Comments by "M d\x27 Ph" (@Tititateo63) on "German MEP Michael Gahler backs Finland in NATO immediate membership" video.

Identitätslinker , just try to answer yourself, as it says in latin "Cui prodest", "Who benefits?". Putin has attacked Ukraine - that is fact, yes. But what is the reason that has resulted that deadly conflict beetween two brother nations: russians and ukraines? The reason is that US want in every way avoid that EU (most german capital and high tech) and Russia (enourmous nature and hunman resources) cooperate. That would create a superpower the US couldn't beat. The main interest in the view of the US to create a long-term conflict far away from the US in Europe between, that would weaken both Russia and the EU at the same time. The way to achive this goal is pushing NATO agressively towards Russia. As former US foreign minister Kissinger said once: don't push the Russian bear near its nest because he'll be agressive. That is exactly what we see now. Furthermore the US encouraging of the EU sanctions on oil and maybe gas against Russia would just open for new pussibilities for the US to sell their dirty oil and LNG at much higher price than originally the Russian ones. What is that if not the US is a winner and the EU is a looser. Anyway, the Russians will sell their oil and gas in Asia. However the Russians has earned as much just during 4 month as they normally would during a whole year. So wo is the winner and who is the loser? About NATO membership of Finland and Sweden, that is just emotional of these two countries as they today has no conflict with Russia. But a NATO membership should place both countries in the status of enemies for Russia. Why that is so good for Finland and Sweden???
1