Youtube comments of Pantherparatrooper (@506thparatrooper).

  1. 285
  2. 123
  3. 92
  4. 68
  5. 45
  6. 44
  7. 41
  8. 37
  9. 32
  10. 30
  11. 29
  12. 25
  13. 24
  14. 22
  15. 21
  16. 20
  17. 19
  18. 18
  19. 17
  20. 16
  21. 16
  22. 15
  23. 15
  24. 14
  25. 14
  26. 14
  27. 13
  28. 13
  29. 13
  30. 13
  31. 13
  32. 12
  33. 12
  34. 12
  35. 11
  36. 11
  37. 10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 9
  45. 9
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 8
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 8
  54. 8
  55. 8
  56. 8
  57. 8
  58. 8
  59. 8
  60. 8
  61. 8
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 7
  68. 7
  69. 7
  70. 7
  71. 7
  72. 7
  73. 7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 6
  82. 6
  83. 6
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 6
  91. 6
  92. 6
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 5
  105. 5
  106. 5
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. As a recently retired American Soldier, 29 years of service, with two assignments in Germany 2013-2017, including on the Commanding General's U.S. Army Europe's staff officer's staff, I admire and honor Secretary General Stoltenberg's incredible diplomatic skills, intellect, integrity and personal sacrifice.  Ashamedly, DW's correspondent joins the majority in the western media trashing President Trump's justified criticism of most NATO countries lack of defense spending for decades. She implies President Trump is the source of almost every NATO issue from Stoltenberg's contract extensions to complicating the selection of a successor. In her outburst, ie sudden release of emotion, DW's NATO correspondent ignores decades of every American President since President Eisenhower berating the majority of European NATO nations for their consistently reckless cuts in defense spending and manufacturing capabilities. The EU gladly left it to the American taxpayer to make up the difference like America covering 70% of NATO's expenditures in 2022 according to NATO. Recent historical events vindciate President Trump for all his "outbursts". Rarely one to learn from their mistakes and heed any American President's warnings, Europe to this day sends millions of Euros in oil and LNG profits to Russia. Ignoring President Trump's valid criticism that Russia used those European Euros to ramp up its defense modernization & capabilities, most EU countries cut their military forces and capabilities for decades.   As Stoltenberg's stellar service demonstrates, as well as history, there is no room for EU politics nor identity politics to determine the best candidate to replace Stoltenberg. Determine the most qualified candidates and then select the best candidate. I favor Kaja Kallas not for her sex which should not matter. Instead, she brings a much neglected Baltic focus too often ignored because of Western Europe's indifference towards the all to real Russian threat. Like Stoltenberg, she has a proven depth of geopolitical knowledge and ability to work with other nations as demonstrated during her time as Estonia's MP in the EU parliament and as Estonia's current Prime Minister. Of all the Europeans, those NATO countries bordering Russia and once occupied by Russia have no illusions Russia's imperial plans. They also know from decades of experience the difference between wise prevention and provocation. The Lithuanian Foreign Minister, Gabrielius Landsbergis, is another wise choice. Candidates from nations whose defense spending does not fulfill NATO's agreed on 2% should be disqualified on principle.
    4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. 4
  130. 4
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. I served as an American Soldier on two senior US Generals's staffs in Kaiserslautern & Wiesbaden, Germany, 2013-2017, I understand host nation's cost sharing and actual costs to the American taxpayer. I believe America has benefited from the NATO alliance like post 911 and am grateful. Lets compare without complaining Europe's contributions with America's. Even while enjoying the tremendous economic benefits of over 100,000 American Soldiers and their families as well as the taxes of thousands of EU national workers paid by America, Germany reimburses a fraction of the billions of taxpayer dollars for these expenses. Like most American Soldiers, my German rent was three times the local German's rent in the same area. According to NATO, why is 20 of 31 nations failing to fulfill their commitment of 2% for almost 10 years acceptable but America failing for 5 months to fulfill her commitment to Ukraine some unspeakable failure? Several dear Ukrainian friends are in Ukraine so I understand the urgency. During NATO's 75 years, America ALWAYS fulfilled her commitment resulting in Europe's longest time of peace. According to NATO, America paid 70% of NATO's financial expenditures in 2022 alone. The 911 terrorist attacks occurred in America and also killed 133 citizens from 12 other NATO countries. It was an attack on more than one NATO nation. Operation Eagle Assist ran 7 months, 9 October 2001-16 May 2002, To date, 830 crew members from 13 NATO nations patrolled US skies. Since NATO's creation, America flew tens of thousands of combat, refueling and reconnaissance air patrols over Europe. These were supported by hundreds of thousands of American airmen, planes equipment and weapons costing the American taxpayer trillions of dollars. According to the World Institute for Economic as of January 2024, EU support to Ukraine=$90B including $10 billion for military aid & 70 billion finances to Ukraine government. Uk provided about $15 billion in military and some humanitarian aid while the US provided $42 billion in military aid, $20 billion financial and $8 billion humanitarian or $70 billion total. Once America resolves several critical issues through the democratic process and passes an expected $61 billion aid package, total US aid to Ukraine will jump to $131 billion total. My Danish friend, when can America expect the EU will get its house in order and provide the remaining two thirds of the one million artillery shells it promised to Ukraine last year? North Korea with an economy a fraction of the EU's possibly Denmarks provided Russia with 1 million artillery shells.
    3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. Most Americans support giving Ukraine additional military support. They do not support endless military aid for a war President Biden has yet to declare a Ukrainian victory is America's policy and how this is achieved as General Ben Hodges, former US Army Europe Commanding General, repeatedly states is critical for sustaining the American people's support for Ukraine. The Republican led US House passed a combined aid packaged in December 2023 that included bipartisan supported reforms to asylum processes and funds for securing America's southern border through which 8 million and growing illegals crossed in the past 3 years. Biden threatened to veto this bill and his democrat colleagues in the US Senate defeated it. The same Biden whose idea of supporting Ukraine as Russia's imminent third invasion loomed offered President Zelensky a flight out of Ukraine! The same Biden who delayed for months and years in some cases, F-16's, ATACMs, American armor, Ukraine's request for military assistance. EU countries and the UK with stricter immigration policies than America resulted in Poland closing its borders with Belarus when Russia tried to flood Poland with illegal immigrants ignore this same threat American national security. Europeans depend on America for defense manufacturing because they gutted their own defense manufacturing capacity for the past 30 years to inflate government pensions, raise their standards of living and pursue green agendas. Germany produces two tanks a month and needs 7 years to produce the artillery ammunition Ukraine fired in one month during the height of its counteroffensive last summer.The British military—the leading U.S. military ally and Europe’s biggest defense spender—has 150 deployable tanks and a dozen serviceable long-range artillery pieces. In 2022, the British military considered sourcing multiple rocket launchers from museums to donate to Ukraine! Like 300,000 American troops stationed in Europe during the Cold War (over 100,000 since 1991) over 10,000 American Soldiers stationed in Poland since the war began in Ukraine also excellent for the Polish economy. This includes an American armored brigade & combat aviation brigade, America's Fifth Corp Forward Headquarters in Poznan, missile defense system in Redzikowo, equipment & ammo depots in Powidz. What does 20 NATO allies' failure to fund their defense with 2% of its GDP after committing to do so in 2014 say about their credibility and commitment to NATO's collective defense?
    2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. I served under General Ben Hodges from 2013 to 2017 so I respect his professionalism and insights. Unfortunately, this brilliant General Officer consistently ignores President Trump's strong and meaningful support of Ukraine by sending hundreds of American Soldiers to Ukraine and Javelin anti-armor missiles Ukraine used to defend Kyiv in 2022. Then this brilliant military leader excused and ignored Biden's & Harris's consistent incompetence for the past three years leading to Ukraine's slow loss of this war. General Hodges did not accept the results of the election and within days of the election he criticized tens of millions of Americans who voted for Trump as despising the US Constitution. I propose Democrat President Roosevelt's and Prime Minister Churchill's approach to the end of WW2 are a clear example of the kind of "peace through strength" approach President Trump will employ in quickly ending the war in Ukraine. Europe was divided into the free west and occupied Soviet eastern Europe. In time, the west rebuilt, grew stronger and more prosperous while the Soviet Union weakened and eventually collapsed unifying Germany and liberating eastern Europe, the Baltic States and Ukraine without a shot fired. Russia is a fraction of the Soviet Union's economic and military power. President Zelensky made it very personal with President Trump by leaking their phone call about the investigation of the corruption involved in paying millions of dollars in bribes to the Biden family though Hunter Biden. Then weeks before the election and during a visit to the US, President Zelensky doubled down on this insult with a photo op with only democrat politicians in a key election battleground state, Pennsylvania, and trashing Trump's Vice Presidential pick, JD Vance, during a press interview.
