the democratically elected President and the US then decided who should lead the country. Didn't realise that was in UA's constitution. RU's SMO started in 2022 to end the shelling of RU's speakers in the Donbas after UA ignored the Minsk 2 ceasefire as brokered by France & Germany. Merkal admitted Minsk was a sham to allow the west time to weaponise, build up and train UA's military where it was the largest military in EU & the 2nd largest out of NATO countries - trained by NATO. So the daily attacks you are speaking of are when UA used NATO weapons to kill UA civilians in UA Donbas
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n you should read the Rand Corporations oped commissioned by the US military on how to provoke & go to war with RU who the US military acknowledged were trying to avoid conflict. Then you'll see the step by step process the US is following - regime change in Belarus (tried & failed) illegal sanctions, provide lethal aid to UA etc. Same as the 2009 Brookings Institute oped on how to provoke & go to war with Iran using Israel as their proxy where an entire chapter is devoted to Israel (Ch5 Leave it to Bibi) where the US mentions encouraging Israel to attack Iran, the advantage being Israel will be blamed on the global stage & not the US
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n & before you come back with some US independence BS - UA ceased to be a sovereign country after the USA’s violent and illegal coup in 2014. From 2014 until today UA is a client regime to the USA and its allies that has no interest in Ukraine and the Ukrainian people, it is only serving the interests of the USA.
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n Oleksii Arestovych, former UA Strategic Communications Advisor stated on UA TV in 2019 that the price for entry into NATO is to provoke a war with RU that leads to Russias defeat, he also stated that RU provided a very good peace deal, made a lot of concessions in 2022 – thanks to Boris Johnson it was blocked Ukraine 2019 Oleksey Arestovych (UA Intelligence) admitted to be granted membership into NATO required a war with Russia. UA increased their shelling against Russian civilians in the Donbas & Crimea in late 2021 / early 2022, the Russian speakers in those areas asked RU for help which was an escalation of the shelling by UA since the 2014 coup, RU said they were not interested in expanding their borders, as the UA attack increased (shelling increase noted by OSCE) RU parliament voted to help those people because the Minsk 2 agreements were not being enforced by the UN, RU followed international law that allows them to protect their own people who live beyond their borders UN Charter Responsibility 2 Protect R2P.
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n David Arakhamia a Ukrainian Government Official stated on TV that peace talks were undertaken with RU a few weeks into the SMO, he stated that RU’s principle goal of the war was not to invade Ukraine but to have Ukraine remain neutral & not be part of NATO, also that Boris Johnson flew to Ukraine and said “we will not sign anything with them, let’s just fight” – proof it is the west that prevented the peace deal
1
@JohnJohnson-n3n Victoria Nuland is on video stating that peace was almost signed but it was unacceptable to the USA & UK. She came up with some BS saying RU tried to hide details in the document. The delegates at the negotiations included members from Belarus, Isreal & UA in Turkey, where UA reps posted it was time to crack open the champagne because peace was almost agreed to - & then the US told Boris to torpedo them
1