Comments by "bobby hans" (@user-oc7ll9sv5r) on "Jake Broe: Why a Trump Presidency Will Never Threaten Ukraine" video.
-
RUSSIA AND GERMANY STARTING WW2 AND UNDER WW2
Poland (1939 Invasion of Poland and Bessarabia invasion of Poland together with Germany
(World War II)
Invasion and occupation Baltic states (1940–1991)
invasion and occupation Finnish territories (1940)
Invasion and occupation Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina (1940)
Invasion and occupation Northern Iran 1941–1946
Invasion and occupation Hungary (1944)
invasion and occupation Romania (1944)
Invasion and occupation Bulgaria (1944)
Invasion and occupation Czechoslovakia (1944)
Invasion and occupation Northern Norway 1944–1946 / Bornholm 1945–1946
### OCCUPATION AFTER WW2 Occupation after ww2
Invasion and occupation Germany (1945)
Invasion and occupation Austria 1945–1955
Invasion and occupation Manchuria 1945–1946
Invasion and occupation Korea 1945–1948
Invasion and occupation Czechoslovakia (1968–1989)
Invasion and occupation Afghanistan 1979–1989
AND ONE CAN ALSO SAY THAT Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia and other was also under occupation a political occupation and hegemony control by Moscow puppets that was holding those nation's inside Moscow’s hegemony control and dominance...
### RUSSIA WORLD EVIL DOMINATION TOUR
TODAYS RUSSIA !
1992 invasion and occupation Moldovan (Transnistria War)
1994 invasion and occupation Nagorno Karabakh
1994 First Chechen War
1999 Second Chechen War
2000 Second Chechen War part 2
2008 invasion and occupation Georgia
2014 invasion, occupation and annexation of CRIMEA
2015 invasion and occupation East Ukraine
Russians that support Putin historical glory version of facts are nothing but stupid an have not historical knowledge
Soviet's Crimes Against Humanity
RUSSIAN PROXY WARS
###
In many cases, involvement was in the form of military advisors as well as the sale or provision of weapons. addition to explicit wars, the Soviet military took part in a number of internal conflicts in various countries as a means of advancing their strategic interests.
1936-39 Spain
1933-34, 1937-39 Republic of China
1939 Mongolia
1945-49, 1950-53 People's Republic of China
1950-53 North Korea
1961-74 North Vietnam
1962-64 Algeria
1962-63, 1967-75 Egypt
1962-63, 1969-76 Yemen
1967, 1970, 1972-73, 1982 Syria
1975-79 Angola
1967-69, 1975-79 Mozambique
1977-79 Ethiopia
1960-70 Laos
1980-91 Iraq
1982 Lebanon
2011 Syria still ongoing ….
2014 Crimea
2014 East Ukraine
2022 All of Ukraine
This Is What A Russian Invasion Of Ukraine Could Look Like
3
-
AND ITS NOT CORRECT AT ALL ITS MYTH AND SUCH A MYTH THAT EVEN SOME AMERICANS BELIEVE IN THIS MYTH AS WELL !!
BEFORE SOMEONE STARTS SAYING USA AND NATO ILLEGALLY INVADES OTHERS BLA BLA BLA IS WRONG SOME WARS ARE LEGAL SOME ARE NOT ...LET ME TELL YOU THIS !!
1. Iraqi invaded Kuwait (first Iraq war ) and US responded with a UN secretary council mandate !! Members of Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, (that both Russia and China are members of and both have veto rights in the UN Security Council ) agree at the time that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm.
2. Afghanistan was harboring al-Qaede, and was asked to give up Bin Landen the refused and became a party in the 9/11 attacks ... so USA was attacked and it responded with a UN mandate
3. Libya was NOT USA it was in fact a UN security counsel section mission by the UN.. They asked NATO to help ... The NATO-led operation was launched under the authority of two UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR), 1970 and 1973, both quoting Chapter VII of the UN Charter, and neither of which was opposed by Russia.