    2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. Montel would never wear ribbons or medals especially as a new recruit that only those who served in a declared combat zone in Vietnam wore and have official orders to wear them. If he did, he would be called out and a law since 2006 calls this criminal behavior to steal valor either through false written or verbal claims and/ or actions, ie wearing unauthorized ribbons, combat patches and rank . The Department of Defense sets specific requirements including required number of consecutive days in a declared combat zone with specific boundaries as well as rank achieved at the time of retirement. One's retirement rank determines one's legal retirement pay. It is criminal behavior to defraud the state or federal government claiming the wrong rank and with regards to disabilities only combat veterans serving in declared combat zones can claim. Montel Williams makes an absurd comparison between a new recruit E-1, ie lowest rank and the highest enlisted position Command Sergeant Major (E-9) in a US Army/ Minnesota National Guard unit with 24 years of military service. Senior NCO's make on the spot corrections of such infractions as one of their key tasks. As a Commissioned Officer (O-5) several ranks above the highest enlisted rank, Command Sergeant Major (E-9), I received corrections for improper wear of my military uniform from Non-Commissioned Officers of all ranks. Once my "infraction" little or small was pointed out, I was expected to correct it quickly. No professional Command Sergeant Major nor Master Sergeant would ever except wearing unauthorized ribbons, ranks or unearned combat patch without office DoD orders showing I earned them. If Tim Walz wore the wrong rank or signed official documents stating the incorrect rank, combat zone service or ribbon/ medal before he retired he would receive some kind of disciplinary action especially because of his senior rank. Imagine President Trump claiming he won the Presidential Medal of Freedom because he decided to award himself this award?
    2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. This 29 year US Army vet, appreciates you passionate and creative thinking to help with retention! One of the biggest drags on Soldiers' morale is the separate and unequal standards for female Soldiers who always received equal pay but not equal work standards. Then US Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley declared all combat positions including the elite fighting units like Rangers, Special Forces, etc open to females because they could do whatever a male Soldier could do. To this day, female Army Physical Fitness Standards (APFT) height, wieght and body fat ratios are considerably lower than the male standards. For decades, male Airborne school trainees had to complete 10 pull ups at the end of the morning Physical Training or dropped from the course. That standard was always waived for females. Additionally, pregnant female Soldiers avoid combat tours, work details and other MOS specific requirements for their 9 month pregnancy and additional 180 days after birth. Other Soldiers most often the males pulled extra duty or deployed to combat on short notice. Female Soldiers wisely but unfairly often completed college courses during this time giving them an unfair advantage over their male peers on promotion boards. A national draft is highly likely in the event of a war with a near peer enemy, females should register for the draft at 18 just like American males and face the same penalties for failing to do so. Doing this would not only help with the recruitment and retention of male Soldiers but actually support and defend the US Constitution they swore to defend!
    2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337.  @PaulWarrenTop  I understand any Polish concern about cheap Ukrainian grain imports on Poland's and the EU's economies. I never said Ukraine should be able to flood their markets. So you raise a "straw man argument". So believe you and ignore President Zelensky's expressed concerns about the detrimental impact on the war efforts of delayed military shipments? Also, Poland's Prime Minster's threats to suspend military aid to Ukraine had no impact on Ukraine's war efforts? The Washington Post reporting was false? “We are no longer transferring any weapons, because we will now arm ourselves with the most modern weapons,” Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said in a Wednesday20 September 2023 evening interview with Polsat News. Poland will only fulfill existing contracts and deliver previously agreed-upon supplies of weapons, Polish government spokesman Piotr Müller clarified to the Polish Press Agency on Thursday, saying that included Polish-made Howitzers. He cited “totally unacceptable statements and public gestures” by Ukraine in the decision. The Washington Post 21 September 2023. conveniently ignore my more important point about the serious impact on Ukraine's war effort with every delay hour let alone days Poland's border is closed with Ukraine. So those tractors and protestors with communist flags were fighting for fair & free trade, right? Speaking of whataboutism, what about all that cheap Russian oil/ LNG still flooding Europe which provides Russia with the financial means to build the weapons destroying Ukraine and threatening Poland & Europe? Of course, Poland only imports oil/ LNG from friendly countries, right?
    2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. Having completed two combat tours in Iraq (2003 & 2005), I can confidently say the justification for America resuming war with Iraq was to force a truly evil man to comply with the treaty conditions he agreed to end the first Gulf War. Totally agree with how we fought it, failed to define a clear exit strategy and disastrously creating another socialist parliamentary form of government. The resumption of the Gulf War is no different than stationing 300,000 plus American Soldiers in post WW2 Germany primarily to prevent the resurrection of nazism. As the current concerns of growing anti-semitism in Germany and Europe 75 years after D-Day confirm. Certainly, the threat of Soviet communism became the central role of those American Soldiers but not the exclusive role. From 1980 to 1988, Saddam Hussein's nearly 8 year war after invading Iran resulted in over a million Iraqi and Iranian casualties primarily from chemical weapons. In 1988, he killed thousands of Kurds with chemical weapons. On 2 August 1990, he invaded Kuwait resulting in 1,000 Kuwaiti deaths and 300,000 fleeing their country. America established no-fly zones in Iraq after the Gulf War to protect the Kurdish population in the north and the Shia Muslim population in the south from attacks by Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime, preventing the brutal suppression of these groups including the use of chemical weapons against the Kurds in the past. The current Iraqi government is hardly the highly destabilizing threat to the region that Saddam was or a modern day Iraq led by Saddam's evil sons, Oday and Kusay would be.
    2
  348.  @Blanka1100  As an American Soldier, I am grateful for Poland's increasingly strong contributions to NATO and Ukraine. My point is while the Foreign Minister calls on America to do more for Ukraine touting Poland's efforts, he would do well with the American people comparing Poland's efforts with America instead of only mentioning invoices for Polish troops, Poland's most recent percentage of GDP for defense and recent Polish contracts for advanced American weapon systems. Percentage of GDP: America's 6% GDP for 75 years compared with Poland's 2% of GDP average beginning in 2015, invoice for 2,500 Polish troops annually to Afghanistan compared with an invoice for 10,000 American Soldiers in Poland, and Polish military contracts for Abrams tanks, Patriot air defense and F-35's fighters (All top military technology America spent trillions of dollars researching & developing) compared with America's millions of dollars pumped annually into Poland's economy also good for Polish business as those 10,000 American Soldiers spend on the local economy, local nationals on American bases pay, etc. According to Polish government information, Poland spent 2% annually for defense 5 times over 15 years 2009-2022, 2.1%, (2015), 2% (2018 & 2019), 2.2% (2020 & 2021) and 2.4% (2022). From 2000 to 2011, Poland spent 2% once in 2007. Poland is a great ally and strong force for NATO's collective defense. America demonstrates her commitment to Poland and NATO always meeting her NATO commitments and putting American lives on the lone stationing 10,000 American troops in Poland in addition to the 100,000's of American Soldiers in other NATO countries.
    2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. You ignore 64 years of the counter-culture's war on authority and masculinity to ask why a man must remind a woman he is the man. Having to show you are better is reminding the woman you are the man. Every month, tens of thousands of women knowingly leave or divorce much better, wealthy, highly competent, strong leading men only to quickly regret it but rarely admit it. Millions of dysfunctional children raised in overwhelmingly single mother homes attest to how few women ever admit their man was a better leader in the home. After retiring with 29 1/2 years of military service I can confirm the counter culture's/ feminist's question all authority is radically transforming the greatest Army the world ever knew. The most junior enlisted Soldiers, especially females, consistently question and attempt to destroy extremely successful, competent leaders, especially heterosexual, white male leaders. Older veterans are shocked at how little of the military discipline and authority you describe remains in the US military. Proven, highly competent male leaders even at the highest ranks deal with the persistent threat of false sexual harassment, equal opportunity, hostile environment or other "toxic leadership" claims by junior soldiers. In the Army I joined, leaders rarely pulled rank because every Soldier fulfilled their oath to follow the lawful orders of their leaders unless the order was illegal, unethical or immoral. A man proving he is better to a woman is the equivalent of pulling rank-ie gold medal vs silver. This is why the majority of strong, competent and successful western men are checking out of dating all together or dating westernized women wherever they are found and seek more feminine, cooperative and submissive women from other cultures. While healthy men seek self-improvement, the average man doesn't get into a relationship with a woman for the same competition they face in the world. They look for rest and peace at home.
