General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Binkov's Battlegrounds
comments
Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
There's just one little problem - Russia will never allow any foreign troops in Ukraine. And Europe will not dare to send them. So this whole video is pointless.
21
Russia - had to increase the maximum size of the army to 1.5M because they otherwise wouldn't be able to legally hire all the volunteers. Ukraine - had to decrease mobilization age and performs exclusively forced conscription with results never reaching the goals. Now you tell me again who will run out of troops first. smh
19
Another pointless video serving as a distraction from the fact that Ukraine is losing badly with or without US help. They can take the deal now or be forced to take a worse one later.
11
You think morale of units around Pokrovsk was also boosted by the idiotic attack into Russia?
9
Why would Russia bomb their own territory?
7
@galactic-guy You think showing arbitrarily selected numbers and still upholding the myth of Russia having more losses is more or less neutral? Come on.
7
Putin had to increase the maximum size of the army to allow for all the new volunteers to be hired. Sorry to tear your puny argument to shreds.
6
@4NT0N10MZC "Russian economy is controlled by the government" - It isn't.
5
@ewok40k You think I'm talking about territory? Man, you are bad at thinking.
4
Now do the debts.🤭
4
@deadbeef-i8b Hilarious. You should try stand up comedy.
4
@JayFlorence Nope, Russia presented quite reasonable conditions. It's the Kiev regime refusing to negotiate.
4
@Lasstpak The actual news say Ukraine is doomed.
4
Also, anyone who still thinks Russia will be in any way negotiating with Kiev regime needs to pay attention to what Russian officials say. Unconditional surrender is the only form of negotiations that is on the table now.
4
@4NT0N10MZC You must be joking, that document is 10 years old and that section doesn't say anything at all about state ownership. What is wrong with you?
4
They are about two thirds done, there's your answer.
3
@davout5775 You are confusing Russia with Ukraine apparently. Seek help.
3
@davout5775 In other words, you have no evidence but you are doubling down on your lie. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic.
3
Fun question - which country has an occupation forces and military bases in Europe since WW2?
3
lol
2
@dukenukem8381 Maybe you haven't noticed but the people of Ukraine do not get to decide anything anytime soon.
2
Noooooo Ukraine is winniiiiiiiiing oink oink huiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.😅
2
@davout5775 But Russia is not. And you presented zero evidence for it.
2
@Tom_Darippa Very convincing argument. Go back to sleep.
2
@jacobthesettler7616 So money isn't a problem since they are totally dependent on foreign aid? You are funny.
2
That's cute. Who would have guessed, right?
2
@michaela8676 Project Wartears for example.
2
@victorlazari5708 No idea, but it definitely isn't Ukraine, as they wouldn't be able to continue functioning there.
2
@Lasstpak Oh you mean the news that were telling us how Russia is running out of everything? But those are one of those saying Ukraine is doomed. So which ones do you mean? Ukrainian telemarathon?
2
@galactic-guy The facts are that Russia has strong advantage in all kinds of weapons and uses it regularly. There is no possible way for them to have more casualties. It does not compute to any reasonable person. How do you justify such numbers? How, according to you, are Ukrainians achieving such reality breaking results? I'm all ears.
2
@galactic-guy "you did claim that russia has fewer losses" - Where do I claim such a thing? "proves you simply do not have any" - So you want me to provide a source for a claim I did not make? "Russia has suffered more losses than Ukraine." - Only according to pro-UA sources. For example project Wartears estimates UA losses over 600k killed already. Such losses put the ratio at least 5:1 in Russian favor, which corresponds to the situation on the ground, where Russia has at least 5:1 artillery advantage. Not even talking about glide bombs. "Meanwhile no one can back up your statement." - What statement? You talk about claims and statements without EVER actually specifying anything. "This is not open to debate by the way, since this is visually confirmed." - Have you actually seen those "visually confirmed" losses? I guess not, because you wouldn't embarrass yourself like this otherwise. Russia losing three times more of everything is just another myth and a part of western propaganda. So far you utterly failed to explain how it's possible for UA to inflict such losses with inferior army. Which was my question in the first place. Remember? So get to it, stop evading.
2
Well, not everyone is a glutton for punishment apparently.🤭
2
@christophmahler Hilarious, thanks.
2
@jf7009 Ukraine may not be in NATO, but NATO is definitely in Ukraine. So once again, from NATO.
2
The turkey is a little dry.
1
Dude, seriously? Low morale? Try watching some Russian channels with reports from the field. Well, at least you're not the typical Ukrofanboy channel spewing pure propaganda.
1
@distincthouseflavor Who is "we"?
1
@joaquimbarbosa896 You are just listing all the NAFO talking points, none of it is true.
1
@joaquimbarbosa896 I have yet to see a single NK soldier in Russian army. There is literally ZERO evidence of ANY NK soldiers. Why are you lying?
1
@davout5775 It isn't.
1
Exactly.
1
Quite well? You call this quite well? So how would "losing badly" look according to you?
1
@VisiblyPinkUnicorn That's not losing badly, that's not having the means to even try properly.
1
@elliotgillum Hey, Godzilla is allegedly going to help Ukraine win.
1
@Cx10110100 What is belgorod? Who are they?
1
So you want it to be in ruins again?
1
@pilky_boooi If you don't like the reality, it doesn't mean it's bs. And what's balbber?
1
@Lasstpak I asked you a question.
1
@Lasstpak That was not the question, but I don't even care, it's like talking to a dog anyway.
1
@Lasstpak What a good boy, have a treat.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All