Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. I hope that scientists can one day solve the longstanding problem of having to invent stuff to cover holes in theories.
    37
  2.  @Zionswasd  Please cite one experiment that would in any way provide evidence of that mysterious dark matter.
    2
  3.  @Zionswasd  There are no holes in physical laws, just holes in our understanding of those laws and universe in general, big difference. If your theory doesn't fit the observable universe, it's not the universe's fault.
    2
  4.  @Deathtobunny1  You can form hypothesis based on observations, but if you can't provide experimental evidence, even indirect one, it matters a lot. You see, not being able to detect something that supposedly forms a majority of the universe in dozens of experiments over decades is not very convincing argument in support of such hypothesis. To put it very mildly.
    2
  5.  @williamschlosser  The problem is that such model wouldn't generate so much grant money. Looking for something that doesn't exist while ignoring things that do exist is the perfect grant money loophole.
    2
  6. More like grant money fraud, not a mistake.
    1
  7. Well, it's more like mafia than communism.
    1
  8. Časové bubliny temné hmoty? To je jednoduše slovní salát, ne vysvětlení.
    1
  9.  @karelcerny1813  Je to blábol nedávající žádný smysl. Salát.
    1
  10. Not existing half of the time also makes no sense, yet here we are.
    1
  11. So they just picked some random laymans who had no idea how such systems work and thus had very little idea how to interrogate the AI? Very smart.
    1
  12.  @iamchillydogg  But that doesn't mean there's completely undetectable dark matter. It should be called make-believe matter, or wishful-thinking matter. Or perhaps grant-money-generating matter, as that seems to be the whole point of this matter.
    1
  13.  @richardchapman1592  That makes as much sense as the whole dark matter theory.
    1
  14.  @Deathtobunny1  Why should I? They are quite detectable and quite well described already, aren't they? Nothing like the "dark matter".
    1
  15.  @Deathtobunny1  But in just four years there was strong experimental evidence in support of this theory and since then all it took was to devise a method of direct detection. The dark bs has been around for almost 100 years and all we have is observations. So again, please cite one experiment that would in any way provide evidence in support of the "dark matter".
    1
  16.  @Deathtobunny1  I clearly mentioned the observations and asked for experimental evidence. Did you miss that part?
    1
  17.  @Etimespace  Maybe you should stop expanding your word salad and collapse it into your black hole.
    1
  18. Maybe instead of looking for something that maybe isn't even there scientist should concentrate on things that we already know about being there. I mean, because you don't see the sun trough the clouds doesn't mean there is no sun. Maybe it's just our limited perspective that is causing the problem.
    1
  19. Well, at least some scientists are honest, thank you for that. Dark matter will be propped up as long as the grant money keep flowing.
    1