    2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463.  @yurilytviak9066  Europe's aid to Ukraine exceeds America's?! Hardly! I admire the Baltic States aggressively working to fulfill their 2% of GDP for defense pledge as well as donated equipment and funds. They may give more of a percentage of their GDP than America but not combined dollars and certainly not counting the costs of a carrier battle group on station in the eastern med and other airborne intel assets providing real time info to Ukraine nor Patriot missile batteries surged to Romania, Poland and the Baltic States. The EU's, especially the Baltic States, combined GDP is a fraction of America's GDP as is the total amount of military and economic financial aid compared to the EU's combined contribution. For decades America spent 7% of her GDP on defense especially basing hundreds of thousands of American troops permanently stationed in Europe while many EU countries slashed their defense spending to less than 1% for decades. The EU nations know contrary to French & German fantasies of a European defense force minus American forces that they have neither the capital, defense manufacturing capabilities, political will nor populations to defend themselves. Unlike the other NATO countries, America has very real defense commitments to nations like Israel and allied countries in the south Pacific. It is predominantly American artillery shells, Iron Dome missiles and other critical war stocks going to Israel as well as Ukraine. ATACM missiles alone are $1 million a piece. What's Europe's excuse?
    1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530.  @automnejoy5308  Not complicated-equal rights means equal responsibilities. Not identical but equal. Never said nor believe any woman should suffer the loss of rights. The facts are the overwhelming majority of western military forces are male, 68-85% and 95% of war casualties are men. In the west, 100% of males must register for military conscriptions or suffer legal ramifications. The loss of life results in the loss of all of men's rights American men who fail to register for selective service at their 18th birthday is a felony punishable by up to a $250,000 fine and/or 5 years imprisonment. They are also barred for life from federal employment and federal loans. Whats the equivalent for a woman failing to get pregnant and carry it to full term? Nothing. The need for two incomes is the result of exploding government programs including rapidly exploding numbers of programs to support single mother families. Increasing numbers of women choose to be single. A little less than half, 46.8% of the American women population were childless In 2020 The most dangerous job, logging, was 33 times more dangerous than the average job nationwide. Additionally, many of the most dangerous jobs earn average salaries that are below the May 2019 annual mean wage of $53,490. Of the individuals who work in the four most dangerous jobs (logging, pilots privately planes, derrick operator at oil, gas mining, roofers) more than 90% are men. The Logging Industry workforce in 2021 was 7.41% woman, and 92.6% men. Consequently, across all occupations, men are much more likely than women to be killed on the job. In 2017, for example, 4,761 men were killed at their workplace, compared to just 386 women. According to the Center for Disease Control, This report "maternal mortality rates for 2018 and 2019 (2). In 2020, 861 women were identified as having died of maternal causes in the United States, compared with 754 in 2019 (3). The maternal mortality rate for 2020 was 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births." Most western countries are experiencing population losses for several years now as birth rates plummet. As of 2021, the average life expectancy at birth in the United States is 73.5 years for men and 79.3 years for women. This is the widest gap between the two genders since 1996.
    1
  531.  @automnejoy5308  A $53,000 annual salary is more than enough for a family of two particularly in States with no or low state taxes. Unfortunately, high tax states and destructive regulations like California, Oregon and Washington drive logging jobs out of their states and the raise the cost of living dramatically. I live in the state of Texas with no state income tax and where they encourage oil exploration, drilling and exports. $53,000 goes further than $70,000 thousand in California. While waiting to come on active duty and living in New Hampshire vs Massachusetts, I supported a family of 6 with pay below the official poverty line while paying for my wife and my student loans. When my wife became a stay at home mother, the expenses dropped. Several two parent families discovered after the expense for a second car, childcare, work clothes, higher tax bracket, etc were deducted there really wasn't a significant financial advantage to two incomes. The number of childless women in their 30's and 40's is rapidly increasing as are the number of women discovering freezing their eggs is often not successful. After several years of dramatically missed recruiting goals in all five military branches, restoring the draft in peacetime, like Denmark and Germany are planning to do, is a very real possibility soon in America. The average draft age is 18-26 years of age. Many American women are waiting until their 30's to start families, single or traditional. In America, heart disease and cancer are the top 2 leading causes of death for men and women. In 2020, there was a total of 1729 prostate cancer deaths (36.2 deaths per 100,000 men), 1463 breast cancer deaths (19.8 deaths per 100,000 women), and 766 uterus cancer deaths observed (10.3 deaths per 100,000 women). In comparison with the expected deaths (per 100,000) during the same period, the numbers of excess deaths and the excess death rate by prostate, breast, and uterus cancer were 610 (55%) prostate cancer deaths (12.8 deaths per 100,000 men), 443 (43%) breast cancer deaths (6 deaths per 100,000 women), and 154 (25%) uterus cancer deaths (2 deaths per 100,000 women). Millions of medical studies funded with taxpayer money for women's health while men's health issues, suicide & prostate cancer, receives minimal funding. The third leading cause of death especially for men, is unintentional injuries-falls, fires, etc. The fourth through tenth leading cause of death are strokes, lung diseases, diabetes, the flu, suicide, kidney disease and Alzheimer's disease. Depression is one of the most important risk factors in suicide. Unfortunately, male depression is under-diagnosed because men are less likely to seek help and because men don’t always develop standard symptoms, such as sadness, but instead are more likely to experience fatigue, irritability, sleep disturbances, and a loss of interest in work and hobbies.
    1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. It is not Washington, America nor DC! Joe Biden crippled by fear keeps these absurd restrictions on Ukraine believing in appeasing Russian autocratic tyrants. In 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed developing the first generation missile defense system that created the Patriot missile defense system and Joe Biden criticized President Reagan for "crossing the red line" or destabilizing the peace with Russia. Today, President Biden takes credit for the Patriot missile system's success stopping hundreds of Iranian missiles launched at Israel and that now defends Ukraine. The appeasing autocrats mindset led the Obama-Biden administration to respond to Russia's two invasions and annexation of Crimea sending non-lethal aid. For almost 3 years, Biden denied Ukraine critical military aid like long range ATACMS and the permission to use them. After two days of heavy Russian aerial bombardment of Ukraine, Joe Biden enjoys his second week of vacation. Even though President Trump sent the first American troops to Ukraine and lethal military aid like the Javelin anti-armor missiles crucial to the defense of Kyiv in 2022, Jason cannot criticize Joe Biden by name. Kamala Harris or 38 days makes no commitment to lifting these absurd restrictions and a Ukrainian victory in this war. If Jason is courageous enough start criticizing Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the appeasing Democrat party. The answer to this foolishness is electing President Trump who Putin feared him enough not to invade Ukraine during his presidency.
    1
  582. 1
  583. Always fascinating to hear the same British who cannot find the political will to meet their bare minimum NATO article 3 treaty obligations-2% of GDP for defense, giving advice to President Trump on executing American foreign, domestic and national security policies. For years, Biden-Harris refused to sanction 7 financial institutions critical to Russia's oil/ LNG exports. What an absurd "straw man" argument that Trump owes Putin anything for his election. The same Trump who opposed Nordstream 1 & 2 pipelines and EU purchase of Russian LNG/ oil and sent hundreds of American Soldiers and Javelin anti-armor to Ukraine, indebted to Putin. Furthermore, America's economic and military strength are the foundation of the rules based world system. With America's national debt exploding past $34 trillion and its interest payments now exceeding America's annual defense budget, both America's economic and military power are in grave danger of rapidly diminishing. Those billion dollars sent to Ukraine in actual dollars, $106 billion according to the US Government, and billions of dollars in donated equipment are added to the national debt. Meanwhile, American stockpiles of critical equipment, US Air Force will retire 1,000 planes in the coming years, and munition stockpiles drop to dangerously low levels. The US Navy's anti-ship missile stockpiles will be completely depleted after only a few days of combat with China. This is would lead to America losing any war with China whether Russia is defeated or not.