4. In 2003 invasion of Iraq (2nd Iraq war )!! Everyone believed Saddam when he said he had weapons and why not believe he had only some years before in the IRAN /IRAQ war used such weapons so there was not reason to not to believe him and he was offered several time to prove he did not have and let the UN weapons inspectors in to confirm or disconfirm if he had those weapons that everyone believed he had and he refused to let in the UN weapons inspectors (by the way how was french not American ) and the UN Security Council that Russia and CHINA are members of and has veto vote in (so they can use veto vote to block anything they want )did not have any problem in the United Nations Security Council and US demanding Saddam follow the restriction and demands that was imposed by the United Nations Security Council at they time !! Because everyone's own intelligence agency (not just the US ) even Russia and china was convinced Sadam did in-fact have WMDs
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a United Nations Security Council resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolutions 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, and 1284).[1] It provided a justification for what was subsequently termed the US invasion of Iraq !!!
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
IF RUSSIA DID NOT PLAY BALL ON THE LYBIA ISSUE AND RUSSIA DID NOT WANT THE UN TO ASK NATO TO TAKE OUT LYBIA WHY DID RUSSIA NOT USE ITS VETO RIGHT IN THE UN AND STOP ANY ACTION ????
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq war as Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
I Can go on and on but you get the point !!
RUSSIASINVASION OF UKRAINE in 2014 VIOLATEDINTERNATIONAL LAW:
1. The Geneva Convention.
2. Charter of the United Nations
3. The Helsinki Accords
4. The Charter of the OSCE
5. Budapest Memorandum of 1994
6. Two Russia, Ukraine friendship treaties
7. International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination
8. European Court of Human Rights
there was not any Observers in Crimea from OSCE and UN in this so called referendum
And yes I would vote Yes in a referendum too if I had 20,000 Russian soldiers pointing their weapons at me when I was standing at the votingbox.
When RuSSia actually get another country (besides North Korea and a couple of other basket-cases) to support the claim of ownership of Crimea, I hope Putin will let us know, In the meantime, Putin can and will do what the Kremlin like there, but it will always belong to Ukraine and in the end it will go back to Ukraine
TODAYS RUSSIA ! ALL DONE WITH OUT ANY LEGAL STANDING WITHOUT ANY UN MADATE !!
1992 invasion and occupation Moldovan (Transnistria War)
1994 invasion and occupation Nagorno Karabakh
1994 First Chechen War
1999 Second Chechen War
2000 Second Chechen War part 2
2008 invasion and occupation Georgia
2014 invasion, occupation and annexation of CRIMEA
2015 invasion and occupation East Ukraine
2022 Kazakhstan
2022 All of UKRINE ???
1
-
Did Bush Lie About Iraq? | 5 Minute Video NO HE DID NOT !!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgQw8EhPJWw
Members of Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, (that both Russia and China are members of and both have veto rights in the UN Security Council ) agree at the time that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm.
Following the adoption of Security Council Resolution 1483 two months after the war, then-UN Secretary General Kofi Annan appointed a Special Representative for Iraq and the UN assumed some small responsibilities there.
In August 2003, an attack on UN headquarters in Baghdad confirmed the critics' fears, killing fifteen UN staff including the Special Representative. The UN in February 2004, the UN agreed to send a mission to the country, to help construct a new interim government..
US and UK officials have argued that existing UN Security Council resolutions related to the 1991 Gulf War and the subsequent ceasefire (660, 678), and to later inspections of Iraqi weapons programs (1441), had already authorized the invasion,,
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and 67 and 1441 made the iraq war legal !!
United Nations Security Council Resolution 660,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_660
United Nations Security Council Resolution 678
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_678
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1441
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1483
1
-
AND ITS NOT CORRECT AT ALL ITS MYTH AND SUCH A MYTH THAT EVEN SOME AMERICANS BELIEVE IN THIS MYTH AS WELL !!
BEFORE SOMEONE STARTS SAYING USA AND NATO ILLEGALLY INVADES OTHERS BLA BLA BLA IS WRONG SOME WARS ARE LEGAL SOME ARE NOT ...LET ME TELL YOU THIS !!
