Comments by "bobby hans" (@user-oc7ll9sv5r) on "Professor Gerdes Explains 🇺🇦 "
channel.
-
192
-
20
-
14
-
8
-
3
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
Former President, (Putin's boy) Mr . Viktor Yanukovych . After he fled to Putin with billions of stolen money the Kremlin-backed politician and his cronies (made away with $40 billion in state Ukrainian assets disappear ) the idea that he remained the legitimate head of the Ukrainian state, and therefore the manner in which he was replaced was automatically illegitimate is based on those facts that Mr. Yanukovych COMMITTED outright theft for state funds and ran off to Russia with it shows 3 things
1. It proves he was and is a Russian puppet ( its funny when Russian falsely cries foul and say zeleniski is a USA puppet)
2. He ran off by his own accord to his master in moscow abandoning his position and therefore also any legitimate claim to the office of being the president ----
3. So this facts is clear evidence there was no coup d'etat
Let’s look at Ukraine’s disgraced former president, the legitimately elected Victor Yanukovych. After Victor Yanukovych he fled to Russia the idea that he remained the legitimate head of state, and therefore the manner in which he was replaced was automatically illegitimate, was commonplace. This line of thinking was heavily promulgated by his new host country for reasons that are self-evident. But was it right, or even logical, to claim this?
The legitimacy of the Yanukovych regime indeed began with a fair election, albeit an election in which the Ukrainian people had no good choices. But could that legitimacy go on unquestioned despite the blatant grand scale theft of state resources? No. Of course it could not.
Common hooligans and thugs were brought to Kyiv by the Yanukovych authorities (first recorded on Nov. 29, 2013 when the Maydan demonstrations was just a few days old) to terrorize the residents of the capital. This acts was completely in contradiction to Article 3 of the constitution that Yanukovych was elected to uphold. It was right to question Yanukovych’s legitimacy after this.
Can the legitimacy of a ruling authority survive past the blatantly illegal adoption of laws designed to end democracy and create a dictatorship? No. Of course it cannot. Yet, this is what the Yanukovych controlled Party of Regions attempted to do on Jan. 16, 2014. Later analysis of images taken in parliament that while 235 MPs were declared to have voted for these “dictatorship” laws, only about half of this number of MPs were actually in the session hall when the vote was taken (by a show of hands – also illegal.)
After such clearly anti-democratic and dishonest actions, can anyone consider that authority to be legitimate? The actions were a breach of Article 5 of Ukraine’s constitution - something that Yanukovych was under oath to protect and uphold. But he failed to keep his word.
There were more violations of the constitution by Yanukovych, its supposed protector.
Article 27 of Ukraine’s constitution says that “Every person shall have the inalienable right to life. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of life.” Yet Yuri Verbitsky, a 42 year old geologist from Lviv, was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by forces belonging to the Yanukovych regime between Jan. 22 and Jan. 25 of 2014.
That Yanukovych had already lost any legitimacy by this point should be beyond question. Later, of course, came the deaths of many more people on Jan. 18 and then Jan. 20, after which Yanukovych fled to Russia, insisting his authority and position were still legitimate. Define legitimate.
The idea that legitimacy carries on from appointment without further question is a complete fallacy. It is something that we should refuse to accept. An elected leader most certainly can lose their legitimacy through illegal and/or unconstitutional, actions. The most recent public attempt at increasing the fog blurring the distinction between legitimately elected and legitimate comes from Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Bottom line, they are not the same, although it is easy to see why Russia’s ruling clan would seek to pretend that they are.
1
-
1
-
Let's see it form this side ; See it from a different angle.
If America was invaded by its neighboring country say Mexico or Canada or Russia that borders Alaska and Russia says for historical reasons (Alaska used to be Russian ) we are taking Alaska becouse it used to be part of Russia so we are taking back ; could you imagine what America would say? will Trump and Vance and the US just let Russia take Alaska in the ints. of world peace !!???
if the rest of the world said that Mexico can just walking in as an aggressor and can take back Texas to New Mexico and all land all the way to Nevada, will US agree to that in the ints. of world peace ?? Will America agree to not be part of any pace talks and be put on the side line and just let European Union or China deal with Putin over Alaska to make peace with Russia for taking Alaska .. becouse Russia has nuclear weapons ?..
The EU goes in and asked Putin for a pace talk to make a deal on how things will be regarding Putin getting Alaska back AND THE EU TELLS the US. you don't get to come to the "pace talks"
I don't think Trump or the American people would agree to "make pace" so why would and should Ukraine agree to their country being carved up and given to Putin. Throughout this last year that's how American thought has been perceived in the West. This so called 'deal' is not a commodity to be bought or sold.
LIKE i have said before ... Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Trump says just give up on wanting your cities, your land back your people , back ; becouse its just a small bitt of landmass anyway that Russia wants so just give it up and we all can have some peace ..
lets get the facts correct here 120,000 km2 of land we are talking about here ..
