Hearted Youtube comments on MegaLag (@MegaLag) channel.
-
240000
-
220000
-
36000
-
21000
-
21000
-
15000
-
13000
-
11000
-
9900
-
9900
-
9500
-
7500
-
6900
-
5700
-
4900
-
4700
-
4300
-
3900
-
3900
-
3700
-
3200
-
3100
-
3100
-
3000
-
2900
-
2800
-
2700
-
2400
-
2200
-
2100
-
1900
-
1800
-
1800
-
1700
-
1600
-
1500
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1300
-
1300
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
964
-
957
-
951
-
931
-
927
-
876
-
870
-
866
-
845
-
798
-
774
-
719
-
710
-
706
-
703
-
688
-
664
-
659
-
637
-
629
-
617
-
612
-
606
-
601
-
585
-
579
-
571
-
569
-
557
-
550
-
512
-
510
-
493
-
468
-
444
-
415
-
415
-
409
-
393
-
391
-
389
-
382
-
376
-
360
-
343
-
310
-
310
-
307
-
306
-
299
-
287
-
281
-
267
-
263
-
261
-
253
-
253
-
246
-
245
-
242
-
239
-
238
-
237
-
225
-
220
-
215
-
213
-
213
-
209
-
203
-
189
-
186
-
169
-
167
-
166
-
164
-
163
-
159
-
159
-
153
-
149
-
146
-
144
-
142
-
142
-
137
-
132
-
130
-
126
-
122
-
120
-
120
-
118
-
117
-
108
-
108
-
107
-
106
-
104
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
93
-
93
-
84
-
81
-
81
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
74
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
67
-
65
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Excellent work!... thank you for doing this. Scammers preying on the vulnerable make my flesh crawl. 😢
I remember when these "color-blindness-correcting" glasses came out that... at the time I felt so hopeful for those who ARE color blind, but I had trouble believing that, if they did indeed work, ONE pair of glasses was supposed to be the solution for all. I was thinking that if this concept had merit, it should require a very specific diagnosis for the exact colors & intensities seen & not seen by each individual patient, & then there would need to be a very specific prescription with very specific filters, having been configured to each patient's specific defect. I remember thinking it just could not be this simple; that, just as refractive defects required a specific prescription, so should individual experiences of color blindness. I hadn't studied color blindness much, but that seemed to me to be the least of what might be needed.
A huge kindness & a service to humanity you've done here... May God bless you for all this work & your good heart, sir! 😇
["Exposing the Fake Science behind Color Blind Glasses (Part 2)" - via MegaLag]
[11.26.2024]
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Great video, I've watched a lot of Ken's drone videos in the past and they seemed OK, BUT Ken released a video 10 hours ago calling you out for "Deceptive Spin" claiming you are Cyber Bullying him which is clearly rubbish.
As someone who is colourblind but not one of the three main types these glasses have always interested me but I have called them out everywhere I've seen them, the reason people are colourblind is down to an issue with the cones of the eyes not being aligned, because of this full colour blindness is extremely rare, I myself have issues with Blue through to Pink (also rare), the walls in my house are apparently pink, I just see them as creamy orange. The only way a pair of glasses could help multiple types of colour blind people would be to move the spectrum to other colours but that would just move the issue rather than fix it, for the same pair of glasses couldn't fix total colour blindness because there is no spectrum to move the colour too.
It's a bit like loosing your sense of smell and a company coming out and saying "wear our magic mask and you'll be able to smell everything through it", it just wouldn't work.
In fact the only way these glasses would work as advertised is to wire them up with cameras and wire them directly in to the visual cortex and that technology doesn't exist yet.
I posted the following, hopefully he'll listen:
I have the same type of colour blindness, hell apparently my living room is pink (I still don't see it), the problem is that the way that colour-blindness works is that the cones in the eyes are damaged or malformed and that stops us seeing certain mixes of colours, a pair of glasses could mitigate this by shifting the whole spectrum over but all you are doing when that happens is making every colour slightly wrong and yes I may be able to tell that pink and purple are "Different" if the spectrum of light was shifted but that same shift would make all colours wrong and would move my non visible range to a different colour, I may end up not seeing green with them on, it's not a fix, it's actually breaking all colours to mitigate not seeing one of them.
If I wear glasses that only let in the colour yellow then I could probably tell that two colours that I can't see are different shades... But they would all still be yellow.
As for black and white colour-blindness no glasses on the planet could fix that issue because even shifting the colours they would all still be shades of grey.
I don't mean to have to call you out but the way the eyes work and the way that colour blindness affects us means that at best looking through your glasses would make the world trippy (and they would do this for someone with normal vision too) at worst they would do nothing at all, also when you got the glasses for free (which is considered payment) and you put affiliate links in (which also pay you) you were attaching your name to a product and promoting a product that I'll be honest with all my research in to my condition can't possibly work without colour shifting all the colours which just makes you colourblind to a different colour and makes all the colours wrong (again this would affect anyone wearing them even those that are not colour blind but wouldn't affect people who see in greyscale).
