Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Putin Renews Support For 'Independent Palestine'; Russia For Ceasefire Amid Israel-Hamas War" video.
-
8
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ukraine became independent six months after Crimea, and after the latter had proclaimed its sovereignty on September 4. On February 26, 1992, the Crimean parliament proclaimed the “Republic of Crimea” with the agreement of the Ukrainian government, which granted it the status of a self-governing republic. On 5 May 1992, Crimea declared its independence and adopted a Constitution. The city of Sevastopol, managed directly by Moscow in the communist system, had a similar situation, having been integrated by Ukraine in 1991, outside of all legality. The following years were marked by a tug of war between Simferopol and Kiev, which wanted to keep Crimea under its control.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@carlbervin8183 you have listed 4 US conflicts - what about the other 211 since 1991? and once again you are saying they have no right to go into UA, you clearly ignore or refuse to acknowledge the UA shelling of the civilians in the Donbas for 8 years where 14,000 here killed (some say more like 20,000), or how RU tried to get Minsk 2 followed, RU sent a draft treaty for EU security framework to the USA and NATO in Dec 2021 (who have since ackowledged receiving it - and ignoring it), how the Donbas declared themselves independant as is their right for self determination under International Law (but only when it works in Americas favour apparently), how UA drmatically increased the shelling against the Donbas as recorded by the OSCE, and how RU followed the UN's Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine which is for nations to end the violence and persecution. So you are saying RU should have stood by and allowed Zelensky to wipe out these people? Any other country would be lauded for ending this mass killing. the fact that this has continued is thanks to the USA & UK telling Zelensky not to sign the peace agreement in April 2022 where he was prepared for peace and neutrality (which is already written in UA's constitution from 1991). So ask yourself - why does (did) the USA want this war? MONEY - follow the money. Initially the US goal was to overthrow Putin helped by the USA / EU's illegal sanctions - only the UN can stipulate what the sanctions are and must be approved by the UN Security Council to be legal, break up RU & rape it of its oil, gas and mineral wealth, now that has failed plan B - EU must now buy US gas at 4 times the price thanks to the USA blowing up Nord Stream which is an acto of war against an ally along with being the worst act of international / environmental terrorism. from 2015 US ports were preparing facilities for gas transfer to ships - and as soon as the US blows up Nord Stream they say to EU - don't worry, we can supply you. How lucky was that? and no cheap gas / energy will mean the collapse of Germany's steel industry - no steel means no Leopard tanks so all of NATO will have to buy US tanks, along with the German car indusrty, and the US has offered tax perks for companies that relocate. US provoking and saying they will next go to war with China and US Politicians have said they would blow up taiwans semiconductor factories, and as we speak the US is building semiconductor factories in case this happens. Imagine the USA is shelling Texas and has killed 14,000 in 8 years, Texas is full of Mexicans / Spanish speakers, after 8 years they declare themselves independant from the USA as they are allowed under International Law and they ask mexico for help, the USA dramatically increases the shelling against the Texans - what should Mexico do to end the killing? should they apply the UN R2P to end the killing? or should they sit back and watch the slaughter?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LoveHammerMan On 23 February 2014, not only did the new authorities in Kiev emerge from a coup d’état
that had definitely no constitutional basis and were not elected; but, by abrogating the
2012 Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law on official languages, they no longer respected this
guarantee of the 1997 treaty. The Crimeans therefore took to the streets to demand the
“return” to Russia that they had obtained 30 years earlier.
On March 4, during his press conference on the situation in Ukraine a journalist asked
Vladimir Putin, “How do you see the future of Crimea? Do you consider the possibility
that it joins Russia?” he replied: No, we do not consider it. In general, I believe that only the residents of a given country
who are free to decide and safe can and should determine their future. If this right has
been granted to the Albanians in Kosovo, if this has been made possible in many parts of the world, then no one is excluding the right of nations to self-determination, which, as far as I know, is laid down in several UN documents. However, we will in no way provoke such
a decision and will not feed such feelings.
On March 6, the Crimean Parliament decided to hold a popular referendum to choose between remaining in Ukraine or requesting the attachment to Moscow. It was after this
vote that the Crimean authorities asked Moscow for an attachment to Russia.
With this referendum, Crimea had only recovered the status it had legally acquired just
before the independence of Ukraine. This explains why it renewed its request to be
attached to Moscow, as in January 1991.
1
-
1
-
@LoveHammerMan try doing research about all of the USA's covert & overt wars, of governments overthrown by the USA, countries put on sanctions because they refuse to kowtow to the USA, and of course there are the leaders that the USA formerly supported, weaponised - and when they no longer served their purpose - Muammar Gaddafi - dead, Manual Noriega - prison, Osama bin Laden - dead, Saddam Hussein - dead, Ngo Dinh Diem (Vietnam) - dead, Zelensky - TBA (look for the USA to use a bomb so they can blame RU). the USA has NOT been at war for 16 years since 1776, former President Jimmy Carter said the USA is the most warlike nation on the planet. Oh - and don't forget how former US Secretary of State said the death of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it. So you tell me who the violent Government is
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@carlbervin8183 typical ignorant pro western analysis. RU's supposed 3 week SMO is US lies. Not once has RU said they would take over UA or a timeline. One minute the US says RU is intent on taking over all of Europe the next they say they entered UA with a small force & their military is weak, poor leadership, poorly trained drunk conscripts - you cannot have it both ways The aim was to bring Zelensy to peacetalks which were successful until the USA told Boris Johnson to fly to UA and instruct Zelensy not to sign or to agree to neutrality. Nuetrality that is written in the UA constitution in 1991 with their independance.