For the European Union that land mass will be about the same as Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg alltogether..
And for the United Kingdom we are talking about Scotland and all but of England all put together !!
When it comes to how much land that is for America South Carolina, West Virginia will have been lost !!
Why the f. should Ukraine give Russia all that land for what? TO ONLY be invaded some years later when Russia as had a brake and regrouped ,rebuilt its army and fortified positions !!
I SAY RUSSIA GETS TO TAKE LAND AND DEMAND UKRAINE CAN NOT JOIN NATO IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AT ALL !! Nobody wants to be a "buffer country".  NO nation wants to have a little bit of freedom !!!! ; The whole concept is demeaning to an independent nation. NO nation wants to have a little bit of freedom  and self-determination, like some sort of 2nd class country; That is not right, and Russia has no right to demand or bully Ukrainians or Ukraine to accept that Ukraine and its ppl. should become some sort of lap dog on a leash 2nd class country to serve kremlins geopolitical agenda; so Kremlin, Putin and RuZZans can feel better about themselves ..
FACT ; December 1974, Definition of Aggression, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) Article 5:
1. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, may serve as a justification for aggression.
2. A war of aggression is a crime against international peace. Aggression gives rise to international responsibility.
3. No territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful. (*this includes any deals on minerals made under pressure*)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And Russia and Iran is behind all of this Russia is the one supporting Hamas, sending weapons and resources and have done for years Russia does this via Iran, using Iran as a puppet state a this way have possible deniability so Kremlin can send Hamas weapons and funding !!
And ppl. in the west that are pro Putin are infact all indirectly (but to stupid to understand ) supportive of all the western enemies enemies like Syria , Iran , North Korea, Hamas and even the Taliban by supporting Russia as Russia is backing them all up to the teeth !!
Ask yourself this question ; Who benefits from this destabilization right now who ???
You dont fine this strange that all this happened just right after Putin had all those massive meetings in the last months ; Putin in the last months has had personal meetings with all of the leaders of Iran , North Korea , China and even the Taliban and Hams in the last months !!! And now all we all of see that suddenly out of the blue, Hamas has all the resources it needs to go all out war with the strongest country in the middle east Hamas a little bankrupt terror org. can now go an all out attack full scale attack on Israel !!!
Ask yourself HOW IS THE POSSIBLE how did they almost over night get those resources and who benefits from all this uproar and destabilization in the middle east WHO ???
NOT ISREAL NOT IRAN NOT AFGHANISTAN NOT SYRIA NOT THE EU NOT USA NOT UK NOT CHINA NOT EVEN PALESTINE INFACT NO COUNTRY BENEFITS FROM THIS, WITH THE ONE EXCEPTION THERE IS ONE COUNTRY THAT DOES BENEFITS AND ITS RUSSIA; YES RUSSIA BENEFITS FROM THIS AND THEY REALLY BENEFIT FORM IT BIG TIME !!
RuZZia gets to have western media look another way form what RuZZia is doing inside Ukraine!!!!! Russia gets to defect the worlds attention way from the war crimes, genocide , the 10s of thousands of Ukrainian children Russian army has kidnapped in Ukriane !!!
Russia gets the world media to look another way when it comes to the fact the Putin is a wanted man that the ICC International criminal court in The Hague as issued an arrest warrant ,for war crimes and crimes against humanity including but not limited to genocide and for kidnapping of Ukrainian children and forcibly deporting them to Russia !!
Also Russia gets to make US , EU ect ect divert resources and weapons from UKRAINE to Israel; divert military intelligence resources , divert aid ect ect ect ect away from UKRAINE !!!
SO ALL YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS IS WHO BENEFITS AND HOW THEY BENEFIT !! AND YES RUSSIAN AND ONLY RUSSIA BENEFITS HERE BIG TIME !!
1
-
I am not american but if i was i will have been a Reagan republican myself , as far as i can see ppl like Tucker Carlsen is not a pro American he is more a pro Russian the same for the YouTube Dr Turley ...
This is what i think !!!
1. Tucker will end up working for his war-criminal wanted for genocide by the ICC The international criminal court mr Putin; Tucker will for sure be working (like he covertly has been ) for RT NEWS kremlins and Putins controlled media outlet !!
Tucker will be whitewashing genocide done by Russia in Ukriane whitewashing Putin and demonizes Ukraine for all its worth to justifyRussia's illegal invasion and annexation of its smaller neighbor...
Trying to defect you from the facts that there is only one aggressor and one victim here and that aggressor is Russia and the victim is Ukriane !!