1. Iraqi invaded Kuwait (first Iraq war ) and US responded with a UN secretary council mandate !! Members of Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, (that both Russia and China are members of and both have veto rights in the UN Security Council ) agree at the time that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm.
2. Afghanistan was harboring al-Qaede, and was asked to give up Bin Landen the refused and became a party in the 9/11 attacks ... so USA was attacked and it responded with a UN mandate
3. Libya was NOT USA it was in fact a UN security counsel section mission by the UN.. They asked NATO to help ... The NATO-led operation was launched under the authority of two UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR), 1970 and 1973, both quoting Chapter VII of the UN Charter, and neither of which was opposed by Russia.
4. In 2003 invasion of Iraq (2nd Iraq war )!! Everyone believed Saddam when he said he had weapons and why not believe he had only some years before in the IRAN /IRAQ war used such weapons so there was not reason to not to believe him and he was offered several time to prove he did not have and let the UN weapons inspectors in to confirm or disconfirm if he had those weapons that everyone believed he had and he refused to let in the UN weapons inspectors (by the way how was french not American ) and the UN Security Council that Russia and CHINA are members of and has veto vote in (so they can use veto vote to block anything they want )did not have any problem in the United Nations Security Council and US demanding Saddam follow the restriction and demands that was imposed by the United Nations Security Council at they time !! Because everyone's own intelligence agency (not just the US ) even Russia and china was convinced Sadam did in-fact have WMDs
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a United Nations Security Council resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolutions 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, and 1284).[1] It provided a justification for what was subsequently termed the US invasion of Iraq !!!
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
IF RUSSIA DID NOT PLAY BALL ON THE LYBIA ISSUE AND RUSSIA DID NOT WANT THE UN TO ASK NATO TO TAKE OUT LYBIA WHY DID RUSSIA NOT USE ITS VETO RIGHT IN THE UN AND STOP ANY ACTION ????
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq war as Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
I Can go on and on but you get the point !!
RUSSIASINVASION OF UKRAINE in 2014 VIOLATEDINTERNATIONAL LAW:
1. The Geneva Convention.
2. Charter of the United Nations
3. The Helsinki Accords
4. The Charter of the OSCE
5. Budapest Memorandum of 1994
6. Two Russia, Ukraine friendship treaties
7. International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination
8. European Court of Human Rights
there was not any Observers in Crimea from OSCE and UN in this so called referendum
And yes I would vote Yes in a referendum too if I had 20,000 Russian soldiers pointing their weapons at me when I was standing at the votingbox.
When RuSSia actually get another country (besides North Korea and a couple of other basket-cases) to support the claim of ownership of Crimea, I hope Putin will let us know, In the meantime, Putin can and will do what the Kremlin like there, but it will always belong to Ukraine and in the end it will go back to Ukraine
TODAYS RUSSIA ! ALL DONE WITH OUT ANY LEGAL STANDING WITHOUT ANY UN MADATE !!
1992 invasion and occupation Moldovan (Transnistria War)