    1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. Thank God for Christoph Heusgen saying what DW seems incapable of understanding and admitting: those NATO countries, including Germany, that cut their defense spending from 3% to 1.3% of GDP and their defense manufacturing invited Russia to attack a weakened NATO with European countries incapable of defending themselves. Europe's assumption like in WW1, WW2, after the Cold War and Russia's two invasions of Ukraine in 2014 is America will save Europe from the inevitable consequences of their actions no matter the cost for America. The truth is the Palestinians received billions of dollars and euros in assistance from America, Europe and other countries that they allowed their elected Hamas and Fatah authorities to squander on lavish lifestyles and building tunnels & forces to attack Israel. The truth is the Republican led U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that included $61 billion dollars in new military aid to Ukraine. President Biden threatened to veto it and his democrat party which leads the U.S. Senate defeated this bill pandering to the most extreme elements in their party. It was Joe Biden how delayed for months and even year Ukraine's requests for critical weapon systems and sufficient ammo supplies that resulted in tens of thousands of Ukrainian casualties in the stagnant war. Thank God for Christoph Heusgen saying what DW seems incapable of understanding and admitting: those NATO countries, including Germany, that cut their defense spending from 3% to 1.3% of GDP and their defense manufacturing invited Russia to attack a weakened NATO with European countries incapable of defending themselves. Europe's assumption like in WW1, WW2, after the Cold War and Russia's two invasions of Ukraine in 2014 is America will save Europe from the inevitable consequences of their actions no matter the cost for America.
    1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666.  @cyan_oxy6734  Never said all America does is selflessly saving everyone's butt's. You offer a typical rewriting of history worthy of the most liberal mind indoctrinated in university. Europe is of course never to blame for any troubles in Europe, ie Balkans, Kosovo and Ukraine. You may not be saying America is bad but you are repeating the blame America for almost everything that is bad in the world. Lets start with the American victory in the Cold War 1947-1991, or 33 years ago, resulting in 75 years of unprecedented peace in Europe. At the height of the Cold War in 1962 when the Berlin Wall went up, more than 400,000 U.S. forces were stationed across 100 communities on the European continent. After the Berlin Wall fell, the average was 109,452 troops per year 1996-2000. With the resulting collapse of the USSR, eastern Europe and some former Soviet Republics including Ukraine regained their independence thanks in large part to American troops and nukes without a violent war. In 1994, most European countries including the wealthiest rewarded America with paying 75% of NATO's financial expenditures while they cut their defense budgets, military forces and manufacturing capabilities. Like the Balkans, Kosovo was not prevented by America's allies either. America surged from an average of 63,000 Soldiers in Europe to 74,000 (2022-2024). Based on most of western Europe's indifference towards Russia's two invasions of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea, willingness to pump billions of Euros into Russia for cheap LNG and weak military forces, Poland, the Baltic States and much of NATO's eastern flank want the reliability of American troops permanently stationed in their countries vs other NATO allies. What is delusional is your lack of awareness of America's consistently saving Europe's the middle east and South China sea allies collective butts while they divert defense dollars to fattening government pensions and social programs. In 2014, 3 of then 28 NATO allies paid what the the current and incoming NATO Secretary General admits 2% of GDP or bare minimum for defense. Ten years later, it is 23 of 32 NATO countries. Shared "core values" are only as good as a nation's political and military will and means to defend them. Whoever educated you did a real disservice to you.
    1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. Typical European farcical talking points that Biden and Democrats are poor victims of those mean Republicans daring to include immigration reforms and funds to defend & secure America's southern border while millions of illegals cross it for years, including military aged males from China, Iran, Russia, etc & 10 IEDs confiscated in Tucson, Arizona just this week, in a bill with billions of dollars for Ukraine to defend her borders. The outrage! More like cracks growing in liberal British talking points describing Republicans as destroying everything by building border security and tightening asylum standards while compassionate Democrats allow the human tidal waves destroying support infrastructure and cities to continue unabated. Never underestimate a liberal's impulse, especially European liberal, to distort the truth for real or imagined political gain. The same British whose military, even as Europe's largest defense spender, has only 150 deployable tanks and perhaps a dozen serviceable long-range artillery pieces. Typical Europeans who cut their defense spending from 3% of GDP during the Cold War years to 1.3% while America accounted for nearly 70% of NATO's defense spending last year demand America spend billions of dollars more in Ukraine too. Pretty cheeky if not condescending! To quote a British professor, "Europe has systematically demilitarized itself because it didn’t need to spend the money, thanks to the lack of an apparent threat and U.S. military dominance around the globe, said Anthony King, a professor of war studies at the University of Warwick. “They have basically gone to sleep.” Wall Street Journal 8 December 2023
    1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. Fascinating the rewriting of history and ignoring of the UK's and Europes dramatically pulling back from NATO. President Trump like many American military officials and political leaders have long urged Europe to carry more of the military burden, including every American president since Dwight D. Eisenhower but President Trump is a threat to Europe's security. In 2014, NATO allies agreed to move toward spending 2% of economic output on defense within a decade. In 2023, only 11 of NATO’s 31 members are expected to hit the target, according to NATO.  President Trump's issue with Angela Merkel was her willingness to provide Russia with billions of Euros in oil and gas profits with Nordstream 1 & 2 that it used to build the military destroying so many Ukrainian lives, villages and cities. But a President Trump is a threat to NATO and Europe's defense?! Unlike the UK, a crucial member of NATO, and western European countries, Poland, Finland and the Baltics—all sharing or near borders with Russia—moved the fastest to build up their militaries. Poland said it wants to spend more than 4% of its annual economic output on defense next year, almost double what it did in 2022. Poland could have the strongest conventional forces in Europe in two or three years, said Bence Nemeth, the academic program director of the Advanced Command Staff course at the Defense Academy of the U.K., As President Trump warned: UK's overall army size is expected to shrink to 72,500 full-time troops from a previous target of 82,000. It is replacing its 227 tanks with 148 more-modern versions, but those won’t be deployed until 2027. Of its existing 227 tanks, only 157 can be deployed within 30 days and perhaps only 40 are fully functioning and ready to move, military analysts said. WSJ 8 DEC 2023
    1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. ​ @SorbusAucubaria  You make some valid points that the United States has a large influence in the World in general and NATO specifically and NATO provided minimal support exercising article 5 after the 911 terrorist attacks. Like most Europeans, you conveniently ignore the more critical issues. Where was all this European and Finnish concern for the past 70 years? Why is Finland joining NATO now to face a Russian threat that is a fraction of the size of the Communist Soviet threat? America has an major influence in the world by most countries requests, Finland & Sweden are the latest joining NATO, because America paid for Europe's freedom with the blood of tens of thousands of Americans in two world wars and the Cold War. Why do you ignore the benefit of 300,000 American Soldiers and nuclear weapons in Europe during the Cold War and since its end? World Wars that Americans did not create and many Americans believed were of Europe's making. Europe, like Finland now, unable to defend itself from a Russian threat much of their making, significant defense spending & manufacturing cuts and billions of Euros in LNG/oil purchases sent to Russia, once again calls on America to make up the difference. All this while Europe raised expensive government pensions, unsustainable socialist programs and green agendas cutting their electricity generating and manufacturing capacity. I did two tours in Iraq. I will always remember the gratitude of Yazzidi's, Kurds, women and children sometimes gassed with chemical weapons and always treated worse than animals by Saddam. Those middle east borders by the way were drawn primarily by European colonists.
    1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. How convenient liberals, especially European liberals, Obama-Biden refused for 8 years to send anything more than helmets and medical supplies to Ukraine after Russia's two invasions and annexation of Crimea in 2014. President Trump provided Ukraine with lethal military equipment and the critical military training by American and other NATO country military trainers. Even as Biden's Department of Defense warned Ukraine and the world of Russia's imminent third invasion and the resulting war, Biden's idea of supporting Ukraine was offering President Zelensky a flight out of Ukraine. Over the past 22 months, Biden denied Ukraine's requested critical weapon systems for months and even years in some cases only to send them in such quantities as to guarantee the current stalemate. Even with the Democrats controlling both houses of Congress and the White House, this slow trickle continued. Europeans hypocritically criticize the US who contributed billions of dollars in military aid already while Europe primarily makes empty promises of hundreds of thousands of artillery shells and then delivers a third of those promised. This after the US like most of the past 74 years provide 70% of NATO's expenditures last year. The reason Europeans are terrified of President Trump is his ability to call out European indifference to their own defense. Most NATO countries cut their defense spending from 3% of GDP to 1.3%. Europe's slashing it's military manufacturing capacity to the point Germany, the largest economy in NATO, can only produce 3 tanks a month. UK has a couple dozen long-range artillery pieces! This is nothing more than the usual pathetic liberal talking points about President Trump.