Give it time and the slot will be back not a prob. Carlson will be forgotten like Bill O Reilly before him , yes its down now becouse the shiny baby rattle toy was taken away and the child is upset , but when the next big shine toy popes up the populace baby will forget all about it and move on with it
2, Turley knows LEAVESÂ OUTÂ facts that don't fit with his narrative and him pushing a rooting for the Kremlin / Russian Orthodox Church agenda !!
You need to understand that so called Dr, Turlry is himself a Russian Orthodox Church flower and Russian Orthodox believer and that is why he is shilling , praises Putin and Russia for pure Russian Orthodox believer religions reasons of self-interest, personal and loyalty to the Russian Orthodox Church and there expansionary agenda ..
You must also take into amount that the Kiyv Pechersk Lavra Church is in Ukriane and that the Russian Orthodox Church wants this historical monuments, within there control something they never will have if Ukriane is not under Kremlin hegemony control so that is also a factor to take into the equation .. (this is why the church help putin and much of putins political base is there )
The Kiyv Pechersk Lavra Church been a preeminent center of Eastern Orthodox Christianity in Eastern Europe since the 1051. Together with the Saint Sophia Cathedral, (also in Kyiv ) it is inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
The religious sites of Kyiv are the equivalent for Orthodox faith believers as the Vatican is for catholics and if those are under control of the Russian Orthodox Church it gives the Russian Orthodox Church and the leaders more power base, legitimacy and therefor also more control and authority over Orthodox faithful and believers ( and also the kremlin legitimacy) as all is hanging together;
And that is WHY OUR FAITHFUL GOOD OTHTERDOX BELIEVER MR TURLY pushing the kremlin agenda and demonizes Ukraine it is highly disingenuous and in-fact unholily and immoral and in the case of The so called good Dr. Mr Turley also hypocritical as he preaches that ppl. should not be countered by other bigger powers and nationalism and self-governance and holding own culture values and believes is the way to go but not so much for UKRIANE
1
-
1
-
1
-
GIVING A SURRENDER IS NOT A PEACE DEAL ITS A SHAKE DOWN !!!! Anyone can make a peace deal when they surrender, which is what Trump is asking Ukraine to do. Trump and his admin appear to be Putin's lifeline.
Trump is trying to force Ukraine into a capitulation a total surrender ; masquerading as a" PEACE DEAL " its not a peace deal when only one side must give up everything and the other side gets everything it wants ; and it defiantly not a peace deal when one side must give a 3rd party 50% of its natural resources and get nothing in return !!
This a MAFIA tactic it is putting a gun to someones head and telling them take this deal now; becouse either your brains or your signature will be on the document your choice !
ITS A SHAKE DOWN NOT A PEACE DEAL !!
TRUMP HAS :
- undermining democracy in the US by dismantling the division of forces (lawmaking, judiciary and executive). The core of any democracy. Clearly only benefits Russia
- tariffs hurt everybody (also US) but NOT Russia.
- creating international instability with his talks on Greenland, Canada and Panama. Typical Russian doctrine. If they fight amongst each-other, they don't focus on Russia. You just need to give them something to fight about. THIS ONLY BENEFITS RUSSIA
- his wife Melania was born and raised in communist Yugoslavia. Is she his agent handler??
Its obvious what happened. A US president tried to shake down a foreign leader for mineral rights in Ukraine. The USA has abandoned its leadership role in the world and is now just for sale.
The Republicans have lost their minds and perhaps their souls. Siding with Russia and trying to force Ukraine to accept an unjust "peace" without any security guarantees, other than you give us 50% of your natural resources rare metals your lithium, cobalt, scandium, graphite, tantalum, and niobium in Ukraine and Putin will never attack you because our companies are inside your country !!!!
WOW its was that easy all a long to scare off Putin just send American companies into Ukraine!! LOL ..... That the guarantee thats what they are now telling Zelenskyy this is what Trump and Vance are trying to sell Zelenskyy this is what they say is a security ;
WOW thats fantastic then why did the US. need to send all those weapons in the first place should have just sent in Microsoft, Ford motor company , Heinz Tomato Ketchup , Coca Cola , Mac Donalds. together with some big boys like Conoco Philips, Hecla Mining, Chevron and Goldman Sachs and last but not least The Walt Disney Company!! I hear Mickey Mouse big ears really scares Putin to death -- THEY TRYING TO PLAY UKRAINE AND FOR FOOLS SO WHO IS BEING DISRESPECTFUL HERE !!
ON A SIDE NOTE ; Following the September 11 attacks in 2001, several countries began military operations against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in Afghanistan.
UKRAINE WAS ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES Ukraine was with the US. for 11 years side by side back to back with US forces !!!!