1994 invasion and occupation Nagorno Karabakh
1994 First Chechen War
1999 Second Chechen War
2000 Second Chechen War part 2
2008 invasion and occupation Georgia
2014 invasion, occupation and annexation of CRIMEA
2015 invasion and occupation East Ukraine
2022 Kazakhstan
2022 All of UKRINE ???
1
-
VIETNAM.. Vietnam war Was not started by the USA it was a proxy war started by the USSR and China to export communism and the French was in Vietnam first fighting a war know as Indochina War of the The Vietnam War (Vietnamese: Chiến tranh Việt Nam), also known as the Second Indochina War 1946, leaving Vietnam in the hands of the French. Soon thereafter, the Viet Minh began a guerrilla war against the French Union forces, beginning the First Indochina War. The Viet Minh fight was hampered by a lack of weapons; this situation changed by 1949 when the Chinese Communists had largely won the Chinese Civil War and were free to provide arms to their Vietnamese allies In January 1950, the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union recognized the Viet Minh's Democratic Republic of Vietnam, based in Hanoi, as the legitimate government of Vietnam. The following month the United States and Great Britain recognized the French-backed State of Vietnam in Saigon, led by former Emperor Bảo Đại, as the legitimate Vietnamese government. : Geneva Conference (1954) Vietnam was temporarily partitioned at the 17th parallel, and under the terms of the Geneva Accords, civilians were to be given the opportunity to move freely between the two provisional states In December 1960, the National Liberation Front (NLF, a.k.a. the Viet Cong) was formally created with the intent of uniting all anti-GVN activists, including non-communists. This was what happened the Chinese and Soviet government started this proxy war to export communism the west and USA reacted on the request for help from the Vietnam government at the time,,,
Did the United States win or lose the Vietnam War? We are taught that it was a resounding loss for America, one that proves that intervening in the affairs of other nations is usually misguided. The truth is that our military won the war, but our politicians lost it. The Communists in North Vietnam actually signed a peace treaty, effectively surrendering. But the U.S. Congress didn't hold up its end of the bargain. In just five minutes, learn the truth about who really lost the Vietnam War. The Truth about the Vietnam War https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hqYGHZCJwk
1
-
YOU NEED TO RED SOM FACT ... Vietnam war Was not started by the USA it was a proxy war started by the USSR and China to export communism and the French was in Vietnam first fighting a war know as Indochina War of the The Vietnam War (Vietnamese: Chiến tranh Việt Nam), also known as the Second Indochina War 1946, leaving Vietnam in the hands of the French. Soon thereafter, the Viet Minh began a guerrilla war against the French Union forces, beginning the First Indochina War. The Viet Minh fight was hampered by a lack of weapons; this situation changed by 1949 when the Chinese Communists had largely won the Chinese Civil War and were free to provide arms to their Vietnamese allies In January 1950, the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union recognized the Viet Minh's Democratic Republic of Vietnam, based in Hanoi, as the legitimate government of Vietnam. The following month the United States and Great Britain recognized the French-backed State of Vietnam in Saigon, led by former Emperor Bảo Đại, as the legitimate Vietnamese government. : Geneva Conference (1954) Vietnam was temporarily partitioned at the 17th parallel, and under the terms of the Geneva Accords, civilians were to be given the opportunity to move freely between the two provisional states In December 1960, the National Liberation Front (NLF, a.k.a. the Viet Cong) was formally created with the intent of uniting all anti-GVN activists, including non-communists. This was what happened the Chinese and Soviet government started this proxy war to export communism the west and USA reacted on the request for help from the Vietnam government at the time,
1
-
THE JIHADIST IN AFGHANISTAN WAS INFACT THE SOVIETS FAULT THEY CREATED THIS REACTION BY INVADING AFGHANISTAN BACK IN THE DAY
ISIS CAME OUT OF AL QAEDA
ISIS was founded by Abu Musab Al Zarqawi who originally was a member of Al Qaeda and one of the top guys !!! ... The split came due to power struggles within the Al Qaeda org.
After the death of (terrorist) Osama bin Laden and his protege Ayman al-Zawahiri (terrorist)'s and his accomplice in carrying out bad deeds, Al Zarqawi started ISIS... Al Zarqawi sees at the time this fight as a continuance of the Afghan war that he and his old buddy Bin Ladin had with Russia in the mind of Al Zarqawi anyone that is an infidel and from the west (what he sees as the west any christian nation ) is the enemy of islam !!! and that is why ISIS sees all of the world as an Islamic state this is their end goal !
The Russians USSR started this problems where muslims from all over the world went to a jihad by invading Afghanistan, the against the infidel was going on long before US, force even was able to point out on a map where the f...Afghanistan even was.. If Russia did not try and take over Afghanistan to export Kremlin domains over the country then this situation we have today with jihadist will most likely never developed in the way it has .