    1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818.  @kirstinevad347  I seriously compared a cruel, backwards, insignificant North Korean economy with technologically, economic powerhouse Germany & EU who could rapidly produce what Ukraine urgently needs. I was stationed for a year on the DMZ separating . No doubt the EU and the UK awakened to the all to real Russian threat. You are welcome. Honored to serve my country and her allies. Very rewarding to play a part ending the killing in Kosovo and Iraqi. Fulfilling to hear so many Iraqi women express their gratitude to America for giving them a better of life their mother's never dreamed of. Women used the American grants to create their own businesses. More accurate that Speaker Johnson passed a combined aid packages bill last December with $61 billion for Ukraine. Biden threatened to veto Speaker Johnson's bipartisan bill before his democrat colleagues in the US Senate defeated it. Then Biden headed off for a lengthy vacation in the Caribbean. All too often, bipartisanship means a lopsided "compromise" where Republicans compromise their principles and betray their constituents. I visited 9 European countries. Great experience. IncredibIe experience living in Europe and many discussions with the Europeans. No fighting, just passionate debate about critical issues. I support two Ukrainian families that are dear friends still living in Ukraine. After three trips to Ukraine. I would gladly volunteer to fight in Ukraine except my age would make me a liability instead of an asset. I regularly visit the NATO site and listen to Secretary General's press conferences. I especially enjoy listening to Estonia's Prime Minister, Kaja Kallas. She really gave to the Republican Senator on a Munich Security Council panel with her and the Stoltenberg. I get a diverse exposure to the European mindset. Caio!
    1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. Never in my life would I expect to hear LTG Ben Hodges enabling any failing commander to shift blame for their leadership failures by blaming other leaders. The leader of the free world & Commander in Chief of America is Joe Biden. As Democrat President Truman said, the buck stops here. For the past 2 years, General Hodges wisely said, Biden must consistently state America's policy Is Ukraine's victory over and spell out the strategy to achieve it. Biden has not done either. Republicans, the party of President Reagan trust but verify, and a few Democrats whose constituents suffer the tragic effects daily of an open border, want to trust President Biden's commitment to victory while verifying whether his commitment to the cause is real with a specific plan. Why should any American believe Biden supports Ukraine defending its borders when he won't defend America's? Also, there is a growing mistrust of President Biden's commitment to victory because of his consistent lack of such a clearly stated policy and demonstrable trickling of critical weapons systems Ukraine needs and requested for the last 22 months. With Democrat majorities in the US House & Senate, JFK's party we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty, neither Joe Biden nor Democrats supplied Ukraine with long range ATACMS, air defense, aviation and artillery rounds as Ukraine requested. Hearing Biden statements yesterday shocked General Hodges because the overwhelming evidence for the past 22 months demonstrates to any intellectually honest observer Joe Biden's complete lack of commitment to Ukraine's victory as well as many Democrats playing politics with Ukrainian lives. By consistently providing Biden and Democrats who defeated the latest Republican House bill with billions in additional aid to Ukraine & Israel with political cover, General Hodges repeating democrat talking points and taking cheap shots at Republicans ensures more gridlock in Congress. This will result in even more suffering by innocent Ukrainians and Israelis and Americans suffering the effects of an open border and exploding national debt. That's not the kind of leadership nor discernment many have come to expect from him.
    1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. After nearly 3 years of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Ryan assumes that Biden-Harris actually want Ukraine to win this war. For months and years, Biden-Harris denied and eventually trickled just enough for Ukraine to fight while placing destructive restrictions on Ukraine's use of these weapons. Hardly a fantasy, the A-10, like Reagan's strategic defense initiative created the Patriot missile systems of today, was a very efficient and cheap response to the overwhelming numbers of Russian and Warsaw Pact armor and troop numbers. Instead of building costly numbers of tanks and military forces, America built on the strengths of a defensive force vs offensive while enjoying 75 years of peace through strength and credible deterrence. Following your rational, America should never have built any air bases in Europe nor stationed any planes there during the Cold War since they would be destroyed in the first hours of any Russian invasion. As history reveals, these air bases & planes like the vastly out-numbered Soldiers contributed to over 75 years of peace in Europe to this day. Ukraine denied Russian planes air superiority in Ukrainian skies and at least a couple hundred kilometers inside Russia. If Ukraine used her existing fighters plus the increasing number of F-16's for cover for the A-10's strafing large Russian armor and supply columns, defensive lines and large Russian troop concentrations, it would have as devastating an effect as it did Iraq and Afghanistan. The US used napalm for close in support in open fields as well as thick jungle in Vietnam with deadly effect.
    1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900.  @SiliconCurtain  For over a year, spun any event that President Trump and Republicans hate Ukraine and want her to fail. Without US aid, Ukraine will most likely fail. I close my eyes and I honestly cannot tell the difference between never Trump BBC, CNN, PBS, CBS, etc. Why do people supporting Ukraine think it's wise to insult President Trump and the over 77 million Americans who elected him to end this war? Instead of listening to both sides of an obvious disagreement, they pour gas on the fire destroying any chance for a sustainable peace in Ukraine. Secretary of State Rubio, "Security guarantees are contingent on peace. Everyone’s saying security guarantees to secure the peace. You first have to have a peace. We don’t even know if the peace is possible and this was understood by the Ukrainians. It was explained to them repeatedly. Here is our strategy-we’re trying to get Putin to a negotiating table. Let’s not rehash. Everyone knows the history here, the back and forth We all understand that but the question now is can we get them to a table to negotiate? That’s our goal. Don’t do anything to disrupt that and that’s what Zelenskyy did unfortunately. He found every opportunity to Ukraine-splain on every issue. Then he confronts the Vice President when the Vice President says, the goal here is diplomacy. He immediately jumps in and challenges the vice president, well what kind of diplomacy? We all understand that Putin is not going to be an easy negotiator in this regard. We all get that but we have to start the process to see if something is even possible. I honestly am puzzled I just don’t understand the Biden administration berated Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israelis. Put all kinds of conditions and pressure on them to try to get a ceasefire. In this particular case, we’ve been nice by comparison and all we’re trying to do is figure out whether a peace is possible. All these other things people keep bring up that’ll have to be a part of a negotiation. Right now there is no negotiation. Shouldn’t we at least try to see if there is a way to end the war in a way that’s acceptable to both sides and is enduring and sustainable? How is that a bad thing? I really am puzzled why anyone thinks that trying to be a peacemaker is a bad thing. It’s only a bad thing when it’s Donald Trump trying to do it. It’s absurd to me." ABC 02 MARCH 2025
    1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. The US military messaging problem is if you are a patriotic, conservative, white heterosexual male you need not apply. As a recently retired, US Army, field grade officer with 29 1/2 years of military service, I can emphatically say the US military is governed at the highest to lowest lever by the woke, progressive, liberal agenda. I endured mandatory annual Sexual Harassment Response Program (SHARP), Equal Opportunity, ethnic & women pride months, toxic leaders and gay/transgender sensitivity training where the woke, feminist, progressive ideology was taught as US Army doctrine. Missed annual recruiting goals and the increasing numbers of veterans recommending against military service are the demonstrable results of this destructive agenda.   Every Biden-Harris defense budget cuts DoD budgets after inflation while diverting scarce dollars to woke/ progressive programs and the DoD going "green". The US Army has hollowed out Brigade Combat Teams. Soldiers no longer qualify on their weapons twice a year and increasingly even once a year due to dwindling small arms ammo stocks. Today's US Navy and US Air Force are the smallest, least trained and oldest equipment in over a century. In recent Congressional testimony, the US Air Force Chief of Staff testified the Air Force will retire 1,000 airframes including C-17 transports in the coming year and needs a budget for 340 new airframes a year to stay at the current level. Barely 100 airframes are financed in Biden's next fiscal year budget. USNI News US Navy reported Military Sealift Command drafted a plan to remove crews from 17 critical support ships due to skilled manpower shortages across the Navy. The US Marine Corps (annual budget $50 billion/ mil aid package to Ukraine $60 billion) has not budgeted to build the ships critical to its island hopping strategy to defend Taiwan.