Ukraine allowed use of its airspace and airbases to the US and its allies, but only for cargo flights. Ukraine was a participant in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and deployed troops as part of NATO's ISAF mission to the country. It contributed medical personnel supporting Provincial Reconstruction Teams, and provided instructors for NATO's Training Mission. After ISAF's mission ended in 2014, Ukraine supported the follow-on Resolute Support Mission (2015-2021) that trained, advised and assisted Afghan security forces
1
-
1
-
1
-
So the question is Mr Trump wants to Stop The War or Stop Ukraine from resisting Russia's aggression and attack? And Donald Trump says nothing about how he will stop Russia.
That is, the rapist is justified and the victim of aggression is guilty. Everything is turned upside down..
GIVING A SURRENDER IS NOT A PEACE DEAL ITS A SHAKE DOWN !!!! Anyone can make a peace deal when they surrender, which is what Trump is asking Ukraine to do. Trump and his admin appear to be Putin's lifeline.
Trump is trying to force Ukraine into a capitulation a total surrender ; masquerading as a" PEACE DEAL " its not a peace deal when only one side must give up everything and the other side gets everything it wants ; and it defiantly not a peace deal when one side must give a 3rd party 50% of its natural resources and get nothing in return !!
This a MAFIA tactic it is putting a gun to someones head and telling them take this deal now; becouse either your brains or your signature will be on the document your choice !
ITS A SHAKE DOWN NOT A PEACE DEAL !!
TRUMP HAS :
- undermining democracy in the US by dismantling the division of forces (lawmaking, judiciary and executive). The core of any democracy. Clearly only benefits Russia
- tariffs hurt everybody (also US) but NOT Russia.
- creating international instability with his talks on Greenland, Canada and Panama. Typical Russian doctrine. If they fight amongst each-other, they don't focus on Russia. You just need to give them something to fight about. THIS ONLY BENEFITS RUSSIA
- his wife Melania was born and raised in communist Yugoslavia. Is she his agent handler??
Its obvious what happened. A US president tried to shake down a foreign leader for mineral rights in Ukraine. The USA has abandoned its leadership role in the world and is now just for sale.
The Republicans have lost their minds and perhaps their souls. Siding with Russia and trying to force Ukraine to accept an unjust "peace" without any security guarantees, other than you give us 50% of your natural resources rare metals your lithium, cobalt, scandium, graphite, tantalum, and niobium in Ukraine and Putin will never attack you because our companies are inside your country !!!!
WOW its was that easy all a long to scare off Putin just send American companies into Ukraine!! LOL ..... That the guarantee thats what they are now telling Zelenskyy this is what Trump and Vance are trying to sell Zelenskyy this is what they say is a security ;
WOW thats fantastic then why did the US. need to send all those weapons in the first place should have just sent in Microsoft, Ford motor company , Heinz Tomato Ketchup , Coca Cola , Mac Donalds. together with some big boys like Conoco Philips, Hecla Mining, Chevron and Goldman Sachs and last but not least The Walt Disney Company!! I hear Mickey Mouse big ears really scares Putin to death -- THEY TRYING TO PLAY UKRAINE AND FOR FOOLS SO WHO IS BEING DISRESPECTFUL HERE !!
ON A SIDE NOTE ; Following the September 11 attacks in 2001, several countries began military operations against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in Afghanistan.
UKRAINE WAS ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES Ukraine was with the US. for 11 years side by side back to back with US forces !!!!
Ukraine allowed use of its airspace and airbases to the US and its allies, but only for cargo flights. Ukraine was a participant in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and deployed troops as part of NATO's ISAF mission to the country. It contributed medical personnel supporting Provincial Reconstruction Teams, and provided instructors for NATO's Training Mission. After ISAF's mission ended in 2014, Ukraine supported the follow-on Resolute Support Mission (2015-2021) that trained, advised and assisted Afghan security forces
In order to make peace he has to give up his country's most resourceful land.
He's a proud Ukrainian, who is tired of his people being pushed around by the Russians. Now the U.S. is trying to get their hands on the minerals.
JD Vance talks about Zelensky being disrespectful and then points his finger and raises his voice TAKING talking down to Zelensky like he was som sort of child talking this way at a President of a sovereign state who is a visitor in the White House; coming to give 50% of his county natural resources and a deal that is more like a shake down than anything else after VANCE AND TRUNP has call him a dictator and never said any bad word other the praise for Putin .
I did not see Zelenskyy raising his voice. I did not see any arrogance. I saw him attempting to explain that a cease fire without guarantees would not work. He could not get a word in. The tirade of obscene fury from Trump and Vance left no room for a discussion of the issues. Trump, of course, continued lying.
I think when the USA have secret talks with Russia, then propose a deal that gives Russia land and The USA mineral wealth and potentially removes Zelenskyy i from office (allowing Russian puppet government or weak government) with no security guarantees offered other than Putin supposedly respecting Trump, especially when he knows that that Putin is a proven liar that breaks treaties at will, when his host in the oval office has called him a dictator and accused him of starting the war....... l think that that's gonna make Zelenskyy in a bad mood from the start.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1