Comments by "The Wayward Grape" (@thewaywardgrape3838) on "TalkTV" channel.

'Ban crossbows' - Why? They don't load and fire themselves. Just like guns - it's the user that makes it dangerous.
80
@Dorr234 It's the user that decides what the target is, just like with guns. They're inherently harmless without a wielder, just like cars.
31
Arresting means diddly squat in the UK. They need to be prosecuted; a life long criminal record will test their beliefs. Edit: Oh and the protestor wasn't kicked in the head or body, his phone was kicked out of his hand. Completely different.
4
All I'll ask: Why does the UK government actively allow it's national citizens to suffer, yet given £Billions away and allow thousands in.
2
@Lou-Lou. You missed the point: Guns aren't inherently dangerous, it's the user that decides the level of danger.
2
@Lou-Lou. Agree. Can't argue with your logic.
2
Imagine making sleeping outdoors and being without a 'fixed address' a crime......
1
@beafboy01 Comparing literal weapons of destruction that are used for the purpose of war. Vs. Cross bow - a hunting tool. 🤡
1
Have they not got jobs to go too ffs.
1
If this does get green lit and put into use, I'll just refuse to pay. Yes it'll cause no end of grief, yet I'm way past my fill for rules that I've not voted on, that are claimed to be for my benefit, yet are also honied lies. There's a point in which you have to say enough! I pay enough into a system that I don't have a say in where my tax goes. I've not voted for Sadiq Khan, I don't live in London and I don't agree with these rules.
1
Peaceful doesn't mean harmless - the protestors don't understand it. Think about the countless hours and revenue lost due to their impediment on the public. Let alone the lives risked/lost.
1