One only has to read the Minsk agreements to understand that their implementation essentially depends on constitutional reforms in Ukraine. These reforms, however, require dialogue with the autonomists. Kiev, however, has never taken these steps, and the West has never tried to get the Ukrainian authorities to do so. I doubt you have read 1 word of this document
RU was the only country asking the UN if the Minsk 2 agreements would be abided by - Merkal and Zelensky have both admitted they were shams - Merkal as time to build up UA military & Zelensky said he had no intentions to abide by the agreement. Zelensky ran on a platform of pece saying he would end the shelling of the Donbas but instead of ending it - he increased it as documented by the OSCE.
Minsk AND the peace agreement in April 2022 would have the Donbas remaining in UA but under self rule.
RU sent a draft treaty for EU security framework to USA & NATO in Dec 2021 - admitted to by Stoltenberg - both USA & NATO ignored this proposal. The reason why you say this peace proposal was not suitable to UA was because they had no intention to end their shelling on the Donbas. RU used UN article Responsibility to Protect (R2P) to end this genocide in the Donbas, I suggest you look it up and UN articles to get your facts straight, then point out which of these UN articles the USA uses for all of their illegal wars on countries that are on the other side of the globe. US ignored UN when they said they had no legal bounds for invading Iraq. Maybe you can say what UN article and reason the USA used when they killed Iraqi General Soleiomani who is on the other side of the globe.
"Killing the Russians covertly to arrive at a peaceful solution" is the art of American diplomacy at its best. Michael Morell, former deputy director of the CIA, 2016.
Checnya - they hold at gun point - that is why the Chechens are RU's strongest supporters yeah? More like they fought Islamist terrorists. Georgia - where the CIA once again tried to overthrow the elected Govt yeah? (as they also tried in Belarus). And as usual you would have no proof of your so called "elections at gun point" apart from the lies reported in Western media. the US needs a bogeyman to justify their $$ trillion war machine.
there's a reason why the majority of the globe is supporting RU in this conflict (apart from NATO & the western allies the USA has to threaten / bully - or blow up their billion $$ pipeline to keep them in line), the other 150 nations are for RU because they know how the USA / west lies and uses other countries for their own benefit. Look at France in Africa - they buy Niger uranium for next to nothing and then sell it for massive profits - all while keeping Niger poor / bankrupt while France, which produces nothing, flourishes. USA funds and arms terrorists to destabilise regions then put in their own troops, amazingly in regions where there are resources (like the oil the USA are stealing in Syria) while using ISIS, an organisation created by the USA, as their excuse for being there
Zelensky and his Govt are alive because RU said they have no intention of getting rid of them. Upon hearing that, that is when Zelensky made that p!ssweak video saying he isn't scared. If RU followed the US plan of war - they would have carpet bombed the country from 30,000 feet before sending in the tanks and troops, destruction of dams, water pump stations, electrical transformers - and the political leaders. And the USA still loses to ill equiped and poorly trained fighters with AK47's wearing sandals (you can take your pick of which war that relates to - Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan). USA cannot win against fighters with AK47's (designed in 1947) and RPG7's (released in 1963) - so who is the joke?
RU meanwhile has destroyed pretty much all of NATO's wonder weapons, UA are on their 3rd army and has press ganged old men and childre, and now is to mobilise women. UA still has a functioning army? keep watching CNN / MSNBC, UA has lost 400,000 with 1 million wounded, and his men are surrendering.
RU using NK or Iran for supplies? I suggest you research which country / organisation has run out of pretty much everything. RU military manufacturing going gangbusters meanwhile the USA has to send old & illegal weapons (cluster bombs) because they have run out of 150mm shells (and the US has been begging the globe to send these shells).
when was the last time the USA won a war - was it Grenada or the Dominican Republic in 1983?
Since 1991 according to the Congressional Research Service, the USA has been involved in over 215 military interventions overseas. RU has been involved in 5 in that same timespan
USA wants to overthrow Putin, break RU into different republics, rape RU of its oil, gas and mineral wealth. US want to destroy Putin because of BRICS & decoupling the US$ - the last 2 people who tried to do that - Muammar Gaddafi & Saddam Hussein - the US lied to invade or go to war to BOTH leaders.
the USA using George Soros' New World Order policy of the 1990's - to go to war with RU you need to use eastern European manpower with modern NATO weapons. NATO countries would not tolerate bodybags returning to their shores. So NATO / US is happy for this war as is because UA soldiers lifes aren't worth anything - till the last Ukrainian - remember that. Good US policy that one all so US congress can become millionaires
I suggest you look at the USA and its President / Vice President if you want to see what country is the laughing stock of the world. they are the 2 best people avalabe to lead the country - what does that say about the mentallity & ability of the other 300 million who live there. Uni students cannot name what ocean is on the east coast of the country but can name all of the Kardashians - look it up online, it's fkn hilarious.
Time for you to go now and watch a trans drag show yeah?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1