    1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. General Hodge' is brilliant and wise from years of experience as the US Army in Europe Commanding General. For 2 years, he consistently pressed President Biden and the West to state clearly a Ukrainian victory is America's policy and laying out to the American people how to achieve that goal. For more than two years, Biden and the west failed to do this. After months and years of Biden and the west denying Ukraine's requests for critical weapon systems and ammo essential for victory, Hodges still believes a Biden second presidency is better for Ukraine, NATO and American constitutional democracy. A wise LTG Hodges consistently directs his harshest criticism not at Biden & Democrats who defeated the Republican bill with $61 billion in aid to Ukraine but at President Trump and the Republican led US House. President Trump was the first US President to put American "boots on the ground" in Ukraine sending military trainers and lethal military aid. The Republican led US House passed an aid bill last December with $61 billion in new aid to Ukraine. Biden threatened to veto it and his Democrat US Senate defeated this bill before Biden headed off for his Caribbean vacation. While Joe got sunburned, Republican negotiators worked through the holidays with the White House to find a compromise. Two months later, the Democrat US Senate passed a bill they new would not pass in the US House. The level of intellectual dishonesty for a US Army general officer is shocking. It is absurd for Hodge's to say President Trump's words recklessly communicates NATO disunity while 20 of 31 NATO countries, including Germany & France, fail to pay the bare minimum of 2% of GDP. If 2% of GDP is as meaningless as the general says, why did NATO countries unanimously commit in 2014 to do so? What kind of military force would General Hodges have commanded if America funded it less than 2% of GDP? If Putin attacks a NATO country, he will do so believing he can defeat NATO militaries hollowed out by 30 years of reckless European cuts to military defense budgets, military forces and defense manufacturing capacity.
    1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. There can be no Ukrainian victory until there is an end to the Biden-Harris failed foreign policy so evidenced in the incompetent withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Biden- Harris's denial for years of critical military aid to Ukraine, Biden's withdrawal of American troops President Trump sent to Ukraine days before Russia's third invasion and the absurd Biden-Harris restrictions to this day on Ukraine's use of long range American weapons Congressional Republicans forced them to send. For nearly 3 years, General Hodges laid out clear steps Biden-Harris should do to ensure a Ukrainian victory like stating a Ukrainian victory is America's policy. Nothing so dangerously undermines Americans' confidence in elections than Hillary Clinton's repeated lies to this day with help from by multiple media outlets & elected Democrat leaders that Donald Trump stole the election in 2016 through Russian collusion. Fifty one American intel leaders claiming Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation significantly helped Joe Biden get elected. Now weeks before an election, the DOJ violates its own decades long policy of avoiding high profile criminal indictment announcements like Russians inserting money into "right wing media outlets, which General Hodges repeats just weeks before a national election. For years General Hodges discredited himself avoiding criticizing Biden or Harris for their incompetence while disparaging President Trump. Hodges repeats the same dangerous disinformation that Trump is a threat to democracy, a friend of Putin/ dictators and naive about Putin's threat to NATO. Putin could never duplicate the horrendous damage to Americans' confidence in the presidential elections than these collective efforts by so many American government agencies and influential leaders like Ben Hodges amplifying the Russian lies and level of influence on American elections.
    1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. Certainly, give Ukraine everything it needs to defeat Russia and liberate all of Ukraine. I served on LTG Hodges' staff when he commanded the US Army Europe & Seventh Army. I respected his insights and professional then and his candid discussions of wining the war in Ukraine now. Ukraine is in the predicament because President Biden's persistent leadership failure. Four more years of Joe Biden, will only prolong Ukraine's suffering and likely guarantee Ukraine's defeat. The West following Biden's lead trickling just enough financial and military aid to barely keep Ukraine alive. For months, Biden denied Ukraine the critical weapons LTG Hodges says it needs for victory to eventually send some. Truly disheartening to hear a senior US Army General and fellow American Soldier who swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States including the presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a trial of ones peers provide cover for Biden's failures describing former President Trump as a convicted criminal and all but endorsing Biden for President. The fact is, Biden threatened to veto any bill for support to Ukraine that had any Republican requirements for securing America's southern border and restoring order to the immigration process. The Democrat controlled US Senate defeated this week the Republican bill passed by the US House with significant aid for Ukraine and Israel because Republicans dared to include some methods for regaining control of America's southern border. General Hodges should appreciate the risks FBI Director Wray highlighted warning of multiple indications of imminent attacks like those that occurred in Israel on 7 October happening in America because of the open border. If that happens, the loss of aid to Ukraine will be the least of America's, LTG Hodges', and the West's concerns.
    1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. European logic: It's certainly not 20 NATO allies, including Germany & France, failing for the past 10 years to fund NATO's collective defense by the agreed on minimum 2% of GDP casting doubt on NATO allies protecting each other. No! it is the Republican US House of Representatives insisting on any additional aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan includes bipartisan reforms of the asylum process and funds for securing the US southern border! Isn't this debate in Congress the democratic process the EU lectures everyone to respect? I agree new aid is critical for Ukraine's defense, why did President Biden threaten to veto and his Democrat led US Senate defeated the Republican bill with $61 billion for Ukraine the Republican led House passed last December? Why have the Democrats offered a bill two months after the Republican US House bill was passed? It's not Europe's actions for 30 years hollowing out their military forces, their defense budgets and their defense manufacturing capacity that dilutes the effects of the NATO expansion with Sweden's & Finland's admission to NATO that undermine trust in the notion of NATO's collective defense, No, it's President Trumps questioning whether nations meeting their collective commitment to defense spending should defend those who don't care enough about their own defense and the collective defense that does these things. Certainly not EU promising Ukraine 1 million artillery shells and delivering only 200,000 that undermines trust in NATO. Telling, an Austrian Colonel whose country is a non-NATO member, agrees President Trump's words and the ongoing democratic process in the US Congress on future aid calls into questions America's commitment to defend Europe. Austria spent ,77% on its own defense. I'm sure that reassures its fellow EU member states of its commitment to the EU defense. Sweden spent 1.3% of GDP and Sweden 2.3% while America who always spent 6% of its GDP on defense for 75 years.
    1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. Here's the truth: Rare earth minerals are used in the manufacturing of aircraft engines for F-16's, missile guidance systems for ATACMS, HIMARs, Patriot missiles, range finders for M-1 Abrams tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, and night vision goggles. No rare earth minerals, no production of US weapons. Secretary of State Rubio, Joe Biden had frustrations with Zelenskyy. There are newspaper articles out there about how he cursed at him in a phone call because Zelenskyy instead of saying thank you for all your help is immediately out there messaging what we’re not doing or what he’s not getting. Secondly, I was personally very upset because we had a conversation with President Zelenskyy. The US Vice President and I, the three of us and we discussed this issue about the mineral rights. And we explained to them we want to be in a joint venture with you not because we’re trying to steal from your country but because we think that’s actually a security guarantee. If we’re your partner in an important economic endeavor, we get to get paid back some of the money the taxpayers have given, close to $200 billion and we have a vested interest in the security of Ukraine. He said, ‘Sure we want to do this deal. It makes all the sense in the world. The only thing is I need to run it through my legislative process. They have to approve it.’ I read two days later that Zelenskyy is out there saying, ‘I rejected the deal. I told him no way that we’re not doing that.’ That’s not what happened in that meeting. So you get upset by somebody. We’re trying to help these guys.” 21 FEB 2025
    1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. We agree on several points. Allies and Germans imposed restrictions on Germany after WW2. And yet a divided Germany overcoming the devastation of WW2 fielded a 495,000 manned army in the west and a 300,000 manned army in the east and spent over 3% of GDP. Today with the strongest economy in Europe a unified Germany has 183,000 Soldiers. Having used the peace dividends to pursue an aggressive green agenda, higher government pensions and standard of living, Germany produces only 2 tanks a month and only 200,000 artillery shells in its yet constructed new factory. This is the equivalent number of shells Ukraine expended in one month during its counter offensive last summer. Germany agreed on its own to spend 2% on GDP in 2014, but still fails to do so like 19 other NATO allies after 10 years. This is not trying. It's more talk while expecting the American taxpayer to make up the difference after 75 years of always paying 6% of her GDP for defense. T America met her commitments while fight costly wars in support of other allies like the UN mission in Korea and the Gulf War. Imagine any EU country failing to pay its EU taxes or other commitments? Can America trust her European allies to be there in the current conflict with Iran & the Houthi's let alone a conflict with China when it could only deliver 200,000 artillery shells of the 1 million it promised Ukraine? Finland and Sweden are great examples European socialist & environmentally friendly countries did on their own so why can't 28 unified European nations do the same? You are absolutely right the best guarantee of peace is through our collective strength. Like a chain, NATO is only as strong as our weakest link. Right now, there are 20 weak links. Germany, America and the west wisely attempted economic and political engagement with Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Nord Stream 1 is understandable but Nord Stream 2 and other EU business with Russia was reckless. Golda Meir wisely said, "You cannot negotiate peace with someone who has come to kill you." Europe not only negotiated peace but paid the money to Russia build the weapon systems responsible for the death and destruction in Ukraine and threatening Europe. President Trump was right about Nord Stream 1 & 2, 2% of GDP for defense, providing lethal aid & military advisors to Ukraine, and confronting Russia. He is mocked and dismissed today by Europe even more than he was during his Presidency. Ironically, President Trump's words already accomplished in the past year what every President since President Eisenhower failed to accomplish in 60 years-8 more NATO allies paying at least 2% and Europe actually planning to defend herself without America. I would call that a brilliant win, win for America, Europe and NATO. Unfortunate it takes such harsh & threatening language but a win is a win.
