Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Zelensky Zaluzhny Feud, Without Military Plan, Ukr Coup Warning; Storm Stops War; NATO Blocks Talks" video.

  1. 11
  2. 9
  3. 5
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. Jacques Baud - Swiss former Security Officer & UN Peacekeeper - Putin became Western elite’s “bête noire” in 2007 with his famous speech in Munich. Until then, Russia had only moderately reacted to NATO expansion. But as the US withdrew from the ABM Treaty in 2002 and started negotiations with some East European countries to deploy anti-ballistic missiles, Russia felt the heat and Putin virulently criticized the US and NATO. This was the start of a relentless effort to demonize Putin and to weaken Russia. The problem was definitely not human rights or democracy, but the fact that Putin dared to challenge the western approach. The Russians have in common with the Swiss the fact that they are very legalistic. They try to strictly follow the rules of international law. They tend to follow “law-based International order.” Of course, this is not the image we have, because we are used to hiding certain facts. Crimea is a case in point. In the West, since the early 2000s, the US has started to impose a “rules-based international order.” As an example, although the US officially recognizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is only a part of it, it maintains a military presence on the island and supplies weapons. Imagine if China would supply weapons to Hawaii (which was illegally annexed by the USA in the 19th century)! What the West is promoting is an international order based on the “law of the strongest.” As long as the US was the sole superpower, everything was fine. But as soon as China and Russia started to emerge as world powers, the US tried to contain them. This is exactly what Biden said in March 2021, shortly after taking office: “The rest of the world is closing in and closing in fast We can’t allow this to continue.” As Henry Kissinger said in the Washington Post: “For the West, the demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi or the absence of one.”
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1