Also if you Just google them you will see that people who are colour blind say they don't work and they were studied by the University of Granada in 2018 and shown to be fake, even their Wikipedia page states that the American Optometric Association called them out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Updating this now that I've finished the video. I want to start with saying that I've found these videos entertaining, interesting and I generally really like them! :) That said there are some issues with some of your statements. (I really hope this can be constructive)
*the error rates are from companies that benefit from making it look worse, not independent studies
*the accuracy of their machines is again something they're motivated to look as favorable as they possibly can
*just an fyi but machines also in my experience destroy more parcels (things get stuck in belts etc)
*those shipment numbers aren't international, they include (probably predominantly) local mail
*each point of sort is also a chance for an error to be caught
*ocr still cannot interpret writing on a not insignificant number of parcels/letters
*I cannot speak to if unions oppose the usage of these systems, I'd understand if they did. But I suspect if these systems are not ready (and I honestly don't think they are yet) they still need improvement to be ready to replace the current systems. Until they are, the cost of implementation, adaption in real world, decommissioning current systems is not worth it. This especially when the technology may finally be improving at a modest rate and they'd risk needing to replace it again soon with something substantially better
*based off another comment reminded me. These facilities are big (as you saw) and so shutting them down even partially is very, very expensive (reduced efficiency means tons of OT), and the not insubstantial cost of new equipment, and that's assuming they aren't still paying for the old equipment, which if they can't sell basically just gets scrapped.
TL;DR
I agree, more automation is the future and the right direction. But in my opinion the issue is more complex than what you've observed and at first blush your estimations seem like they're missing several parts (basically I think it's not as bad as you're saying, but I agree it can be better). Please keep making content, I think you have potential. If I may suggest, look (or if you did, then show) a little deeper, as it feels like there wasn't much digging to counter check information.
Original comment:
I can't speak to international, but as for in country logistics for USA. Part of why these systems are manual is handwriting, machines still are not at the level of being able to interpret the wide ranges of styles/flaws. With the bulk of letters sent from individual lean towards the older demographic I don't think you'll see barcodes (qr or other) requered, etc.
Machines are improving all the time, but I think the majority of people have no clue what large logistics is really like and think it would be easy. While you've previewed some, honestly I still think you haven't scratched the surface in reality. Honestly I'm not sure many, if not all would jump to more automation if it would save them money. But at the moment they aren't in a position to fully replace existing systems and the transition would be far from painless.
Other notes:
Carbon footprint wise, just like a bus is more effecient than a car, this is even more substantially true for parcels.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hi yes, I have protoanomaly.
Got these last year. Now I want to make one thing clear: My family, we are Brazilian. We have plenty of money by Brazilian standards, but we still live in a country that isn't the US nor the EU. So not only did we have to deal with currency exchange rates (5 of our currency for 1 USD, give or take), but also pay international shipping fees (some 100 BRL more) AND import taxes (80% of the total value, in this case) and ALSO, because I have astigmatism and anglos use a different measuring system on glasses prescriptions, I had to get a doctor to convert the values for me.
So, they took eight months to get here. They were meant to be a birthday gift in July. They arrived in late december.
Boy what a disappointment these things were. Like. Fucking Windows has a built-in shader to help colorblind people distinguish stuff, and it dances circles around these fucking things, even though they are functionally doing the same thing: Fucking with the hue/saturation/contrast to make things easier to tell apart (while of course, not revealing any 'new' colours)
So I wrote a disappointed but still cheerful review for their site, basically saying "Now I'm not about to say these are a scam, I'm just one guy. Maybe I'm just unlucky?"
Never got published in their site. That's when I realised we'd been scammed out of ~5.000 Moneys
Also the glasses themselves are shit. The frames feel flimsy and like I could bend them by looking at them funny, and one of the lens popped out one time and required me to force it back in.
It did lead me to realise I liked tinted lenses though. Not for any secret magical colorblind-fixing properties, but just because they reduce glare while not being quite as dark as sunglasses. Just wish I'd discovered that without first my family losing a lot of dosh.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
im 80% through the video, and it has been EXCELLENT. however, i then came to your search for manual sorting error rates. as we all know, an OBJECTIVE source for data is a neutral third party. so far, your two data points have come from 2 purveyors of auto-sorters. would a seller of automated tech that is attempting to replace manual tech be classified as "objective"?! i hope we all can easily see the answer (its "no", of course). someone with a vested interest in a system will never (or at the very least, is incentivized to not) give objective statistics related to that system. to get objective data, you would need to see stats from multiple whistle blowers within the entities, or from an audit by a neutral third party source (this probably doesnt exist, as why would the entities ever allow such an audit to happen!) i would predict that the true error rate is likely between 0.5-2%, at the highest 4%. the companies would all be out of business if 1/10 packages were wrongly sorted, and logically that high an error rate just doesnt make sense. all this said, i 100% agree that auto-sorting would be a far better solution than manual.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1