    1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. Lots of respect for brilliant Kaja Kallas and yet her typical selective European bias towards the US-if anything is wrong in Europe, blame the US and demand they do more, is showing. For 14 years Europe ignored Russia's threat to Europe after Russia's invasion of Georgia and then Ukraine. Jens Stoltenberg, former NATO Secretary General, "On Ukraine, NATO allies back in 2016 and 2014 after the annexation of Crimea was that we should not provide lethal aid to Ukraine because it would provoke Russia and that was why we did not provide so much lethal aid. It was President Trump decided to start to provide lethal aid and the Javelins. So the first Javelins were provided under the previous Trump administration. I can say Trump can be quite strong on Ukraine." Davos 23 JAN 2025 NATO membership would be cheap for Ukraine like it is for most of Europe not paying 2% of GDP for defense for decades but very expensive for the US consistently paying 4% of GDP while assuming most of the financial burden of defending Ukraine. For decades, the US paid 2/3rds of NATO's annual financial expenses while paying the expense of stationing 100,000 plus American Soldiers in Europe. The US was 1 of 3 NATO allies out of then 28 paying at least 2% of GDP on defense. Ten years after Russia's first invasions of Ukraine in 2014, only 23 of 32 NATO allies met their 2% GDP commitments. At the Munich conference, the German Defense Minister admitted to a DW reporter that Germany could not find 3 billion of the 3.5 billion Euros promised to Ukraine. Democrat President Clinton failed to get the US Senate ratification of the Budapest Memorandum and creating a treaty obligation for the US defense of Ukraine. Democrat Presidents Obama and Biden failed to defend Ukraine after invasions.
    1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. Service is service! Consistently honorable military service is honorable service. Combat zone service as the Department of Defense describes combat zone service is honorable combat zone service. Where were all these "patriotic, Soldier loving libs" when Admiral Jeremy M. “Mike” Boorda, killed himself after accusations as the Secretary of the Navy wore a V for Valor device on awards on his military uniform. "Admiral May Have Been Entitled To Wear ‘V’ Decorations After All Admiral Boorda killed himself after questions were raised about two of his Vietnam-era decorations, may have had a right to wear the combat “V” pins after all, according to a 1965 Navy awards manual and interviews with former military officers. That dislcosure came as the military mourned the loss of Boorda, the Navy’s highest ranking officer, and struggled to understand the reason for his suicide. Boorda, 56, shot himself in the chest at his home in the Washington Navy Yard Thursday shortly after learning a magazine was questioning his right to have worn two tiny bronze pins normally awarded for combat duty. Boorda killed himself after leaving two notes expressing concern that the controversy over the “V” pins would destroy his reputation and damage the Navy. Reporters with a small news service that searched the awards record contended Boorda did not have a right to wear the pins, saying that his citations failed specifically to give him that right. However, the Navy awards manual issued in 1965, in the early years of the Vietnam conflict, appears to vindicate Boorda’s decision to wear the “V” pin on his Navy Commendation Medal. That was one of the two ribbons on which he wore a “V” pin for years until a query was made last year about whether he had earned it. The manual did not list the other decoration, the Navy Achievement Medal, as one for which the combat “V” would be awarded. But former chief of naval operations Elmo R. Zumwalt Jr. said Friday in an interview that he was confident Boorda also could properly wear the pin on that ribbon as well." Washington Post 18 May 1996
    1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. No mention of the democrat party elites and most media's "coup" that overturned 50 million Americans' votes for Joe Biden pushing him out and nominating VP Harris who never earned a single primary vote for president. Hodges has only praise for Tim Walz who when seconds counted as Minneapolis burned took days to supply law enforcement with the promised MN National Guard Soldiers. Disappointing, General Hodges, a senior US Army General Officer, does not explain to American military veterans the catastrophic consequences for Ukraine that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris never state as Hodges repeatedly said for two years that Joe Biden must state that Ukraine's defeat of Russia is America's national policy, lays out the plan to achieve it, and provides Ukraine years ago with all the means necessary to achieve this goal. General Hodges praises Tim Walz lied about his retired rank, serving in a Dept of Defense designated combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan, and claiming to not know his unit was on deployment orders to Iraq (which he publicly acknowledges knowing in 2005 or long before his separation from military service) running for Congress, Governor and now Vice President of the United States. General Hodges certainly omits for political purposes the democrat led US Senate with Joe Biden's approval defeated in December 2023 the Republican, MAGA led US House $61 billion aid package to Ukraine bill within weeks of Speaker Mike Johnson assuming this position. Over the past two years, I only heard General Hodges grudgingly admit once that then President Trump sent Ukraine its first American lethal military aid, Javelin anti-tank weapons. As a US Army senior field grade officer, I always said US military General Officers like General Hodges chasing the next star or political appointment were almost always "stealth" politicians first and military general officers second.
    1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. Even with overwhelming evidence for the past 22 months of Biden's inability or more likely reluctance to do a better job supporting Ukraine, LTG Hodges clings to the notion Biden wants Ukraine to win. Having served under his command in Europe, I respect General Hodges's wisdom and yet his continued "overestimation" of Biden's leadership abilities and support of Ukrainian victory increasingly resemble his admitted overestimations of Russian capabilities during his command. President Trump taps into what a large number of Americans, Republicans & Democrats, knew for decades and a few European academic, military & political leaders are admitting: "Europe has 'systematically demilitarized itself because it didn’t need to spend the money,' thanks to the lack of an apparent threat and U.S. military dominance around the globe, said Anthony King, a professor of war studies at the University of Warwick. 'They have basically gone to sleep.' In the decades since the end of the Cold War, weakened European armies were tolerated by governments across the West because an engaged America, with its vast military muscle, underpinned the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and defense policy in Europe. The U.S. accounted for nearly 70% of NATO’s defense spending last year.  “The (German) armed forces are lacking in everything,” Eva Högl, the parliamentary commissioner for Germany’s armed forces, said earlier this year. The European Union looks unlikely to keep a promise to supply a million desperately needed artillery shells to Kyiv by this spring, achieving only around a third of that so far. North Korea, an impoverished dictatorship with a population of 25 million, has shipped over a million shells to Russia in the same period, according to Western officials and Russian government statements." WSJ 8 DEC 2023 For almost two years, Biden denied Ukraine's requests for critical weapons systems and ammunition stocks necessary for a Ukrainian victory than eventually sending just enough to guarantee a stalemate in the war. Biden ran for president on his track record of getting things done in Congress through bipartisan compromise and yet refuses to lead a coordinated effort to achieve a bipartisan compromise bill both and pass a Ukrainian support bill quickly. Instead, Biden for his own political gain warns of Ukraine's imminent destruction without renewed American financial support. Where are the long range ATACMS that could destroy the Kerch Bridge and critical Russian supply lines? How many tens of thousands of Ukraine casualties could have been avoided if even these ATACMS along with sufficient air defense systems were sent to Ukraine over a year ago? If there is any questioning of waning American support for Ukraine, the buck stops at President Biden's desk and the Senate Democrats willing to play immigration politics with Ukrainian lives.
    1
  1191. 1
  1192. Agreed, it's unhealthy for the individual and society to fan the flames of real or imagined grievances between the sexes. To truly find a better way forward, requires addressing the "elephants in the room"-feminism, 80% of all American divorces, predatory pornography and the widening political divide among American men & women advanced by fairly intelligent if not ethical women as well as men. It reminds me of a story of a happily married husband and wife in their later years riding along in their vehicle with a front bench seat. It had been their practice for the woman to sit as close to her husband while he drove. Years laters, while sitting next to the passenger side door, she asked, "Why he was so far from her?" The husband said, "I never moved." That is not say there are not male actions and inactions contributing to the "battle of the sexes". Decades after many incredible victories for women like the right to vote, increasing access to universities and jobs often "closed" to women and major medical advances for women's health, there is overwhelming evidence of the woman's side becoming angry vitriolic and hate filled toward the majority of men who were often the primary basis for those advances. Too many disgruntled, despised men are repeating the mistake of employing the same sexist anger towards women. I would propose that group is not a majority. The majority of men are limiting or completely withdrawing from any interaction with women as much as possible. When these topics are addressed in the conversation like today, real progress might begin for men, women and society.