NEXT YOU WILL ASK WHO GAVE mujahideen STINGER MISSILES !!!!!
YES...back in the day it was the US that gave the mujahideen STINGER MISSILES.... but they did not start the war in AFGHANISTAN BACK IN THE DAY it was the USSR in 1979 that did that and that hornists nest and made that snow ball rolling, that was Russia controlled USSR that started it all by themselves ...
The Russians started this problems by invading Afghanistan 1979 and the US and the west responded by giving the stinger rockets to help the peoples freedom fighters of Afghanistan fight back the Russian invaders, the west and the US was helping defenseless people from what the USSR was doing with Russians helicopter gunships, they RuSSians was killing civilians and children in a scale that even STALIN will have be disgusted with a massive onslaught of killing of civilians So the fact the USA give the Afghani peoples freedom fighters some small help to help fight the evil, Russian control USSR is a good thing..
And lets get some facts correct the Taliban my friend was never in good with the white house and the oval office in the 80's, or with Reagan back in the day or anyone else in the west; as the Taliban did not see the light of day before after the war was over when the USSR pulled out then and only then did what we know today as the Taliban see its creation and was formed; WHEN THE USSR had pulled out of Afghanistan they left the country in a power vacuum with warlords all over the place they stated to form their own militant groups one of them was the Taliban among others and infighting between all the dif. groups started and after a lot in revelry the Taliban ended up as one of the dominate militant groups ...
The people that was in good the with Ronald W.Reagan White House, was the mujahideen (not to be confused with the Taliban ) the mujahideen that is who the US. was helping fight the evil of Russian USSR in the 80' the ppl. that was good in with Reagan was the leaders of the mujahideen fighters and the mujahideen fighters ended up later as the North United Front, The United Front was formed in late 1996 against the Taliban government by opposition factions of the old mujahideen fighters.
But after the USA invaded Afghanistan The North Front became part of the North Alliance (The Afghan Northern Alliance officially known as the United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan they became part of the Afghani ppl. that was fighting the Taliban and extreme jihadist in Afghanistan ) and they was hard core enemies of the Taliban. The Taliban was formed by some brake aways groups of the mujahideen and other groups as well that is true; but they was never the mujahideen as such and not a fare from the mujahideen we had as allies fighting the Russians back in the day YOU NEED TO GET YOUR FACTS CORRECT...
1
-
1
-
IRAQ Why did America invade Iraq in 2003? Was it for oil? Or was it because Saddam Hussein was a mass-murdering dictator who harbored terrorists and threatened the region with Weapons of Mass Destruction?
If it was the former, wouldn't it have been a lot easier to just buy Iraq's oil on the open market?
And if it was the latter, why did Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and John Kerry support President Bush?
Noted British historian, Andrew Roberts, has the answers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2tbpUqNwRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgQw8EhPJWw
Members of Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, (that both Russia and China are members of and both have veto rights in the UN Security Council ) agree at the time that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm.
Following the adoption of Security Council Resolution 1483 two months after the war, then-UN Secretary General Kofi Annan appointed a Special Representative for Iraq and the UN assumed some small responsibilities there.
In August 2003, an attack on UN headquarters in Baghdad confirmed the critics' fears, killing fifteen UN staff including the Special Representative. The UN in February 2004, the UN agreed to send a mission to the country, to help construct a new interim government..
US and UK officials have argued that existing UN Security Council resolutions related to the 1991 Gulf War and the subsequent ceasefire (660, 678), and to later inspections of Iraqi weapons programs (1441), had already authorized the invasion,,
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and 67 and 1441 made the iraq war legal !!
United Nations Security Council Resolution 660,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_660
United Nations Security Council Resolution 678
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_678
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1441
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1483
5. LIBYA Claim: NATO's operation over Libya was illegitimate
The NATO-led operation was launched under the authority of two UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR), 1970 and 1973, both quoting Chapter VII of the UN Charter, and neither of which was opposed by Russia.
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1970(2011)
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1973(2011)
UNSCR 1973 authorized the international community "to take all necessary measures" to "protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack". This is what NATO did, with the political and military support of regional states and members of the Arab League.
After the conflict, NATO cooperated with the UN International Commission of Inquiry on Libya, which found no breach of UNSCR 1973 or international law, concluding instead that "NATO conducted a highly precise campaign with a demonstrable determination to avoid civilian casualties."
1
-
BEFORE SOMEONE STARTS SAYING USA AND NATO ILLEGALLY INVADES OTHERS BLA BLA BLA IS WRONG SOME WARS ARE LEGAL SOME ARE NOT ...LET ME TELL YOU THIS !!
1. Iraqi invaded Kuwait (first Iraq war ) and US responded with a UN secretary council mandate !! Members of Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, (that both Russia and China are members of and both have veto rights in the UN Security Council ) agree at the time that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm.
2. Afghanistan was harboring al-Qaede, and was asked to give up Bin Landen the refused and became a party in the 9/11 attacks ... so USA was attacked and it responded with a UN mandate
3. Libya was NOT USA it was in fact a UN security counsel section mission by the UN.. They asked NATO to help ... The NATO-led operation was launched under the authority of two UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR), 1970 and 1973, both quoting Chapter VII of the UN Charter, and neither of which was opposed by Russia.
4. In 2003 invasion of Iraq (2nd Iraq war )!! Everyone believed Saddam when he said he had weapons and why not believe he had only some years before in the IRAN /IRAQ war used such weapons so there was not reason to not to believe him and he was offered several time to prove he did not have and let the UN weapons inspectors in to confirm or disconfirm if he had those weapons that everyone believed he had and he refused to let in the UN weapons inspectors (by the way how was french not American ) and the UN Security Council that Russia and CHINA are members of and has veto vote in (so they can use veto vote to block anything they want )did not have any problem in the United Nations Security Council and US demanding Saddam follow the restriction and demands that was imposed by the United Nations Security Council at they time !! Because everyone's own intelligence agency (not just the US ) even Russia and china was convinced Sadam did in-fact have WMDs
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a United Nations Security Council resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolutions 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, and 1284).[1] It provided a justification for what was subsequently termed the US invasion of Iraq !!!
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
IF RUSSIA DID NOT PLAY BALL ON THE LYBIA ISSUE AND RUSSIA DID NOT WANT THE UN TO ASK NATO TO TAKE OUT LYBIA WHY DID RUSSIA NOT USE ITS VETO RIGHT IN THE UN AND STOP ANY ACTION ????
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq war as Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
I Can go on and on but you get the point !!
RUSSIASINVASION OF UKRAINE in 2014 VIOLATEDINTERNATIONAL LAW:
1. The Geneva Convention.
2. Charter of the United Nations
3. The Helsinki Accords
4. The Charter of the OSCE
5. Budapest Memorandum of 1994
6. Two Russia, Ukraine friendship treaties
7. International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination
8. European Court of Human Rights
there was not any Observers in Crimea from OSCE and UN in this so called referendum
And yes I would vote Yes in a referendum too if I had 20,000 Russian soldiers pointing their weapons at me when I was standing at the votingbox.
When RuSSia actually get another country (besides North Korea and a couple of other basket-cases) to support the claim of ownership of Crimea, I hope Putin will let us know, In the meantime, Putin can and will do what the Kremlin like there, but it will always belong to Ukraine and in the end it will go back to Ukraine
TODAYS RUSSIA ! ALL DONE WITH OUT ANY LEGAL STANDING WITHOUT ANY UN MADATE !!
1992 invasion and occupation Moldovan (Transnistria War)
1994 invasion and occupation Nagorno Karabakh
1994 First Chechen War
1999 Second Chechen War
2000 Second Chechen War part 2
2008 invasion and occupation Georgia
2014 invasion, occupation and annexation of CRIMEA
2015 invasion and occupation East Ukraine
2022 Kazakhstan
2022 All of UKRINE ???
1
-
1
-
1