    1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217.  @mats8375  Are you an "armchair general" or do you have actual military experience? For context, I am a retired US Army Lieutenant Colonel with 29 years experience. including deploying to Kosovo with the initial American force in 1999. I served from 2013-2017 on the American General's staff overseeing all American' NATO military logistics and the US Army in Europe Commanding General's staff. I know a little bit about the current topics we are discussing. This does not mean I'm right and your points are wrong. I have some credibility and military experience you seem willing to dismiss or ignore by often spouting irrelevant facts. Every American President since President Eisenhower in the 1950's criticized Europe's consistent failure to properly finance and resource their own defense. They were consistently ignored. Poland has recently begun developing its defense capabilities. It still has a long way to go. You can argue the relevance of the 2% of GDP funding all you want. The fact 100% of NATO countries agreed this was critical to do in 2014 speaks more credibly than your dismissal and counter arguments. During his 4 year presidency, President Trump gave Ukraine critical lethal military aid, American military advisors and trainers and initiated changes to Ukrainian laws and military procedures showing dramatic results on the battlefield in Ukraine. After Russia's two invasions and annexation in 2014, the Obama-Biden administration provided insignificant, non-lethal aid and tepid sanctions on Russia. While his intelligence consistently showed him of the imminent third invasion of Ukraine, President Biden's idea of providing critical support was removing American forces and embassy staff while offering President Zelensky a flight out of Ukraine. President Trump's criticism while in office and his comments on the campaign trail now, accomplished more than the 9 previous American presidents did-11 NATO countries meeting their 2% GDP commitment in 2023. That speaks louder to Putin and the American taxpayer than your words.
    1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. Jake Broe, show us one tweet, public statement, comment Kamala Harris made about the war in Ukraine over the past 24 days she became the presumptive democrat party nominee for President of the United States. I'll show you 4 years of then President Trump's support of Ukraine-ie American Soldiers & Javelin anti-tank weapons. Ukraine's success in Kursk demonstrates how incredibly incompetent, fearful, destructive Joe Biden- Kamala Harris administration's and most of western Europe's approach to the war in Ukraine really is. For 2 1/2 years,, they trickle barely enough military aid to Ukraine "avoiding any provocation" of Russia. Every Putin threat of retaliation including the use of nuclear weapons were shown to be empty threats. Even after 2 1/2 years of empty Russian threats and Russia's bombing of a Ukrainian children's hospital, Biden-Harris and the west still trickle just enough aid and place absurd restrictions. Ukraine's highly successful driving Russians out of 50% of the Ukrainian territory it captured as well as the ease with which Ukraine invaded Kursk show this war could already be over with a Ukrainian victory at least a year ago had Joe and Kamala, who Jake Broe foolishly believes are the best American presidents for Ukraine's victory, stated Ukraine's victory is America's goal and provided Ukraine with all the necessary tools to achieve that goal without any restrictions. Do this day, Kamala Harris has made no statements to continue sending aid to Ukraine nor lifting these absurd restrictions.
    1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. ​ @MattyOfPassion  You make valid points. You are now investing like crazy. Like Poland, the Nordic countries are a welcome addition to NATO. Trust is a two way street. The Nordics and you, like most NATO allies, apply these standards rigidly to the US but rarely to themselves. If you find it hard to trust after a "perceived American failure", imagine how most Americans perceive our European allies. For 75 NATO's year existence, America spent 6% of GDP, $1.573 trillion, and additionally covered 70% of NATO's financial expenditures in 2022. Meanwhile, most European countries slashed their defense spending, military forces and defense manufacturing capacity for 30 years. Like 19 of 31 NATO countries, Norway never spent 2% of its GDP even after all NATO allies committed to do so in 2014. While America made up the difference, European governments used that money to fatten government pensions and standards of living which will impossible to undo in the current economic climate. Every American President since President Eisenhower criticized Europe for falling to adequately fund their defense, they were all ignored for more than 60 years. Especially galling like Germany's Nord stream pipelines enriching Russia, Norway sold its top secret submarine base, Olavsvern, near Ramfjord near Norway's border with Russia. It's currently rented by a Russian front company. "Our military and civilian readiness has been badly weakened," says Anne-Margrete Bollmann, a former career military officer and now president of the Norwegian Defence Association. "Facilities have been closed, reserve capabilities have been reduced, readiness plans have been forgotten. Olavsvern is a prime example of a facility that has been lost," It is currently rented by a Russian company. Time will tell if Sweden & Finland become as trustworthy as its Nordic neighbors. The fact is, no matter what America does now Europe will not only trust America to come save them but demand she does so.
    1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. On 29 MAY 2024, the Financial Times quoted leaders saying Nato has 5% of air defenses needed to protect eastern flank. Lack of systems required in case of war lays bare vulnerabilities, according to alliance’s own assessments. One senior Nato diplomat said the ability to defend against missiles and air strikes was “a major part of the plan to defend eastern Europe from invasion”, adding: “And right now, we don’t have that.” As eastern European NATO countries, Ukraine and Israel beg for more American missile defense systems, you repeat Senator Biden's "MAD" argument he used disparaging President Reagan's missile defense initiative (SDI) which produced the highly successful Patriot systems. In a 1986 speech, Senator Joe Biden claimed “' 'Star Wars'' represents a fundamental assault on the concepts, alliances and arms-control agreements that have buttressed American security for several decades, and the president’s (Reagan's) continued adherence to it constitutes one of the most reckless and irresponsible acts in the history of modern statecraft.” Like you, Biden claimed SDI would lead to a renewed arms race. In fact, President Reagan convinced the Russians/ Soviet Union to reduce its nuclear ballistic missile capabilities, ie MAD, after initiating his Strategic Defense Initiative. Typical Biden took credit for the Patriot missile defense for its leading role in preventing 90% of the missiles and drones with conventional warheads that Iran launched at Israel on 13 April 2024.
    1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. Great display of modern, European, liberal whose first reaction to a political opponent is an emotionally based attack of their political opponent's character rather than deal factually with the historical record and substance of President Trump's policies proven right by three years of Biden's domestic and foreign policies. President Trump was vilified but correct as Dr. Fauci, WHO and in some cases the British NHS, as well as the American CDC now admit that the draconian COVID responses prevalent in Europe and adopted by the US health agencies and hospitals were not scientifically based but much like Ms Isabelle Horrocks' based on fear and non-factual claims. As President Trump stated, China produced, leaked and denied the COVID virus responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths. President Trump was right in his peace & nuclear deterrence through strength with N. Korea. Under Biden's weak, appeasement like approach to Russian, Iranian and North Korean aggression and nuclear threats North Korea now openly threatens to use his nuclear weapons against America and the Republic of Korea, Russia's commenced its third invasion of Ukraine, Iran's Hamas proxies committed unspeakable acts against Jewish people not seen since WW2. In her rush to judgement of President Trump, she fails to grasp an impeachment of a President by the U.S. House of Representatives does not prove guilt. The U.S. Senate acquitted President Trump of both impeachment charges. Unlike President Bill Clinton, also impeached and acquitted, who upon leaving office plead guilt to lying under oath and obstruction of justice resulting in a massive fine and disbarment. President Trump was proven right about immigration & border policy with over 14 million illegal border crossings including 302,000 illegal crossings in December of 2023 alone. Biden has now vowed to resume rebuilding the border wall and tightening asylum and immigration policies like President Trumps. President Trump was right about the economic policies that lead to incredibly strong and American economy with the lowest jobless rates for all Americans especially minorities. President Trump was right about confronting Russian aggression in Ukraine sending lethal military aid, American military trainers and pushing for critical political & military reforms in Ukraine. President Trump was right about then VP Biden's active involvement in & benefiting from in Hunter Biden's corruption as a member of the Burisma board in Ukraine. The sheer hypocrisy of the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump for insisting on revealing VP Biden's criminal and treasonous enriching himself and his family through his political office. Ms Horrocks-Taylor, as President FDR famously said, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself!"
    1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1